<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Auckland vs Wellington arts funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:17:09 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kiwitoffee</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426463</link>
		<dc:creator>kiwitoffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:45:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426463</guid>
		<description>Te Gumint. Love it!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Te Gumint. Love it!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: expat</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426456</link>
		<dc:creator>expat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 11:15:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426456</guid>
		<description>The Irish, I&#039;m afraid to point out, did rather well by BEING subsidised by Europe.  Wellington has done rather well by being subsidised by the rest of New Zealand regardless of whether it was by Auckland or Hokitika. 

Wellington thanks Hokitika and the rest of New Zealand for donating to the Arty classes.  Quite often with an arched eyebrow, outstretched palm and slightly superior scratch of the collective chin ;~)

On the point of the high turnstile numbers for Te Papa, thats what happens when every school within 200 km is shipped in for free by Te Gumint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Irish, I&#8217;m afraid to point out, did rather well by BEING subsidised by Europe.  Wellington has done rather well by being subsidised by the rest of New Zealand regardless of whether it was by Auckland or Hokitika. </p>
<p>Wellington thanks Hokitika and the rest of New Zealand for donating to the Arty classes.  Quite often with an arched eyebrow, outstretched palm and slightly superior scratch of the collective chin ;~)</p>
<p>On the point of the high turnstile numbers for Te Papa, thats what happens when every school within 200 km is shipped in for free by Te Gumint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: unaha-closp</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426252</link>
		<dc:creator>unaha-closp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Mar 2008 00:14:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426252</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The Irish seem to have done rather well by subsidising the arts, demonstrating that there is an economic pay-off.&lt;/i&gt;

They joined the EU open market, got subsidies and large direct investment, reformed their tax system - perhaps the &quot;economic pay-off&quot; wasn&#039;t entirely resultant of them switching to pinot &amp; increasing their artists funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Irish seem to have done rather well by subsidising the arts, demonstrating that there is an economic pay-off.</i></p>
<p>They joined the EU open market, got subsidies and large direct investment, reformed their tax system &#8211; perhaps the &#8220;economic pay-off&#8221; wasn&#8217;t entirely resultant of them switching to pinot &amp; increasing their artists funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilBest</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426162</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilBest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426162</guid>
		<description>The stupid thing about State funding of the Arts, is that all great art has been produced in times of ECONOMIC prosperity, under a system that involved that artists had to do the hard yards looking for patronage. Demeaning? Hey, it produced great art. Guaranteed State funding, like tenure at universities, has only ever tended to result in ivory-tower charlatanism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stupid thing about State funding of the Arts, is that all great art has been produced in times of ECONOMIC prosperity, under a system that involved that artists had to do the hard yards looking for patronage. Demeaning? Hey, it produced great art. Guaranteed State funding, like tenure at universities, has only ever tended to result in ivory-tower charlatanism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PhilBest</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426159</link>
		<dc:creator>PhilBest</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 21:36:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426159</guid>
		<description>OK, what say Wellington lets Auckland have some more of the Arts funding, and Auckland lets Wellington have some more of the roading funding?

The way it works now is simple. If you want Arts, and the anti-business, anti-infrastructure attitudes don&#039;t bother you or don&#039;t affect you, you live in Wellington. Otherwise, you join the exodus to Auckland.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, what say Wellington lets Auckland have some more of the Arts funding, and Auckland lets Wellington have some more of the roading funding?</p>
<p>The way it works now is simple. If you want Arts, and the anti-business, anti-infrastructure attitudes don&#8217;t bother you or don&#8217;t affect you, you live in Wellington. Otherwise, you join the exodus to Auckland.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jafapete</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426129</link>
		<dc:creator>jafapete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 20:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426129</guid>
		<description>Hobb: &quot;Many cultural activities such as drama and classical music suffer from the problem that no one wants to go and watch the shit they put on.... Its welfare for the chattering classes paid for by the working classes.&quot;

A couple of points:

(1) I&#039;ve been to quite a few concerts that sold out the Aotea Centre or the Town Hall in recent years... by the NZSO, NBR (yuck) Opera, NZ Ballet, etc. When you think about it, if you count Symphony under the Stars and the like as broadly classical, you might even find more people indulging in this elitist culture than in pop culture.

