About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

June 8, 2007 7:09am by David Farrar

Most popular name in the UK this year

Guess what name for baby boys, will be No 1 in he UK by the end of the year?

Share this:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment109

Uncategorised
International Politics

Related Stories

Iceland Nanny State
UK Labour now third place with working class
PM popular in UK

Comments (109)

Login to comment or vote

Redbaiter

“I think”

Well of course you would think, but who cares???
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 6:15pm
james cairney

“”mindsets of those that abuse and label are the mindsets that lie behind tyranny.” Those are your words, not mine you shallow fuckwit.”

They were yours actually: “The left call other people bigots and deniers with the objective of shutting down debate.” and there was “When a thread ends up as this one has, in a frenzy of senseless hate from multi-knicked abusers of what is such an excellent discussion forum, its usually best just to let it die. However, there’s a point to be made here. The behaviour of Woppo and others (if there are others, personally I doubt there are that many) should serve as a reminder of the mindset that underpins tyranny.”

and let’s not forget this gem: “DM’s use of the terms “anti muslim bigot” and “climate change denier” are examples of the left’s cowardly thuggish anti-intellectual attempts to silence opposition to their ideas. Labeling [sic] dissenters with such emotive and pejorative names has been a trick the left have used successfully throughout history. In Stalin’s times for example, the people who ended up dead or in gulags for expressing “unapproved” ideas were referred to as “blasphemers,” “renegades,” “fascists,” “counter revolutionarys” and “enemies of the people.” ”

And Redbaiter follows that with : fool, loser, arsehole, deranged pseudo-liberal, etc etc….

hahahaha, what a thrashing! and with your own words as well, too easy boy!

You are obviously not used to winning, but don’t get so angry, you can still learn (I assume you’re only very young). Just relax and try not to contradict yourself. Such as, if you proclaim, ‘he who does X is a Y!’ Be sure not to do X yourself, unless you happen to be proud to be a Y (and for goodness sake don’t do X in the same thread!).

It’s a trap for young players, but keep trying, because your failures are pretty fucking funny!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 6:34pm
Redbaiter

“They were yours actually:”

You so sweepingly declare, and then, to illustrate your point, post a completely different set of words. These ones-

“The left call other people bigots and deniers with the objective of shutting down debate.”

Whereas the sentence you composed said this-

“”mindsets of those that abuse and label are the mindsets that lie behind tyranny.”

Really, if you truly cannot detect that these two sentences have completely different meanings then I know I’m dealing with yet another leftist retard whose comprehensive skills are almost equal to a those of a garden slug. I’ll try again. The difference is the declared objective James.

But hell, I’ve already tried to explain this to you what, four five times, and each time you keep coming back with the same shit like some kind of malfunctioning robot. I guess its all part and parcel of being a leftist. If you did have your wits about you, you wouldn’t be one.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 7:42pm
Fred

Easy peeecy…

Maybe NZ wants a significant Sharia Law craving, misogynist, death to homosexuals, democracy hating, imman ruled, 7th century religious mob of arseholes as immigrants.

Who knows?
Maybe NZ does not.

Let’s vote.

It’s called a referendum.
But first let’s have a referendum to make referendums binding, like Aust.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 8:21pm
Andrew W

So RB, like many of histories dictators you’re a social conservative, perhaps you are now prepared to accept that you don’t need the big government of socialism to have a totalitarian regime, infact most of the dictators of the recent past haven’t been socialists but rather they have been social/religious conservatives – like you!

I’ve already mentioned Franco and Pinochet, Hitler is another, Hitler didn’t need big government ownership of the state, like most people brighter than you, he understood that it’s control that’s important, not ownership of a states resources, I could run through a list of Christian and Muslim religious conservative leaders, who, like you, believed in their own rightousness, and like you, the evilness of those who dared to disagree with them.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 8:24pm
james cairney

” … should serve as a reminder of the mindset that underpins tyranny”

You missed those, they were your words, and they make the point that you are running scared from you fucking coward. Loser!

It is your words that serve (by your own declaration no less) as a reminder of the mindset that underpins tyranny. You have been absolutely drilled today sunshine (by four different posters), learn from this. Tosser.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 9:32pm
james cairney

And while I’m at it I’ll even smash your ‘declared objective’ argument to smithereens (because you are easy to me, it takes no effort). If, by your rationale, a totalitarian dictator in ‘labelling to socially stigmatise’ an opponent, states his objective is in fact to further political diversity and for small government then how the fuck are you two any different!!!

“declared” objectives are not worth a dime you intellectual failure!

Objectively assessed objectives are the only objectives worth discussing. And, objectively, you label and abuse more than those who you condemn for it!!!!!

You are out of your fucking league boy! Let’s play on.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 9:43pm
Redbaiter

Isn’t it weird the way leftists spend half the argument declaring themselves the victor? The obvious conflict of interest that might arise from a contestant appointing themselves as umpire never seems to enter their tiny minds.

