Chris Barton looks at the Government’s fibre plans:
We do know fibre-optic cable is at the centre of Joyce’s rewiring plan and the mechanism to get there is the much-vaunted public-private partnership.
So far so good. But just who does Joyce plan to partner with? And will he be seduced by Telecom’s wiles?
There’s no doubt Telecom would love to bed Joyce. Such a tryst – Telecom building, operating and no doubt, wanting to own, the new wires – would secure the firm’s monopoly dynasty forever.
I think Mr Barton needs to take less Viagra before he writes his column
But it’s also clear such a dalliance would be a terrible mistake. Not to mention a betrayal of voter trust and a very poor return on taxpayers’ money.
And getting the maximum return on the Government’s investment is crucial.
If Joyce is still uncertain about what to do, he should re-read the very fine piece of analysis prepared for Internet New Zealand by Network Strategies. There, in glorious return on investment detail, is a simple answer to who the Government should partner with instead of Telecom – electricity lines companies.
Why? Because if New Zealand wants to rewire its aged telecommunications to a fibre-optic future, the electricity lines companies are the cheapest, most efficient way to do it.
Plenty of power poles and ducting are already going by our homes, already with resource consent, making it much easier to string or trench fibre to our doorsteps. How much cheaper? Without the lines companies, Network Strategies estimates a fibre network will cost $5 billion.
With the lines companies on board, the cost drops to $3 billion – making the Government’s $1.5 billion investment look like a very realistic sum to fulfil its election promise.
A $2 billion difference is far from insignificant. I am of course on the Board of Internet New Zealand, but we were as surprised as anyone I think that the research turned up such a massive price difference.
There are other reasons why this is very good idea. Most of the 27 lines companies in New Zealand are owned by consumer trusts – an ownership structure that tends to be sympathetic to longer payback periods and fits well with local initiatives that recognise the importance of broadband to a region’s economic and social wellbeing. And some, such as Vector and Counties Power, are already providing fibre to homes or businesses.
And even more importantly, lines companies do not tend to be in the business of providing services over their lines – they are an access provide rather than a service provider. This is actually crucial as you then avoid a vertically integrated monopoly, and then multiple service providers can comptere and offer different packages over the fibre.
But there are two problems. The first is what such a network would do to Telecom’s share price. There’s no doubt it would have an unsettling effect. But if the new wires are “open access”, it’s hard to see how Telecom can complain too much.
Open access means companies get equal access to the infrastructure on non-discriminatory terms and conditions, so all comers are offered the same wholesale products or services at the same price and equivalent conditions. In other words, consumers get choice and Telecom competes for business with everyone else, probably getting a whole lot more efficient in the process.
The impact on Telecom is a real issue – not just in terms of share price, but also their fibre to the cabinet plans. Would they continue? Would they sell Chorus if the line companies get the nod to build the fibre to the home network? Could there be a win-win – maybe some partnership with lines companies and Telecom/Chorus? So many issues, which is why a decision should not be rushed.Tags: broadband, Chris Barton, electricity lines companies, fibre, InternetNZ, Telecom