<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Espiner says no chance of Maori-National coalition</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:56:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gloria</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500535</link>
		<dc:creator>Gloria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 22:33:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500535</guid>
		<description>Maori household incomes are improving, Maori coffers are worth billions, yet people are still trotting out the same comments that they were ten years ago about Maori.  Pita Sharples should realise that Maori fortunes are also reliant on having a good economy and although he says what is good for Maori is good for New Zealand, I don&#039;t think continually increasing taxes to pay for underpriviledged Maori is good for either Maori or New Zealand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maori household incomes are improving, Maori coffers are worth billions, yet people are still trotting out the same comments that they were ten years ago about Maori.  Pita Sharples should realise that Maori fortunes are also reliant on having a good economy and although he says what is good for Maori is good for New Zealand, I don&#8217;t think continually increasing taxes to pay for underpriviledged Maori is good for either Maori or New Zealand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wikiriwhis business</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500524</link>
		<dc:creator>wikiriwhis business</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 21:48:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500524</guid>
		<description>This is one thread I definitely have to comment on

First of all, Maori don&#039;t know only one party.   Winston proved they can be side tracked.

But,,  

Maori always put themselves first,  if that means the country goes down the tubes, so be it.  Even the educated ones have no glimmer of what Liarbour is doing to this country.  Maori cultutre is about networking anyway, so socialism is natural to them.  The right of the individual is always superceded by the direction of the mob.  

The only situation in which Maori would go against Labour en masse is if Hullun gave up the country to the Muslims.  

This could become a very real paradigm in the future.  More Kiwi&#039;s are leaving, as they have over the decades because of both parties.  More immigrants are entering, esp Muslim Somali&#039;s.  Which is interesting, because if their God was great, their country would be great.  But they have to flee from it for sanctuary in Christian countries.  

I also notice on Maori tv, Turiana and Pita alwys appear with Labour MP&quot;s.  

But at the end of the day, the Maori party wil do whats best for them. I find it very naieve of the commentator to say he will print this thread and eat it if Maori go with National.  They will go with the winner.

At this stage, that&#039;s looking like National.  Though they won&#039;t be able to govern alone.  

But,,

the commentator is free to add salt and sauce to the thread  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one thread I definitely have to comment on</p>
<p>First of all, Maori don&#8217;t know only one party.   Winston proved they can be side tracked.</p>
<p>But,,  </p>
<p>Maori always put themselves first,  if that means the country goes down the tubes, so be it.  Even the educated ones have no glimmer of what Liarbour is doing to this country.  Maori cultutre is about networking anyway, so socialism is natural to them.  The right of the individual is always superceded by the direction of the mob.  </p>
<p>The only situation in which Maori would go against Labour en masse is if Hullun gave up the country to the Muslims.  </p>
<p>This could become a very real paradigm in the future.  More Kiwi&#8217;s are leaving, as they have over the decades because of both parties.  More immigrants are entering, esp Muslim Somali&#8217;s.  Which is interesting, because if their God was great, their country would be great.  But they have to flee from it for sanctuary in Christian countries.  </p>
<p>I also notice on Maori tv, Turiana and Pita alwys appear with Labour MP&#8221;s.  </p>
<p>But at the end of the day, the Maori party wil do whats best for them. I find it very naieve of the commentator to say he will print this thread and eat it if Maori go with National.  They will go with the winner.</p>
<p>At this stage, that&#8217;s looking like National.  Though they won&#8217;t be able to govern alone.  </p>
<p>But,,</p>
<p>the commentator is free to add salt and sauce to the thread  <img src='http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OECD rank 22 kiwi</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500366</link>
		<dc:creator>OECD rank 22 kiwi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 14:36:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500366</guid>
		<description>Looks like National will be scrapping the Maori seat a little earlier than 2014.  Probable guess is that they&#039;ll be gone by lunch time.

That outcome would be good for New Zealand.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks like National will be scrapping the Maori seat a little earlier than 2014.  Probable guess is that they&#8217;ll be gone by lunch time.</p>
<p>That outcome would be good for New Zealand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: democracymum</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500231</link>
		<dc:creator>democracymum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 03:10:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500231</guid>
		<description>Rex

I sense genuine concern amongst New Zealanders many of whom are now just waking up to what MMP really means for our democracy

I just listened to Willie Jackson say it is because Maori will finally have some control and become Kingmakers
and white NZers aren&#039;t happy about having to have Maori taught in schools, Maori history etc.

I don&#039;t think NZers are happy with any tail wagging any dog.
After yesterday&#039;s media beat up, many are left wondering why we even have a Maori Party

From Stuff today
&quot; A Marlborough vineyard contractor says three-quarters of his Pacific Island workers had to be shown how to flush a toilet and clean a shower, demonstrating there was some truth in National MP Lockwood Smith&#039;s controversial comments about foreign vineyard workers.

Grapeworx managing director Mack Pouwhare&#039;s comments come after Dr Smith, National&#039;s immigration spokesman, told The Marlborough Express that some Asians were more productive vineyard workers because their hands were smaller, and that Pacific workers brought into New Zealand under the Recognised Seasonal Employer Scheme needed to be taught to use toilets and showers.&quot;

I don&#039;t think many anticipated that MMP would result in our election being purchased by the highest bidder against the will of the majority of the people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rex</p>
<p>I sense genuine concern amongst New Zealanders many of whom are now just waking up to what MMP really means for our democracy</p>
<p>I just listened to Willie Jackson say it is because Maori will finally have some control and become Kingmakers<br />
and white NZers aren&#8217;t happy about having to have Maori taught in schools, Maori history etc.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think NZers are happy with any tail wagging any dog.<br />
After yesterday&#8217;s media beat up, many are left wondering why we even have a Maori Party</p>
<p>From Stuff today<br />
&#8221; A Marlborough vineyard contractor says three-quarters of his Pacific Island workers had to be shown how to flush a toilet and clean a shower, demonstrating there was some truth in National MP Lockwood Smith&#8217;s controversial comments about foreign vineyard workers.</p>
<p>Grapeworx managing director Mack Pouwhare&#8217;s comments come after Dr Smith, National&#8217;s immigration spokesman, told The Marlborough Express that some Asians were more productive vineyard workers because their hands were smaller, and that Pacific workers brought into New Zealand under the Recognised Seasonal Employer Scheme needed to be taught to use toilets and showers.&#8221;</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think many anticipated that MMP would result in our election being purchased by the highest bidder against the will of the majority of the people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rex Widerstrom</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500224</link>
		<dc:creator>Rex Widerstrom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 02:44:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500224</guid>
		<description>democracymum suggests:

&lt;blockquote&gt;The Maori Party must reflect the will of the democracy and ironically put aside their race based affiliations&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Sadly, the diametric opposite is true. MMP functions by &lt;i&gt;encouraging&lt;/i&gt; the flourishing of parties whose concern isn&#039;t for all NZers or even for the majority. Instead they represent subsets of people (those of a particular race, those with a curious affinity for snails, those who believe they need to sharpen the ends of their walking sticks to defend us against the Yellow Peril etc) who, while they have every right to &lt;i&gt;a&lt;/i&gt; voice in politics do not, by virtue of their numbers, have a right to a &lt;i&gt;deciding&lt;/i&gt; voice - but this is what they get.

Most people don&#039;t vote strategically and even those who want to cannot because they would have to to know for certain the intention of the majority of other voters.

So every three years we have a lottery to see which minority interest comes up trumps and wins an influence vastly exceeding its level of support.

To me that doesn&#039;t even &lt;i&gt;approach&lt;/i&gt; democracy, whether that party is Maori, Green, NZF or Act. And let&#039;s not forget that the bulk, if not all, of those party&#039;s MPs will not have been able to garner the support of a majority of any electorate but will instead owe their positions to manoevuring and favour-seeking within their own parties in order to win a high list ranking - as will a fair proportion of National and Labour MPs.

And this is an improvement on FPP?! It&#039;s time we admitted we were conned into swapping one undemocratic system for another, and demanded the chance to explore and then choose an alternative.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>democracymum suggests:</p>
<blockquote><p>The Maori Party must reflect the will of the democracy and ironically put aside their race based affiliations</p></blockquote>
<p>Sadly, the diametric opposite is true. MMP functions by <i>encouraging</i> the flourishing of parties whose concern isn&#8217;t for all NZers or even for the majority. Instead they represent subsets of people (those of a particular race, those with a curious affinity for snails, those who believe they need to sharpen the ends of their walking sticks to defend us against the Yellow Peril etc) who, while they have every right to <i>a</i> voice in politics do not, by virtue of their numbers, have a right to a <i>deciding</i> voice &#8211; but this is what they get.</p>
<p>Most people don&#8217;t vote strategically and even those who want to cannot because they would have to to know for certain the intention of the majority of other voters.</p>
<p>So every three years we have a lottery to see which minority interest comes up trumps and wins an influence vastly exceeding its level of support.</p>
<p>To me that doesn&#8217;t even <i>approach</i> democracy, whether that party is Maori, Green, NZF or Act. And let&#8217;s not forget that the bulk, if not all, of those party&#8217;s MPs will not have been able to garner the support of a majority of any electorate but will instead owe their positions to manoevuring and favour-seeking within their own parties in order to win a high list ranking &#8211; as will a fair proportion of National and Labour MPs.</p>
<p>And this is an improvement on FPP?! It&#8217;s time we admitted we were conned into swapping one undemocratic system for another, and demanded the chance to explore and then choose an alternative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: emmess</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500187</link>
		<dc:creator>emmess</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 01:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500187</guid>
		<description>National need to stop pussy footing around and stop hope that they either won&#039;t need the Maori Party or can buy them off cheaply with some devolved Maori run services.
They need to start warning the country now of the severely disenfranchising effect that the Maori seats are causing.
It&#039;s one thing to do that now and entirely another to do it after the election when the National/ACT have a higher share of the vote but less seats than L/NZF/G/MP/P seven headed monster. 
Unlike say the 2000 election in the US where if that is the case it benefit either side, this undemocratic result has been seen coming from mile aways.
National: Let the people know now this is highly likely to happen and avoid sounding like Al Gore/Michael Moore etc when it&#039;s too late</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National need to stop pussy footing around and stop hope that they either won&#8217;t need the Maori Party or can buy them off cheaply with some devolved Maori run services.<br />
They need to start warning the country now of the severely disenfranchising effect that the Maori seats are causing.<br />
It&#8217;s one thing to do that now and entirely another to do it after the election when the National/ACT have a higher share of the vote but less seats than L/NZF/G/MP/P seven headed monster.<br />
Unlike say the 2000 election in the US where if that is the case it benefit either side, this undemocratic result has been seen coming from mile aways.<br />
National: Let the people know now this is highly likely to happen and avoid sounding like Al Gore/Michael Moore etc when it&#8217;s too late</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freethinker</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500156</link>
		<dc:creator>freethinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:45:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500156</guid>
		<description>On a brighter note - John Keys apparent optimism may be totally justified - Winston First 2% no electorate seat, Greens 4.9% &amp; no electorate seat, Act 1 electorate seat and 10% party vote - 9 seat overhang, Jim 1 seat, Dunne - gone, Maori 7 seats - 4 seat overhang, National 65 seats, Labour - who gives a fuck. Gee I feel better already but tomorrow reality will return</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On a brighter note &#8211; John Keys apparent optimism may be totally justified &#8211; Winston First 2% no electorate seat, Greens 4.9% &amp; no electorate seat, Act 1 electorate seat and 10% party vote &#8211; 9 seat overhang, Jim 1 seat, Dunne &#8211; gone, Maori 7 seats &#8211; 4 seat overhang, National 65 seats, Labour &#8211; who gives a fuck. Gee I feel better already but tomorrow reality will return</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: democracymum</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500134</link>
		<dc:creator>democracymum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500134</guid>
		<description>Our democracy should be based on the concept of &quot;one man (or woman) one vote&quot;
Therefore the election should be decided mathematically and NOT
based around politicians personal preferences.

And another thing - (and this is my real hobby horse)

The election result should be known on the day!!!
Not weeks after the event!

Otherwise election day is like like sex without an orgasm
An interesting use of your time but ultimately unsatisfying!

(I thought I would continue with &quot;the foreplay&quot; metaphor mentioned above)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Our democracy should be based on the concept of &#8220;one man (or woman) one vote&#8221;<br />
Therefore the election should be decided mathematically and NOT<br />
based around politicians personal preferences.</p>
<p>And another thing &#8211; (and this is my real hobby horse)</p>
<p>The election result should be known on the day!!!<br />
Not weeks after the event!</p>
<p>Otherwise election day is like like sex without an orgasm<br />
An interesting use of your time but ultimately unsatisfying!</p>
<p>(I thought I would continue with &#8220;the foreplay&#8221; metaphor mentioned above)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freethinker</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500125</link>
		<dc:creator>freethinker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:14:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500125</guid>
		<description>Only Pita Sharples knows his real intent but if he did allow Clark to form a 4th Labour led govt he may inadvertently be allowing a 2011 landslide of the right who may abolish the Maori seats instantly and remove all subsides to Maori organisations. Pita will know the countries mood is for change and if he effectively prevents this will be held responsible for whatever goes wrong - and it will believe me - the world recession is not getting fixed overnight and the Cullen/Clark axis have shown their inabiity to sucessfully manager a good economic era. The shame is Tariana appears to believe in democracy in practice by consulting her voters who seem to favour Labour and may not be able to be persuaded otherwise which may result in the demise of the Maori party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Only Pita Sharples knows his real intent but if he did allow Clark to form a 4th Labour led govt he may inadvertently be allowing a 2011 landslide of the right who may abolish the Maori seats instantly and remove all subsides to Maori organisations. Pita will know the countries mood is for change and if he effectively prevents this will be held responsible for whatever goes wrong &#8211; and it will believe me &#8211; the world recession is not getting fixed overnight and the Cullen/Clark axis have shown their inabiity to sucessfully manager a good economic era. The shame is Tariana appears to believe in democracy in practice by consulting her voters who seem to favour Labour and may not be able to be persuaded otherwise which may result in the demise of the Maori party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fletch</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500119</link>
		<dc:creator>Fletch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Oct 2008 00:06:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500119</guid>
		<description>This is not democracy....

There should be a law change made so that the party that gets the most votes in an election is the only one that is allowed to form a government. 

Some of the smaller parties may not be as close in ideology to the party that wins, but isn&#039;t that the point? When we voted for MMP that was the idea, that we could vote for the party we liked, they could get into parliament and keep the bigger parties honest; however, it&#039;s turned into this deal-making thing between the bigger and smaller parties.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not democracy&#8230;.</p>
<p>There should be a law change made so that the party that gets the most votes in an election is the only one that is allowed to form a government. </p>
<p>Some of the smaller parties may not be as close in ideology to the party that wins, but isn&#8217;t that the point? When we voted for MMP that was the idea, that we could vote for the party we liked, they could get into parliament and keep the bigger parties honest; however, it&#8217;s turned into this deal-making thing between the bigger and smaller parties.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mavxp</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500031</link>
		<dc:creator>mavxp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500031</guid>
		<description>Sharples is playing hard to get as a form of foreplay. Yes Maori traditionally vote Labour, but the Maori Party know Labour screwed them over the Foreshore and Seabed, and their policies HAVE NOT WORKED in making NZ a more prosperous nation, and Maori are leaving for Oz in significant numbers. 50% of Maori young men leave school without recognised qualifications. Labour have failed. They&#039;ve had 9 FRIGGEN YEARS of the best financial weather, and tons of cash milked from the electorate. WHAT ELSE CAN THEY TRULY OFFER NZ??? 

Sharples will do a deal with National. He just wants people to know its not a foregone conclusion. 

I&#039;m beginning to think the best thing National/ Maori can do is open the way for NZ to join the Australian Commonwealth, before its too late. Our democracy has been distorted by the left. We need something more robust to keep it in line - like a Federal government in Canberra. I never thought I&#039;d say it, but its time we thought about it seriously.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharples is playing hard to get as a form of foreplay. Yes Maori traditionally vote Labour, but the Maori Party know Labour screwed them over the Foreshore and Seabed, and their policies HAVE NOT WORKED in making NZ a more prosperous nation, and Maori are leaving for Oz in significant numbers. 50% of Maori young men leave school without recognised qualifications. Labour have failed. They&#8217;ve had 9 FRIGGEN YEARS of the best financial weather, and tons of cash milked from the electorate. WHAT ELSE CAN THEY TRULY OFFER NZ??? </p>
<p>Sharples will do a deal with National. He just wants people to know its not a foregone conclusion. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m beginning to think the best thing National/ Maori can do is open the way for NZ to join the Australian Commonwealth, before its too late. Our democracy has been distorted by the left. We need something more robust to keep it in line &#8211; like a Federal government in Canberra. I never thought I&#8217;d say it, but its time we thought about it seriously.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ton</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-500009</link>
		<dc:creator>ton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:16:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-500009</guid>
		<description>I am going to be so annoyed if Labour are able to form another government.

I am sick of their &#039;handouts to bludgers&#039;, &#039;castigations of hard workers or those who want to get ahead with their lives&#039;, &#039;high tax&#039;, &#039;we know best&#039;, &#039;lowest common denominator schooling&#039;, &#039;die on waiting list&#039;, bureaucratic bullshit!

FFS New Zealand, vote National for a positive change!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to be so annoyed if Labour are able to form another government.</p>
<p>I am sick of their &#8216;handouts to bludgers&#8217;, &#8216;castigations of hard workers or those who want to get ahead with their lives&#8217;, &#8216;high tax&#8217;, &#8216;we know best&#8217;, &#8216;lowest common denominator schooling&#8217;, &#8216;die on waiting list&#8217;, bureaucratic bullshit!</p>
<p>FFS New Zealand, vote National for a positive change!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: goodgod</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-499993</link>
		<dc:creator>goodgod</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 22:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-499993</guid>
		<description>s.russel -  your theory is philosophically and morally irresponsible because it allows, theoretically, 20 small parties, all promising one extreme concession, to band together and rule.  Think about it.  What you&#039;re saying is that 51% of NZders could decide to commit nationhood suicide, regardless of the remaining 49% of sane people who are interested in the basics of life -  The Jonestown of the Pacific.  What you&#039;re saying is that NZ must have the right to self destruction.  What you&#039;re saying is that life is not worth anything.  Check your head.

As for the maori party, there must be a legislative end to race based parties.  National do not need the likes of racists propping them up.  John Key must state now that he will not deal with racists and rule them out of a coalition.  

It&#039;s make or break time - anything less that a centre right government this time means communism within 20 years for NZ.  This is it people, National need to turn this into a FPP election.

&lt;blockquote&gt;the only way for the center right to achieve this will be if the Nat’s split into two, lets just say that the Nat’s do not form the government and end up with 50-55 MP’s, it would make perfect sense for the party to split down the middle, one side could continue with Key’s more middle of the road policies and the other could push a more traditional National party line.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Key&#039;s middle ground party would always drift to the left.  Eventually you&#039;d have the same problem as yo have now, several leftwing parties, one centre right, one right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>s.russel &#8211;  your theory is philosophically and morally irresponsible because it allows, theoretically, 20 small parties, all promising one extreme concession, to band together and rule.  Think about it.  What you&#8217;re saying is that 51% of NZders could decide to commit nationhood suicide, regardless of the remaining 49% of sane people who are interested in the basics of life &#8211;  The Jonestown of the Pacific.  What you&#8217;re saying is that NZ must have the right to self destruction.  What you&#8217;re saying is that life is not worth anything.  Check your head.</p>
<p>As for the maori party, there must be a legislative end to race based parties.  National do not need the likes of racists propping them up.  John Key must state now that he will not deal with racists and rule them out of a coalition.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s make or break time &#8211; anything less that a centre right government this time means communism within 20 years for NZ.  This is it people, National need to turn this into a FPP election.</p>
<blockquote><p>the only way for the center right to achieve this will be if the Nat’s split into two, lets just say that the Nat’s do not form the government and end up with 50-55 MP’s, it would make perfect sense for the party to split down the middle, one side could continue with Key’s more middle of the road policies and the other could push a more traditional National party line.</p></blockquote>
<p>Key&#8217;s middle ground party would always drift to the left.  Eventually you&#8217;d have the same problem as yo have now, several leftwing parties, one centre right, one right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-499985</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-499985</guid>
		<description>democracymum, you&#039;d want Labour to work with ACT then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>democracymum, you&#8217;d want Labour to work with ACT then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redbaiter</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-499974</link>
		<dc:creator>Redbaiter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:46:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-499974</guid>
		<description>STV</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STV</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philu</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-499972</link>
		<dc:creator>philu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:45:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-499972</guid>
		<description>sheesh..!..dpf..!

..i&#039;ve been trying to tell you there isn&#039;t a snowballs&#039; chance in hell of a national/maori party gummint..

..ever since the (ludicrous)/fanciful idea was first floated way back when..

(..by adolf..wasn&#039;t it..?..)

..and a big &#039;dream on!&#039; to those still trying to talk that little chimera up..

..tho&#039; i can understand nationals&#039; looking around for those/anyone(!) to coalesce with..

..and they are getting rather/somewhat desperate and dateless..

..eh..?

(and..when will you be wheeling out your &#039;finance minister&#039;..?

..wodger douglas..?..)

that should scare away even more punters..eh..?

..then of course..there is key..and his ship of fools..

..the lockwoods/the maurices&#039;/the bills&#039;..

..eh..?

..all in all..

..it&#039;s not looking too crash hot for you lot..

..eh..?

..going the way of mccain..

..as it were..

..eh..?

..phil(whoar.co.nz)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sheesh..!..dpf..!</p>
<p>..i&#8217;ve been trying to tell you there isn&#8217;t a snowballs&#8217; chance in hell of a national/maori party gummint..</p>
<p>..ever since the (ludicrous)/fanciful idea was first floated way back when..</p>
<p>(..by adolf..wasn&#8217;t it..?..)</p>
<p>..and a big &#8216;dream on!&#8217; to those still trying to talk that little chimera up..</p>
<p>..tho&#8217; i can understand nationals&#8217; looking around for those/anyone(!) to coalesce with..</p>
<p>..and they are getting rather/somewhat desperate and dateless..</p>
<p>..eh..?</p>
<p>(and..when will you be wheeling out your &#8216;finance minister&#8217;..?</p>
<p>..wodger douglas..?..)</p>
<p>that should scare away even more punters..eh..?</p>
<p>..then of course..there is key..and his ship of fools..</p>
<p>..the lockwoods/the maurices&#8217;/the bills&#8217;..</p>
<p>..eh..?</p>
<p>..all in all..</p>
<p>..it&#8217;s not looking too crash hot for you lot..</p>
<p>..eh..?</p>
<p>..going the way of mccain..</p>
<p>..as it were..</p>
<p>..eh..?</p>
<p>..phil(whoar.co.nz)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: democracymum</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-499964</link>
		<dc:creator>democracymum</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-499964</guid>
		<description>This is one of the faulty parts of our current MMP system
The largest party should automatically have to work with
the next largest party.  If not Labour then at least the next 
largest.  Which in this case may be the Greens.
The people must be the Kingmakers 
Not the politicians.

