Winston on You Tube
This should be saved for election year!
Hat Tip: Mike Heine
No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)
Tags: Winston FirstWinston on You Tube
30 Responses to “Winston on You Tube”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
July 27th, 2007 at 5:59 pm
That was one of the BEST I’ve ever seen on yout ube.
July 27th, 2007 at 5:59 pm
The perfect end to a perfect day. Excellent!
July 27th, 2007 at 7:01 pm
“This should be saved for election year!”
Except that the person responsible for it would have to include their name and full residential address on the YouTube page and file a statutory declaration with Google…
July 27th, 2007 at 7:13 pm
Great stuff!! Not of course that we should approve of politicians being satirised and mocked – no, that would never do he he he…….
July 27th, 2007 at 7:33 pm
That was from Mondays Facelift show
July 27th, 2007 at 7:38 pm
Many a truth spoken in jest!
July 27th, 2007 at 7:39 pm
just beautiful, beautiful…. put that one aside dpf.
July 27th, 2007 at 8:00 pm
my favorite bit is the part about Bob Clarckson – just hillarious!
July 27th, 2007 at 9:06 pm
The Politicians want to ban satire of politicians.
But, it’s not really satire if its true, isn’t it?
July 27th, 2007 at 10:22 pm
yeah baby yeah! how good is this? superb!
July 27th, 2007 at 10:59 pm
Heh, heh, great stuff, got me thinking that the last line works several ways; for example:
…make a more permanent mark, we’ll all celebrate the announcement:
“That your greed has brought down, Helen Clarkkkkkkkk”
“That you have been rolled, by Ron Markkkkkkkkk”
etc…
Definitely file that one away.
July 28th, 2007 at 12:21 am
“my favorite bit is the part about Bob Clarckson – just hillarious!”
If we had more real people like Bob Clarkson, and a hell of a lot less of indoctrinated loony left wing robots like Roger Nome, this country might be ble to claw its way out of the hole its in. Sadly, the left wing loons are in the majority, so it looks we’re fucked for some time yet.
July 28th, 2007 at 10:22 am
You’ve gotta love Facelift
Clarkson is borderline Schollum and co isn’t he RB?
July 28th, 2007 at 10:41 am
Porcupine – I’d be very very careful with what you are suggesting.
July 28th, 2007 at 1:32 pm
yous donts want to worry about porcupine fara,
he mean well,
July 28th, 2007 at 1:35 pm
also, another thing,
Winston correct,
we are in a financial crisis,
we do not rule our own economy,
July 29th, 2007 at 9:19 am
“Clarkson is borderline Schollum and co isn’t he RB?”
Clarkson like all of us, has his flaws, but its pretty nasty to make a smear like that based on the mainstream media and their obvious campaign to discredit the man. Much of the smug and simpering NZ media, indoctrinated as they are with politically correct Marxist doctrines, don’t like Clarkson because he doesn’t think like them. He still owns his own mind.
The reality is that he is a man of some achievements, and to be so, he must be capable of clear thinking. Merely because he refuses to subscribe to views that the Marxist academic left social hierarchy deem fashionable is no reason to malign Clarkson. To attempt to align him with a gang of alleged rapists because he is not politically correct is just a cowardly smear.
Clarkson, whatever human flaws he may possess does not deserve to be denigrated merely because he does not subscribe to fashionable PC social mores. Rather, his achievements and successes should be acknowledged. He is I repeat, a far more worthy citizen of this country than the likes of non achieving parasitical Marxist academics like Roger Nome who have for decades waged a social and political campaign that has brought this country to lows it has never before sunk to. (and they will take it a lot lower before it eventually bottoms out)
Clarkson is overall a clear positive. Roger and his mates are a clear negative. More like Clarkson will raise living standards in this country and allow us all to prosper. More like Roger, as times show us all too well, will bring us social decay, poverty and despair.
July 29th, 2007 at 11:25 am
OK DPF and RB, my unfounded insinuation based on the MSM campaign was out of line. DPF, you are welcome to remove my comment.