(2) That should probably be &quot;Nat-tering&quot; classes. Did you know that the Queen Elizabeth II Arts Council was established in 1963 and the New Zealand Film Commission in 1978, for example? What do those two dates tell you?

(3) The Irish seem to have done rather well by subsidising the arts, demonstrating that there is an economic pay-off.

(4) We&#039;re pinot drinkers now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hobb: &#8220;Many cultural activities such as drama and classical music suffer from the problem that no one wants to go and watch the shit they put on&#8230;. Its welfare for the chattering classes paid for by the working classes.&#8221;</p>
<p>A couple of points:</p>
<p>(1) I&#8217;ve been to quite a few concerts that sold out the Aotea Centre or the Town Hall in recent years&#8230; by the NZSO, NBR (yuck) Opera, NZ Ballet, etc. When you think about it, if you count Symphony under the Stars and the like as broadly classical, you might even find more people indulging in this elitist culture than in pop culture.</p>
<p>(2) That should probably be &#8220;Nat-tering&#8221; classes. Did you know that the Queen Elizabeth II Arts Council was established in 1963 and the New Zealand Film Commission in 1978, for example? What do those two dates tell you?</p>
<p>(3) The Irish seem to have done rather well by subsidising the arts, demonstrating that there is an economic pay-off.</p>
<p>(4) We&#8217;re pinot drinkers now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hobb</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426044</link>
		<dc:creator>Hobb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:38:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426044</guid>
		<description>&quot;Many cultural activities such as drama and classical music suffer from the problem that their marginal physical productivity is essentially fixed&quot;

Nah Many cultural activities such as drama and classical music suffer from the problem that no one wants to go and watch the shit they put on.  Splitz Enz concert? Sold Out.  DD Smash?? Same thing. Fuck me plenty of people would line up to go and see Howie the Maori sing about how his Old Man&#039;s An All Black.  

But why do the NZSO or Ballet need taxpayer subsidisation - cos hardly anyone wants to go and watch that shite.  Its welfare  for the chattering classes paid for by the working classes.  

Why is it okay to throw 20m a year (or whatever amount it is) at the sacred cow  the chardonnay sippers call the &quot;Arts&quot; but not okay to throw a couple of mill at a Street race or to do up &#039;Puke?  

Oh thats right cos a motor race is of interest to the low brow working class - and they only that happen to fund this arts programme (and a braying shithouse  for a half a buck isn&#039;t art - its a waste of fucking money thats what it is)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Many cultural activities such as drama and classical music suffer from the problem that their marginal physical productivity is essentially fixed&#8221;</p>
<p>Nah Many cultural activities such as drama and classical music suffer from the problem that no one wants to go and watch the shit they put on.  Splitz Enz concert? Sold Out.  DD Smash?? Same thing. Fuck me plenty of people would line up to go and see Howie the Maori sing about how his Old Man&#8217;s An All Black.  </p>
<p>But why do the NZSO or Ballet need taxpayer subsidisation &#8211; cos hardly anyone wants to go and watch that shite.  Its welfare  for the chattering classes paid for by the working classes.  </p>
<p>Why is it okay to throw 20m a year (or whatever amount it is) at the sacred cow  the chardonnay sippers call the &#8220;Arts&#8221; but not okay to throw a couple of mill at a Street race or to do up &#8216;Puke?  </p>
<p>Oh thats right cos a motor race is of interest to the low brow working class &#8211; and they only that happen to fund this arts programme (and a braying shithouse  for a half a buck isn&#8217;t art &#8211; its a waste of fucking money thats what it is)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bev</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426033</link>
		<dc:creator>Bev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 10:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426033</guid>
		<description>AWMM only ask for a suggested donation. (http://www.aucklandmuseum.com) Same as Te Papa. The only thng is that AWMM has to put those Front of House staff there as cashiers. Yes, someone has to take the money off tourists who want to see Maori cultural performance. And no, the dome was never meant for public &#039;just walk and have a look&#039; thing. It is an event centre for commercial purposes. And if you were one of those FOH staff who sit behind the counter, and got told more than 10 times a day that you don&#039;t have to pay a donation to get through the museum, you would probably get  sick of explaining too. And it is in AWMM&#039;s act to not take any money from people visiting the war memorial.

