I’ve tried reading your three long posts, but they just don’t make sense. Your prose is unintelligible. It keeps sending me to sleep but I’ll try again.

zzzzzzzzzzz damn there it goes again…….zzzzzzzzzzzz………

Name one thing Clarkson achieved after being elected

He got rid of Winnie. Setting aside solving world hunger, that achievement is pretty hard to beat.

Unfortunately Labour have no idea that they are the cause of the present social ills. They still insist on blaiming National or the international economy, the heat, the full moon, the number of liquor shops, anything but themself. They still honestly believe that they are making the country better not worse. Labour have had their chance to make the country a better place, they failed, time for the heave-ho before they make it even worse.

This in my opinion negates Winston from acting irresponsibly to crime as you may be suggesting. Crime is crime whether in law or lore. The differences with the punitive codes is how the punishment is administered and by who it should be administered. If as the bulk of writers seemt o think Winston is not to be trusted with power because he likes to manipulate power then he will respond accordingly to a powerful Maori Party. To this end, where I am suggesting that the Maori party are more likely to have the kind of influence you believe will be resulting from a vote for WINSTON I would think your comments would be more accurately directed if levelled at them.

I cannot reasonably back up my comment on Ron Mark in regards to humility, other than for my own perception at recent events so my comment is retractable. For public perception, however the information was centred on his recent life saving action on a citizen stopping them from bleeding to death and his counter argument against armed police as an effect. Having saved a couple of people in circumstantial situations myself I know that the effect in humility was profound. I met with Simon Power today and I stand by my statement. He has made no promises for the information we exchanged, nor should he be so obliged.

And uncapping the final statement: if any believe that Labour after ’9 long years’ are the cause of these present social ills then if you want answers, then they are logically the best to put it right. I say logically because in political honesty they are the only ones with the full knowledge of the damage they have done. If you want it fixed, the tagger in pink should really be the one who cleans it all up.

As for Winston – well there are afew months to go yet…

Respectfully,

Benjamin Easton
(of a) father’s coalition.

Hmmmmmmmmmmmmmm clearly one of the (confused) 29%.

At the very least 3 years without Winston.

He has looked after only himself for the past 12 years at least. Tauranga has seen through him completely and is ready to give a new person a real chance.

Simon Bridges has 16 years party experience. He’s well educated, and well connected in Tauranga. He will do very well.

Peters displays all the politics of envy that the country is looking to be rid of. We have all had enough of the dictatorial style of politics. He is seen so closely aligned to the past with Clark that I firmly believe he will be put in the past where he deserves to be.

but in a reflection within reason this is then otherwise called the tall poppy syndrome.