<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Criminal age of responsibility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 21:57:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tauhei Notts</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373427</link>
		<dc:creator>Tauhei Notts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 07:42:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373427</guid>
		<description>I recall some silly politicians just a few months ago pushing for the voting age to be reduced to sixteen.
In a democracy voting is the most important thing a person will do.  And if those politicians think that 16 is old enough to vote, then they are being hypocritical in not pushing for the age of criminal responsibility to be reduced to 16.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recall some silly politicians just a few months ago pushing for the voting age to be reduced to sixteen.<br />
In a democracy voting is the most important thing a person will do.  And if those politicians think that 16 is old enough to vote, then they are being hypocritical in not pushing for the age of criminal responsibility to be reduced to 16.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew W</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373404</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 05:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373404</guid>
		<description>baxter, I was thinking of 5, but 8&#039;s good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>baxter, I was thinking of 5, but 8&#8242;s good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baxter</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373372</link>
		<dc:creator>baxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 04:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373372</guid>
		<description>Up until 1962 the age for criminal responsibility was 8 if the Police could establish the offender knew what he was doing was wrong and at age eleven the offender was fully responsible. They were law abiding times. Parental responsibility was paramount and they would invariably be charged with having a child who was not under proper control...Greg O&#039;Connor is right the gangs would jump for joy, another year of penalty free crime for their Prospects and fallguys to hold their hands up for.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Up until 1962 the age for criminal responsibility was 8 if the Police could establish the offender knew what he was doing was wrong and at age eleven the offender was fully responsible. They were law abiding times. Parental responsibility was paramount and they would invariably be charged with having a child who was not under proper control&#8230;Greg O&#8217;Connor is right the gangs would jump for joy, another year of penalty free crime for their Prospects and fallguys to hold their hands up for.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kehua</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373298</link>
		<dc:creator>kehua</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 02:58:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373298</guid>
		<description>The age of criminal responsibility should be lowered to 12 and parental responsibility set at 16. Many of these video brainwashed kids are so far removed from their peer age-group you are already dealing with quite sophisticated criminal minds in that adolescent age group. They  should be responsible for their actions and their parents should be responsible for reparation of damage etc until the child reaches 16. Forget about the effect `today` and look at the deterent factor, it may take 5/6 years to work, but it will.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The age of criminal responsibility should be lowered to 12 and parental responsibility set at 16. Many of these video brainwashed kids are so far removed from their peer age-group you are already dealing with quite sophisticated criminal minds in that adolescent age group. They  should be responsible for their actions and their parents should be responsible for reparation of damage etc until the child reaches 16. Forget about the effect `today` and look at the deterent factor, it may take 5/6 years to work, but it will.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnboy</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373200</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 01:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373200</guid>
		<description>Space must be kept available in the prisons for all who make a political statement without due authorisation next year. Hence raising the age for non-political prisoners. QED really or application of the new Law of Common Sense!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Space must be kept available in the prisons for all who make a political statement without due authorisation next year. Hence raising the age for non-political prisoners. QED really or application of the new Law of Common Sense!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LG</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373131</link>
		<dc:creator>LG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 23:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373131</guid>
		<description>David -- you are quite correct that it is *only wikipedia*, but one of the good things about wikipedia is that they are starting to provide sources. Down the bottom is a link to Unicef, which is clearly where the table and data was borrowed from: 
http://www.unicef.org/pon97/p56a.htm

You&#039;ll see from this link where full adult justice v. responsibility kicks in
Japan    20 v 15
China    18 v 14
Brazil    18 v 12
Sweden 18 v 15