As for Te Papa, they do not have such a contrains. However, more people have donated to Te Papa than AWMM. Simply because they have this donation box at the entrance. They know their consumer psychology and can get your money!

I think in a away, Aucklanders are in Auckland for a reason - they are here to work their butts off so they can have a brilliant holiday in their home town. I am often amazed by the number of people in Slyvia Park the days after holidays, e.g. Christmas. Like, people have never been to a shopping mall on a &#039;normal&#039; weekend? Do they have to come to the shopping mall when the sales last like weeks? Families rather go shopping, see a movie, go to the beach, walk the dogs, sit in a cafe... than going to see a festival, or a concert? Not that there aren&#039;t people who goes to it, but the turnout is relatively small. Quite depressing!

As for John, we know he always want more central government funding to fund Auckland. Good on him. Who knows what you will get if you don&#039;t fight for it eh?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AWMM only ask for a suggested donation. (<a href="http://www.aucklandmuseum.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.aucklandmuseum.com</a>) Same as Te Papa. The only thng is that AWMM has to put those Front of House staff there as cashiers. Yes, someone has to take the money off tourists who want to see Maori cultural performance. And no, the dome was never meant for public &#8216;just walk and have a look&#8217; thing. It is an event centre for commercial purposes. And if you were one of those FOH staff who sit behind the counter, and got told more than 10 times a day that you don&#8217;t have to pay a donation to get through the museum, you would probably get  sick of explaining too. And it is in AWMM&#8217;s act to not take any money from people visiting the war memorial.</p>
<p>As for Te Papa, they do not have such a contrains. However, more people have donated to Te Papa than AWMM. Simply because they have this donation box at the entrance. They know their consumer psychology and can get your money!</p>
<p>I think in a away, Aucklanders are in Auckland for a reason &#8211; they are here to work their butts off so they can have a brilliant holiday in their home town. I am often amazed by the number of people in Slyvia Park the days after holidays, e.g. Christmas. Like, people have never been to a shopping mall on a &#8216;normal&#8217; weekend? Do they have to come to the shopping mall when the sales last like weeks? Families rather go shopping, see a movie, go to the beach, walk the dogs, sit in a cafe&#8230; than going to see a festival, or a concert? Not that there aren&#8217;t people who goes to it, but the turnout is relatively small. Quite depressing!</p>
<p>As for John, we know he always want more central government funding to fund Auckland. Good on him. Who knows what you will get if you don&#8217;t fight for it eh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwitoffee</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426020</link>
		<dc:creator>kiwitoffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 08:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-426020</guid>
		<description>If we are going to compare Te Papa with anything similar in Auckland, I suggest more suitable than AWMM would be Rainbow&#039;s End. 

I wonder what ex-serivecemen and women would say to the Te Papafication of AWMM.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If we are going to compare Te Papa with anything similar in Auckland, I suggest more suitable than AWMM would be Rainbow&#8217;s End. </p>
<p>I wonder what ex-serivecemen and women would say to the Te Papafication of AWMM.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Peak Oil Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425992</link>
		<dc:creator>Peak Oil Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425992</guid>
		<description>JSF2008:

I believe you&#039;re &quot;John&quot; under another alias?  When did you last visit Te Papa, and did you enjoy the experience?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JSF2008:</p>
<p>I believe you&#8217;re &#8220;John&#8221; under another alias?  When did you last visit Te Papa, and did you enjoy the experience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: calendar girl</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425990</link>
		<dc:creator>calendar girl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:29:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425990</guid>
		<description>In one of the articles, Creative NZ chief executive Stephen Wainwright - a Wellingtonian - says .... &quot;though Creative NZ is Wellington-based, it has offices in Auckland. Many institutions make a conscious decision where to be based, and while the NZSO is in Wellington, Auckland is home to NZ Opera.&quot;

