<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clarkson stepping down</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:59:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dressed To The Left</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-445035</link>
		<dc:creator>Dressed To The Left</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 10:13:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-445035</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What legal trials? Not a single prosecution came out of the Winebox. A decent MP would have focused on the real issue - the extensive tax avoidance devices used by big corporates, but Peters just invented stuff about there being a conspiracy involing the Head of the SFO and IRD. He then failed to produce a shred of evidence to back it up. He defamed Selwyn Cushing and had to pay him out.&lt;/i&gt;

Thank you for your opinion. I don&#039;t know how much you followed it but cases I was referring to were the Peters v Davison trials, which Winston won.

Focusing on the real issue? And Neil, you call it a wasted exercise? Without Winston the Bolger government would have done absolutely nothing... In fact, they tried to get away with doing exactly that. I agree, the Winebox Inquiry Commission report was a wasted exercise... Which is why Winston and Ian Wishart (see The Paradise Conspiracy) relentlessly continued to pursue the issue, resulting in the biggest exposure of government department incompetency in NZ history. I am surprised you downplay the Magnum transaction, David, considering it was the central focus and crux of Winebox.

I am an extreme right ACT supporter but I am not blind to the fact that Winebox made a much greater difference to NZ&#039;s tax laws than Rodney Hide ever did with his crusade against the IRD. I am not saying Hide didn&#039;t save those people with all the media publicity, but looking at the wider picture nothing has changed in substance. What happened in the end? The IRD got a slap on the wrist but ultimately the department still operates under the exact same conditions. Without Winston Peters the tax law loopholes arising from the 80s reforms exploited by white collar criminals would still be there, and in the end it would still be the lower tier taxpayers who take the fall.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What legal trials? Not a single prosecution came out of the Winebox. A decent MP would have focused on the real issue &#8211; the extensive tax avoidance devices used by big corporates, but Peters just invented stuff about there being a conspiracy involing the Head of the SFO and IRD. He then failed to produce a shred of evidence to back it up. He defamed Selwyn Cushing and had to pay him out.</i></p>
<p>Thank you for your opinion. I don&#8217;t know how much you followed it but cases I was referring to were the Peters v Davison trials, which Winston won.</p>
<p>Focusing on the real issue? And Neil, you call it a wasted exercise? Without Winston the Bolger government would have done absolutely nothing&#8230; In fact, they tried to get away with doing exactly that. I agree, the Winebox Inquiry Commission report was a wasted exercise&#8230; Which is why Winston and Ian Wishart (see The Paradise Conspiracy) relentlessly continued to pursue the issue, resulting in the biggest exposure of government department incompetency in NZ history. I am surprised you downplay the Magnum transaction, David, considering it was the central focus and crux of Winebox.</p>
<p>I am an extreme right ACT supporter but I am not blind to the fact that Winebox made a much greater difference to NZ&#8217;s tax laws than Rodney Hide ever did with his crusade against the IRD. I am not saying Hide didn&#8217;t save those people with all the media publicity, but looking at the wider picture nothing has changed in substance. What happened in the end? The IRD got a slap on the wrist but ultimately the department still operates under the exact same conditions. Without Winston Peters the tax law loopholes arising from the 80s reforms exploited by white collar criminals would still be there, and in the end it would still be the lower tier taxpayers who take the fall.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James W</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-445011</link>
		<dc:creator>James W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 07:52:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-445011</guid>
		<description>Baldock will get 4th, behind Bridges, Peters and Pankhurst. Actually, it will be interesting to see if he can even beat Act&#039;s Ron Scott, himself an elected local body politician. That&#039;s assuming Act contest the seat, rather than endorsing the Nat candidate like last time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Baldock will get 4th, behind Bridges, Peters and Pankhurst. Actually, it will be interesting to see if he can even beat Act&#8217;s Ron Scott, himself an elected local body politician. That&#8217;s assuming Act contest the seat, rather than endorsing the Nat candidate like last time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letterman</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444958</link>
		<dc:creator>Letterman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444958</guid>
		<description>Seems everyone is missing the likely Tauranga bolter - Larry Baldock of the Kiwi Party - has served Tauranga in a local body capacity, and is a well known local identity. If Baldock wins Tauranga - National will have a dedicated new &quot;mate&quot; in Parliament, as Baldock and the Kiwi Party have already publically pledged to back National, and reject Labour. Crown Prosecutor or not, Bridges does not have Baldocks depth of local profile.

