<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five good and five bad for the Government</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:30:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bevan</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293267</link>
		<dc:creator>Bevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 19:47:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293267</guid>
		<description>&quot;Surely the light armoured vehicle purchase was a shocker &quot;

I could never understand why we needed 105 Lavs, we are never going to deploy a quarter of them let alone requiring 105 - well that was until an Army mate of mine told me that at least 20 are getting serviced at one time!

&quot;F16&#039;s? There were other choices, less expensive with greater range - better for over-ocean combat/patrols for example, a shame they weren&#039;t given a chance.&quot;

Whilst i agree with the gist of your statement, Ive got to add, the F16&#039;s were not overpriced, personally I believe they were a bargain. 28 F16&#039;s for 1Bil NZD over a ten year lease, which included spares, training, weapons, refurbishing and upgrade was in fact a bloody good deal - even though they were the A model, they were extremely low hour jets that only had been flown from the manufacturer to the storage facility, the engines weer cranked up periodically to keep them in running order. When you factor in that at the same time the C model cost 26 Mil USD/plane not including training and spares it doesnt sound too bad.
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Surely the light armoured vehicle purchase was a shocker &#8221;</p>
<p>I could never understand why we needed 105 Lavs, we are never going to deploy a quarter of them let alone requiring 105 &#8211; well that was until an Army mate of mine told me that at least 20 are getting serviced at one time!</p>
<p>&#8220;F16&#8242;s? There were other choices, less expensive with greater range &#8211; better for over-ocean combat/patrols for example, a shame they weren&#8217;t given a chance.&#8221;</p>
<p>Whilst i agree with the gist of your statement, Ive got to add, the F16&#8242;s were not overpriced, personally I believe they were a bargain. 28 F16&#8242;s for 1Bil NZD over a ten year lease, which included spares, training, weapons, refurbishing and upgrade was in fact a bloody good deal &#8211; even though they were the A model, they were extremely low hour jets that only had been flown from the manufacturer to the storage facility, the engines weer cranked up periodically to keep them in running order. When you factor in that at the same time the C model cost 26 Mil USD/plane not including training and spares it doesnt sound too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie James</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293266</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 10:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293266</guid>
		<description>Not only is there Good and Bad but there is also Ugly. 

I read in the Herald on the weekend, that first impressions are important, that one&#039;s dress and appearance are taken to illustrate one&#039;s true feelings and attitudes. 

In other words if one doesn&#039;t care about ones appearance it gives the impression that one doesn&#039;t really care about anything much.

God, didn&#039;t she look terrible on the TV 1 tonight, the teeth looked more crooked than ever and the makeup was virtually non-existant, or was it just the camera angle? Not a great look for the head of a country. 

Most in NZ have become immune as she has been around so long, but is she sending the wrong message to our very ...........very good friends?? 

Can we really expect them to take us seriously, regarding a free trade agreement, when we send over someone who doesn&#039;t follow basic rules of business engagement . 

First impressions count, we don&#039;t expect our dearleader to look sexy but we do expect that she looks like a leader who means business.

Dear Leader allows herself to be made up for the election billboards but appears to lack the ability or is it desire to look the part everyday. One does wonder why, is it that she is too busy, doesn&#039;t want to attract male attention, just plain lazy, too tight..........??

