<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ear &#8220;flicking&#8221; Dad prosecuted for assault</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:17:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zesty</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-413991</link>
		<dc:creator>Zesty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Feb 2008 19:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-413991</guid>
		<description>This is for Monty - who&#039;s wife thought twice about smacking a three-year-old having a tanrum. Monty said she normally smacked but out of fear of getting into trouble she had to wait 10 minutes for the tantrum to finish. Let me explain. Smacking is negative attention. It reinforces the behaviour. It is standard practice to ignore a toddler&#039;s tantrum and give them NO ATTENTION for it - the behavior dies very quickly after that. Yes I did that with my children. They seldom had a tantrum after I used the ignoring strategy and I had to do the same as Monty&#039;s wife a couple of times. However Monty&#039;s wife has up to now been consistently smacking for a toddler tantrum and her child is now three.  To me - smacking isn&#039;t a good resource for discilpining children - people are just used to it!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is for Monty &#8211; who&#8217;s wife thought twice about smacking a three-year-old having a tanrum. Monty said she normally smacked but out of fear of getting into trouble she had to wait 10 minutes for the tantrum to finish. Let me explain. Smacking is negative attention. It reinforces the behaviour. It is standard practice to ignore a toddler&#8217;s tantrum and give them NO ATTENTION for it &#8211; the behavior dies very quickly after that. Yes I did that with my children. They seldom had a tantrum after I used the ignoring strategy and I had to do the same as Monty&#8217;s wife a couple of times. However Monty&#8217;s wife has up to now been consistently smacking for a toddler tantrum and her child is now three.  To me &#8211; smacking isn&#8217;t a good resource for discilpining children &#8211; people are just used to it!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401939</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 03:00:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401939</guid>
		<description>Ben, do you support all the demands of the Maori Party?  If not, does that make you a racist?  I am not arguing for a repeal of the Homosexual Reform Act.  I am not calling homosexuals faggots etc.  However, I am strongly opposed to the demands of the militant homosexual lobby that are mainly left wing.  People who cannot debate an issue without terms such as racist, sexist or homophobe show their own bigotry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ben, do you support all the demands of the Maori Party?  If not, does that make you a racist?  I am not arguing for a repeal of the Homosexual Reform Act.  I am not calling homosexuals faggots etc.  However, I am strongly opposed to the demands of the militant homosexual lobby that are mainly left wing.  People who cannot debate an issue without terms such as racist, sexist or homophobe show their own bigotry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Wilson</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401811</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Wilson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401811</guid>
		<description>LOL, BDO is a homosexual issue. If it wasn&#039;t a homophobic mistake it would have been really witty.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL, BDO is a homosexual issue. If it wasn&#8217;t a homophobic mistake it would have been really witty.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KevOB</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401661</link>
		<dc:creator>KevOB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 20:29:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401661</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s open to challenge that this prosecution is in the public interest and consideration that the police are abusing their power in seeking a prosecution over a triviality which parliament sought to excuse. The will also face criticism for calling out 6 police. They will also have to explain how the severity of the crime has escalated from cautionary. My only conclusion is that this prosecution is meant to bring fear to parents that the police are in control. The police will still have that even if they get told off in Court.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s open to challenge that this prosecution is in the public interest and consideration that the police are abusing their power in seeking a prosecution over a triviality which parliament sought to excuse. The will also face criticism for calling out 6 police. They will also have to explain how the severity of the crime has escalated from cautionary. My only conclusion is that this prosecution is meant to bring fear to parents that the police are in control. The police will still have that even if they get told off in Court.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freethinker</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401576</link>
		<dc:creator>freethinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 10:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401576</guid>
		<description>The incident reportedly took place at the Bridge of Remembrance which is about 50 metres from the main police station makng it possible for plod to just look out the window and assess the attendance requirement. To send 6 officers suggests that a case of burglarly had just been reported ensuring the exodus to attend a less complex matter with more fun, no risk and requiring the mass brain of our illiterate plods to fail to ascertain actual events thus having to refer the matter to higher PC authority were a dubious decision will probably cost the taxpayer dearly and plod another notch down the ladder of public credibility.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The incident reportedly took place at the Bridge of Remembrance which is about 50 metres from the main police station makng it possible for plod to just look out the window and assess the attendance requirement. To send 6 officers suggests that a case of burglarly had just been reported ensuring the exodus to attend a less complex matter with more fun, no risk and requiring the mass brain of our illiterate plods to fail to ascertain actual events thus having to refer the matter to higher PC authority were a dubious decision will probably cost the taxpayer dearly and plod another notch down the ladder of public credibility.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401549</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 09:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401549</guid>
		<description>Finn, thanks for pointing that out.  I made a factual error and confured it with Gay Day Out an event where Helen and her friend Judith, Carter and Barnett go to to help get homosexual votes.