Going to be an interesting race indeed.

Winnie? Toast and jam.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seems everyone is missing the likely Tauranga bolter &#8211; Larry Baldock of the Kiwi Party &#8211; has served Tauranga in a local body capacity, and is a well known local identity. If Baldock wins Tauranga &#8211; National will have a dedicated new &#8220;mate&#8221; in Parliament, as Baldock and the Kiwi Party have already publically pledged to back National, and reject Labour. Crown Prosecutor or not, Bridges does not have Baldocks depth of local profile.</p>
<p>Going to be an interesting race indeed.</p>
<p>Winnie? Toast and jam.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: baxter</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444950</link>
		<dc:creator>baxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444950</guid>
		<description>I agree with Redbaiter....PAUL you and your Liabour  mates are simply upset because BOB was a working man who made good whereas your lot are schoolteachers and union officials with no actual workers representing workers. BOB was the type of person I would like to see running the country.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with Redbaiter&#8230;.PAUL you and your Liabour  mates are simply upset because BOB was a working man who made good whereas your lot are schoolteachers and union officials with no actual workers representing workers. BOB was the type of person I would like to see running the country.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James W</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444948</link>
		<dc:creator>James W</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 04:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444948</guid>
		<description>Any truth to the rumour that Roger Payne is now the front-runner for the Tauranga nomination? I hear dad4justice is running his campaign :p</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any truth to the rumour that Roger Payne is now the front-runner for the Tauranga nomination? I hear dad4justice is running his campaign :p</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444923</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 02:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444923</guid>
		<description>Could I say congrats to Bob Clarkson for having the sense to realize that he is functioning &#039;outside his comfort zone&#039; (his words) and deciding to step down.   he goes out on his terms.    Can&#039;t say the same for Winston though.   He will pay the price for propping up a tired old government and his own arrogance and will depart Parliament on our terms with his tail between his legs.    A mavrick who, in the great scheme of things, will be remembered not for his contribution to good governance (there was none) but for his baubles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Could I say congrats to Bob Clarkson for having the sense to realize that he is functioning &#8216;outside his comfort zone&#8217; (his words) and deciding to step down.   he goes out on his terms.    Can&#8217;t say the same for Winston though.   He will pay the price for propping up a tired old government and his own arrogance and will depart Parliament on our terms with his tail between his legs.    A mavrick who, in the great scheme of things, will be remembered not for his contribution to good governance (there was none) but for his baubles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paulus</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444922</link>
		<dc:creator>Paulus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 01:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444922</guid>
		<description>As a Tauranga-ite we hope that &quot;Bauble&quot; will stand so that we can show him clearly what at least Tauranga thinks of him. 

Bob has done what was required of him - a good and somewhat difficult campaign, due to the &quot;Grey Power&quot; vote at the time, and to get rid of the &quot;bauble&quot;. He succeeded. 

Being a similar vintage we applaud the work he has done in Parliament particularly, and in his constituancy, in the Building Industry side and Leaking Homes. He has served his constituancy well. We appreciate his non nonsence &quot;kiwi&quot; style, which upsets the PC brigade who don&#039;t like the truth in &quot;simple&quot; terms.

&quot;Bauble&quot; he has shown himself to be nothing but a big &quot;MOUTH&quot; who stands only for himself. It is a pity that some of his fellow MP&#039;s are still supporting him, because there are some good people there, and they will fall at the next election as it is doubtful that they will get 5%.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a Tauranga-ite we hope that &#8220;Bauble&#8221; will stand so that we can show him clearly what at least Tauranga thinks of him. </p>
<p>Bob has done what was required of him &#8211; a good and somewhat difficult campaign, due to the &#8220;Grey Power&#8221; vote at the time, and to get rid of the &#8220;bauble&#8221;. He succeeded. </p>
<p>Being a similar vintage we applaud the work he has done in Parliament particularly, and in his constituancy, in the Building Industry side and Leaking Homes. He has served his constituancy well. We appreciate his non nonsence &#8220;kiwi&#8221; style, which upsets the PC brigade who don&#8217;t like the truth in &#8220;simple&#8221; terms.</p>
<p>&#8220;Bauble&#8221; he has shown himself to be nothing but a big &#8220;MOUTH&#8221; who stands only for himself. It is a pity that some of his fellow MP&#8217;s are still supporting him, because there are some good people there, and they will fall at the next election as it is doubtful that they will get 5%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hoolian</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444891</link>
		<dc:creator>Hoolian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:59:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444891</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt; Simon Bridges has announced he is putting himself as the new candidate. Simon is one of the local Crown prosecutors, and in his own words:

Mr Bridges has been a prominent criminal lawyer in Tauranga for the past several years, specialising in jury trials. Mr Bridges was educated... &lt;/i&gt;

So, Simon Bridges speaks in the third person then?

