what kind of lawyer is Cacofinix??

That nutbar squirrel. A very hairy lawyer.

eww,, and it’s sour cream,, yucckkk!!

Nice picture though if you see through the contradiction.

Now I know someone understands me, cause I started off this line of thought

“Like a frozen solid Chunk” spitting out a luke warm stream of dribbling cream”

{courtesy of A.D.K. and Eskimo Nell}

Just in case he doesn’t come through with the goods though, and ‘cos you seem like a decent bloke, if he admits he was lying about the statements he said I made, I’ll settle the issue for you and tell you if I am or not, just so you can sleep easy ok mate?

Just dictates.”

How does a block of ice dictate?

What a perfect description of Helen.

She’s not even a masochist, that would invole passion.

A block of ice that doesn’t see, hear or reason.

Just dictates.

Naaah. Cold contempt/disdain is pretty much the standard leftist pose, particularly when it issues from such a virtuous person as yourself, so when any the pot starts to boil it’s quite obvious.

Your mockery of quite ordinary fellow New Zealanders was nothing new either – I just thought I’d ladle a little back your way to see how you dealt with it.

It would appear that you were not amused!

There could be a ‘bubble sort’ routine that keeps the clever little lawyers comments at the top and dumb-arses at the bottom… just like real life.

Lawyers-legends in their own mind.

I only post under one name, so I’ve no idea what you’re on about sorry pal.

Seeing as Phil U doesn’t delete comments, and no comment exists to back up Rogers stalker claims, I’m still waiting for evidence. Just a link will do. A link to where I say I’m an environmental lawyer, if it exists.

I know Roger’s a perverted little prick, but I just don’t see what my job, relationship status, size of my dick and the other rubbish he keeps harping on about have anything to do with the EFB or anything else.

So David, Stan, forgive me if I don’t wait for some, y’know, evidence before I have to apologise ay guys?

I’ve stated my job on this blog before, so it’s no big secret. If you’re that desperate to find out what it is, try a google search you retards.

I am a right winger I suppose, but am an environmental lawyer and although I do not agree with you often, and I think you get a little too personal

And if he’s going to apologise to Roger for calling him a liar?

Interestingly, Peter Dunne’s position on the EFB is now clear. UF will support the revised Bill, but oppose any urgency motion to rush it through. Which is grandstanding in the extreme – Dunne knows that UF’s votes will not affect the urgency motion if Labour, Greens & NZ First support it.

http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/story.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10477647
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/section/1/story.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10477656

The EFB is clearly rushed and flawed. If the previous law was so bad that it absolutely had to be replaced, why was it left until now to do so? The rush has led to seriously bad new law with no consultation. Undue haste indicates undue motivation!

“..Now that’s a terrible thing to say about someone from whom you lifted some quotes to your blog a few weeks ago, with comments such as “makes the most sense” and had “good historical perspective”..”

so..what happened..?

phil(whoar.co.nz)