Wellington Opera and Auckland Opera merged about a decade ago in the face of financial difficulties. The new entity, National Business Review NZ Opera, performs identical productions in both cities. It is logical that it is based in Auckland because Auckland provides greater paying audiences and private sponsorship funding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of the articles, Creative NZ chief executive Stephen Wainwright &#8211; a Wellingtonian &#8211; says &#8230;. &#8220;though Creative NZ is Wellington-based, it has offices in Auckland. Many institutions make a conscious decision where to be based, and while the NZSO is in Wellington, Auckland is home to NZ Opera.&#8221;</p>
<p>Wellington Opera and Auckland Opera merged about a decade ago in the face of financial difficulties. The new entity, National Business Review NZ Opera, performs identical productions in both cities. It is logical that it is based in Auckland because Auckland provides greater paying audiences and private sponsorship funding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jafapete</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425987</link>
		<dc:creator>jafapete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:23:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425987</guid>
		<description>JSF2008, You just stay right where you are. Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JSF2008, You just stay right where you are. Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee C</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425986</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 07:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425986</guid>
		<description>As a visitor to Wellington I have visited Te Papa once I  thought it was unfinished, and lacked character. As a resident of Auckland, I have visited the Domain more times in the last eighteen months than I would have because I take my little boy.  he is under two and he runs his little legs off in the War Memorial, and genuinely enjoys every bit of it even the stairs. You don;t have to pay if you do not want to, but $5.00 for such a rockin&#039;child-friendly place with miles of sights, sounds and dry places to run while it is pissing down outside - it is a bargain. Next time we are in Wellywood I will put Te Papa to the test, but my gut feeling is it will fail miserably. For a start it doesn&#039;t even have a spitfire.  What kind of an art gallery is that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a visitor to Wellington I have visited Te Papa once I  thought it was unfinished, and lacked character. As a resident of Auckland, I have visited the Domain more times in the last eighteen months than I would have because I take my little boy.  he is under two and he runs his little legs off in the War Memorial, and genuinely enjoys every bit of it even the stairs. You don;t have to pay if you do not want to, but $5.00 for such a rockin&#8217;child-friendly place with miles of sights, sounds and dry places to run while it is pissing down outside &#8211; it is a bargain. Next time we are in Wellywood I will put Te Papa to the test, but my gut feeling is it will fail miserably. For a start it doesn&#8217;t even have a spitfire.  What kind of an art gallery is that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sushi Goblin</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425976</link>
		<dc:creator>Sushi Goblin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 06:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425976</guid>
		<description>Bugger, Dog eat Dog beat me to it. I doubt that JSF would have been to an NZSO performance - ever. 

I wonder what his problem with Chinese people is all about? Is JSF worried some Chinese criminal might cook him up for a black bean sauce dish?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bugger, Dog eat Dog beat me to it. I doubt that JSF would have been to an NZSO performance &#8211; ever. </p>
<p>I wonder what his problem with Chinese people is all about? Is JSF worried some Chinese criminal might cook him up for a black bean sauce dish?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dog_eat_dog</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425967</link>
		<dc:creator>dog_eat_dog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 06:17:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425967</guid>
		<description>You know, JSF2008, if Wellington is the cultural capital of NZ, and you are so proud to live in it as a result...why the hell can&#039;t you spell words correctly or construct a coherent sentence?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You know, JSF2008, if Wellington is the cultural capital of NZ, and you are so proud to live in it as a result&#8230;why the hell can&#8217;t you spell words correctly or construct a coherent sentence?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interested Party</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425963</link>
		<dc:creator>Interested Party</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 06:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425963</guid>
		<description>Jafapete wrote : &quot;Look, it’s probably true that a smaller proportion of Aucklanders spend their time in cultural activities, but you would expect that when there are so many beaches, parks, etc, to enjoy and the summers are twice as long. That’s why there are more people living here than the next three largest urban areas (Wellington, Christchurch &amp; Hamilton) put together, after all. So many more recreational opportunities&quot;


Spot on Jafapete. Auckland also has significantly more shows, music concerts (big and small), sporting and multi cultural events, better shops, much nicer nearby holiday spots etc etc. 