[DPF: Only when doing a press release, as everyone does]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i> Simon Bridges has announced he is putting himself as the new candidate. Simon is one of the local Crown prosecutors, and in his own words:</p>
<p>Mr Bridges has been a prominent criminal lawyer in Tauranga for the past several years, specialising in jury trials. Mr Bridges was educated&#8230; </i></p>
<p>So, Simon Bridges speaks in the third person then?</p>
<p>[DPF: Only when doing a press release, as everyone does]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444878</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444878</guid>
		<description>I agree with DPF, the winebox was a wasted exercise. All it did was provide light weight Winston the chance to throw mud at a large number of people.
Who wants Winston back. Current polls put NZF First at 1.5%. I didn&#039;t think there were that many fugitives from reality left in NZ !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with DPF, the winebox was a wasted exercise. All it did was provide light weight Winston the chance to throw mud at a large number of people.<br />
Who wants Winston back. Current polls put NZF First at 1.5%. I didn&#8217;t think there were that many fugitives from reality left in NZ !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Farrar</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444875</link>
		<dc:creator>David Farrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:47:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444875</guid>
		<description>What legal trials? Not a single prosecution came out of the Winebox. A decent MP would have focused on the real issue - the extensive tax avoidance devices used by big corporates, but Peters just invented stuff about there being a conspiracy involing the Head of the SFO and IRD. He then failed to produce a shred of evidence to back it up. He defamed Selwyn Cushing and had to pay him out.

The only potential criminality exposed was the Magnum transaction and it was a seriously borderline call - even Judges disagreed about whether it was illegal, if I remember correctly.

Now the Winebox inquiry did expose some very dubious tax avoidance measures. And that was a good thing. But Peters massively over-reached with his claims.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What legal trials? Not a single prosecution came out of the Winebox. A decent MP would have focused on the real issue &#8211; the extensive tax avoidance devices used by big corporates, but Peters just invented stuff about there being a conspiracy involing the Head of the SFO and IRD. He then failed to produce a shred of evidence to back it up. He defamed Selwyn Cushing and had to pay him out.</p>
<p>The only potential criminality exposed was the Magnum transaction and it was a seriously borderline call &#8211; even Judges disagreed about whether it was illegal, if I remember correctly.</p>
<p>Now the Winebox inquiry did expose some very dubious tax avoidance measures. And that was a good thing. But Peters massively over-reached with his claims.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig Ranapia</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444872</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig Ranapia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:45:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444872</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;My apologies to Ron Mark but I am sure he understands collateral damage.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Well, GPT, there&#039;s a certain wisdom in the only proverb &quot;when you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.&quot;  :) Mark is a bit of a curate&#039;s egg, but Brian Donnelly has shown himself to be an intelligent and thoughtful contributor (though one I disagree with more often than not) when Winnie isn&#039;t looking.  Shame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>My apologies to Ron Mark but I am sure he understands collateral damage.</p></blockquote>
<p>Well, GPT, there&#8217;s a certain wisdom in the only proverb &#8220;when you lie down with dogs, you get up with fleas.&#8221;  <img src='http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />  Mark is a bit of a curate&#8217;s egg, but Brian Donnelly has shown himself to be an intelligent and thoughtful contributor (though one I disagree with more often than not) when Winnie isn&#8217;t looking.  Shame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dressed To The Left</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444866</link>
		<dc:creator>Dressed To The Left</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 21:28:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444866</guid>
		<description>Can all the people who gave me negative Karma please explain how Neil&#039;s comment: &quot;Winston is a light weight and &lt;i&gt;always has been&lt;/i&gt;&quot;, stands in light of the Winebox Inquiry and the legal trials that he won in the 90s? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can all the people who gave me negative Karma please explain how Neil&#8217;s comment: &#8220;Winston is a light weight and <i>always has been</i>&#8220;, stands in light of the Winebox Inquiry and the legal trials that he won in the 90s? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Oscars Grouchy Mum</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444861</link>
		<dc:creator>Oscars Grouchy Mum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 19:14:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444861</guid>
		<description>&quot;Call a man who has been in govt on both sides of the block ...&quot;

Yes this is true, he has shown himself to be a skillful politician, especially when it comes to getting what is best for WINSTON.  All he has ever said is that he will &quot;negotiate&quot; with the party that has the most votes first.  That is not to say he won&#039;t go into coalition with the party that comes second.

If the Nats are going to pull back in Tauranga in the hopes of assuring themselves a coalition partner, they are playing a dangerous game.  I cannot see how you could trust Winston to follow what the constituents say - he is after all &quot;Bauble Man&quot;, and he really does appear to dislike the Nats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Call a man who has been in govt on both sides of the block &#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes this is true, he has shown himself to be a skillful politician, especially when it comes to getting what is best for WINSTON.  All he has ever said is that he will &#8220;negotiate&#8221; with the party that has the most votes first.  That is not to say he won&#8217;t go into coalition with the party that comes second.</p>
<p>If the Nats are going to pull back in Tauranga in the hopes of assuring themselves a coalition partner, they are playing a dangerous game.  I cannot see how you could trust Winston to follow what the constituents say &#8211; he is after all &#8220;Bauble Man&#8221;, and he really does appear to dislike the Nats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dressed To The Left</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444860</link>
		<dc:creator>Dressed To The Left</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 18:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444860</guid>
		<description>Karma is bullshit... All it does is reflect whether or not someone liked your comment, rather than the quality of the debate. I&#039;m not sure if there would be a system of doing it, but people who give out negative points ought to have to also make a post giving a reason, explaining why the comment was a failure. I cannot see how my comment above was anything but accurate, and no responses have been made to rebut it - just a lot of ignorant people willing to press the minus button &#039;cos they don&#039;t like to admit that the Winebox Inquiry was one of the biggest political issues in the 90s with Winston at the forefront.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Karma is bullshit&#8230; All it does is reflect whether or not someone liked your comment, rather than the quality of the debate. I&#8217;m not sure if there would be a system of doing it, but people who give out negative points ought to have to also make a post giving a reason, explaining why the comment was a failure. I cannot see how my comment above was anything but accurate, and no responses have been made to rebut it &#8211; just a lot of ignorant people willing to press the minus button &#8216;cos they don&#8217;t like to admit that the Winebox Inquiry was one of the biggest political issues in the 90s with Winston at the forefront.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davidp</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444850</link>
		<dc:creator>davidp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 12:23:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444850</guid>
		<description>&gt;People still talk about that speech today.

At first I though these people must have very sad and boring lives not to have anything more interesting to talk about.

But then a speech at a conference has managed to get millions of people to support Barack Obama.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;People still talk about that speech today.</p>
<p>At first I though these people must have very sad and boring lives not to have anything more interesting to talk about.</p>
<p>But then a speech at a conference has managed to get millions of people to support Barack Obama.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444845</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444845</guid>
		<description>&quot;Winston is a light weight and always has been&quot;

Neil, shows how much you know about politics.  Call a man who has been in govt on both sides of the block and about the place longer than most in National, the man who has all but charmed the pants off the US Secretary of State,

oh bugger what do I know, I guess that&#039;s a light weight.  Laughable analysis of one hell of a political career there sunshine.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Winston is a light weight and always has been&#8221;</p>
<p>Neil, shows how much you know about politics.  Call a man who has been in govt on both sides of the block and about the place longer than most in National, the man who has all but charmed the pants off the US Secretary of State,</p>
<p>oh bugger what do I know, I guess that&#8217;s a light weight.  Laughable analysis of one hell of a political career there sunshine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444844</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 11:09:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444844</guid>
		<description>What an arrogant wanker.  What a consummate tosser this man is.  His outgoing shots at the government were about as hollow and bravado as his term in government.

His bullshit and vile suggestions that all he needed to fix the housing problem in NZ is five minutes.  What all that time, why not just 1 minute, you are apparently a superman in disguise of an arrogant tosser.

Why if he thinks he can fix the problem of housing (leaky homes, shortages etc) in NZ in only five minutes is he leaving as he&#039;s about to get his chance.  According to you folk, National are on the verge of government, so there you go sunshine, you are going to get more than 5 minutes, you are going to get 3 years.

