<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The 2009 Budget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 13:00:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chthoniid</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567359</link>
		<dc:creator>Chthoniid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:13:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567359</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Getting off your bums are developing a strategy to value add to our exports and training our kids in science and engineering, we need to brand ourselves so we can attract high spending tourists to spend more time here.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Kids don&#039;t do science for the simple reason that it is a dumb career move for most.

I spent 10 years at university going from BSc to PhD (the PhD took a wee bit longer because I worked some of the time to stop debt getting out of hand).  At a financial level, that was really dumb.  If I&#039;d left school, got a job in the bank or the like, settled on an &#039;average salary&#039; and got into a real estate rather than a PhD I&#039;d be far better off.  

I&#039;ve got a good salary now but by world standards, scientists in NZ don&#039;t get paid a lot.  

The real hurt comes from the tax &amp; welfare system.  Give up ten years of income and you will- despite a much higher salary- not be better off. The reality is that Cullen&#039;s tax and WFF programmes mean I could take a pay-cut of about 50% and my household income would barely change.  You can&#039;t justify getting a science qualification in NZ when for most scientists, this will reduce their permanent-income.  5+ years of study at no income to be no better off- and probably worse off- than the leeches driving the property markets- has throttled the participation of young kiwis interest in science-education.

If you want to make science more attractive, then you can&#039;t use the tax-and-welfare to punish those people who are trying to be innovative and productive, open new markets etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Getting off your bums are developing a strategy to value add to our exports and training our kids in science and engineering, we need to brand ourselves so we can attract high spending tourists to spend more time here.</p></blockquote>
<p>Kids don&#8217;t do science for the simple reason that it is a dumb career move for most.</p>
<p>I spent 10 years at university going from BSc to PhD (the PhD took a wee bit longer because I worked some of the time to stop debt getting out of hand).  At a financial level, that was really dumb.  If I&#8217;d left school, got a job in the bank or the like, settled on an &#8216;average salary&#8217; and got into a real estate rather than a PhD I&#8217;d be far better off.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;ve got a good salary now but by world standards, scientists in NZ don&#8217;t get paid a lot.  </p>
<p>The real hurt comes from the tax &amp; welfare system.  Give up ten years of income and you will- despite a much higher salary- not be better off. The reality is that Cullen&#8217;s tax and WFF programmes mean I could take a pay-cut of about 50% and my household income would barely change.  You can&#8217;t justify getting a science qualification in NZ when for most scientists, this will reduce their permanent-income.  5+ years of study at no income to be no better off- and probably worse off- than the leeches driving the property markets- has throttled the participation of young kiwis interest in science-education.</p>
<p>If you want to make science more attractive, then you can&#8217;t use the tax-and-welfare to punish those people who are trying to be innovative and productive, open new markets etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567355</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567355</guid>
		<description>What a wierd and silly idea....that the State should produce a budget for its citizens.......with their own money...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What a wierd and silly idea&#8230;.that the State should produce a budget for its citizens&#8230;&#8230;.with their own money&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LC</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567306</link>
		<dc:creator>LC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 20:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567306</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s a book called &#039;The confident hope of a miracle&#039; about the Spanish Armarda.  I think the title applies to this budget.  An unexpected storm destroyed the Spanish Armada.  Bill/John, you had a chance to prepare us for the unexpected storm, a chance to move NZ to a position to weather the  future storm.  Instead we&#039;ll insulate our houses (which sort of reflects the inwards &#039;don&#039;t look outside&#039; thinking that this budget reflects)  Maybe next year something with purpose?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a book called &#8216;The confident hope of a miracle&#8217; about the Spanish Armarda.  I think the title applies to this budget.  An unexpected storm destroyed the Spanish Armada.  Bill/John, you had a chance to prepare us for the unexpected storm, a chance to move NZ to a position to weather the  future storm.  Instead we&#8217;ll insulate our houses (which sort of reflects the inwards &#8216;don&#8217;t look outside&#8217; thinking that this budget reflects)  Maybe next year something with purpose?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KiwiGreg</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567295</link>
		<dc:creator>KiwiGreg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 19:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567295</guid>
		<description>The only good thing I can say about the budget is that Cullen would probably have put taxes up (arguably English did but I&#039;m in a generous mood...).  Poor quality spending, lack of vision, state crowding out private sector.

New Zealand will still fail to pay its way in the world (imports&gt;exports, I&#039;m including services dont quote the last 3 months physical trade stats at me); we will still become (relatively, if not absolutely) poorer.  As the rest of the world, particularly Australia, recovers from recession these differences will become even more pronounced.

I get the real politik of managing a country for a re-election, but New Zealand actually needs leadership.  Of course New Zealand in the main doesnt WANT leadership so I guess we get what we deserve.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only good thing I can say about the budget is that Cullen would probably have put taxes up (arguably English did but I&#8217;m in a generous mood&#8230;).  Poor quality spending, lack of vision, state crowding out private sector.</p>
<p>New Zealand will still fail to pay its way in the world (imports&gt;exports, I&#8217;m including services dont quote the last 3 months physical trade stats at me); we will still become (relatively, if not absolutely) poorer.  As the rest of the world, particularly Australia, recovers from recession these differences will become even more pronounced.</p>
<p>I get the real politik of managing a country for a re-election, but New Zealand actually needs leadership.  Of course New Zealand in the main doesnt WANT leadership so I guess we get what we deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viking2</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567288</link>
		<dc:creator>Viking2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 18:52:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567288</guid>
		<description>Fran O&#039;sullivan gets it right. English is devoid of ideas so he has set up a group of advisers to tell him what needs to be done. This mornings post.  http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501241&amp;objectid=10575140

He was always going to be like that. He is an abject failure, was always going to be. Conservative, Catholic, Treasury trained and a trough snuffler of old. No training in innovation, no idea of why and how people are energized. 
Has shafted Keys ambitions and the rest of NZER&#039;s as well.

Prediction;
Within 2 years the Australian economy will be running full steam ahead. Consequences for NZ. Lots more of us are going to leave for better climate, much better wages and much less tax.  If you doubt me then get to reading the Aussie papers everyday instead of filing nonsense posts and do some thinking about what you read.
Same old same old.
No game breaking from the Nats as per usual.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fran O&#8217;sullivan gets it right. English is devoid of ideas so he has set up a group of advisers to tell him what needs to be done. This mornings post.  <a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501241&#038;objectid=10575140" rel="nofollow">http://www.nzherald.co.nz/business/news/article.cfm?c_id=1501241&#038;objectid=10575140</a></p>
<p>He was always going to be like that. He is an abject failure, was always going to be. Conservative, Catholic, Treasury trained and a trough snuffler of old. No training in innovation, no idea of why and how people are energized.<br />
Has shafted Keys ambitions and the rest of NZER&#8217;s as well.</p>
<p>Prediction;<br />
Within 2 years the Australian economy will be running full steam ahead. Consequences for NZ. Lots more of us are going to leave for better climate, much better wages and much less tax.  If you doubt me then get to reading the Aussie papers everyday instead of filing nonsense posts and do some thinking about what you read.<br />
Same old same old.<br />
No game breaking from the Nats as per usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvb</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567287</link>
		<dc:creator>tvb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:19:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567287</guid>
		<description>Do not forget that budget arises out of a Labour Government leaving the cupboard bare.  Labour Governments eventually run out of money leaving a big hole with a new set of people doing nothing and with their hands out for taxpayers&#039; money.  Everytime.  The public overall understand that but taking the axe to people such as students getting free money would have been nice but the poltiical ground for that wasn&#039;t there. The final solution is to find a constitutional way to destroy the Labour Party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do not forget that budget arises out of a Labour Government leaving the cupboard bare.  Labour Governments eventually run out of money leaving a big hole with a new set of people doing nothing and with their hands out for taxpayers&#8217; money.  Everytime.  The public overall understand that but taking the axe to people such as students getting free money would have been nice but the poltiical ground for that wasn&#8217;t there. The final solution is to find a constitutional way to destroy the Labour Party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Banana Llama</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567278</link>
		<dc:creator>Banana Llama</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567278</guid>
		<description>Science? Engineering? what are these things you speak of, everyone knows we make money by borrowing and spending, that the true driving force behind the economy are shopping malls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Science? Engineering? what are these things you speak of, everyone knows we make money by borrowing and spending, that the true driving force behind the economy are shopping malls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burt</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567277</link>
		<dc:creator>burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:10:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567277</guid>
		<description>Anyone who tells us Cullen left us in a better position than most...

