Comments on: Domain Name Disputes

By: skgutoc lcdzkv

skgutoc lcdzkv — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:12:52 +0000

hieozrm cdfu xkqcerz igtzuqlo ungbvp hyewobk rogieb

By: skgutoc lcdzkv

skgutoc lcdzkv — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:12:14 +0000

hieozrm cdfu xkqcerz igtzuqlo ungbvp hyewobk rogieb

By: skgutoc lcdzkv

skgutoc lcdzkv — Fri, 08 Jun 2007 07:10:42 +0000

hieozrm cdfu xkqcerz igtzuqlo ungbvp hyewobk rogieb

By: Rick

Rick — Sat, 26 May 2007 16:22:43 +0000

free downloads t mobile ringtones http://idisk.mac.com/ringtonesforyou/Public/index.html

By: Brytney

Brytney — Thu, 24 May 2007 02:29:23 +0000

free downloads t mobile ringtones http://idisk.mac.com/ringtonesforyou/Public/index.html

By: CJ Hunt

CJ Hunt — Wed, 27 Sep 2006 10:52:15 +0000

I thought it was about time something happened with intercity.co.nz – I always thought it was wierd that the bus service didnt own the website (their current site is intercitycoachlines.co.nz – not a easy site to promote).
Generally in these cases, people just buy the rights so that they know they can sell them – basically like a form of domain name blackmail.

I’m surprised that Harcourts did not succeed – its one of the most reconisable trade names disputed so far.

By: Red

Red — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:06:46 +0000

the case that was dismissed appears to have been resolved by other means as both demains in dispute now go where they should.

By: Kent Parker

Kent Parker — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:47:57 +0000

On a first in first served basis, trademark and copyright law has been around a lot longer than internet domain names. It appears that the same rules that apply to that are being applied to domain names.

There is nothing illegal with someone setting up a webhost purporting to sell domain names at bargain prices and using that as a means to find out who is looking for what name. With inside knowledge they scoop in and buy up wanted domain names before the business entity does with the purpose of demanding an inflated price.

By: belt

belt — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 19:09:19 +0000

I’m officially on record against the current dispute process. I believe I called it a solution looking for a problem. First come first served has worked well in the past, with any aggrieved party going to court.

By: Mike Readman

Mike Readman — Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:06:17 +0000

That process is ridiculous! It should be first come, first served when it comes to domain names. If somebody wants a name, why don’t they register it first instead of waiting for somebody else to do it, and then demanding they hand it over?!