Damn good David, for an encore I hope Obama picks Hagel as a running
That would wind up the great and the good in both the Democrats and
May even help with that hard working white vote that clings to God and
Phil me old sausage, David is performing a public service.
It’s like when you watch tv.
They don’t show repeats, they offer ‘another chance to see.’
I too posted Jib Jab in Friday Frolics last Friday over at No Minister.
I got it from Peter Creswell at Not PC, so he could well be the first to post it in NZ.
But where did Peter get it from.
Yes, that is hilarious. now, I just can’t resist THIS on the subject of John McCain and “humour”:
“NY Times Rejection Letter to John McCain”
by Mac Johnson (on “Human Events”)
Editor’s note: It was recently revealed that the New York Times, after publishing an editorial from Democratic Presidential Savior/Candidate Barack Obama on the need for immediate surrender in Iraq, rejected a counterpoint editorial from post-maverick Senator John McCain, the Republican nominee for President. This apparent double standard has led many to speculate on the reasons behind the Times rejection of McCain. Happily, Human Events has obtained a copy of the rejection letter, which is reprinted for the record below.
To: Senator John McCain
Evil Republican Standard Bearer
From: Pinch Ahmadinejad Sulzberger
Editor-in-Chief-for-Life, New York Times
New York, NY
Re: Submission (yours)
Dear Senator McCain,
Thank you for your recent unsolicited editorial submission to the New York Times. While we appreciate your desire to have your piece published in America’s newspaper of record, we regret that we cannot use it at this time.
We understand that you have had many thoughts published in the New York Times in the past, and that you have enjoyed fawning coverage by both our editors and reporters for years. However, it has recently come to our attention that you are, in fact, a Republican. We therefore cannot publish any more of your work until after you have lost the upcoming Presidential election. We encourage you to submit bitter critiques of conservative figures after that time.
We hope that you do not take this rejection personally, as you have been very useful to us in the past, and — like all good manipulable politicians — you care deeply about how you are described in our venerable and uppity pages. But you must understand that our past praise of you was conducted only with the hope of damaging other leading Republican figures with whom you disagreed. Now that you are the leading Republican figure, our only hope is to damage you, the Anti-Barack. May you cease to threaten the coming 1000-year peace of the Dalai Obama’s reign. (Hock, Patooie!)
Oo, that reminds me, please (for old Time’s sake) post the following classified employment advertisement in the Senate break room. We suddenly have a position available.
Wanted: Republican or near-Republican Senator to serve as “iconoclastic maverick” in the eyes of the World’s Most Important Newspaper. Must be willing to criticize own leaders, comrades, underlings and especially the Party’s base. Must love pets and illegal aliens. Veteran status a plus. Only non-smokers, please.
Again, thank you for all your many past services, sucker.
P.S. We would, of course, be willing to reconsider your article if you are willing to submit a revised “second draft” of the work. Please change “victory” to “American withdrawal and apology” wherever it appears, and offer to serve (if asked) in the upcoming Obama administration. Also, please try to work in a reference to speculators contributing to Global Warming. Thanks.
See the mainstream media, firmly in the tank for Obama, are pushing the lie that 200,000 turned up to see him speak in Europe. Leaving out (of course) the quite pertinent information that directly before Obama appeared, there was a “free” concert at the very same venue from a couple of Europe’s most popular bands. This is how the left and their media plants manipulate and lie and propagandize and deny you the truth. They are partisan scum, Goebellian deceivers who have betrayed the once honourable profession of journalism.