One called Helen and the other called Margaret……

An equivalent question would be are they able to play online poker for 15 hours a week?

I cant see it.

>> under the current labour mal-administration i see it as totally likely for job seekers to use blogging as “an entry back into the workforce”

The question is how the party started with two cows, reported it only had two cows, and yet was later discovered to have hundreds of them.

Clearly someone has been inseminating the party on the quiet, yet Winston is claiming that it was, in fact, actually a lot of bull.

It’s far too late for me to match the lyricism of some of the above, so instead I shall offer my Winston Haiku:

Yes that’s a barbecue
And that’s a steak
But two cows?
I know nothing

Nice blog, bustedblonde… I do hope we’ll hear more. One can never have too many fish head recipes, I find

You have two cows.
Heifer 1 (H1) gives sour milk
No one wants to milk Heifer 2 (H2)

You don’t have two cows.
The facts are that you have domesticated ungulates, a member of the subfamily Bovinae of the family Bovidae.
You lot are a disgrace. Do some research. Don’t smear my heifers with inference and innuendo under the guise of journalism. Go back and do Journalism 101.

You say I have two cows?
That’s garbage. Next week you’ll get all the answers you need. But in the meantime you go and find out which of the three types of cow that Bob Jones has said he has given me you believe.

You have two cows?
“Bullshit,” says Sir Bob Jones, “absolute bullshit.” Peters, he says, has come looking for thousands of cows before every election. And most parties are no different.

You have two cows.
But you talk so much crap your carbon footprint is bigger than both heifers combined.

You claim I have two cows?
That’s udder garbage you lying wanker.

You have two cows.
Helen can’t see either of them and John avoids all discussion. Rodney’s screaming TB! but no one’s listening.

You have two mad cows.
The voters just realised and will elect the chickens on Nov 18.

I cant see it.

Nomestradamus, I totally agree.

Where I was going was – if, hypothetically, a job seeker was allowed to classify blogging (their own blog) as starting up a business (looking for ad revenue etc), how much grant money would they receive and would it keep the ‘man’ off their back re: actually getting a job.

You see where I’m leading?

Nome has been banned twice before. Do you know how many infringements that is??

With Labour “south polling” at the moment I reckon Nome will come back in such a tizzy that he will burn through another 100 points within a week.

He either doesnt learn or he doesnt care. He doesnt even discuss the topic at hand anymore, he will just find some way to link whatever story it is to National in the 1990′s, to John Key misspeaking, to the war in Iraq, to climate change, to the ECA, to the Waitemata Trust, etc.

He comes on here, lies, and then never backs up his accusations. He is a complete waste of comment space.

Question:

Anyone know if its coincidence that these two are banned at the same time?

Phil U – one week suspension until 19 Aug 2008
Roger Nome – 1 week until 14/3/08 and 2 weeks until 18 June 2008 and one month until 3/9/09.

I’m not sure where you’re going with this, Expat, but how exactly is one glorious week without two of Kiwiblog’s serial threadjackers, Philu and Phillip John/Roger Nome, a bad thing?

Go look at what he wrote and tell me you dont think he deserved what he got.

Then the party firmly locks it’s lips around the teats of the other cow and resumes sucking, [its default position] hoping the dogs will stop that barking racket and life on Animal Farm will be business as usual

Anyone know if its coincidence that these two are banned at the same time?

Phil U – one week suspension until 19 Aug 2008
Roger Nome – 1 week until 14/3/08 and 2 weeks until 18 June 2008 and one month until 3/9/09.

In the interest of fairness…

Under Labour:
You have two cows.
The government nationalises one of your cows for a billion dollars and assigns 17,000 bureaucrats to manage milk production.
Your other cow has to register as a third party under the EFA.

Under National:
You have two cows.
The govt re-privatises your cow for $1 to an Australian bank and de-regulates the milking market.
There is a policy on your other cow but you’re not allowed to know what it is yet.

Under the Maori Party:
You have two cows.
A Strategic Governance Group is set up to ensure that your milking processes are in accordance with Te Tiriti.
Tame Iti shoots your other cow.

Under the Greens:
You have two cows.
One of your cows burps. The govt taxes you.
Your other cow has a calf and kicks it. The govt prosecutes you.

“I have what???”
Winston Peters on You have Two cows

You have 3 Cows. You trade one for a tonne of Coal. You trade another for a Car.

Then you have the 3 big “C-words” of unsustainability (Cows, Coal, and Cars) that are stuffing our environment.

Oh, and as for NZFirst, there is a 4th “C-word” – but I don’t think I’m allowed to say that one here.

You have two cows, one is a knackered, CJD-infected barely breathing carcass, fit only for the knackers yard, and incineration, called ‘My Honour’. The other is a prize ‘cash-cow’ with unlimited to teats for you to suck on, which you named ‘Senile Voters’.
You parade the knackered cow is through the town dressed up in a banner which says ‘keeping NZ politics honest’ then euthanise it.

You deny any knowledge of the second cow, even as you are witnessed riding it straight up Parliament’s back passage..