The 40 below party
It sounds like Friday’s 40 below party went very well. Pam from Young Labour managed to crash the event and has a fairly positive report.
No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)
Tags: NationalThe 40 below party
20 Responses to “The 40 below party”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
March 26th, 2007 at 1:36 pm
If anal was her goal she couldn’t have chosen better than a National do eh Pam…;-)(in joke)
March 26th, 2007 at 2:00 pm
Mike Bowden. Drug Trafficer
John Key. Budding Leader.
Goes so well together.
March 26th, 2007 at 2:49 pm
Whose Mike Bowden?
March 26th, 2007 at 2:57 pm
MATT bowden = evangelical party pill pusher, making an absolute fortune, has PR & legal teams on overdrive so he can keep peddling pills as legitimate “social tonics”
March 26th, 2007 at 3:28 pm
Who is that blood nut who stood up in front of everyone and got a huge cheer when he said Key will be the next Prime Minister?
He’s a bit all right I think
March 26th, 2007 at 3:28 pm
Who is that blood nut who stood up in front of everyone and got a huge cheer when he said Key will be the next Prime Minister?
He’s a bit all right I think
March 26th, 2007 at 3:29 pm
Who is that blood nut who stood up in front of everyone and got a huge cheer when he said Key will be the next Prime Minister?
He’s a bit all right I think
March 26th, 2007 at 3:29 pm
Alright Matt Bowden and John Key, still a drug dealer and still a JK’s litte DOO.
March 26th, 2007 at 3:48 pm
Is this the worst you can throw at Key?
If Key didn’t have some connection to this little DOO, what excuse would you use to slag him off? Are you Finlay McDonald?
I guess not because Finlay’s main gripe with John Key is that he isn’t groovy and has never tried drugs.
What the fuck is a little DOO?
March 26th, 2007 at 4:50 pm
John Dalley
Let me guess, it would be socially acceptable if it was one of the CEO’s of the liquor companies, which of course actually do have a high level of adverse affects.
Face it. There is a demand for a product. He and others are servicing that demand legally, with somethign that is cheap, by and large safe with minimal negative effects (bar hangover).
What exactly is the problem?
Do you actually have a problem with him serving this market? Would you prefer that people sourced BZP on the black market? or would you prefer that they were perhaps criminalised for consuming it?
Please elaborate on this…
March 26th, 2007 at 4:50 pm
John Key associating with a known drug dealer.
DOO. Take you pick.
March 26th, 2007 at 4:56 pm
Perhaps he should run a list of business people he knows past you John, just to see if they measure up to your lofty code of ethics, that way he can distance himself from anyone one you decide you don’t like and there-by earn your very important vote.
March 26th, 2007 at 5:24 pm
there appear to be a few nasty bzp hangovers lurking between exclamation marks on this thread! well, it is monday, after all…
March 26th, 2007 at 8:59 pm
JohnDalley – by your definition if he had dinner with executives of GlaxoSmithKline he would also be associating with known drug dealers?
March 26th, 2007 at 10:55 pm
EM. Are you suggesting that a supplier (legal at this stage) of Party Pills is someone JK should be associating with?
BZP is dangerous and should be illegal.
As for alcohol, i do not miss the irony that it is still a legally adictive substance and though is pointless to have prohibition back the creadence given to the alcohol industry is too much.
MikeE. Why anyone is so stupid to take any for of illicite drugs beats me. BZP and others of alike should be banned. Is it going to stop people using drugs, not a chance the human race is too stupid for that.
March 27th, 2007 at 8:13 am
I don’t see what your problem is John, regardless of what your opinion of BZP is, what do you expect Key to do? Stand up and make a grand announcement that he is leaving the party because Matt Bowden is here and he doesn’t want to be seen with him? Refuse to shake his hand and tell him to bugger off because he is a legitimate business man selling a product that MIGHT become illegal one day?
I would like to hear what Matt Bowdens “surprisingly sensible ideas” were before jumping to any conclusions about John Key’s associations with a “known drug dealer”
March 27th, 2007 at 9:05 am
No EM, i would expect his minders to get rid of him, and don’t tell me he was going to sit down and discuss the poos and cons of BZP.
March 27th, 2007 at 9:52 am
Are BZP poos anything like the dreaded “booze poos”?
March 27th, 2007 at 9:53 am
On what grounds FFS!? The guy hasn’t done anything illegal and unless he went to the function without paying for a ticket what reason would they have for getting rid of him? You seem to be the only person worried about this.
“and don’t tell me he was going to sit down and discuss the poos and cons of BZP.” Why would I try and tell you that? Unlike you, I’m not jumping to conclusions about what they may have discussed.
March 27th, 2007 at 10:54 am
You are obsessed, James.