How much would it really cost to get those teeth sorted ??? Extreme Makeover perhaps...???.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not only is there Good and Bad but there is also Ugly. </p>
<p>I read in the Herald on the weekend, that first impressions are important, that one&#8217;s dress and appearance are taken to illustrate one&#8217;s true feelings and attitudes. </p>
<p>In other words if one doesn&#8217;t care about ones appearance it gives the impression that one doesn&#8217;t really care about anything much.</p>
<p>God, didn&#8217;t she look terrible on the TV 1 tonight, the teeth looked more crooked than ever and the makeup was virtually non-existant, or was it just the camera angle? Not a great look for the head of a country. </p>
<p>Most in NZ have become immune as she has been around so long, but is she sending the wrong message to our very &#8230;&#8230;&#8230;..very good friends?? </p>
<p>Can we really expect them to take us seriously, regarding a free trade agreement, when we send over someone who doesn&#8217;t follow basic rules of business engagement . </p>
<p>First impressions count, we don&#8217;t expect our dearleader to look sexy but we do expect that she looks like a leader who means business.</p>
<p>Dear Leader allows herself to be made up for the election billboards but appears to lack the ability or is it desire to look the part everyday. One does wonder why, is it that she is too busy, doesn&#8217;t want to attract male attention, just plain lazy, too tight&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.??</p>
<p>How much would it really cost to get those teeth sorted ??? Extreme Makeover perhaps&#8230;???.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thehawk</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293265</link>
		<dc:creator>thehawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:55:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293265</guid>
		<description>Surely the light armoured vehicle purchase was a shocker - great for European or Australian conditions, not really much good in NZ, or Timor, or anywhere that isn&#039;t flat with nice roads.
F16&#039;s? There were other choices, less expensive with greater range - better for over-ocean combat/patrols for example, a shame they weren&#039;t given a chance.
Not going to Iraq - Superb albeit based on a hatred of all things USA rather than sense.
Bad - letting HUGE amounts of NZ coal be sold to the Indians. I bet we thank Helen for that in 50 years as the lights go out. Think why did we sell all the gas to the Canadians?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Surely the light armoured vehicle purchase was a shocker &#8211; great for European or Australian conditions, not really much good in NZ, or Timor, or anywhere that isn&#8217;t flat with nice roads.<br />
F16&#8242;s? There were other choices, less expensive with greater range &#8211; better for over-ocean combat/patrols for example, a shame they weren&#8217;t given a chance.<br />
Not going to Iraq &#8211; Superb albeit based on a hatred of all things USA rather than sense.<br />
Bad &#8211; letting HUGE amounts of NZ coal be sold to the Indians. I bet we thank Helen for that in 50 years as the lights go out. Think why did we sell all the gas to the Canadians?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Snack</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293264</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Snack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293264</guid>
		<description>Bad: Keeping NZ &quot;nuclear free&quot; (apart from xrays, cancer treatment, university neutron sources, etc etc), the most arrogant corruption yet seen in NZ especially the pledge card spending, and new lows in public trust of government. Good, relatively stable economic environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bad: Keeping NZ &#8220;nuclear free&#8221; (apart from xrays, cancer treatment, university neutron sources, etc etc), the most arrogant corruption yet seen in NZ especially the pledge card spending, and new lows in public trust of government. Good, relatively stable economic environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim barclay</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293263</link>
		<dc:creator>tim barclay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 09:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293263</guid>
		<description>The worst Labour Government ever theough Kirk Rowling was nearly as bad, and only marginally better than Muldoon 1981-4 which was probably the worst Government ever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The worst Labour Government ever theough Kirk Rowling was nearly as bad, and only marginally better than Muldoon 1981-4 which was probably the worst Government ever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dad4justice</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293262</link>
		<dc:creator>dad4justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:54:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293262</guid>
		<description>Burt I just posted this on that tossers site just left, you can bet it will be gone by morning ; 

  Helen Clark said the underclass was &quot;extrapolated from an anecdote.&quot;

Is this a good or bad thing from government ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Burt I just posted this on that tossers site just left, you can bet it will be gone by morning ; </p>
<p>  Helen Clark said the underclass was &#8220;extrapolated from an anecdote.&#8221;</p>
<p>Is this a good or bad thing from government ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burt</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293261</link>
		<dc:creator>burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293261</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t make this comment over on Jordan&#039;s because I know he just deletes stuff that makes him look stupid.

His no 5 (bad) thing was;
Too little focus on the poorest New Zealanders....

And he had the nerve to post that after all the posts he did saying that Key was full of sh1t talking about the underclass. All his rhetoric about Labour doing soo much for the most needy in NZ and then he sneaks in the first part of the new Labour policy angle - stolen from National....

