Comments on: Judith and the broomstick

By: freddy

freddy — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:53:34 +0000

Woppo – well at least you’ve finally come out and admitted it: you think you have a big “johnson”! I suppose that is why you feel so obsessed with telling others that they are “littledicks” etc. Shallow, and I guess it’s important to you, but it does reinforce the hypocrisy of the tired old feminist (oh sorry, feminazi) sexist putdowns regarding men’s penis size.

Don’t get too cocky with the validity of your claim though. You have obviously lined up many other “johnsons” alongside your own to establish your size-based superiority complex, but evidently they were all just little boys. Eeek! Maybe you’re revealing a little more than you intended here!

By: mo more

mo more — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 12:26:17 +0000

Homophobic Red Fred?

How does that go down with all your lefty mates? Or don’t you broadcast it (only anonymously) – shit you’re brave.

By: Lockwood's Mum

Lockwood's Mum — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:45:35 +0000

What’s Lockwood Smith got to do with any of this Red Fred?

By: Red Fred

Red Fred — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 09:23:54 +0000

Er as much as I enjoy a good old bit of rumpty I think the personal sex shit here is out of order .If yous tories really want a bit of biffo a la Lockwood Smith etc well hell yes lets just keep going.Or shut the fuck up .Again.I do so hate to bring myself down to your level.

By: woppo

woppo — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 03:08:46 +0000

Getting a little off topic here boys & girls – shouldn’t we all just be celebrating the delicious irony of lard-arse Tizard blubbing in the house, cos she can dish it out but can’t take it back.

You bet. I didn’t come in here to boast about my enormous johnson. If Freddy and his pals from littledicks libertarian lib have a problem in that area they can always approach Tiz for a bit of implant tissue from her next liposuction session.

By: little phil

little phil — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:49:56 +0000

Getting a little off topic here boys & girls – shouldn’t we all just be celebrating the delicious irony of lard-arse Tizard blubbing in the house, cos she can dish it out but can’t take it back.

My complaint is: where the bloody hell was the TV coverage?

By: freddy

freddy — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:35:51 +0000

Woppo – you seem to be a bit of an expert on this, how did you make your’s grow?

By: my 2c

my 2c — Thu, 28 Jun 2007 00:29:20 +0000

woppo seems to be very defensive about anyone attacking the “femminazis” for taunting blokes about their dick size, and persevere’s with his/her own tired old penis taunts.Why the double standard?

It seems clear whitch camp woppo is from.

By: woppo

woppo — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 23:54:32 +0000

Bad case of Clark envy there, Freddy.
Put it away, it’ll grow by itself – if you’re lucky.

By: freddy

freddy — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 22:06:13 +0000

Aucklander At Large – so what! If it is acceptable to denigrate an individual’s sexual appendages, then so be it – game on! But the same rules surely must apply to both teams.

My response at the time of Clark’s gibe was: “how the hell would she know a small dick from a large one?” (like she’s ever seen one).

By: Missus Davis

Missus Davis — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:49:24 +0000

Poor Judith’s hormones are probably swirling all around at the moment – she has 1 teary “menopause-moment” in the house, and everybody attacks her.

Show her a bit of respect. She’s been a solid workhorse MP for many years, and has given her all to help keep the upper echelons of the Labour government well-oiled and operating so slickly and competently.

By: Chuck Bird

Chuck Bird — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:43:27 +0000

Freddy, I seen a photo of Clark’s oversised clitoris. It is about 6 inches. I was told it was done on Photoshop. I suppose it was but when I hear her husky voice I am not so sure.

By: George Soros

George Soros — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:23:30 +0000

A very handsome and urbane stockbroker I know spernt a pleasant Saturday night with Judith in the back seat of her parliamentary limousine. He was impressed with, amongst other things, her broad knowledge of sub-prime. He has subsequently stated that “she is the safest route to Asia’s riches”

By: freddy

freddy — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 21:05:10 +0000

Woppo – seems you can’t reply without “joking” about my penis size…ha ha ha (is that really the best you can do, or are you intentionally proving my point)? You’re comedic skills are as limp as Crosbie and Clark.

Presumably you’d have no problem then with a “Herr Helen’s agressiveness is due to her oversized clitoris” taunt?

Or are you a hypocrite?

By: James

James — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 13:15:41 +0000

The creator of Wikipedia is a Libertarian.

By: Aucklander At Large

Aucklander At Large — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:58:15 +0000

Helen Clark tried to make a penis-size wisecrack at a protester during the last election campaign.

The protester was wearing only a g-string…

By: woppo

woppo — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 12:38:46 +0000

Got a problem with those little dick cracks eh Freddy?
Bet those nasty feminazis stole your extra inches.

By: freddy

freddy — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 11:25:16 +0000

Get over yourself Stinky – men have had to tolerate worse shit than this for years (remember Sharon Crosbie blaming the man’s bad driving on his small penis – that was 1992; Helen Clark tried to make a penis-size wisecrack at a protester during the last election campaign..etc).

You’re sexist if you think poor Judith needs to be protected from such an attack – why the special rules for girls (are they weaker, so have special needs?).

It’s obviously touched a nerve for her, but that’s her problem, nobody else’s.

By: Stinky

Stinky — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 10:58:15 +0000

Oh, oh, the Megadon of Ignorance, D4J, is not the only misogynist here tonight. He’s got company. Mind you, he still marks himself out by clearly being the most bitter. Dress it up however you wish, calling a woman a witch is misogyny.

Someone better inform D4J that misogyny is just a fancy word for the kind of stomach ripping hatred he routinely displays for women in power.

No matter how you cut it, it’s misogyny. There’s a lot of baggage in someone who uses that kind of put down.

The “two wrongs” argument about the slings and arrows young Nicholas has had to endure doesn’t have much merit. That is pretty low stuff too. The fact that someone is rude about treatment for a mental disorder (even implied mental disorder), in that context, is pretty low. But it’s irrelevant. Surely?

I think Tizard is an awful performer in the House. Shockingly bad. But say that. Call her lazy. Call her incompetent. Call her Helen’s indulgence. Those are all justifiable outrages. You don’t need to engage in low-ball misogyny.

By: Chuck Bird

Chuck Bird — Wed, 27 Jun 2007 07:58:55 +0000

Selam asks,”And how is the good Dr Smith and his meds.”

Maybe she can tell us all how Lianne Dalziel and he meds are.