Gosh and there you are James, quoting completely out of context again, desperately trying to make my words means something that will justify your argument.

What I said was “The behaviour of Woppo and others (if there are others, personally I doubt there are that many) should serve as a reminder of the mindset that underpins tyranny.”

“Behaviour” James, not “words”. I was referring to the cowardly attacks and misuse of this forum that they have indulged in. The multiple nicks, the completely off topic false allegations. Maybe you knew that. Given your comprehension is so poor, I’m prepared to grant you the benefit of the doubt.

As for your absurd fantasies concerning what a totalitarian dictator might say, for God’s sake give it a rest. As if that would ever be a trustworthy declaration. Just as you can tell Andrew W’s leftist allegiances from his actions rather than his words, anyone knows a totalitarian dictator is never going to allow political diversity, and as for small weak government, well if he believed in that he wouldn’t exist. For fucks sake you’re so desperate its pitiful.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 10:29pm
Andrew W

“anyone knows a totalitarian dictator is never going to allow political diversity”

After all the venomous attacks you have made on those who disagree with you, I can’t imagine you tolerating political diversity if you had the power, if this was your blog, few of us wouldn’t be band.
“and as for small weak government, well if he believed in that he wouldn’t exist.”???
Are you refering to this comment RB:”I cannot be a tyrant or a totalitarian when I advocate for small unnoticeable powerless government.”

Those are your words, not mine, sorry I forgot to use speech marks when quoting you on that occasion. I wouldn’t advocate “unnoticeable powerless government.” Government still needs noticable power, but ultimately the power needs to be under the control of the people.
You also have made it clear in the past that you are in favour of governments being able to dictate morality through the power of law, hardly a position of advocating “unnoticeable powerless government”.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 10, 2007 11:18pm

More comments:

‹
1
2

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Login to comment or vote

« 12 Mb/sec to all homes in Aussie

Hilton back in jail »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Highlights

The Kiwis are fleeing
Inflation by term
Houston we have a problem
Our immunisation disaster

Top Stories

General Debate 17 April 2024
General Debate 18 April 2024
Fire and Emergency costs blowout
Ministry of Education Cuts in Perspective.
UK Labour Deputy Leader in trouble
Graham Adams on MACA and the Court of Appeal
We still have an inflation problem
This could explain the brickbat
The Cass Report
General Debate 16 April 2024

Recent Posts

This could explain the brickbat 18 April 2024
General Debate 18 April 2024 18 April 2024
We still have an inflation problem 18 April 2024
UK Labour Deputy Leader in trouble 17 April 2024
Ministry of Education Cuts in Perspective. 17 April 2024
Graham Adams on MACA and the Court of Appeal 17 April 2024
General Debate 17 April 2024 17 April 2024
Fire and Emergency costs blowout 17 April 2024
The Cass Report 16 April 2024
Another badly designed cycleway 16 April 2024
General Debate 16 April 2024 16 April 2024
Guest Post: Whats the Politics of Israel’s attack on the Iran ‘consulate in Syria? 16 April 2024

Never miss a post

Email Address

Recent Comments

General Debate 18 April 2024
cmm
General Debate 18 April 2024
virtualmark
General Debate 18 April 2024
JimBobJoe
This could explain the brickbat
jkt
General Debate 18 April 2024
virtualmark
This could explain the brickbat
Conservatarian
This could explain the brickbat
slightlyrighty
General Debate 18 April 2024
Ghost
We still have an inflation problem
Omni Consumer Products
General Debate 18 April 2024
thirteenstars
General Debate 18 April 2024
In Vino Veritas
General Debate 18 April 2024
MCōs
We still have an inflation problem
stiff cheese
General Debate 18 April 2024
In Vino Veritas
General Debate 18 April 2024
Lenticular

Links

A question for you all on those sackings
Not PC
Cam Slater: 1000 Jobs Cut in a Single Day
Breaking Views
Despair - construction consenting edition
Offsetting Behaviour
An impermanent public service is a guarantee of very little else but failure
Point of Order
Ordinary Everyday Beauty
No Minister
Job losses in perspective
Hompaddock
What Time Is The Protest March To The Iranian Embassy?
Utopia
The 4% inflation rate vs thousands of jobs cut highlights a need to redesign the Reserve Bank inflation targets
The Daily Blog
Open mike 18/04/2024
The Standard
Ministers are not above the law
No Right Turn
RACIST ADVERTISING
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
Is the state coming for churches?
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
Super Rugby Predictions for Week 9
Stats Chat
Coalition Promises
NZCPR
Arguing about a moot point.
Kiwipolitico
Tougher than that
Croaking Cassandra
ABs stripped of 2011 title after try disallowed
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker
Angie Warren-Clark: Meet the Newbies
Dan Moskovitz

editor@kiwiblog.co.nz

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2024 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d