A jew hater and stalker
Nic Miller has set up his own blog, where he declares:
Jews, Judaism and the Israeli people are not welcome in this country. Jews are a slap in the face to the human race.
Nor normally I would say Mr Miller is a retard looking for attention, and is best ignored. However one can only be concerned that he is publishing names, addresses, phone numbers and house photos of several Jewsih individuals in Wellington. This is not illegal, but clearly intended to intimidate.
Mr Miller was in court last year, over an alleged assault on three Somalis.
UPDATE: Well that was quick. The four posts with photos and details of Wellington Jews have been removed in the last couple of hours.
UPDATE2: The site is the lead story for the Sunday News. Miller adds to his collection of quotes with “They should have been exterminated” and “Jews being in New Zealand is harassment to me. They do not belong here.”
August 12th, 2006 at 5:26 pm
Oh dear I am sorry you gave publicity for this dreadful individual.
August 12th, 2006 at 5:35 pm
might be an idea to take this particular item down off the blog.
August 12th, 2006 at 5:46 pm
Sunlight is the best disinfectant, and that includes little wannabe nazis.
August 12th, 2006 at 5:54 pm
Well done, David.
August 12th, 2006 at 5:57 pm
Fortunately, Blogger has a “Flag” button, which I don’t know how useful it would be in this case.
August 12th, 2006 at 5:58 pm
I’m not sure if this creep deserves anything but to be contemptuously ignored.
August 12th, 2006 at 6:02 pm
So he’s taken the posts down about jewish residents and their addresses?
[Link to Google Cache deleted by DPF]
August 12th, 2006 at 6:02 pm
It’s possible that an awareness of taking the photographs illegally may have been appreciated – the site does say it does not support any illegal activity (possibly under advice about culpability should any crime be incited by the hate on the site).
August 12th, 2006 at 6:35 pm
Sure he shouldn’t put up addresses -isn’t that the province of the right?
Since when has it become a capital offence to criticise Jews? You people are always calling for the elimination of Muslims.
I hope the hypocrisy is not lost.
August 12th, 2006 at 6:50 pm
Yes, but Ruth, this is outright racism. This is not criticism. This is a statement of exclusion, based on religion alone with no constructive reasoning and in direct violation of international laws that we are party to.
Oh, by the way, you, Ruth, are not welcome on this blog, so get out.
(I don’t really mean this, of course, but do you get the picture?)
August 12th, 2006 at 7:14 pm
I wonder to whom “you people” applies. Is it anyone right wing, anyone western, or anyone not Moslem?
I don’t know of any poster, or post, calling for the elimination of Moslems.
So I guess Ruth is confusing criticsm of terrorism by Moslems, with something else, yet inaccurately declaring that people here are objecting to the criticsm of Jews rather than to the blanket racism on the site referred to.
August 12th, 2006 at 7:14 pm
Top right corner is a button marked “flag”. Click it -> it tells blogger that it is inappropriate material.
August 12th, 2006 at 7:59 pm
I don’t know about calls for elimination, but I wouldn’t be at all surpised to see this in a kiwiblog or SH comment:
Muslims, and Islam are not welcome in this country. Muslims are a slap in the face to the human race.
August 12th, 2006 at 8:41 pm
And yet, MCMC, you can make such types of statements, for example: “Nazis, and National Socialism are not welcome in this country. Nazis are a slap in the face to the human race” I imagine more than a few people would support that statement. Depends, doesn’t it, on what the target group preach and practice.
August 12th, 2006 at 10:01 pm
One of the many depressing things about Israels most recent invasion of South Lebanon is the emergence of genuinely anti-semetic sentiment masquarading as criticism of Israel. The loser DPF linked to above is totally marginal, and even amusing in a pathetic kind of way, but there have been editorials in newspapers http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/a_jew_hater_and_stalker.htmlacross the world – notably the one described in this article in which rhetoric against Israel crosses the line and becomes an attack on the Jewish people in general.
Closer to home, there are plenty of people – MPs amoung them – rebuking ‘the jews’ instead of the Israeli government. And there’s currently a poster over at Sir Humphreys calling himself ‘New Zeal’ (no relation to Trevor Loudens unintentional comic goldmine) who has been mixing up comments about Israels recent exploits with statements like this:
They’re [the Jews] a bit of an evolutionary dead end.
This stuff is tediously contemptible – typical epater les bourgeois racism – but its also counterproductive when it comes to provoking rational debate regarding the morality of Israels actions since it lets Israels apologists dismiss any kind of criticism as ‘anti-semetic’ – and when asked for proof they can simply point to editorials like the one described in the Haaretz article linked to above, or ass-clowns like New Zeal.