Waste of space.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t make this comment over on Jordan&#8217;s because I know he just deletes stuff that makes him look stupid.</p>
<p>His no 5 (bad) thing was;<br />
Too little focus on the poorest New Zealanders&#8230;.</p>
<p>And he had the nerve to post that after all the posts he did saying that Key was full of sh1t talking about the underclass. All his rhetoric about Labour doing soo much for the most needy in NZ and then he sneaks in the first part of the new Labour policy angle &#8211; stolen from National&#8230;.</p>
<p>Waste of space.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dad4justice</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293260</link>
		<dc:creator>dad4justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293260</guid>
		<description>Good – Feral inbreds of the West Coast of the South Island  (where the Labour Party started), PM land speed records, underclass that is extrapolated from an anecdote and cancerous opposition. 

Bad – This Government will be listed on future Internet search engines under the words utopian and corruption. George Bush laughing at lemon face supreme leader .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good – Feral inbreds of the West Coast of the South Island  (where the Labour Party started), PM land speed records, underclass that is extrapolated from an anecdote and cancerous opposition. </p>
<p>Bad – This Government will be listed on future Internet search engines under the words utopian and corruption. George Bush laughing at lemon face supreme leader .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Norton</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293259</link>
		<dc:creator>Norton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:12:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293259</guid>
		<description>GOOD: Keeping NZ nuclear free. Not partaking in the war in Iraq. Keeping National out of govt. for 3 terms in a row  ;)

BAD: Not doing enough for the environment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GOOD: Keeping NZ nuclear free. Not partaking in the war in Iraq. Keeping National out of govt. for 3 terms in a row  <img src='http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>BAD: Not doing enough for the environment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KA</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293258</link>
		<dc:creator>KA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 08:08:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293258</guid>
		<description>Maharey has also got his sticky beak into interfering in the integrated school sector, refusing to grant them roll increases despite increasing demand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maharey has also got his sticky beak into interfering in the integrated school sector, refusing to grant them roll increases despite increasing demand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: smash</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293257</link>
		<dc:creator>smash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 06:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293257</guid>
		<description>Good: Labour seeing off 3 national party leaders
Bad: Bill English back on the podium again</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good: Labour seeing off 3 national party leaders<br />
Bad: Bill English back on the podium again</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: side show bob</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293256</link>
		<dc:creator>side show bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 05:42:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293256</guid>
		<description>Good; Dear Leader going to Washington.

Bad; Dear Leader returning.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good; Dear Leader going to Washington.</p>
<p>Bad; Dear Leader returning.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Spam</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293255</link>
		<dc:creator>Spam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 04:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293255</guid>
		<description>Over at jordan&#039;s, there were a number of people saying that the interest-free student loans were a &#039;good thing&#039;.  I put it in the &quot;bad&quot; category.

I disagree, because I think that the ballooning student debt won&#039;t be solved by this, and secondly, I think that the (ex-)students don&#039;t pay off their loans; not because they can&#039;t, but because they don&#039;t want to.

I did have another thought on this:  NZs woeful savings record will be further hindered by this zero interest student loan policy.  Because its zero interest, it teaches people to not pay off debt; instead, they spend it on toys (which I believe is why the student debt is ballooning in the first place).

Good?  Umm.. Smoke-free restaurants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at jordan&#8217;s, there were a number of people saying that the interest-free student loans were a &#8216;good thing&#8217;.  I put it in the &#8220;bad&#8221; category.</p>
<p>I disagree, because I think that the ballooning student debt won&#8217;t be solved by this, and secondly, I think that the (ex-)students don&#8217;t pay off their loans; not because they can&#8217;t, but because they don&#8217;t want to.</p>
<p>I did have another thought on this:  NZs woeful savings record will be further hindered by this zero interest student loan policy.  Because its zero interest, it teaches people to not pay off debt; instead, they spend it on toys (which I believe is why the student debt is ballooning in the first place).</p>
<p>Good?  Umm.. Smoke-free restaurants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bevan</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/five_good_and_five_bad_for_the_government.html#comment-293254</link>
		<dc:creator>Bevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Mar 2007 01:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://kiwiblog-test.inspire.net.nz/wordpress/?p=16135#comment-293254</guid>
		<description>Good: Campaigning on accountability back when they won their first term.

Bad: Showing what a complete crock that promise was.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good: Campaigning on accountability back when they won their first term.</p>
<p>Bad: Showing what a complete crock that promise was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

