About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

June 9, 2008 6:31am by David Farrar

The headline Helen hates

Bush welcomed to Afghanistan by NZ troops is not what Helen Clark wants people to read, even if it is Laura Bush, not George W.

Share this:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment26

NZ Politics
United States
Afghanistan
Laura Bush

Related Stories

Waiting for the Wailing
Helen and George
Clark compared unfavourably to Bush

Comments (26)

Login to comment or vote

reid

Meanwhile, “the most disliked President in the history of United States-European relations” says goodbye to Europe.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 7:22am
Bryan Spondre

Helen needs to remember who our friends are.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 7:25am
goodgod

Helen’s friends are mainly dead communist dictators.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 8:05am
stephen

Only HELEN hates it…? Good headline writing for a budding journo (nice alliteration) but really…
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 8:28am
Neil

I know it isn’t politically correct top say nice things about George Bush, but I think history might paint a different picture to the left wing bilge filled comments about him.
Clinton’s great achievements during his eight years are now looking increasingly tired. He was impeached for lying. Lying !!!!!!!! President of the USA ! As a role model Bill Clinton was a total disaster.
Laura Bush will go down as one of the better first ladies, not a political spin doctor but someone with humanity and grace. A big difference to Hillary Clinton, someone who never admits she is wrong and believes it was her right to be president.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 8:45am
Murray

Actually Neil, Clinton will remember for his foriegn policy legacy.

9-11
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 8:48am
democracymum

I agree with Neil. Laura Bush is one of the most gracious first ladies to have been in the White house.
She is a supportive wife, a great mother, a teacher and a wonderful role model.

I think you can tell a lot about a man from his wife, and in particular the way he treats his wife.

Read some dirty linen on McCain on this topic in the Daily Mail this morning, – makes for pretty sickening reading.

I never liked Hilary because she stood by Bill and all his philandering, only because it was politically expedient to do so.

And now, she is using the “gender” issue as the reason she lost the nomination.

Ironically had she left Bill back then, she may have had a better shot at the nomination.

I don’t like Barack’s wife either, I find her incredibly negative and again – that whole “racism” thing doesn’t wash when you are both professionals living in a million dollar mansion. Yes America has been very bad for black Americans.

Another irony is I don’t think Obama can win the Presidency without Clinton, and wouldn’t that be a cosy menage a trois?
Hilary, Bill and Obama
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 9:01am
NeilM

“A big difference to Hillary Clinton, someone who never admits she is wrong and believes it was her right to be president.”

Well that was the MSM spin. Nothng to do with reality though. But yeah, how stupid of a candidate to believe they will win. I expect Helen Clark and John Key to making statements about how they might not win anytime now.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 9:02am
jafapete

Certainly Helen must be uncomfortable about people in many Muslim countries reading this, and I would imagine that for the same reason our security services didn’t enjoy the headlines either, but do you also include Kiwis in your statement? What’s your reasoning? And your evidence?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 9:13am
NeilM

“not what Helen Clark wants people to read”

I don’t think she lies awake at night worrying about what Keith Locke reads.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 9:20am
Chris S

Neil – You’re memory is a bit shaky there… Impeachment proceedings were brought against him for which he was acquitted. He even finished his term. Why do you not remember this?

You somehow think Bush hasn’t lied to you? Or is somehow lying about a war or the erosion of freedoms and liberty a lot better than lying about cheating on his hag of a wife?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 9:23am
Murray

Actually given lockes inasne habit of telling everyone everything he gets his grubby little socialist paws on I think she might Neil.

This is the turd who accused the NZSAS of prisoner torture.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 9:26am
PhilBest

I’d like to see Helen put on the spot over this……….I think Mr Farrar is right, she DOESN’T like it, but I’d like to hear her SAY EITHER that she DOESN’T like it, OR that she just loves our role in Afghanistan………..either way, would result in a delicious uproar, just a different uproar from different people…….poor Helen…….
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 9:33am
Bok

Wow Chris,
Now that is what I call a great argument, devoid of any misogynistic, ideologically driven ad hominem attacks on a family member of some-one you happen to have an opinion on. I wish the uncaring bastards on the right would show such adult, mature and intelligent debating skills. The fact is that he was impeached, the truth has since been revealed (and acknowledged by Hillary his wife – who “forgave him”) but in a trend that is only to well-known here.. it was not in the “public interest” to find him guilty. (It was also stupid to impeach him in the first place, as he was and has been since , judged by his lack of integrity to admit his infidelity.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 9:34am
Paul

“Helen’s friends are mainly dead communist dictators” – Wanker, think you’re funny sunshine???