Happy to be a so called cultural philistine if it makes you guys down there feel better about yourselves

 </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jafapete wrote : &#8220;Look, it’s probably true that a smaller proportion of Aucklanders spend their time in cultural activities, but you would expect that when there are so many beaches, parks, etc, to enjoy and the summers are twice as long. That’s why there are more people living here than the next three largest urban areas (Wellington, Christchurch &amp; Hamilton) put together, after all. So many more recreational opportunities&#8221;</p>
<p>Spot on Jafapete. Auckland also has significantly more shows, music concerts (big and small), sporting and multi cultural events, better shops, much nicer nearby holiday spots etc etc. </p>
<p>Happy to be a so called cultural philistine if it makes you guys down there feel better about yourselves</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JSF2008</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425936</link>
		<dc:creator>JSF2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 05:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425936</guid>
		<description>If i hear another comment that dorkland , is better, ie brighter, better parks,better graffite better crime its the asian centre of godszone, under the FTA and with thousands of poor chinese flooding in to your sweaty crime riddled city , why do you people abuse a cultual icon ,WELLINGTON ???? ps the NZSO like WELLINGTON.( I LOVE WELLINGTON) no graffite in my neighborhood,your human dogs dont tag our walls with their urine(spraypaint) like your taggers love to piss on your walls in dorkland. A WELLINGTON LOVER.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If i hear another comment that dorkland , is better, ie brighter, better parks,better graffite better crime its the asian centre of godszone, under the FTA and with thousands of poor chinese flooding in to your sweaty crime riddled city , why do you people abuse a cultual icon ,WELLINGTON ???? ps the NZSO like WELLINGTON.( I LOVE WELLINGTON) no graffite in my neighborhood,your human dogs dont tag our walls with their urine(spraypaint) like your taggers love to piss on your walls in dorkland. A WELLINGTON LOVER.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwitoffee</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425934</link>
		<dc:creator>kiwitoffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:57:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425934</guid>
		<description>Me too, Steve, and not all artists and musicians have their hands out for public money.

This does not mean that art should be or can be provided only by the free market, even if such a thing exists. 

I&#039;m quite happy to see a small share of public money, at about the level we currently have it, allocated to the arts. Not because I get to benefit from it (even though I might) but because I can see the benefits for others who can&#039;t afford to pay.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me too, Steve, and not all artists and musicians have their hands out for public money.</p>
<p>This does not mean that art should be or can be provided only by the free market, even if such a thing exists. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m quite happy to see a small share of public money, at about the level we currently have it, allocated to the arts. Not because I get to benefit from it (even though I might) but because I can see the benefits for others who can&#8217;t afford to pay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425929</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:39:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425929</guid>
		<description>What makes Artists and Musicians think they should be funded by the taxpayer?
If I like Art, I will buy it.
If I like Music, I will buy it, or go to a concert and pay.
Why am I forced to pay tax for this?
Oh, forgot, it is another Social Service</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes Artists and Musicians think they should be funded by the taxpayer?<br />
If I like Art, I will buy it.<br />
If I like Music, I will buy it, or go to a concert and pay.<br />
Why am I forced to pay tax for this?<br />
Oh, forgot, it is another Social Service</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jafapete</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425921</link>
		<dc:creator>jafapete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Mar 2008 04:25:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/03/auckland_vs_wellington_arts_funding.html#comment-425921</guid>
		<description>BlairM: &quot;I’d also argue that if you subsidise art, its quality is decreased by an inverse proportion.&quot;

Hard to see how that has worked with the NZSO. They are truly world class, as the reviews of their London concert the other year, and many of their recordings, show.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>BlairM: &#8220;I’d also argue that if you subsidise art, its quality is decreased by an inverse proportion.&#8221;</p>
<p>Hard to see how that has worked with the NZSO. They are truly world class, as the reviews of their London concert the other year, and many of their recordings, show.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