But I doubt many people will be pointing to Nic Miller as an example of anti-semetism resurgent. The site is just too damn funny. My favourite posts so far:
Nothing new to report. After a few trips to the Tramping hall yesterday afternoon and at about 1pm today, I have concluded that Red Watch NZ either has the wrong hall or nothing is happening.
Saturday, April 15, 2006
The site hasn’t been updated for a while. This is due to a slow time in our war against Communism.
Monday, July 31, 2006
There are plenty more details of Nics epic struggle against Jews and Communism. Go read.
August 12th, 2006 at 10:07 pm
yes, he’s deleted the posts about jews that he’s been stalking, but he forgot to delete the posts where he talks about how he’s going to upload future photos of Wellington Jews and their homes?
This boy ain’t bright.
August 12th, 2006 at 11:05 pm
Unfortunately the Human Rights Act makes it illegal for any of us to refuse to do business with this simpleton. Ideally he would be run out of town because he couldn’t buy a drink, rent a flat, buy petrol, shop at a supermarket or buy clothes easily.
Unfortunately David, you’ve just seen his blog get the most hits ever – they thrive on attention, in their own little twisted world of hatred.
August 12th, 2006 at 11:10 pm
Unfortunately the Human Rights Act makes it illegal for any of us to refuse to do business with this simpleton. Ideally he would be run out of town because he couldn’t buy a drink, rent a flat, buy petrol, shop at a supermarket or buy clothes easily.
Unfortunately David, you’ve just seen his blog get the most hits ever – they thrive on attention, in their own little twisted world of hatred.
August 13th, 2006 at 4:00 am
Depends, doesn’t it, on what the target group preach and practice.
No actually, I don’t think it does.
First, National Socialism was a political movement. While some Muslims subscribe to political Islam, being Muslim is not an identity that people can slip in and out of like a political ideology.
Second, I think the point is that ethnicities and religions shouldn’t be judged as wholes. I think the statement: ‘religion X’ is a slap in the face of the human race should be avoided.
August 13th, 2006 at 9:49 am
“.. being Muslim is not an identity that people can slip in and out of like a political ideology.”
Why not? There are plenty of peaceful religions out there to choose from. Why cling to a religion which preaches death to non-believers?
If you’re a “moderate Muslim” and atrocities are being committed in the name of your religion there are two choices–stand up to the extremists and demonstrate publicly against them (which we never see) or change to a more peaceful religion.
Oh, wait! I forgot–the penalty for that in Islam is death!
August 13th, 2006 at 10:26 am
What a perverted little shit. Best we ignore him and let him shrivel up and fester away in his twisted, hate-fille world.
August 13th, 2006 at 12:39 pm
Isn’t Jew a religion, and not a race? I would like clarity there. Thanks.
August 13th, 2006 at 2:01 pm
Acording to nic I’m one
August 13th, 2006 at 3:18 pm
Mr Bean, it’s both.
August 13th, 2006 at 5:04 pm
God you’re a dick Aaron Bhatnagar. You’ve put people at risk of intimidation or harm just to prove a point.
Dipshit racists looking for that information might not be bright enough to use the tools of the internet well, but you’ve just made it a little easier.
DPF could you please delete that comment for the safety and sanctity of those affected. Freedom of information is one thing – posting peoples details on the net with malicious intent is another.
August 13th, 2006 at 5:23 pm
wtf were you thinking aaron..?
how are you any better than him…?
giving targets to racist nazi scum..
(aren’t you opening yourself up to legal action….from one/some/all whose details you’ve flagged..?
would be an interesting test case..eh..?..under the privacy laws..?
at best/most charitably an act of bleeding stupidity on your part..eh..aaron..?
and i’m surprised dpf linked to him in the first place..
“..sunshine/detergent..” protestations on his part notwithstanding…
phil(whoar.co.nz)
August 13th, 2006 at 5:25 pm
Oh do grow up George. Google searches and google cache is readily available for anyone to use, even nazi dimbulbs. You’re making a heck of an assumption that the aforesaid Nazi dimbulbs couldn’t do that when they’re plainly familiar with setting up websites and blogs.
I suggest you make yourself a hot cocoa and lie down on a sofa with a wet cloth on your head for a while- you’re clearly a bit highly strung.
