A modified Greens scorecard
Save the Humans has done his own version of the Greens scorecard. Nicely done.
No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)
Tags: Greens, Save the HumansA modified Greens scorecard
34 Responses to “A modified Greens scorecard”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
October 21st, 2008 at 4:18 pm
Whats that ocker flag doing on it? Unless it was on the Anti Human side….
October 21st, 2008 at 4:27 pm
Whats that ocker flag doing on it?
National’s goal is to make us just like Australia, except for the high wages, capital gains tax and 9% employer super-payments.
October 21st, 2008 at 4:54 pm
Oh yes DPF, nicely done … you numb nuts.
October 21st, 2008 at 5:15 pm
What an extraordinary load of bullshit.
October 21st, 2008 at 5:19 pm
And of course, the L/NZF/G will make us just like Zimbabwe
October 21st, 2008 at 5:32 pm
The Labour/New Zealand First/green axis sounds like a bit of a mouthful.
How about the “Axis of Idiocy”?
October 21st, 2008 at 5:51 pm
If NZ were to elect a L/NZF/G Govt, I can only hope that Australia would view such an act of mass mental incompetence charitably, treat like the retarded kid brother we are and take us under their wing.
October 21st, 2008 at 6:20 pm
# Ryan Sproull (833) 1 3 Says:
October 21st, 2008 at 5:15 pm
“What an extraordinary load of bullshit.”
What do you mean by that, Ryan Sproull? You mean the Labour/Green axis policies are an extraordinary load of bullshit? An intellect like yours cannot have any RESPECT for that stuff, surely?
October 21st, 2008 at 6:25 pm
I score ten out of ten to “Save the Humans”, for this telling little effort.
October 21st, 2008 at 6:38 pm
Another superb post from Kiwiblog in full election mode!
“Force everyone to take the bus or train”
= false. No-one is forcing you to do this.
“Tell families how to raise their children, and how many to have”
- why do you even bother discussing Greens’ policy, if all you can do is caricature it like this?
“Bring back all of the treaty stuff all over again”
- Yeah, the Treaty may have been a legal document that the crown, like, SIGNED… but you know, we never, like, MEANT it!
“Make all schools equally crap”
And you wonder why we have “tall poppy syndrome” and comments about “rich pricks” in this country!
“and run down public health”
- no, you’re thinking of the last National government there.
“align with dodgy countries who would never come to our aid”
Maybe that’s why people call it CHARITY???
“allow 2.3% of people (all that will vote ACT) to tell the rest of us what to do”
-oops, my bad with that one!
October 21st, 2008 at 6:41 pm
“National’s goal is to make us just like Australia” – it would save a one way airfare for tens of thousands every year
October 21st, 2008 at 7:43 pm
Is it any wonder we got a brain drain. See ya Fred . Hello mate can you speak English?
October 21st, 2008 at 7:45 pm
Oh, DPF – the Aussie flag reveals the real secret agenda!
You and John Key – closet Australians!
Well, I guess Key can play the role of this guy!
Maybe you can be Russ Hinze as his loyal assistant in your fantasy life.
October 21st, 2008 at 7:52 pm
“fantasy life.”
Frothed by the Utopian dreamer amphibian.Oh the irony.
October 21st, 2008 at 8:08 pm
What have you got against Australians, Toad? Your beloved co-leader was one, some of my favorite relatives & coaches have become Australian. Not a bad place by all accounts.
October 21st, 2008 at 8:14 pm
So Toad do you support your party referring to us as a “species”?
October 21st, 2008 at 8:22 pm
There is no down side to a union with Aussie,
We get a decent currency,
We get a proper education system that is not hampered with PC crap.
We get an honourable Labour party as a govt albeit soon to be routed at the next election.
We get mineral wealth
We get a Police force that has guns as standard issue
We get rid of the treaty
We get John O’Neil instead of Steve Tew
We get a soccer team that can make the World Cup finals
We win more than two Olympic Golds
We immediately increase the standard of our woman, Aussie chicks are way hotter than ours.
We get a Parliament that acts like Adults and not kids
We get an Air Force…with real planes to fly
We get to play our part in the war on terror instead of being gutless wimps sponging off the few brave nations doing something about it.
We get a free trade deal with the Yanks
We get lower fuel prices
We get higher wages
And best of all….
We get a cricket team that actually wins!
October 21st, 2008 at 8:41 pm
Southern Raider: But Homo Sapiens REALLY IS a species!
October 21st, 2008 at 8:43 pm
Yes but I’m the top of the food chain so the Greens need to understand I have rights to eat anything else and referring to us as a “species” is a nice way to undermine that position.