In that context, NZ does not appear to be at the top end of our peers at all. (NB there is not data there for US, Australia, UK etc.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David &#8212; you are quite correct that it is *only wikipedia*, but one of the good things about wikipedia is that they are starting to provide sources. Down the bottom is a link to Unicef, which is clearly where the table and data was borrowed from:<br />
<a href="http://www.unicef.org/pon97/p56a.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.unicef.org/pon97/p56a.htm</a></p>
<p>You&#8217;ll see from this link where full adult justice v. responsibility kicks in<br />
Japan    20 v 15<br />
China    18 v 14<br />
Brazil    18 v 12<br />
Sweden 18 v 15</p>
<p>In that context, NZ does not appear to be at the top end of our peers at all. (NB there is not data there for US, Australia, UK etc.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew W</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373125</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373125</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ll go for the same criminal responsibilities from a young age but with age appropriate punishments, while nobody wants to see preteens surving adult sentences, it&#039;s madness to have them beyond the law.
 So &quot;full&quot; criminal responsibility for everyone but &quot;adult&quot;, &quot;youth&quot; and &quot;child&quot; punishments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll go for the same criminal responsibilities from a young age but with age appropriate punishments, while nobody wants to see preteens surving adult sentences, it&#8217;s madness to have them beyond the law.<br />
 So &#8220;full&#8221; criminal responsibility for everyone but &#8220;adult&#8221;, &#8220;youth&#8221; and &#8220;child&#8221; punishments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilBest</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373101</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilBest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 22:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373101</guid>
		<description>Well of course when their education policy continually diminishes the mental age of young NZ-ers I suppose they need to start adjusting the way the law effects them too.

Funny though that our secular leftist leadership seem to regard youngsters as OK for screwing at the age of 12, and are trying by hook or by crook to make this happen by nonparliamentary methods if they can&#039;t actually legislate for it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well of course when their education policy continually diminishes the mental age of young NZ-ers I suppose they need to start adjusting the way the law effects them too.</p>
<p>Funny though that our secular leftist leadership seem to regard youngsters as OK for screwing at the age of 12, and are trying by hook or by crook to make this happen by nonparliamentary methods if they can&#8217;t actually legislate for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Edgeler</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373039</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Edgeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:56:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373039</guid>
		<description>Andrew - &quot;full criminal responsibility&quot;=&quot;adult criminal responsibility&quot;. I think it reasonable to assert that the level of criminal responsibility to which we hold 14-16 year-olds is currently less than full.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew &#8211; &#8220;full criminal responsibility&#8221;=&#8221;adult criminal responsibility&#8221;. I think it reasonable to assert that the level of criminal responsibility to which we hold 14-16 year-olds is currently less than full.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Right of way is Way of Right</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373032</link>
		<dc:creator>Right of way is Way of Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:52:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373032</guid>
		<description>Street Gangs start recruiting at a very young age, so how about we start prosecuting at a very young age too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Street Gangs start recruiting at a very young age, so how about we start prosecuting at a very young age too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew W</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373004</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-373004</guid>
		<description>&quot;that list is the age of criminal responsibility, not adult criminal responsibility.&quot;

&quot;I said at the time that I wondered whether this should mean the age of full criminal responsibility should be increased&quot;

Ok, I sort of get the difference between criminal responsibility and  adult criminal responsibility, but where did &quot;full criminal responsibility&quot; come from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;that list is the age of criminal responsibility, not adult criminal responsibility.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;I said at the time that I wondered whether this should mean the age of full criminal responsibility should be increased&#8221;</p>
<p>Ok, I sort of get the difference between criminal responsibility and  adult criminal responsibility, but where did &#8220;full criminal responsibility&#8221; come from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtualmark</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372996</link>
		<dc:creator>virtualmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:02:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372996</guid>
		<description>Graeme, that&#039;s a good point.  We should be trying to align all these key &quot;ages&quot; of rights &amp; responsibilities.  So on that basis I can see an argument for criminal responsibility raising to 18 (I don&#039;t support lowering drinking or voting to 16).

