According to Helen Clark a parent that gives their child a light spank is a “right wing fundamentalist”, but a man who tortured schoolchildren with tennis balls and got his rocks off walking into the girls changing rooms has been a welcome member of her “government”.

I think Selma is having some difficulty understanding the concept that the standards set in the past are not to be used as a measure stick today. It’s ironic that DB-P wasn’t prosecuted for stuffing tennis balls in kids mouths or allegedly slapping a girl who was having confidence issues abseiling because the standards back then were different to what we accept today. Standards are much higher today and we mustn’t judge the past by today.

Sad sad lefties, how can they be so morally and ethically bankrupt to never once see anything bad in the goings on of their masters.

Don’t you mean DBP?

Or is that one of those “Freudian slips” for which liarbore hacks [like DBP himself] is now so justly famous. A racing certainty that it’s the latter since I’m sure, my dear Selma, you have an intimate and lifelong relationship with the DPB – perhaps even to the point of obsession.

He had this to say at the conclusion of this unbelievably well researched Document:

“My contention here is that the Police reasoning and decisions in this case are not ones you could reasonably agree with. They have in fact made very basic mistakes throughout. They appear to have done almost no actual investigating or interviewing, and misled the public with their public release.”

However when you consider that on 10 February 2006 Acting Police Commissioner Steve Long received an allegation essentially that money had been stolen from Helen’s Leader Funds, and thaat they buried these allegations, then there are more sinister overtones. Who were the Police protecting? Would David Farrar, if he had known at the time of this allegation summed up the situation more strongly?

I ask you the reader, how can we trust a Select Committee to sort out Election processes in view of David’s report and the Police cover-up? Do you consider a Royal Commission of Inquiry is required?

I recall Fran O’Sullivan calling for one

Glasshouses and all that.
Plus we all know where DPF was working at the time so its doubly effective.

Ive raised Nick Smiths integrity for a more recent issue. And we all know what happened to him (NOT).
Having 3 judges saying you cant lie straight in bed, sets an entirely new low.

[DPF:Nick Smith wanted to resign and have a byelection. Helen Clark insisted it was not necessary]

I thought we had been through this a few times. Do you remember my (somewhat confusing to you perhaps) suggestion that applying 5yr/old logic of He did it too is not a good standard to set for Ministers.

However I’ll play your game: Do you really think we should repeal the laws that make it illegal to mislead parliament ?

Please explain.

If you believe that then would you be interested in a bridge I’m currently selling?

ohahaha, oh my, hilarious, tears in my eyes, my side aches, no, please stop…hahahahahaha

“Um, yeah – it’s called politics. You know decisions are made about what’s best for the common good of the party “

Somewhere in there roger you seem to have forgotten that decisions should be based on what is best for the country. With your acceptance of put the party first it’s no surprise that nothing the labour party do will shake your support for a self serving and corrupt bunch of twits.

So the moral of the story – you don’t get sacked for lying. You get sacked for being caught out by the media in a lie.”

DPB was never sacked – he resigned.

Which brings me to Madam speaker. Shouldn’t she be very miffed that someone told porkies in her house. She gets very emotional at other less meaningful transgressions.

Perhaps she should haul DBP up and roundly chastise him for leading the house astray with his economic use of the truth.

When does hell freeze over?