August 13th, 2006 at 6:19 pm
Could I suggest that everyone who finds his blog offensive simply click the ‘flag blog’ button at the top of the page. It is, afterall, just a blogspot blog and if they agree they’ll take it down. Hey, if you’re going to be a racist dipshit, do it on your own server, right?
August 13th, 2006 at 6:28 pm
I love this policy some advocate of lets ignore the nazi in the corner, and hope he goes away. Has worked so well in the past eh.
August 13th, 2006 at 7:33 pm
The flag button is useless, blogs like avoiceofdissent are still able to peddle their hateful filth, all it does is add a warning that some people might find the content a smidge offensive.
August 13th, 2006 at 7:35 pm
Anyone got Mr Nic Millers address? serious question.
August 13th, 2006 at 8:44 pm
Loathsome and offensive as I find the views of the nazi idiot, surely the censorship of free speech is far more loathsome.
For once, the “slippery slope” argument seems relevant here–ban this speech and what’s next? Any speech deemed ‘offensive”? By whom?
Leave the idiot in full public view and ridicule his ideas.
August 13th, 2006 at 8:57 pm
Ignoring the Nazi, except for ridiculing him, has worked very well in the past, DPF. I’ve been reading about the “growth” in neo-Nazi movements for over 20 years now, and they’re still not even populous enough to register on political polls. Must have started out from a bloody low base is all I can say. Ignoring or ridiculing them seems to work just fine.
August 13th, 2006 at 8:57 pm
now listen dpf..some things are sacred..eh..?
and eh..?..is mine..!
are we clear on that..?..eh..?
phil(whoar.co.nz
August 13th, 2006 at 9:11 pm
I don’t think anyone would care if he was just spouting nazi views Keith.
What concerns me and everyone else I know who have seen the site is how he has invaded peoples privacy and gone to their properties to take photographs along with listing their addresses to fellow fruitcakes.
I have no problem with a nazi speaking their mind, but I would have a problem and would get angry if I had an ugly looking nazi taking photos of my house for whatever religion, race, or political party I might belong to.
August 13th, 2006 at 9:18 pm
Agreed, Jeff. But the answer there is to address the invasion of privacy, surely? Some commenters seem to want to shut down the website for the views expressed.
August 13th, 2006 at 9:36 pm
Yeh mate.
Like you I couldn’t give two tosses about the views Keith. I defnitely agree we can’t and shouldn’t ban based on politics or views, no matter how repugnant they are.
Peoples Privacy is the issue with this website.
August 14th, 2006 at 5:08 am
DPF: I love this policy some advocate of lets ignore the nazi in the corner, and hope he goes away. Has worked so well in the past eh.
I thought that would be your strategy since that’s what you advise other people to do when they’re offended by something. Don’t like a south park episode? Protesting draws attention, just don’t watch it. Don’t like the neo-nazi website? Linking to in draws attention, so don’t visit it.
Obviously there’s no equivalence between the subjects, but I don’t understand why you advocate one tactic for things you like and another for things you don’t.
August 14th, 2006 at 5:30 am
If you’re a “moderate Muslim” and atrocities are being committed in the name of your religion there are two choices–stand up to the extremists and demonstrate publicly against them (which we never see) or change to a more peaceful religion.
This may be the one of the stupidest things I’ve ever seen in a blog comment. Why didn’t moderate Christians leave their religion to protest the Crusades? Why don’t Americans who don’t like Bush’s War on Terror renounce their citizenship? Why don’t non-Israeli Jews renounce their religion if they disagree with Israel’s policies? Real insight into how the world works there Keith. Only in your twisted world would does it make sense to be bigoted these people.
Second, having lived in a Muslim country for six months, I’ve heard plenty of moderate Muslims stand up against more extreme parts of Islam. If you’re not seeing it either look harder (aka take off your blinders).
August 14th, 2006 at 6:40 am
” Why didn’t moderate Christians leave their religion to protest the Crusades?”
Because the crusades were to REGAIN lands conquered by Islam? In other words, a response to muslim aggression.
“Why don’t Americans who don’t like Bush’s War on Terror renounce their citizenship? ”
Well, a whole lot of high-profile lefty Americans promised to, should Bush be re-elected. He was, and they didn’t, but that says more about their integrity than anything else.
“Why don’t non-Israeli Jews renounce their religion if they disagree with Israel’s policies?”
Because the policies you refer to are based on self-defence, not religion?
Speaking of stupid, if you can’t understand the connection in Islam’s case between the religion and the violence, you must have been living in a cave for the last ten years. I’d suggest you get some remedial teaching before calling others stupid, mate.
