<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UK Newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2005/10/uk_newspapers.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2005/10/uk_newspapers.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:00:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr K</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2005/10/uk_newspapers.html#comment-145747</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Oct 2005 08:44:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=12557#comment-145747</guid>
		<description>Yeah - coming from the UK, I&#039;m frustrated that there isn&#039;t even one quality national daily.  The historical factors behind small regional papers are perfectly understandable, but these days the technology would easily enable Fairfax to produce a national daily, printed around the country and with local pull-out sections in much the same way the Dom Post has what it laughably calls the world news in Section B.

It&#039;s debatable as to whether it is down to the lack of a national paper, or just a general lack of investment in the content of the papers, but the the quality of the media here is also far lower than the UK - especially in its coverage of public affairs.  The Guardian, Times, Indy and FT in particular play a much bigger and higher quality role in helping explain public policy and hold agencies to account than the papers here do.  Given the lack of think-tanks and alternative sources of policy research in NZ, the lack of this kind of content in the papers is even more acutely felt.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; coming from the UK, I&#8217;m frustrated that there isn&#8217;t even one quality national daily.  The historical factors behind small regional papers are perfectly understandable, but these days the technology would easily enable Fairfax to produce a national daily, printed around the country and with local pull-out sections in much the same way the Dom Post has what it laughably calls the world news in Section B.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s debatable as to whether it is down to the lack of a national paper, or just a general lack of investment in the content of the papers, but the the quality of the media here is also far lower than the UK &#8211; especially in its coverage of public affairs.  The Guardian, Times, Indy and FT in particular play a much bigger and higher quality role in helping explain public policy and hold agencies to account than the papers here do.  Given the lack of think-tanks and alternative sources of policy research in NZ, the lack of this kind of content in the papers is even more acutely felt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Glaister</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2005/10/uk_newspapers.html#comment-145746</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Glaister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 08:24:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=12557#comment-145746</guid>
		<description>It should be added that the abundance of national dailies in the UK is unique in the English-speaking world - it&#039;s a good thing about the UK rather than it&#039;s non-existence here being a bad thing about NZ specifically. NZ&#039;s model is the same as in the US, Australia, and Canada.

Interestingly it does shape the papers&#039; contents, they&#039;re noticably unencumbered by even a pose of objectivity, this is well-understood by sophisticated readers and much of the chattering class buys several newspapers much as DPF described himself as doing. Now I think about it the pattern of content production and consumption in the UK newspaper ecosystem is very blog-like. Fleet Street as the ur-blogosphere perhaps?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be added that the abundance of national dailies in the UK is unique in the English-speaking world &#8211; it&#8217;s a good thing about the UK rather than it&#8217;s non-existence here being a bad thing about NZ specifically. NZ&#8217;s model is the same as in the US, Australia, and Canada.</p>
<p>Interestingly it does shape the papers&#8217; contents, they&#8217;re noticably unencumbered by even a pose of objectivity, this is well-understood by sophisticated readers and much of the chattering class buys several newspapers much as DPF described himself as doing. Now I think about it the pattern of content production and consumption in the UK newspaper ecosystem is very blog-like. Fleet Street as the ur-blogosphere perhaps?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pamyla</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2005/10/uk_newspapers.html#comment-145745</link>
		<dc:creator>Pamyla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 07:03:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=12557#comment-145745</guid>
		<description>How about the new &#039;tabloid&#039; format for the Times and the slightly larger midsize &#039;Berliner&#039; format for the Guardian?. That must leave the telegraph as the only standard broadsheet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about the new &#8216;tabloid&#8217; format for the Times and the slightly larger midsize &#8216;Berliner&#8217; format for the Guardian?. That must leave the telegraph as the only standard broadsheet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