I mistaken thought Russell was trying to wind me up as he had no answer to the police not prosecution the young man who impregnated the 13year old girl.  

I am glad to accept you are rihgt on that point Finn.  I am you agree I am right ion condemning the police inaction as well as Cindy Kiro&#039;s</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finn, thanks for pointing that out.  I made a factual error and confured it with Gay Day Out an event where Helen and her friend Judith, Carter and Barnett go to to help get homosexual votes.</p>
<p>I mistaken thought Russell was trying to wind me up as he had no answer to the police not prosecution the young man who impregnated the 13year old girl.  </p>
<p>I am glad to accept you are rihgt on that point Finn.  I am you agree I am right ion condemning the police inaction as well as Cindy Kiro&#8217;s</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finn Higgins</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401394</link>
		<dc:creator>Finn Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401394</guid>
		<description>Just since nobody has explicitly pointed this out to Chuck just yet... um... the Big Day Out is this strange modern invention called a popular music festival.  It is an event at which popular musicians of the day are called upon to sing or, if you like, play things called &quot;songs&quot; or &quot;tunes&quot; to an audience.  I&#039;m not sure it has much at all to do with being gay, unless you&#039;re aroused by the sight of large numbers of sunburned sweaty teenage boys.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just since nobody has explicitly pointed this out to Chuck just yet&#8230; um&#8230; the Big Day Out is this strange modern invention called a popular music festival.  It is an event at which popular musicians of the day are called upon to sing or, if you like, play things called &#8220;songs&#8221; or &#8220;tunes&#8221; to an audience.  I&#8217;m not sure it has much at all to do with being gay, unless you&#8217;re aroused by the sight of large numbers of sunburned sweaty teenage boys.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Simeon</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401392</link>
		<dc:creator>Simeon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401392</guid>
		<description>To sign the petition, go to www.unityforliberty.net.nz/petition.html

Just print it, sign it, send it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To sign the petition, go to <a href="http://www.unityforliberty.net.nz/petition.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.unityforliberty.net.nz/petition.html</a></p>
<p>Just print it, sign it, send it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gavin Knight</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401371</link>
		<dc:creator>Gavin Knight</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:21:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401371</guid>
		<description>the key to understanding this case is that an off duty officer was one of those who called in the on duty police officers who initially attended the incident.

off duty officers do not lightly put their colleagues through the turmoil such a case would so obviously have (and has) created.

the man who has been charged will (hopefully) have his day in court where he can challenge the evidence the police think they have.  his assertions to date do not align with the fact he has been charged.  a courtroom is the place to filter the evidence and assess who is right, and who is culpable, etc.

we will also find out whether it is an assault case that would always have been prosecuted whether or not S59 had been amended last year.  the police have already said they would have prosecuted anyway.

let&#039;s wait and see.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the key to understanding this case is that an off duty officer was one of those who called in the on duty police officers who initially attended the incident.</p>
<p>off duty officers do not lightly put their colleagues through the turmoil such a case would so obviously have (and has) created.</p>
<p>the man who has been charged will (hopefully) have his day in court where he can challenge the evidence the police think they have.  his assertions to date do not align with the fact he has been charged.  a courtroom is the place to filter the evidence and assess who is right, and who is culpable, etc.</p>
<p>we will also find out whether it is an assault case that would always have been prosecuted whether or not S59 had been amended last year.  the police have already said they would have prosecuted anyway.</p>
<p>let&#8217;s wait and see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpyoldhori</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401359</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpyoldhori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401359</guid>
		<description>Utu go NZ,  no dear boy not from the Greens,
but the EB mob having a crack at the Maori 
party would be interesting.
 