And lots of people DO leave one religion for another–I have two Ba’hai friends who are former Catholics, attracted to the faith by its peaceful nature.
So, you’ve lived in a Muslim country for six months and heard moderate musklims “stand up against” the more extreme parts of Islam.
Well, good for you. And them. Except we never see those people demonstrating in public. Perhaps because in countries such as Thailand and Indonesia, to name just two, they’d risk getting their heads sawn off by other members of the “religion of peace”?
August 14th, 2006 at 6:58 am
Either that, or they simply don’t share your dumbass, bigoted, under-informed views on Islam. I wonder which is more likely?
August 14th, 2006 at 7:05 am
Hmmm…one commenter claims that there are moderate Muslims who oppose violence in the name of their religion and “protest” it.
I ask why muslims aren’t demonstrating their opposition in public and your response is to call me ‘dumbass”, “bigoted” and “under-informed”–and to totally ignore the substance of what either MCMC or myself said.
I don’t debate with ignorant pigs, PM.
August 14th, 2006 at 7:08 am
And now I’m off to work, so don’t mistake my lack of response to your frothing for anything other than absence. Have a nice day.
)
August 14th, 2006 at 7:26 am
Well, this whole thing is rather OT and Keith’s not here to push around, so here’s my last word.
That someone can defend the Crusades as a just attempt to regain land, which Keith did, and yet claim that for those who want to wipe out Israel (regain their land) it’s about religion takes some twisted logic or an unbalanced view of Islam. Or both.
Why don’t we see more moderate Muslims? Because they’re threatened by radicals? Thanks for making my point Keith. Now you can explain how this means we should hold moderates complicit for the actions of the radicals.
The point is that you can’t always blame individual members of a group for actions undertaken by other members of that group just because the radical bunch uses the group name to unite itself.
Yeah, I understand the connection between Islamists and violence, but not between Islam and violence. Perhaps you can explore the difference by chatting up this bloke who tipped off Scotland Yard:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/08/10/AR2006081001654_pf.html
August 14th, 2006 at 8:09 am
MCMC: Well done you compare a satrical TV programme to a nazi preaching extermination of Jews. You yourself said there is no equivalence yet you make the comparison.
The difference is one person is specifically advocating hatred and harm. Southpark is just satire.
August 14th, 2006 at 8:35 am
Nor normally I would say Mr Miller is a retard looking for attention, and is best ignored.
Are you claiming credit for his posts coming down? If not, why do your normal conditions not apply? How exactly does your blogging about it do anything but draw attention to his blog?
August 14th, 2006 at 8:42 am
Yes I believe the attention from myself and the media led to the posts coming down.
The normal conditions did not apply because he took his ranting against Jews from the general to very specific and personal against four individuals.
August 14th, 2006 at 10:04 am
Yes I believe the attention from myself and the media led to the posts coming down.
Like you and Air New Zealand got you to San Francisco?
August 14th, 2006 at 10:19 am
Mea culpa, Keith. I didn’t realise your personal dislike of Islam and bizarre insinuations like “…in countries such as Thailand and Indonesia, to name just two, they’d risk getting their heads sawn off by other members of the “religion of peace”?” were elevated to the status of “debate” in your view.
August 14th, 2006 at 11:40 am
Maybe Mr Miller needs to look at the effect on him and all his other skinheads mates if all the Jews did leave NZ.
Since they are a very productive tax paying community (the Jews, not skinheads)he may find his welfare payments decrease due to the lose of revenue to the country.
Plus the next time he goes to hospital at Christmas or Easter because someones kicked his punk arse head in, he may have trouble trying to find anyone to stitch him up. Since the majority of the doctors working on these days are Jews, Muslims or other ethnic minorities.
August 14th, 2006 at 11:43 am
Aaron – you actually have no idea how stupid some of these people are.
August 14th, 2006 at 12:24 pm
George I agree. If his view of utopia is based around having his creed at the top of the food chain it doesn’t look to apertising.
I suppose at least we wouldn’t have to be concerned with global warming and robots taking over the world as your very unlikely to get any technological advancement from a bunch of welfare bludgers that struggle to get out of primary school.
August 14th, 2006 at 1:20 pm
Message to Danyl and anyone else offended by my comments.
I regret saying some of the things I said over at Sir Humphrey’s. I don’t think I was communicating very effectively what I was trying to say. In other words I screwed up. But also, these blogs should be able to absorb a certain amount of incisive debate and not just be two different sides clobbering each other with their prejudices until one side gives up.
