WIll new rules stop TV campaign ads
June 28th, 2007 at 8:14 am by David FarrarSteven Price points out in the NZ Herald that the new rules for use of photos from the House could mean:
So, for example, if even the Prime Minister could be shown to have lied in the House, the Opposition couldn’t use footage of that in its election campaign.
Hopefully someone is working on a rewrite.
No tag for this post.
June 28th, 2007 at 1:23 pm
“So, for example, if even the Prime Minister could be shown to have lied in the House, the Opposition couldn’t use footage of that in its election campaign.”
What does he mean – IF the PM had been shown to have lied in the House?
Vote:June 28th, 2007 at 8:03 pm
careful which woman PM you say lied to the house.
Vote:I have all the details about those memory lapses in 1999
June 28th, 2007 at 10:00 pm
Looks like the zookeeper let the retarded monkey out of it’s cage again.
Vote:June 29th, 2007 at 6:56 am
Dear Leader misleads the House every time she is asked if she has confidence in this, that or the other Minister, and she replies “Yes”! Even moreso, in the case of Judith Tizard, when she adds “Because she is a competent and hard-working Minister”! Or Horomia, or O’Connor or…..
Vote:June 29th, 2007 at 7:53 am
Helen Clark couldn’t tell the truth even if her twisted life depended on it . She is an embarrassment and a disgrace to all the world, and her government once it is history will be remembered as the most CORRUPT in the South Pacific !
Vote: