What a cancerous disgusting piece of work she really is.

Already asked and answered, chillingly!
The very first question – and she fudges the answer. It is completely behoven on every commentator, blogger and person who wants to rid themselves of this repugnant regime to keep hammering this point – Labour is going to cancel their tax-cuts and increase taxes if re-elected. It is their secret agenda.

Nome speaking on behalf of Kullen.

Fuck me – the retarded speaking on behalf of those chronically out of their depth.

Retire and move back to the UK?

First, we go through the testing regime, at a cost of about $12k to the tax payer.

And then, the day the tax increases take effect, we withdraw our names en masse.

Far better pay the staff but not the Gst/Paye – no cash – no govt

“The productive sector needs to fight back.

How about all the “rich pricks” don’t pay their staff for 3 months and see how long Clark and co last……”

Southern Raider, have you ever read “Atlas Shrugged”?……. I think you’d love it……..

National needs to play it safe to pick up the centre vote, but ACT should be let loose.

How about all the “rich pricks” don’t pay their staff for 3 months and see how long Clark and co last.

Labour will attack the banks, but love credit cards and easy loans as it makes their voters feel rich without having to work hard for anything. Would be interesting to know how many students have iPhones or the average size TV for a beneficiary.

Are you saying that they are a bit thick?

roger nome, you are a such a stinking apologist ponce. If you truly believe some of the total shit you write then you have real problems.

Cullen is a fucking buffoon and if his fat, feathered arse is still on the treasury benches come November 9th then we are in deeper shit than we could ever begin to imagine.

They have less overheads as most couples are professionals, reasonable incomes and no dependents.

Clark And Key Playing Politics With The Economy
Rodney Hide MP
Wednesday, October 22 2008

“ACT Leader Rodney Hide today accused both Prime Minister Helen Clark and National Leader John Key of being ‘head-in-the-sand’ over New Zealand’s economic crisis, and of playing politics to get through the election at a time when economic leadership and direction is needed.

“Mr Key is playing ‘me too’ with Labour’s wild spending policies and promises. He must know they’re unaffordable – which makes him irresponsible in the extreme,” Mr Hide said.

“He has today again ruled out Roger Douglas from Cabinet, blithely parroting Helen Clark’s line that Roger Douglas and ACT’s policies are extreme.

“In the weeks and months ahead, John Key’s government will need all the help and experience the country can muster. That’s why people who know how vulnerable New Zealand is to the world economic meltdown should give a Party vote to ACT.

“ACT has made no bottom lines or demands for its support, as we consider New Zealand’s situation too dire to be playing politics.

“We also know that what Clark and Key say now will change dramatically after the election – and they know it too,” Mr Hide said….”

ENDS
Authorised by Nick Kearney, 137 Beach Haven Road, Auckland

“Bigoted people”

You mean like Helen Clark, Sue Bradford and Russell Norman, who claimed that the more than eighty percent of the population opposing the anti-smacking legislation were “right wing fundamentalists”?

Sounds like bigotry to me.

How about the fact that the most viscous anti-Israeli bigots are all members of the Labour/Green axis?

How about the fact that the most viscous anti-American bigots are all members of the Labour/Green axis?

The Left loves bigotry and hatred when it suits them.”

Especially where “Christian Fundamentalism” is concerned. In fact, that is what is mostly at the root of anti-Americanism. If only Americans could be nice trustworthy apostates like the “enlightened” Europeans, we’d love them too, eh.

“This latest conspiracy theory of yours simple fails the credibility test i’m afraid DPF. People who earn over $100,000 make up perhaps 5% of the electorate, and the vast majority of them will be voting for Act and National anyhow. Labour has no reason to not just introduce this wealth tax notice john key has behaved like a prick, but not all wealthy people harass women about not having children (the context which the “rich prick comment was made). They aren’t all pricks.”

AHA. Soooo, Roger Nome, you are privy to 9th floor of the Beehive decisions, eh? You’re arguing that Labour DOESN’T need to release details of their policy because YOU can assure us it only involves increased taxes on people who earn more than 100 Grand?

Kindly tell us your rank in the Labour Government Hierarchy, and kindly put the detail out properly in a Press Release like we are asking and like you insist the Nats do.

You mean like Helen Clark, Sue Bradford and Russell Norman, who claimed that the more than eighty percent of the population opposing the anti-smacking legislation were “right wing fundamentalists”?

Sounds like bigotry to me.

How about the fact that the most viscous anti-Israeli bigots are all members of the Labour/Green axis?

How about the fact that the most viscous anti-American bigots are all members of the Labour/Green axis?

The Left loves bigotry and hatred when it suits them.

nah – don’t think cullen sees being rich as a bad thing (i.e. nz’s top tax rate is significantly lower than Australia’s). John key is wealthy, therefore has a lot of social power, status, power and knowledge, yet he’s still makes a comment which is sexist/bigoted.

Bigoted people are often that way because they come from a position of social insecurity and ignorance. John Key has neither excuse – that’s the point i think cullen was trying to make.