We were having a discussion on the self-esteem aspect over the proverbial office watercooler a few days ago, especially with regards to the education system and how it teaches dependancy rather than excellence. But I suspect that is a discussion for another topic.

You have a good day too, sir.

Tell me, when you met with Dr Prassad, did you use the type of language that you use here? And call them names as well? I suspect not. But that matters not a whit – because that is not the Dad4Justice that is represented on Kiwiblog. Here you appear to be a noisy, angry man who’s vocabulary and wit is restricted to insults. Outside of this blog you might be a Nobel laureate who regularly dines with the most influential members of society – but that is not the side of you that we are seeing.

As I said earlier, you have the right to do whatever you will. I am however pointing out to you that the face you are presenting on this blog makes you look poorly and will result in your message being ignored, skipped over or dismissed outright. And you don’t want that to happen, do you?

As to the fraudlent pledge card – I would honestly not be surprised. It seems as if there is a certain desperation in the Labour camp recently, perhaps punctuated by witty responses like this “Election for Sale” spoof on Trademe. Reading the commentary that David posted on the State Housing sale, they do seem to be lacking in substance resorting only to attacking without actually dealing with the issues.

It’s almost a pity that so many people are swayed by that type of thing.

Can I expect another criminal labour fraudulent pledge card in my letterbox this election? This is the million dollar question . TAB is paying evens on the odds of it happening !

But when you are throwing around threats of lawsuits, claiming defamation and playing the moral high-card when just about every post of yours contains an insult to someone who might hold a different opinion to yours – having a credible debate on what is affecting our nation becomes very, very difficult.

You do however have the right to say whatever you like, which is why I would like an ignore feature. The only person you’re hurting is yourself and your own credibility. Your message, accurate as it might be, gets lost in the noise.

I agree David. It seems as if every third post is from Dads4Justice posting some random selection of invectives from the dictionary. It’s not funny, it’s not entertaining and it’s most certainly not contributing to the topic. Any chance of getting a /ignore feature, perhaps?

dad4justice Says:
August 14th, 2007 at 11:49 am

“The captain would like to know if passenger policy parrot knows that the parrot on his leftie shoulder is a normal hetrosexual parrot that has the IQ comparable to 5 year old child . Poofters are going stirr crazy in hold Sir !
This is going to one hellva voyage ?”

Way to go Dad4Justice. Now can we have a “utopian” from you please?

After all he will think just like and have the interests of other multi millionaires who made their money on the money markets right at heart.

Its a lot cheaper this way. And even better, you dont have to delegat someone from the round table to provide him with sexual favors!

Bring back Bill English. Bring back Mr Integrity to National.