95% sure
July 26th, 2006 at 7:57 pm by David FarrarThe Red Letter is 95% sure that Geroge W Bush and the “neocons” didn’t actually plan the 9/11 attacks themselves.
I am 95% sure that Helen Clark didn’t murder the Tokoroa school teacher, as a diversion from the Ingram Report into Taito Phillip Field.
July 26th, 2006 at 11:03 pm
given that vitually nothing in life is 100 percent gaurenteed in think 95 percent or all most certain is a good number.
I am nearly 100 percent certain that tis was just to bigger lie to pull off so it must be true. Of course someone once said the public are more inclined to belive a big lie rather than a small one.
someone else said that the wiser the man the more doubts he has about being right.
so yes im nearly certain that there was no conspiracy, I think as certain as one can be really.
Vote:July 26th, 2006 at 11:50 pm
David, have you watched the loose change doco? or a short clip called “hunt the boeing? ( http://www.boreme.com/boreme/funny-2006/hunt-the-boeing-p1.php )It certainly answers some very interesting questions…and states some important facts, like how its imposible for a plane to fit into the size of the hole supposidly caused by the damage of the boeing to the pentagon?
Vote:July 27th, 2006 at 7:22 am
Thanks for the URL, Mark. Apparently, Al Qaeda was not really behind the hijacking. It was really the Illuminati. I also heard that the publicly released photos were doctored by Neil Armstrong – who learned photo manipulation techniques during the faked moon landings. Elvis, who has strong links with major news and entertainment organisations, came out of his ‘retirement’ just to ensure good distribution of the cover-up story. Luckily for the Illuminati, the Mafia was able to bankroll a lot of the operation – or at least that’s what they thought – there’s some speculation that the real money came from an International Cabal of Jewish Bankers – and that the Mafia inadvertantly laundered the cash through drug deals and the illicit trade in ancient artifacts. Interestingly, in the destroyed bit of the Pentagon was a map showing the remains of the Alexandrian library (which was not destroyed by fire as legend has it). Apparently, 1000s of parchments were saved and secretly spirited off to the Far East. The lost map showed the library parchments being held in a secret valley high in the Himalayas in which it is perpetually sunny and warm, despite being at a very high altitude. Unfortunately, without the map, it is impossible to find. It’s fascinating stuff.
Vote:July 27th, 2006 at 9:13 am
DPF, Don’t you think it’s a little humourless to say you 5% think the PM committed a particularly heinous murder that has a lot of people very upset? I realise you have probably written this with the intention of raising a few chuckles, but that doesn’t make it any better. Don’t sink to the level of some of your commenters.
Vote:July 27th, 2006 at 9:27 am
Span – you seem to think I was being serious, when it was not.
To spell it out, I think you would be a raving lunatic to think that the PM murdered the Tokoroa teacher.
I made that statement to highlight how stupid the statement about the US having actually staged 9/11 as a giant hoax was. Both statements fall into the “moonbat” category.
I think it was quite effective in doing so.
Vote:July 27th, 2006 at 9:37 am
I am 95% sure that David Farrar is a human being and not some automated computer virus word generating Trojan Horse kind of a digital cyber bot.
Vote:July 27th, 2006 at 9:49 am
Sorry Mark but the above websites are conspiracy theorist crap. They don’t answer any questions at all, certainly not correctly anyway. Try at least getting a balanced view on things, such as http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/911_pentagon_757_plane_evidence.html.
It’s a website for conspiracy theorist kooks and even many of them fail to come to your conclusion.
Try asking a few logical questions such as:
1. If it was a drone or missile where did they hide the 757 and all the passengers on board?
2. Why would they do the above when they could have just used the plane since it had been hijacked anyway?
3. How come dozens of witnesses came forward saying they saw a large passenger jet flying very low towards the Pentagon but not one witness said they saw a missile or drone? Were every one of them lying? Did a secret cabal have all the witnesses to the missile murdered?
4. Since the Twin Towers had already been hit why would someone (fill in who you believe did it…Bush, the Iluminati etc) bother to strike at the Pentagon when the major strikes had done what was intended. Or do you believe none of them were passenger jets and these evil people have either murdered or hidden hundreds of passengers and put the planes somewhere?
I could ask more questions but I doubt your ability to answer them in any coherent fashion so why bother. The internet’s a wonderful thing. Unfortunately it’s brought out every conspiracy theorist with the inability to think logically and can spew their nonsencical garbage for all to see. Sadly Mark, you appear to be one of them.
Matt
Vote:July 27th, 2006 at 12:54 pm
crasster, irony is a risky device to use on this blog…
Vote: