<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buy NZ owned not made</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/buy_nz_owned_not_made.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/buy_nz_owned_not_made.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:59:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bqckg ispkjz</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/buy_nz_owned_not_made.html#comment-194568</link>
		<dc:creator>bqckg ispkjz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 May 2007 07:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=14655#comment-194568</guid>
		<description>vmna fzgkah fpsao vrojst gztqhk opzjthl rogb
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>vmna fzgkah fpsao vrojst gztqhk opzjthl rogb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Darroch</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/buy_nz_owned_not_made.html#comment-194567</link>
		<dc:creator>George Darroch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 05:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=14655#comment-194567</guid>
		<description>The release Marcel quotes was released after the RNZ article Simon quotes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The release Marcel quotes was released after the RNZ article Simon quotes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/buy_nz_owned_not_made.html#comment-194566</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 04:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=14655#comment-194566</guid>
		<description>&quot;The Green MP responsible for the Buy Kiwi Made scheme, Sue Bradford, says she is making her proposal clearer so such companies (Icebreaker) can be associated with it.&quot;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/latest/200608110900/1586bc3e&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/latest/200608110900/1586bc3e&lt;/a&gt;

Labor jerking the greens around with an election agreement and the obedant greens then selling out Chinese sweet shop labor. Shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Green MP responsible for the Buy Kiwi Made scheme, Sue Bradford, says she is making her proposal clearer so such companies (Icebreaker) can be associated with it.&#8221;<br />
<a href="http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/latest/200608110900/1586bc3e" rel="nofollow">http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/latest/200608110900/1586bc3e</a></p>
<p>Labor jerking the greens around with an election agreement and the obedant greens then selling out Chinese sweet shop labor. Shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcel</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/buy_nz_owned_not_made.html#comment-194565</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Aug 2006 01:36:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=14655#comment-194565</guid>
		<description>Sue Bradford says: “New Zealand manufacturers and workers can be assured that only products actually made in New Zealand will be entitled to carry the New Zealand Made labelling, as specified by legislation.”

From &lt;a href=&quot;http://greens.org.nz/searchdocs/PR10067.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://greens.org.nz/searchdocs/PR10067.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sue Bradford says: “New Zealand manufacturers and workers can be assured that only products actually made in New Zealand will be entitled to carry the New Zealand Made labelling, as specified by legislation.”</p>
<p>From <a href="http://greens.org.nz/searchdocs/PR10067.html" rel="nofollow">http://greens.org.nz/searchdocs/PR10067.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: space</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/buy_nz_owned_not_made.html#comment-194564</link>
		<dc:creator>space</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Aug 2006 03:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=14655#comment-194564</guid>
		<description>The article only says it&#039;s being considered...

... and I don&#039;t think your sweatshop example is what they&#039;re talking about...

...if Icebreaker uses NZ designers, and NZ materials, should they not get at least some of the benefit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article only says it&#8217;s being considered&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230; and I don&#8217;t think your sweatshop example is what they&#8217;re talking about&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8230;if Icebreaker uses NZ designers, and NZ materials, should they not get at least some of the benefit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peter</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/buy_nz_owned_not_made.html#comment-194563</link>
		<dc:creator>Peter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:56:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=14655#comment-194563</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s an ineffective marketing subsidy insisted upon by a party that appears to know nothing about business or marketing. I wonder how they plan to track effectiveness? I see Tariana is weighing in, which should make for an entertaining dust-up, if nothing else. www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0608/S00189.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s an ineffective marketing subsidy insisted upon by a party that appears to know nothing about business or marketing. I wonder how they plan to track effectiveness? I see Tariana is weighing in, which should make for an entertaining dust-up, if nothing else. <a href="http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0608/S00189.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA0608/S00189.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/buy_nz_owned_not_made.html#comment-194562</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:34:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=14655#comment-194562</guid>
		<description>&quot;as I think local manufacturers survive on the basis of their quality, not on the basis of patriotism&quot;.

Used to be the case, now out of date. 
Strict quality supervision by NZ parent means equal quality products produced with tiny labour costs come out of Asia.
Good example are MacPac tents made in Vietnam. The price of the tents didn&#039;t come down but manufacturer margins went ballistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;as I think local manufacturers survive on the basis of their quality, not on the basis of patriotism&#8221;.</p>
<p>Used to be the case, now out of date.<br />
Strict quality supervision by NZ parent means equal quality products produced with tiny labour costs come out of Asia.<br />
Good example are MacPac tents made in Vietnam. The price of the tents didn&#8217;t come down but manufacturer margins went ballistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/buy_nz_owned_not_made.html#comment-194561</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 22:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=14655#comment-194561</guid>
		<description>&quot;as I think local manufacturers survive on the basis of their quality, not on the basis of patriotism&quot;.

Used to be the case, now out of date. 
Strict quality supervision by NZ parent means equal quality products produced with tiny labour costs come out of Asia.
Good example are MacPac tents made in Vietnam. The price of the tents didn&#039;t come down but manufacturer margins went ballistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;as I think local manufacturers survive on the basis of their quality, not on the basis of patriotism&#8221;.</p>
<p>Used to be the case, now out of date.<br />
Strict quality supervision by NZ parent means equal quality products produced with tiny labour costs come out of Asia.<br />
Good example are MacPac tents made in Vietnam. The price of the tents didn&#8217;t come down but manufacturer margins went ballistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simon</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2006/08/buy_nz_owned_not_made.html#comment-194560</link>
		<dc:creator>Simon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 21:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=14655#comment-194560</guid>
		<description>“Yes, you can get your products made in an overseas sweatshop”

Quite correct.  There was a NZ furniture company that closed down its manufacturing in NZ due in part as it was costing $80,000pa to dispose of sawdust.  Its sales offices etc didn’t close &amp; NZ ownership didn’t change but the manufacturing is now done in China.  Presumably the sawdust can now be dumped in a nearby river.  

Now the company would be part of the Greens love in.  What ever the greens are they are not an environmental movement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Yes, you can get your products made in an overseas sweatshop”</p>
<p>Quite correct.  There was a NZ furniture company that closed down its manufacturing in NZ due in part as it was costing $80,000pa to dispose of sawdust.  Its sales offices etc didn’t close &#038; NZ ownership didn’t change but the manufacturing is now done in China.  Presumably the sawdust can now be dumped in a nearby river.  </p>
<p>Now the company would be part of the Greens love in.  What ever the greens are they are not an environmental movement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