 Hone kicking EB arse up and down a drive
would be my bet.
Hmm,would section 59 apply ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Utu go NZ,  no dear boy not from the Greens,<br />
but the EB mob having a crack at the Maori<br />
party would be interesting.</p>
<p> Hone kicking EB arse up and down a drive<br />
would be my bet.<br />
Hmm,would section 59 apply ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david c</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401358</link>
		<dc:creator>david c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:06:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401358</guid>
		<description>Do you know what a straw man is Chuck? Or is this just a freaky coincidence</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you know what a straw man is Chuck? Or is this just a freaky coincidence</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401354</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401354</guid>
		<description>David the only people I misunderstand are retards.  The issue of the Big Day Out was raised by Russell not me.  

If you are unable to understand that when there is an open and shut case of an adult having sex with a minor that person should be prosecuted?

If you cannot understand that and/or are soft on paedophiles you should get off this blog and find one more appropriate to your needs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>David the only people I misunderstand are retards.  The issue of the Big Day Out was raised by Russell not me.  </p>
<p>If you are unable to understand that when there is an open and shut case of an adult having sex with a minor that person should be prosecuted?</p>
<p>If you cannot understand that and/or are soft on paedophiles you should get off this blog and find one more appropriate to your needs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Finn Higgins</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401353</link>
		<dc:creator>Finn Higgins</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:04:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401353</guid>
		<description>I signed up just to laugh...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I signed up just to laugh&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401352</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 04:03:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401352</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;You claim you do not like to pursue arguments by changing the subject. What have homosexual issues like big day out got to do with child abuse. perhaps you think there may be a link.&lt;/i&gt;

Chuck, thank you. I&#039;m struggling to finish a column and my office is too hot, but you have made me smile. Awesome.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>You claim you do not like to pursue arguments by changing the subject. What have homosexual issues like big day out got to do with child abuse. perhaps you think there may be a link.</i></p>
<p>Chuck, thank you. I&#8217;m struggling to finish a column and my office is too hot, but you have made me smile. Awesome.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david c</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401344</link>
		<dc:creator>david c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401344</guid>
		<description>Chuck you&#039;re awesomely awesomely special. Kiro obviously was saying there was a problem in this case. I think you may have misunderstood her comment (and a few other people&#039;s). 

&lt;i&gt;What have homosexual issues like big day out &lt;/i&gt;&lt;i&gt;

I think you explained your personality right there and we need not talk to you any more...&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chuck you&#8217;re awesomely awesomely special. Kiro obviously was saying there was a problem in this case. I think you may have misunderstood her comment (and a few other people&#8217;s). </p>
<p><i>What have homosexual issues like big day out </i><i></p>
<p>I think you explained your personality right there and we need not talk to you any more&#8230;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chuck Bird</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401336</link>
		<dc:creator>Chuck Bird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 03:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401336</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But can I have some of whatever it is that you’re on for the next Big Day Out? I’m pretty sure I could handle it.&lt;/i&gt;

You claim you do not like to pursue arguments by changing the subject. What have homosexual issues like big day out got to do with child abuse.  perhaps you think there may be a link.

You accused me of making things up in a post with the time 3:13.  Kindly show me in a post previous to that where I made things up.

I made the comment about Kiro after your earlier comment so the comment in the later post is not relevant.  Do you understand the logic?


In regards my comment on the social parasite Kiro that is a matter of opinion not fact.  As a journalist you should understand the difference.

In any case a left wing journalist is an oxymoron if there ever was one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But can I have some of whatever it is that you’re on for the next Big Day Out? I’m pretty sure I could handle it.</i></p>
<p>You claim you do not like to pursue arguments by changing the subject. What have homosexual issues like big day out got to do with child abuse.  perhaps you think there may be a link.</p>
<p>You accused me of making things up in a post with the time 3:13.  Kindly show me in a post previous to that where I made things up.</p>
<p>I made the comment about Kiro after your earlier comment so the comment in the later post is not relevant.  Do you understand the logic?</p>
<p>In regards my comment on the social parasite Kiro that is a matter of opinion not fact.  As a journalist you should understand the difference.</p>
<p>In any case a left wing journalist is an oxymoron if there ever was one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Brown</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401299</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:53:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401299</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Russell, I am glad you are familiar with the story. Kindly tell me what I am making up.&lt;/i&gt;

Er, the bit about Cindy Kiro &quot;not giving a stuff about the welfare of children&quot;?