The state of the parties at the moment, is a reflection
of what was happening with the vote when we changed to MMP In which case this election was won or lost
depending on your persepective several years ago</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is one of the faulty parts of our current MMP system<br />
The largest party should automatically have to work with<br />
the next largest party.  If not Labour then at least the next<br />
largest.  Which in this case may be the Greens.<br />
The people must be the Kingmakers<br />
Not the politicians.</p>
<p>The state of the parties at the moment, is a reflection<br />
of what was happening with the vote when we changed to MMP In which case this election was won or lost<br />
depending on your persepective several years ago</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: first time caller</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-499956</link>
		<dc:creator>first time caller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:33:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-499956</guid>
		<description>What we have is the right consolidated into two parties, and the left into five parties. What we don&#039;t have is a truly viable centre party to swing both ways. Dunne is not getting the coverage and seems unlikely to pick up a second seat.

None of this is a fault of National that the right has only two parties. It is also not a reflection that the Nats don&#039;t understand MMP.

In fact it would be worse for the centre right if the left were not so disjointed.

What we do need is a few uninformed undecideds taking a fancy to the cowlick that swings both ways!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What we have is the right consolidated into two parties, and the left into five parties. What we don&#8217;t have is a truly viable centre party to swing both ways. Dunne is not getting the coverage and seems unlikely to pick up a second seat.</p>
<p>None of this is a fault of National that the right has only two parties. It is also not a reflection that the Nats don&#8217;t understand MMP.</p>
<p>In fact it would be worse for the centre right if the left were not so disjointed.</p>
<p>What we do need is a few uninformed undecideds taking a fancy to the cowlick that swings both ways!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: s.russell</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-499941</link>
		<dc:creator>s.russell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-499941</guid>
		<description>Several posters have expressed outrage that a party that gets &quot;nearly 50%&quot; of the vote might not get to be in Government. 

I would like to point out some fairly basic maths. If there is another party - or group of parties - that gets more than 50% of the vote (or at least more than the first party) then THEY have the moral right to form the Government. That is called democracy, and I back that 100% no matter how much I might loathe the parties involved. 

IF National and its allies got more votes than all other parties, and were shut out as a result of an overhang + the MP backing Labour, that WOULD be an outrage. (Though, I point out, no more so than 1978 and 1981 when National got less than 40% of the vote, got less than Labour and still had more seats than all other parties together.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several posters have expressed outrage that a party that gets &#8220;nearly 50%&#8221; of the vote might not get to be in Government. </p>
<p>I would like to point out some fairly basic maths. If there is another party &#8211; or group of parties &#8211; that gets more than 50% of the vote (or at least more than the first party) then THEY have the moral right to form the Government. That is called democracy, and I back that 100% no matter how much I might loathe the parties involved. </p>
<p>IF National and its allies got more votes than all other parties, and were shut out as a result of an overhang + the MP backing Labour, that WOULD be an outrage. (Though, I point out, no more so than 1978 and 1981 when National got less than 40% of the vote, got less than Labour and still had more seats than all other parties together.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: freedom101</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2008/10/espiner_says_no_chance_of_maori-national_coalition.html#comment-499940</link>
		<dc:creator>freedom101</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=28132#comment-499940</guid>
		<description>What about a deliberate gerry-mander.  Form the &quot;List only National Party&quot; and then the &quot;Consituency only National Party&quot;.  The List only party doesn&#039;t stand in any seats.  The Constituency only party does not register for the party vote.

Then we would have a parliament of 160 MPs.

Then Labour would do the same, and we would have 220 MPs.

In effect that&#039;s what the Maori party is doing winning 2-3% of the vote and getting 7 MPs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about a deliberate gerry-mander.  Form the &#8220;List only National Party&#8221; and then the &#8220;Consituency only National Party&#8221;.  The List only party doesn&#8217;t stand in any seats.  The Constituency only party does not register for the party vote.</p>
<p>Then we would have a parliament of 160 MPs.</p>
<p>Then Labour would do the same, and we would have 220 MPs.</p>
<p>In effect that&#8217;s what the Maori party is doing winning 2-3% of the vote and getting 7 MPs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