I certainly will be a lot more careful in how I phrase myself with regards to the Israelis/Jews/Zionists. It appears there is a lot of touchy feely about what is allowed to be said regarding them.
August 14th, 2006 at 2:46 pm
Right-wingers on the web are successfully silencing speech they don’t like – http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/story/0,,1843718,00.html
When a professor named Douglas Giles permitted a student to ask a question about Palestinian rights in his World Religions class, he was fired.
“Giles’s sacking … is part of the movement to suppress criticism of Israel on the grounds that it is anti-semitic. A mild man, Giles seems astonished to find the battle for free speech in his own lecture theatre.”
Sadly believable.
August 14th, 2006 at 3:36 pm
Ruth Said “Sure he shouldn’t put up addresses -isn’t that the province of the right?
Since when has it become a capital offence to criticise Jews? You people are always calling for the elimination of Muslims.”
YES Ruth, the world would certainly be a better place if muslims were GONE!!, its a fact and you know it, my family and friends hate islam and islamics, look at what they are doing to our peaceful nations,
RUTH BELOW ARE A FEW VERSES FROM THE FILTHY STINKING QURAN, you may ponder over::::
Muslim theologians are unanimous in declaring that no religious toleration was extended to the idolators of Arabia at the time of Muhammad. The only choice given them was death or the acceptance of Islam. Similarly, no tolerance is shown to atheists and unbelievers. The Koran is full of lurid descriptions of the punishments awaiting them. Surah XXII.9 states: “As for the unbelievers for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowels and skins shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods.”
The Koran also enjoins all Muslims to fight and kill nonbelievers: “When you meet the unbelievers, strike off their heads; then when you have made wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives” (Surah XLVII.4).
(Surah V.75. See also Surah IV.157 where the crucifixion is denied).
They are also accused of worshiping Jesus as the son of God and, like the Jews, they have been led astray and must be brought back to the true religion, that is, Islam. According to many traditions, Muhammad himself was determined to destroy Christian churches.(4) Lane, in his classic Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians, recounts how a young Muslim “receives lessons of religious pride, and learns to hate the Christians, and all other sects but his own, as thoroughly as does the Muslim in advanced age.”(5)
According to the Koran, Jews have intense hatred of all true Muslims, and, as a punishment for their sins, some of them had, in the past, been changed into apes and swine, and others will have their hands tied to their necks and be cast into the Fire on Judgment Day. The attitude enjoined upon Muslims toward the Jews can only be described as anti-Semitic, and certainly not conducive to a better understanding, tolerance, or coexistence: “Believers, do not take Jews or Christians as friends. They are but one another’s friends. If anyone of you takes them for his friends, then he is surely one of them. God will not guide evil doers” (Surah V.51).
Kill those who join other gods with God (i.e. idolators) wherever you may find them. (Surah IX.5-6)
August 14th, 2006 at 3:37 pm
I wonder if our mate Miller would have the guts to publish a few “Danish type” cartoons?Or would he,even with his limited intelligence,realise that doing so might place him at some GOSH HORROR actual personal/physical risk?… you know,head hacking..that sort of thing.I think even he realises that evil/scum/(add own description)Jews are not much taken by this type of uncouth behaviour.BTW,I hate censorship(except for my kid of course)because I really want to know what folks are thinking,whether I like their thinking or not.
August 14th, 2006 at 3:38 pm
Ruth Said “Sure he shouldn’t put up addresses -isn’t that the province of the right?
Since when has it become a capital offence to criticise Jews? You people are always calling for the elimination of Muslims.”
YES Ruth, the world would certainly be a better place if muslims were GONE!!, its a fact and you know it, my family and friends hate islam and islamics, look at what they are doing to our peaceful nations,
RUTH BELOW ARE A FEW VERSES FROM THE FILTHY STINKING QURAN, you may ponder over::::
Muslim theologians are unanimous in declaring that no religious toleration was extended to the idolators of Arabia at the time of Muhammad. The only choice given them was death or the acceptance of Islam. Similarly, no tolerance is shown to atheists and unbelievers. The Koran is full of lurid descriptions of the punishments awaiting them. Surah XXII.9 states: “As for the unbelievers for them garments of fire shall be cut and there shall be poured over their heads boiling water whereby whatever is in their bowels and skins shall be dissolved and they will be punished with hooked iron rods.”
The Koran also enjoins all Muslims to fight and kill nonbelievers: “When you meet the unbelievers, strike off their heads; then when you have made wide slaughter among them, carefully tie up the remaining captives” (Surah XLVII.4).