For goodness sake man, it appears the story &lt;b&gt;only made the press because she raised it in a speech slamming the way abusers are protected by those around them&lt;/b&gt;.

But can I have some of whatever it is that you&#039;re on for the next Big Day Out? I&#039;m pretty sure I could handle it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Russell, I am glad you are familiar with the story. Kindly tell me what I am making up.</i></p>
<p>Er, the bit about Cindy Kiro &#8220;not giving a stuff about the welfare of children&#8221;?</p>
<p>For goodness sake man, it appears the story <b>only made the press because she raised it in a speech slamming the way abusers are protected by those around them</b>.</p>
<p>But can I have some of whatever it is that you&#8217;re on for the next Big Day Out? I&#8217;m pretty sure I could handle it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401294</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:39:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401294</guid>
		<description>Russell and/or anyone

Why is it that despite the 21 year old man confessing to police they have decided not to lay charges?  Why have they not charged the child&#039;s parents as well?

Surely, this is totally inconsistent with the position taken on the Christchurch smacking incident.

Further, why was the hunter who put his children at risk not charged?

There seems to be a complete lack of any rational approach, I do not disagree with charging Mason and taking it before the courts if the facts warrant it, but at the sametime why are these other cases not being prosecuted?  This is what the police have to clarify.  It is the appearance of double standards and lack of a rational approach that apalls me!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Russell and/or anyone</p>
<p>Why is it that despite the 21 year old man confessing to police they have decided not to lay charges?  Why have they not charged the child&#8217;s parents as well?</p>
<p>Surely, this is totally inconsistent with the position taken on the Christchurch smacking incident.</p>
<p>Further, why was the hunter who put his children at risk not charged?</p>
<p>There seems to be a complete lack of any rational approach, I do not disagree with charging Mason and taking it before the courts if the facts warrant it, but at the sametime why are these other cases not being prosecuted?  This is what the police have to clarify.  It is the appearance of double standards and lack of a rational approach that apalls me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pita</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401293</link>
		<dc:creator>Pita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401293</guid>
		<description>Bogusnews: &quot;A GOVERNMENT AGENCY WATCHING AND TAKING PART IN EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THE RAISING OF YOUR CHILD, AND DECIDING WHAT YOUR CHILD NEEDS/WANTS ARE ETC.&quot;

If I am following your drift correctly more children with find their way into Government care because of failed parenting, smacking for instance?

Wasn&#039;t it reported as an unintended consequence of Sue Bradford&#039;s Bill Foster parents were resigning from the responsibility of child care?

More children requiring care, fewer carers...I see problems ahead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bogusnews: &#8220;A GOVERNMENT AGENCY WATCHING AND TAKING PART IN EVERYTHING TO DO WITH THE RAISING OF YOUR CHILD, AND DECIDING WHAT YOUR CHILD NEEDS/WANTS ARE ETC.&#8221;</p>
<p>If I am following your drift correctly more children with find their way into Government care because of failed parenting, smacking for instance?</p>
<p>Wasn&#8217;t it reported as an unintended consequence of Sue Bradford&#8217;s Bill Foster parents were resigning from the responsibility of child care?</p>
<p>More children requiring care, fewer carers&#8230;I see problems ahead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonic</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401292</link>
		<dc:creator>sonic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 02:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/01/ear_flicking_dad_prosecuted_for_assault.html#comment-401292</guid>
		<description>&quot;Do some research into Antonio Gramsci&quot;

Which of his works is your particular favourite? 

You are aware that he wrote most of his stuff in prison (under Mussolini) so he wrote in code, hence his work can if  you are unaware of the actual circimstances under which it is writte, appear conspiratorial.

I know that passages of his have been meat and drink to some of our more conspiracy-mad rightists, but as I said if you were writing about Marxism while in a fascist prison, you might try and be a little vague too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Do some research into Antonio Gramsci&#8221;</p>
<p>Which of his works is your particular favourite? </p>
<p>You are aware that he wrote most of his stuff in prison (under Mussolini) so he wrote in code, hence his work can if  you are unaware of the actual circimstances under which it is writte, appear conspiratorial.</p>
<p>I know that passages of his have been meat and drink to some of our more conspiracy-mad rightists, but as I said if you were writing about Marxism while in a fascist prison, you might try and be a little vague too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

