OOXML Add this story to Scoopit!.

Colin Jackson blogs on the OOXML debate, as he is off to Geneva as one of three people representing NZ at a meeting of the International Standards Organisation. The standards issue has become a bit of a proxy for the wider Microsoft vs open source debate.

Incidentially at the network operations meeting in Dunedin last week, myself and Keith from InternetNZ presented on current policy issues, including OOXML. I quipped that I thought OOXML was my t-shirt size!

No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)
No tag for this post.

5 Responses to “OOXML”

  1. peteremcc (261) Says:

    Overly Oversized Extra Medium Large?

  2. francis (668) Says:

    This is a really big deal. I’m surprised you’re not pushing a position.

  3. Ross Nixon (389) Says:

    Several dozen deficiencies of OOXML are mentioned here
    http://www.grokdoc.net/index.php/EOOXML_objections

  4. MarkS (68) Says:

    I’ve never looked at the detail of the OOXML standards debate, but most of the commentary around it smells of Open Source: good, Microsoft: bad. This really has appeared to be an opportunity taken by people who hate Microsoft to put the boot in. Which is not to say that there aren’t legitimate objections to and deficiencies in the current OOXML proposal, but I hope that the debate manages to push aside the anti-Microsoft brigade and focus only on the technical issues.

  5. KevOB (242) Says:

    Whenever one of my clients “upgrade” their MS operating system I shudder. I never know what it’s going to break and as I am supporting accounting software that’s usually critical. Non-proprietary data formats are much to be preferred for maintainability or service.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.