But I also like Tim Barclay&#039;s comment that perhaps recidivist offenders below that age are handled through a different (tougher) system.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Graeme, that&#8217;s a good point.  We should be trying to align all these key &#8220;ages&#8221; of rights &amp; responsibilities.  So on that basis I can see an argument for criminal responsibility raising to 18 (I don&#8217;t support lowering drinking or voting to 16).</p>
<p>But I also like Tim Barclay&#8217;s comment that perhaps recidivist offenders below that age are handled through a different (tougher) system.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bevan</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372997</link>
		<dc:creator>Bevan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:02:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372997</guid>
		<description>Wonder what NZ First thinks of this piece of legislation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wonder what NZ First thinks of this piece of legislation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Graeme Edgeler</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372990</link>
		<dc:creator>Graeme Edgeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:56:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372990</guid>
		<description>Yes - that list is the age of criminal responsibility, not adult criminal responsibility.

I look forward to hearing the Green position on this, hopeful that they want to lower the age of adult criminal responsibility to 16, not raise it to 18. Adult minimum wage at 16, vote at 16, surely this is next?

For me, when the discussion over the drinking age was going &#039;round, I wanted it to stay 18, because, I decided, that&#039;s when you became an adult, and should be forced to take responsibility for bad decisions (even if your brain was still growing and you did irreparable damage by drinking etc.). I said at the time that I wondered whether this should mean the age of full criminal responsibility should be increased - I wasn&#039;t a fan of the obvious answer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes &#8211; that list is the age of criminal responsibility, not adult criminal responsibility.</p>
<p>I look forward to hearing the Green position on this, hopeful that they want to lower the age of adult criminal responsibility to 16, not raise it to 18. Adult minimum wage at 16, vote at 16, surely this is next?</p>
<p>For me, when the discussion over the drinking age was going &#8217;round, I wanted it to stay 18, because, I decided, that&#8217;s when you became an adult, and should be forced to take responsibility for bad decisions (even if your brain was still growing and you did irreparable damage by drinking etc.). I said at the time that I wondered whether this should mean the age of full criminal responsibility should be increased &#8211; I wasn&#8217;t a fan of the obvious answer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: virtualmark</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372988</link>
		<dc:creator>virtualmark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372988</guid>
		<description>Inventory2 ... I suspect Labour have always been soft on sentencing.  Well, at least &quot;modern&quot; Labour (the PC version of Labour that&#039;s been in place for the last 20 years or so).

You&#039;d have to expect National to have a fairly robust law &amp; order platform in the election next year - when 96? per cent of the population vote in a referendum for sterner sentences then raising the age of criminal responsibility seems out of touch, and likely to cost you votes if there&#039;s an alternative that&#039;s more in step with what the public want ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Inventory2 &#8230; I suspect Labour have always been soft on sentencing.  Well, at least &#8220;modern&#8221; Labour (the PC version of Labour that&#8217;s been in place for the last 20 years or so).</p>
<p>You&#8217;d have to expect National to have a fairly robust law &amp; order platform in the election next year &#8211; when 96? per cent of the population vote in a referendum for sterner sentences then raising the age of criminal responsibility seems out of touch, and likely to cost you votes if there&#8217;s an alternative that&#8217;s more in step with what the public want &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tim barclay</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372986</link>
		<dc:creator>tim barclay</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 19:37:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372986</guid>
		<description>Do it please Labour Party and lose the election.  On the age thing I would  treat recidivist youth offenders as Adults.  A very small percentage who commit most of the crime are basically feral and represent a real risk to civilised society.  Some may have to be locked up forever as being too feral to be let loose into society, these are people who sadly have become institutionalised and in itself represents a failure of the system.  But the safety of the community is a larger issue.  We have to square up to the fact that a small percentage of people are write-offs and will have to be locked away for good.  Grim for them and their families for sure, but their victims and their potential victims will be relieved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do it please Labour Party and lose the election.  On the age thing I would  treat recidivist youth offenders as Adults.  A very small percentage who commit most of the crime are basically feral and represent a real risk to civilised society.  Some may have to be locked up forever as being too feral to be let loose into society, these are people who sadly have become institutionalised and in itself represents a failure of the system.  But the safety of the community is a larger issue.  We have to square up to the fact that a small percentage of people are write-offs and will have to be locked away for good.  Grim for them and their families for sure, but their victims and their potential victims will be relieved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inventory2</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372944</link>
		<dc:creator>Inventory2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372944</guid>
		<description>Is this, along with the new sentence of home detention, merely a way for Labour to reduce the prison population prior to the next election? Labour has gone soft on sentencing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this, along with the new sentence of home detention, merely a way for Labour to reduce the prison population prior to the next election? Labour has gone soft on sentencing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dad4justice</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372943</link>
		<dc:creator>dad4justice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:15:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372943</guid>
		<description>Cindy Kiro should be in charge of a dog pound not a Children&#039;s Commission .

