«
»

St Molesworth: Top 10 reasons Nandor Tanczos got demoted

April 27th, 2005 at 2:14 pm by David Farrar

St Molesworth is back with Top 10 reasons Nandor Tanczos got demoted.

My favourites:

3. The party realised he is an embarassingly crap hacky sacker.

7. Businesses he was involved with were uncovered making a profit.

Related posts:

  1. St Molesworth: 10 reasons why Helen Clark should be Pope
  2. Trotter on Nandor
  3. Nandor retiring, but when?
  4. Whoar says Nandor to resign
No tag for this post.

This entry was posted on Wednesday, April 27th, 2005 at 2:14 pm and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. Both comments and pings are currently closed.

14 Responses to “St Molesworth: Top 10 reasons Nandor Tanczos got demoted”

  1. Sarah Says:
    April 27th, 2005 at 9:56 pm

    The guy had to go, and well before the election. The greens got in on sane promises that swayed the middle class – and then betrayed them. They failed on the GE issue and pushed through other things that we’re green at all!

    Nandor doesn’t meet the expectations of the middle class and like it or not the greens need them if they’re going to get past 5%. After all the lower socio economic people are going to vote with their race or their backpocket and the rest will never get past Act or National (god forbid)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. tim barclay Says:
    April 27th, 2005 at 10:23 pm

    Agree with the comment that the guy is old he even looks like a little old man. He based his appeal on being cool, riding the scate board that sort of thing, not sure the fleas in the dreadlocks are really that cool, would not want to go to his house without plently of flea powder.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. phil u Says:
    April 28th, 2005 at 7:16 am

    usual drivel, eh tim?..sarah..have you met tonto yet?..

    yiam )whoar.co.nz)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. Mark Says:
    April 28th, 2005 at 8:28 am

    You use a look of question marks in your posts Phil. Don’t you? eh? eh?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. phil u. Says:
    April 28th, 2005 at 10:52 am

    mark..don’t you find it’s all one big question mark? eh?..
    oh, that’s right, i forgot, you have the certainties of the ideologue..by the way,how’s that all going for you? eh?…happy with rodney and bash as your illustrious leaders? eh?..new ideas flowing like water? or just more of the same old, same old? eh?…not looking too good for the election, eh?.

    another three years suffering the whims and uncertainties of those filthy lefties and their cohorts, eh? whoar, break out the prozac..

    yiam (whoar.co.nz) eh?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. Mark Says:
    April 28th, 2005 at 5:00 pm

    I’ll just be happy to see the Greens demise. You’ll be popping Aropax like lollies. eh? eh?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. phil u Says:
    April 28th, 2005 at 6:41 pm

    would you like a little side-bet mark..

    mine (greens) vs. yours (act)

    highest score takes all?

    yiam (whoar.co.nz.)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. Rodders Says:
    April 28th, 2005 at 8:49 pm

    Phil u – have you tried communicating in coherent sentences or do you prefer non sequiturs and riddles?

    ttfn

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. phil u Says:
    April 28th, 2005 at 11:24 pm

    rodders..never mind the quality; feel the width..

    yiam (whoar.co.nz)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  10. Mark Says:
    April 29th, 2005 at 8:29 am

    I support National and always have. As such, I’m reasonably confident that THEY’LL be there. Hey I care about the environment as much as the next person (and I don’t like war) but you cannot base an entire party’s existence on one platform. You get the feeling with the Greens that matters such as education, health etc are incidental to their Gaia-given mission to save the planet.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  11. dave Says:
    April 29th, 2005 at 1:01 pm

    What is a “hacky sacker” ?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  12. Gooner Says:
    April 29th, 2005 at 2:13 pm

    Hacky Sack is a game where there is a small ball filled with beans (like rice) that you kick around in a big circle and try to keep it off the ground.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  13. dave Says:
    April 29th, 2005 at 3:11 pm

    Thanks. It must have passed me by. And passed my kids by. Thank heavens.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  14. phil u Says:
    April 29th, 2005 at 3:23 pm

    dave..hacky sack has always struck me as the lamest excuse of an i don’t know what..

    (though of the molesworth ten, that was the one that cracked me up)

    but why do they do it?..try to keep this sand laden mushy beaded ball thing in the air? (all the while nodding supportively).. apparently it’s non-competitive,(there is no score), which apparently is good, for some reason; though surely non-competitive sport is an oxymoron..but there you go..there’s no accounting for taste

    i’ve been invited to ? on more than one occaison, even when the named crap player was present..(y’know,they do that sort of thing at green party conferences; makes a change from planning global domination and flirting with banks, eh, acts and actresses?)..but, no, lead me to the hot needles i can drive into my eyes instead..

    i reckon i’ve got a phd in timewasting..but hacky sack?..no thank you..

    does anyone else feel this way about hacky sack?..or,is it just me?, again…

    and don’t get me started on fucken petanque..

    yiam (whoar.co.nz)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
«
»