«
»

Politics segment now on Thursdays

May 30th, 2007 at 11:50 am by David Farrar

The weekly politics panel discussion on Good Morning on TV One is now on Thursdays at 11.15 am. They’ve added Willie Jackson to the existing panel of Barry Soper, Jane Clifton and myself.

We’ll be talking polls, amongst other things.

Related posts:

  1. TVNZ Downsizing
  2. DPF now weekly on TV also
  3. Politics Lectures
  4. Fiji gets worse … again …
Tags:

This entry was posted on Wednesday, May 30th, 2007 at 11:50 am and is filed under Uncategorized. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.

9 Responses to “Politics segment now on Thursdays”

  1. Fred Says:
    May 31st, 2007 at 3:09 am

    Just had 3 weeks business and fishing in the NZ time warp.

    If you take any of the self-absorbed lefty rubbish served up on NZ TV as representative reality you will end up poor.

    That simple.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. thehawk Says:
    May 31st, 2007 at 12:29 pm

    People watch TV during the day?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. David Farrar Says:
    May 31st, 2007 at 4:22 pm

    Heh I estimate the audience consists only of my parents, but it seems there are a few people at home during the day who do tune in. No idea actual ratings figures but I would guess no more than 1% or so of pop.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. phil u Says:
    May 31st, 2007 at 6:02 pm

    and how about that ‘bitch-slap’ from mr jackson..?

    right at the end..

    pow..!

    (from one who watched..)

    phil(whoar.co.nz)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. SPC Says:
    May 31st, 2007 at 7:50 pm

    It was appropriate for the “virgin” on the panel to be excitable and think the gathering was all about him. And I think his slap was aimed at the once prominent National strategist not present personally.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. phil u Says:
    May 31st, 2007 at 8:48 pm

    no it wasn’t..it was in direct reply to what dpf said to him..

    and directed at dpf..

    phil(whoar.co.nz)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. SPC Says:
    May 31st, 2007 at 9:17 pm

    Well I guess I made a presumption about what you were referring to (given we had to guess) -the line about some people present not having much to say – which I would have thought referred to the low profile of mum’s (M.M.) the word of late.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. phil u Says:
    June 1st, 2007 at 8:44 am

    nah..!..i was referring to willies jacksons’ curled-lip sneer/putdown of dpf..

    right at the very end..

    the sneer/curled-lip/recoil/physical pull-back..

    coupled with an “..i don’t know about you..yet..”

    twas quite potent..

    and physically jarring to dpf..

    phil(whoar.co.nz)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. phil u Says:
    June 1st, 2007 at 8:45 am

    nah..!..i was referring to willies jacksons’ curled-lip sneer/putdown of dpf..

    right at the very end..

    the sneer/curled-lip/recoil/physical pull-back..

    coupled with an “..i don’t know about you..yet..”

    ’twas quite potent..

    and physically jarring to dpf..

    phil(whoar.co.nz)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

«
»