(Surah V.75. See also Surah IV.157 where the crucifixion is denied).
They are also accused of worshiping Jesus as the son of God and, like the Jews, they have been led astray and must be brought back to the true religion, that is, Islam. According to many traditions, Muhammad himself was determined to destroy Christian churches.(4) Lane, in his classic Manners and Customs of the Modern Egyptians, recounts how a young Muslim “receives lessons of religious pride, and learns to hate the Christians, and all other sects but his own, as thoroughly as does the Muslim in advanced age.”(5)
According to the Koran, Jews have intense hatred of all true Muslims, and, as a punishment for their sins, some of them had, in the past, been changed into apes and swine, and others will have their hands tied to their necks and be cast into the Fire on Judgment Day. The attitude enjoined upon Muslims toward the Jews can only be described as anti-Semitic, and certainly not conducive to a better understanding, tolerance, or coexistence: “Believers, do not take Jews or Christians as friends. They are but one another’s friends. If anyone of you takes them for his friends, then he is surely one of them. God will not guide evil doers” (Surah V.51).
Kill those who join other gods with God (i.e. idolators) wherever you may find them. (Surah IX.5-6)
August 14th, 2006 at 3:39 pm
Ruth please try and show a bit of intelligence.
What most of the posts have objected to isn’t whether Mr Miller should be able to expouse hatred towards one community, but that he has included private information about individuals of that community to the public at large.
I’m sure if you were part of a minority group that was the subject of abuse, vandalism and stereotyping you would be very concerned if your private address and a photo of it were published on a website that is probably frequented by other people with the same views as Mr Miller.
Just remember this is the same guy who assaulted a Somalian for what reason? that’s right because he was a Somalian.
August 15th, 2006 at 11:57 am
In a way you ahve to feel for Nic Miller. Here he is banging on about how “evil” the Israelis are all because they killed Lebanese. Am I the only one to see the inherent idiocy of his rantings? So he’s pro-Lebanese? Or is there a sliding scale of how offensive he finds other nations/ethnic groups?
August 15th, 2006 at 11:58 am
In a way you have to feel for Nic Miller. Here he is banging on about how “evil” the Israelis are all because they killed Lebanese. Am I the only one to see the inherent idiocy of his rantings? So he’s pro-Lebanese? Or is there a sliding scale of how offensive he finds other nations/ethnic groups?
August 17th, 2006 at 8:11 am
Rosemary McLeod,has written,a good article on this 22yo tossier,who works as a aluminium machnist,in the hutt valley,in todays dominion post,his firm must be proud to have this tossier in the work team,but i personly think that nik gets a sexual thrill when he sees himself in his nazi gear , like the nazi in the film BLUES BROTHERS, he was probably laughed at by a jewish women once,and feeles his manhood???is under threat
August 17th, 2006 at 8:48 am
iwikiwi, have, you, been, running, or, something?
You seem, awfully, out of, breath.
Maybe you should, relax, a little, before, posting?
August 17th, 2006 at 12:28 pm
Hi err ,im very relaxed,i have just returned from a long beach walk with my dogs (day off)and i still stand by my words.hes a 22yo nazi and im not,,, no problem
August 17th, 2006 at 12:28 pm
Hi err ,im very relaxed,i have just returned from a long beach walk with my dogs (day off)and i still stand by my words.hes a 22yo nazi and im not,,, no problem
August 17th, 2006 at 3:22 pm
darn is it good that you can post,,, freedom
June 16th, 2007 at 5:32 am
Malick Sidibe becomes the first photographer to win the Venice Biennale's lifetime achievement award…
June 23rd, 2007 at 11:02 am
Pirates of the Caribbean: At World's End takes more in its first week than Spiderman 3, despite scenes being cut…
August 16th, 2007 at 8:44 pm
Israel is a criminal state. Palestinians number the largest group of refugees outside their own borders 500,000. Israel has incarcerated the entire cabinet of a democratically elected government. No one critisises, no one questions. We are all culpable.
August 16th, 2007 at 8:50 pm
And it’s about time we all got over this guilt about the holocaust as we had nothing to do with it and gypsies, gays and the intellectually handicapped were killed as well. Does anyone care about them?
It is not anti-semitic to criticise Israel, the Palestinians are also semitic, they’re the same tribe, the only difference is, the jews have mixed with Russians. Now Russians have more rights in Israel than Palestinians who were born there. Is that fair? Israel is the only country formed on the basis of a religion. Is that right?