Murray, Clinton was not responsible for 9-11, don’t try and rewrite history. Clinton has blood on his hands for Kosovo, but 9-11 is Bush Bush Bush (is that three in the…)

How about another headline for ya David. This from a very conservative and rural paper which is possibly at the heart of the National voter, “National’s vacuum” Ocuh! Otago Daily Times editorial today Ouch! Final sentence of the Editorial

“But this patronising recipe reads as if it was written by an organisation determined to avoid confrontation or contention at all costs, and is a dishonest basis for seeking high office”

Go and have a read girls and boys and see how the conservative rural people are starting to feel about the hide and seek approach to condescending MPs.

http://www.odt.co.nz/opinion/editorial/8883/national039s-vacuum

Ouch!

Ouch!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 9:39am
Redbaiter

“Certainly Helen must be uncomfortable about people in many Muslim countries reading this, and I would imagine that for the same reason our security services didn’t enjoy the headlines either”

Typically spineless leftwing comment. You might see these people as allies in your mission to destroy traditional western culture, but you will eventually discover them to be in the end, more interested in making their own culture dominant. When they eventually succeed in this ambition, you’ll finally get the medicine you deserve.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 9:39am
Paul

“mission to destroy traditional western culture”

does it require a lobotomy or just a ton of arrogance to think like this, I’m going with the frontal lobotomy.

“making their own culture dominant”

He he, this was true for the Germans, Japs, Chinese and now the Muslims, yawn!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 10:06am
Murray

Fuck off Paul.

That mission was a three year operation. They infiltrated, trained, planned and prepared for it on Clintons time you knob. At least make an effort to timeline your bullshit. The Clintons all came out and trined to claim they knew about and told Bush it was going to happen but clamed up when someone asked them why they didn’t do anything.

This is the same tool who gave us Mogadishu. Little incident with ablackhawke you may have heard of.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 10:29am
Redbaiter

“Helen’s friends are mainly dead communist dictators.”

The Chinese ones are still alive, and more friends than ever.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 10:36am
paradigm

NielM wrote:
“I don’t think she lies awake at night worrying about what Keith Locke reads.”
I was under the impression the only paper Keith Locke reads is “The Militant” (the communist newspaper that they try to -ironically- sell outside the Auckland University student union buildings).

Paul wrote:
“He he, this was true for the Germans, Japs, Chinese and now the Muslims, yawn!”
There is an obvious difference here: the first 3 are countries, the last is an ideology; this makes it inherently more subversive and uncontainable by a country’s borders; however thank you for agreeing that the threat of Fundamentalist Islam is as significant as Imperialist Japan or Nazi Germany.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 10:46am
tom hunter

Clinton has blood on his hands for Kosovo,

Nice to see Sunshine(TM) (I am not a communist! ) unload his usual single neuron spark of the morning with that piece of far, far, far left criticism of Clinton.

As opposed to all those fabulous European leaders who watched the Balkan massacres power up for several years and still did fucking nothing to stop it. No blood on their hands I’m sure – well apart from the Major government who were of course evil, callous right-wingers.

“making their own culture dominant”

He he, this was true for the Germans, Japs, Chinese and now the Muslims, yawn!

This may come as a surprise to you Sunshine(TM) – I’m sure many things do – but the Germans and Japanese both spat on ‘Western culture’ once upon a time and proclaimed their own polities to be superior and wanted to impose those on the West. Things did not work out that way of course and now they’re unique parts of Western Democratic Capitalism.

We’re steadily working away on the Chinese too – the first big step being to get rid of all that collectivist claptrap that kept everyone poor and murderous for such a long time – non-politicised institutions are next with real democratic elections down the line. Same with the Middle East.

Of course we don’t expect any help from the likes of you, but that’s okay. You serve as a constant reminder of how awful the alternative is. You also demonstrate how useless resistance is – via your move from teaching your students to think your way to running a $100,000 / year design business.

Welcome to capitalism Sunshine(TM). Wonderful is’nt it. Of course you do have to share this with Reid – he has a unique take on the global situation that you may not be entirely comfortable with, even if your conclusions are the same. But who knows – those whose dreams have turned to ashes can get bitter and cling to the strangest things.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 10:57am
PhilBest

That’s right, Murray, that point needs a lot more penetration through the myth and bullshit (created by the anti-Bush MSM) over Sept 11 2001.