So why are you running away if all you needed was five minutes.  Why are you hiding.  Your vile and disgusting comments this evening on National radio portray a man who is overcome with the allure of his own self worth, yet with out the intestinal fortitude to carry through your hollow threats.  You are nothing with those words, and thank god you time in this government has come to an end, piss off you arrogant hollow wanker.  Deserting the people of NZ when all you needed was 5 minutes, hang your bloody head in shame.

Still we have Simon Power to &quot;Stomp Out Crime&quot; there&#039;s one thing to look forward to, a crime free NZ.

New Zealand deserves better than all of this hot air and false promises.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What an arrogant wanker.  What a consummate tosser this man is.  His outgoing shots at the government were about as hollow and bravado as his term in government.</p>
<p>His bullshit and vile suggestions that all he needed to fix the housing problem in NZ is five minutes.  What all that time, why not just 1 minute, you are apparently a superman in disguise of an arrogant tosser.</p>
<p>Why if he thinks he can fix the problem of housing (leaky homes, shortages etc) in NZ in only five minutes is he leaving as he&#8217;s about to get his chance.  According to you folk, National are on the verge of government, so there you go sunshine, you are going to get more than 5 minutes, you are going to get 3 years.</p>
<p>So why are you running away if all you needed was five minutes.  Why are you hiding.  Your vile and disgusting comments this evening on National radio portray a man who is overcome with the allure of his own self worth, yet with out the intestinal fortitude to carry through your hollow threats.  You are nothing with those words, and thank god you time in this government has come to an end, piss off you arrogant hollow wanker.  Deserting the people of NZ when all you needed was 5 minutes, hang your bloody head in shame.</p>
<p>Still we have Simon Power to &#8220;Stomp Out Crime&#8221; there&#8217;s one thing to look forward to, a crime free NZ.</p>
<p>New Zealand deserves better than all of this hot air and false promises.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: berend</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444843</link>
		<dc:creator>berend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 10:51:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444843</guid>
		<description>I have to agree with Willie. John Clueless immediately responds with &quot;Roger Douglas&quot; won&#039;t be part of my cabinet, but saying &quot;Winston Peters? No problem.&quot;

Unfortunately for Clarkson he announced before all this that he would stand. But John suddenly Cluefull wants Winston in the Cabinet, just making sure he has the numbers. So Clarkson has to stand down. And Winston will stand in Tauranga. Mark my words: National + NZ First formn the next cabinet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have to agree with Willie. John Clueless immediately responds with &#8220;Roger Douglas&#8221; won&#8217;t be part of my cabinet, but saying &#8220;Winston Peters? No problem.&#8221;</p>
<p>Unfortunately for Clarkson he announced before all this that he would stand. But John suddenly Cluefull wants Winston in the Cabinet, just making sure he has the numbers. So Clarkson has to stand down. And Winston will stand in Tauranga. Mark my words: National + NZ First formn the next cabinet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reid</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444838</link>
		<dc:creator>reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 10:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444838</guid>
		<description>Whatever you might think of Peters his political skills are top drawer. If he can&#039;t see off a 30-year-old first timer then I&#039;ll eat my hat. There&#039;s a difference between wishful thinking and reality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever you might think of Peters his political skills are top drawer. If he can&#8217;t see off a 30-year-old first timer then I&#8217;ll eat my hat. There&#8217;s a difference between wishful thinking and reality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee C</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/05/clarkson_stepping_down.html#comment-444837</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee C</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 10:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=19823#comment-444837</guid>
		<description>I think this indicates that National are looking to put Winnie to the sword.  The &#039;left&#039; had already compiled a hefty dossier on why they thought Clarkson was a loser. But this pisses on their fireworks big time.  If Tauranga is a shoo-in for National post Winnie, it should go to an MP with some valuable shelf-life ahead of them.  I also think that National are going to unveil some interesting new talent this election, in stark comparison to Labour, I might snidely add.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this indicates that National are looking to put Winnie to the sword.  The &#8216;left&#8217; had already compiled a hefty dossier on why they thought Clarkson was a loser. But this pisses on their fireworks big time.  If Tauranga is a shoo-in for National post Winnie, it should go to an MP with some valuable shelf-life ahead of them.  I also think that National are going to unveil some interesting new talent this election, in stark comparison to Labour, I might snidely add.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