July 29th, 2007 at 12:26 pm
“He is I repeat, a far more worthy citizen of this country than the likes of non achieving parasitical Marxist academics like Roger Nome who have for decades waged a social and political campaign that has brought this country to lows it has never before sunk to.”
Who are you calling a Marxist Baiter? In fact I’m placed in about the middle of the lefty liberal quadrant on the political compass. A Marxist would be placed on the far left, and like you, would be well into the authoritarian territory. So give me a break, you probably don’t even no what a Marxist is. In fact I’ll bet my left testicle that you’ve never picked up, let alone read any of Marx’s books.
July 29th, 2007 at 7:08 pm
but roger, honestly who would read karl marx,
when there are so many good comic books,
and pictures of girls mn things in them magazine,
i saw this good picture of heather roy once.
July 29th, 2007 at 7:21 pm
A communist is someone who reads Marx. An anti-communist is someone who understands Marx.
July 29th, 2007 at 7:25 pm
“Who are you calling a Marxist Baiter?”
So which part of that euphemism for legislative theft, “from each according to ability to each according to need” do you disagree with?
July 29th, 2007 at 7:26 pm
“A communist is someone who reads Marx”
The implication being that anyone who has ever read marx is so convinced by the self-evident truth of his work that they imediately become marxists? No wonder you refuse to read any marx, you’re so afraid that you’ll find his argument so persausive that you’ll become a filthy communist! Wonderful!
July 29th, 2007 at 7:31 pm
“from each according to ability to each according to need”
not my ideology master baiter – who believes in that these days anyway? Poor baiter, you truly were born in the wrong century. If only you could time travel back to your spiritual home, during the time of McCarthyism in the USA – how happy you would be.
July 29th, 2007 at 8:00 pm
“not my ideology”
I’ll enjoy reminding you of that the next time your frothing away on here in defense of socialism with its reliance on progressive taxation and other such forms of “wealth transfer” you worthless half educated commie loon.
July 29th, 2007 at 8:40 pm
Redbaiter:
“I’ll enjoy reminding you of that the next time your frothing away on here in defense of socialism with its reliance on progressive taxation and other such forms of “wealth transfer”
There’s plenty of room in the middle of the political spectrum you know. We all know that you’re a slightly unhinged right-wing extremist, so maybe this effects the way you view others – i.e. someone who is near the centre, like me, to you looks like Stalin – at least this is the impression you give.
July 29th, 2007 at 9:01 pm
“We all know”
Who is that “we all” then Phillip? You have been delegated to speak for how many other people, and who are they? Do you have a gang of commie troglodytes just like you with no brains, no wit, and no education there drooling away over your shoulder as you write, or are you just like most brainwashed collectivists, pathologically convinced you’re speaking for the hive, or the school, or the herd, or that imaginary crowd of cheering commies that you delusionally think are thankful for every dimwitted irrational utterance you make on here?
So if you disagree with the foundations of Marxist ideology as you claim, when are you going to write something opposing progressive taxation and other forms of wealth transfer you boring non-comprehending hopelessly confused politically ignorant dumbfuck?
July 29th, 2007 at 9:23 pm
“Who is that “we all” then Phillip? You have been delegated to speak for how many other people, and who are they?”
Many people here have pointed out that you’re a mentally unstable extremest baiter, and juudging by how often you’re here it seems unlikely you have a job. In fact you don’t have one do you? Bloody hypocrite. You would think that you would be greatful for Helen’s hand-outs.
July 29th, 2007 at 9:37 pm
You didn’t answer the questions Phillip. Who are the people who have delegated you the right to speak for them? What are their names? How many of them are there? When are you going to write something expressing your disagrement with the maxim that underpins Marxism, that ideology you said was “not yours”?
..as for your pathetic and cowardly false allegations, so typically Stalinist. Falsely accused of joblessness, (and insanity, a typical totalitarian ploy) tried in a kangaroo court and sent off to the gulags right?. Jezuz Phillip, you are one repulsive little commie slimeball.
July 30th, 2007 at 9:36 am
So no job then Baiter? On the mental health sickness benefit perhaps? Not that I have anything against that normally, it’s just that you are always slagging off the welfare state when you are so clearly a beneficiary of its generosity. Just doesn’t make much sense.