October 21st, 2008 at 8:47 pm
Go for a paddle at St Clair – tell the great white sharks all about how you’re the top of the food chain.
They’ll be sooooo impressed!
(Hint: You’ll find that being the top of the food chain is more about ability than “rights”….)
October 21st, 2008 at 8:53 pm
Being called a “species” is all about the Green Party manipulating the population towards their twisted communist ideas
October 21st, 2008 at 8:57 pm
AND it’s all about the fact that Homo Sapiens REALLY, REALLY IS a species!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Baby steps, SR…
(Or are all biology textbooks also part of the Greens’ socialist conspiracy, including the ones that were published before the inception of the Green Party?
)
October 21st, 2008 at 9:20 pm
You should try being out in an estuary filled with 5 metre, 1 tonne Crocodylus porosus, or if you prefer, salties…
. I’ve never quite felt on top of the foodchain there (and parenthetically, other areas with large carnivores partial to soft, pink snacks). Still, crocodiles have a number of virtures- they treat you with an honesty of intent that most people lack, and of course, I’m allowed to use a .44 magnum on one if it attacks me.
The point however, is that if people are no different to animals in an ethical or legal sense, then building abbatoirs for people is no different to building abbatoirs for animals. Which remains the Nazi’s peculiar contribtion to the field of animal rights.
October 21st, 2008 at 9:38 pm
“Tell families how to raise their children, and how many to have”
- why do you even bother discussing Greens’ policy, if all you can do is caricature it like this?”
Thats not a caricature bud, thats a fair description. Both Sue Bradford and Russell Norman ARE telling us how to raise our children. Why don’t you and your Green Party pond scum be honest about this? So far not ONE of the GP people who have come on to this blog have had the guts to front up to the fact that in terms of discipline and numbers of children your ARE telling people what to do. Your a bunch of gutless liars.
October 21st, 2008 at 9:53 pm
So according to the Greens, how many are we allowed to have?
October 21st, 2008 at 10:05 pm
“So according to the Greens, how many are we allowed to have?”
one kiwi or your own, and 2 refugees (provided you take their relatives as well)
October 21st, 2008 at 10:19 pm
Oops, big bruv.
Best of all, we get a cricket team that actually wins
The Aussies are taking a hammering from the Indians at the moment.
Oh well, the exception proves the rule.
October 21st, 2008 at 10:42 pm
Thanks for posting it DPF, had a lot of fun making it. The environmentalists have picked out the Aussie flag and seem to be suggesting that the idea promoted is that we become Australia. For a party with an Aussie as the leader they are mighty touchy about this point. But the flag only represents a direction, largely an economic direction.
Sadly for NZ at the moment, the first world is something we can aspire to but are not quite part of. The Aussie flag indicates the first step along that road is to catch up (again) with Aussie. We can then set our sights on better things.
Environmentalist policies are certainly not taking us forward in any sense that our children or grandchildren will appreciate.
Reading through the environmentalists’ policies it seems that the only future they see is as a world museum.
October 21st, 2008 at 10:42 pm
If we’re only allowed one child, how will Helen replenish her supply of fresh baby meat?
October 22nd, 2008 at 3:36 am
The bigger picture is that the Greens are willing to trade off economic growth for environmentalism.
They’ve made their call, because they have a faith based approach to food, transport, climate change and the like which means draconian tax, subsidy and regulatory approaches.
Could have added:
- Increase welfare state dependency
- Give the Commissioner for Children power to monitor all children all of their lives to check if parents are not treating them inappropriately
- Support EU Common Agricultural Policy and foreign countries blocking/taxing NZ exports because of “food sovereignty”
October 22nd, 2008 at 4:39 am
Bloody good laff and it helps to settle my ulcers when I can have a good belly-laff!
Next one should be the Maori Party’s scorecard on choosing between Labour/National…could have a lot of fun with this one too.
October 22nd, 2008 at 5:13 am
The Greens want to drag humanity back into the dark ages.
Thankfully they’re not that popular in New Zealand. Unfortunately New Zealand has MMP.
October 22nd, 2008 at 12:05 pm
Southern Raider;
I forget who made the following comment, it might have been P.j. O’Rourke:
Humans are the ONLY one of the species whose value judgements concerning OTHER species goes beyond “Is it food? Yes/no”.
October 22nd, 2008 at 12:06 pm
Good one, OECD!
I guess you’ll be pretty pissed off when ACT form a coalition with National and implement their policies, right?