The vast bulk of the Al Quaeda preparation occurred on Clinton’s watch. And how many people are aware that Sandy Berger, the former National Security advisor under Clinton, visited the US National Security Archives and heisted a whole swag of sensitive documents out of the place before all the 9/11 investigators could get their mitts on them , and no-one but Sandy Berger and friends KNOWS what was contained in those documents? Where is the uproar from the MSM over THAT?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 10:58am
Redbaiter

“Sunshine (TM)”

Thanks for the laff…
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 11:01am
francis

Chris, Clinton was impeached. The senate found him, narrowly, not guilty, in a party line vote. You might see this as a distinction without a difference, but it is not. As Wiki notes: “Upon the passage of H. Res. 611, Clinton was impeached on December 19, 1998, by the House of Representatives on grounds of perjury to a grand jury (by a 228-206 vote) and obstruction of justice (by a 221-212 vote). … Upon passage of H. Res. 611, Clinton became the first elected U.S. president and the second U.S. president to be impeached, following Andrew Johnson in 1868.”
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 11:30am
RRM

Although to be fair, in order to assert with authority that Helen hates the said headline, one should either
(a) Quote her expressing her hatred, or
(b) Supply evidence of mind-reading credentials 🙂
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 11:54am
LabourDoesntWork

When they eventually succeed in this ambition, you’ll finally get the medicine you deserve.

The left is slouching toward dhimmitude. Unfortunately they’re too busy hating their own cultural heritage to be aware of it.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 9, 2008 12:43pm

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Login to comment or vote

« Sir Roger’s return

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Highlights

The Kiwis are fleeing
Inflation by term
Houston we have a problem
Our immunisation disaster

Top Stories

General Debate 24 April 2024
Two Ministers lose portfolios
Should media practice what they preach?
Meet a (Won’t be a striker at all) – former Third Striker # 1
Literature and Males
High Court quashes Waitangi Tribunal summons
An awful idea
Call for Support: Has the Time Come for a Wellington Ratepayer Activist Group?
Is the Commerce Commission for consumers or suppliers
General Debate 23 April 2024

Recent Posts

Remembering the war dead 25 April 2024
High Court quashes Waitangi Tribunal summons 24 April 2024
Literature and Males 24 April 2024
Should media practice what they preach? 24 April 2024
Is the Commerce Commission for consumers or suppliers 24 April 2024
Two Ministers lose portfolios 24 April 2024
An awful idea 24 April 2024
General Debate 24 April 2024 24 April 2024
Meet a (Won’t be a striker at all) – former Third Striker # 1 24 April 2024
Call for Support: Has the Time Come for a Wellington Ratepayer Activist Group? 23 April 2024
A good win for Newsroom 23 April 2024
General Debate 23 April 2024 23 April 2024

Never miss a post

Email Address

Recent Comments

Should media practice what they preach?
jptucker
Literature and Males
Alwyn Poole
Remembering the war dead
mikenmildagain
Remembering the war dead
Tomtoddy
Literature and Males
artemisia
High Court quashes Waitangi Tribunal summons
Souvlaki
Two Ministers lose portfolios
KH
High Court quashes Waitangi Tribunal summons
Rumblestrip
High Court quashes Waitangi Tribunal summons
Notsofast
High Court quashes Waitangi Tribunal summons
Tasman devil
Should media practice what they preach?
Ghost
Literature and Males
slijmbal
High Court quashes Waitangi Tribunal summons
Rumblestrip
Should media practice what they preach?
Graeme Hall
High Court quashes Waitangi Tribunal summons
Grunter

Links

"Comity" versus the rule of law
No Right Turn
Government to axe $6billion cyclone fund for tax breaks as Civil Defence report highlights how vulnerable we are to climate change
The Daily Blog
It’s not forgetting, it’s not learning
Hompaddock
Open mike 25/04/2024
The Standard
5 Best Chess Opening Traps in the French Defense
Utopia
At a time of media turmoil, Melissa had nothing to proclaim as Minister – and now she has been demoted
Point of Order
Whose bloody tree was it?
No Minister
Jacinda’s legacy – Increasing number of abortions
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
REEFTON – THE NEW PARIS
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
#CountdownToAnzacDay: On “the last afterglow of the most radiant cultural atmosphere in human history”
Not PC
United Rugby Championship Predictions for Week 15
Stats Chat
Again, hate crimes are not necessarily terrorism.
Kiwipolitico
Despair - construction consenting edition
Offsetting Behaviour
Coalition Promises
NZCPR
Tougher than that
Croaking Cassandra
ABs stripped of 2011 title after try disallowed
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker
Angie Warren-Clark: Meet the Newbies
Dan Moskovitz

editor@kiwiblog.co.nz

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2024 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d