Visit a Court house where you see the ever so young ages of offenders, but what the hell , as the judiciary and cops are a pathetic joke. Youth Court is a laughable deterrent , however that suits the dysfunctional  government systems who are mass producing the so -called me generation . These delinquent kids are the product of a modern depraved philosophy endorsed by the freak show labour gummint who just love advocating a lifesytle that says , if it feels good - do it . After all New Zealand is well known for non accountabiluity and the total absence of culpability of individuals , for example , Helen Clark can do a 100 mph through small rural communities endangering lives and Trevor Mallard can stage lets maul a smart alec in parliament . etc...etc... These insane politician people are role models from the gallery of the absurd . 
  
Why does New Zealand, the land of twisted politicians continue to put this country out of step with the common sense world ? Who said kiwiland wasn&#039;t a Klark utopianism and  cess -pit of corruption where children fail !!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cindy Kiro should be in charge of a dog pound not a Children&#8217;s Commission .</p>
<p>Visit a Court house where you see the ever so young ages of offenders, but what the hell , as the judiciary and cops are a pathetic joke. Youth Court is a laughable deterrent , however that suits the dysfunctional  government systems who are mass producing the so -called me generation . These delinquent kids are the product of a modern depraved philosophy endorsed by the freak show labour gummint who just love advocating a lifesytle that says , if it feels good &#8211; do it . After all New Zealand is well known for non accountabiluity and the total absence of culpability of individuals , for example , Helen Clark can do a 100 mph through small rural communities endangering lives and Trevor Mallard can stage lets maul a smart alec in parliament . etc&#8230;etc&#8230; These insane politician people are role models from the gallery of the absurd . </p>
<p>Why does New Zealand, the land of twisted politicians continue to put this country out of step with the common sense world ? Who said kiwiland wasn&#8217;t a Klark utopianism and  cess -pit of corruption where children fail !!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inventory2</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372942</link>
		<dc:creator>Inventory2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 18:15:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372942</guid>
		<description>This is an absurd suggestion. I fully support Ron Mark&#039;s move (geez, am I REALLY saying I support Ron Mark?) to lower the age of criminal responsibility so that the little thugs that live in my suburb can actually be made to face some consequences for their anti-social and criminal behaviour, for which they all know the police can do diddly-squat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an absurd suggestion. I fully support Ron Mark&#8217;s move (geez, am I REALLY saying I support Ron Mark?) to lower the age of criminal responsibility so that the little thugs that live in my suburb can actually be made to face some consequences for their anti-social and criminal behaviour, for which they all know the police can do diddly-squat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: side show bob</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372940</link>
		<dc:creator>side show bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:57:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/11/criminal_age_of_responsibility.html#comment-372940</guid>
		<description>This will upset one of Dear Leaders lapdog parties. Wasn&#039;t Ron Mark calling for a lowering of the age of criminal responsibility. Looks like Dear Leader will have a conflict of interests, how sad never mind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This will upset one of Dear Leaders lapdog parties. Wasn&#8217;t Ron Mark calling for a lowering of the age of criminal responsibility. Looks like Dear Leader will have a conflict of interests, how sad never mind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