OK, lets put this to the test. Labour said they would put us back in the top half of the OECD and we went backward. Once we generally agree that the global economic crisis is past the bottom lets see if after all OECD countries have been ranked (after hitting the ‘bottom’) we are in the top half, better or worse than we were in 2008, better or worse off then before we went backward under Cullen.

That will be the proof of the pudding for Cullen. Do you agree this is a fair test ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone who tells us Cullen left us in a better position than most&#8230;</p>
<p>OK, lets put this to the test. Labour said they would put us back in the top half of the OECD and we went backward. Once we generally agree that the global economic crisis is past the bottom lets see if after all OECD countries have been ranked (after hitting the ‘bottom’) we are in the top half, better or worse than we were in 2008, better or worse off then before we went backward under Cullen.</p>
<p>That will be the proof of the pudding for Cullen. Do you agree this is a fair test ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grumpyoldhori</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567267</link>
		<dc:creator>grumpyoldhori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 11:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567267</guid>
		<description>bchapman   good god, I hope you are joking about kids doing science and engineering.
Just look how well NZ is doing with all those doing media bloody studies.
Sorry let my sarcasm go then, you are right and I hope we copy the education systems of countries such as Finland.
But that is probably asking for too much .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bchapman   good god, I hope you are joking about kids doing science and engineering.<br />
Just look how well NZ is doing with all those doing media bloody studies.<br />
Sorry let my sarcasm go then, you are right and I hope we copy the education systems of countries such as Finland.<br />
But that is probably asking for too much .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: burt</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567252</link>
		<dc:creator>burt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:50:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567252</guid>
		<description>LC

When we extended them to people earning up to $120K a year.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LC</p>
<p>When we extended them to people earning up to $120K a year.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LC</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567246</link>
		<dc:creator>LC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:43:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567246</guid>
		<description>When did benefits become &#039;entitlements&#039;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did benefits become &#8216;entitlements&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bchapman</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567237</link>
		<dc:creator>bchapman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:37:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567237</guid>
		<description>I haven&#039;t seen anyone provide a clear message detailing how we are going to grow GDP and exports. Arguing about the rate of tax cuts is meaningless unless we can develop some high tech industries and value add to our primary exports.
Hoping &#039;the market&#039; or &quot;China buying our milk&quot; will save us is wishful thinking.
Getting off your bums are developing a strategy to value add to our exports and training our kids in science and engineering, we need to brand ourselves so we can attract high spending tourists to spend more time here.
RWC 2011 is coming, lets not waste it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I haven&#8217;t seen anyone provide a clear message detailing how we are going to grow GDP and exports. Arguing about the rate of tax cuts is meaningless unless we can develop some high tech industries and value add to our primary exports.<br />
Hoping &#8216;the market&#8217; or &#8220;China buying our milk&#8221; will save us is wishful thinking.<br />
Getting off your bums are developing a strategy to value add to our exports and training our kids in science and engineering, we need to brand ourselves so we can attract high spending tourists to spend more time here.<br />
RWC 2011 is coming, lets not waste it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OECD rank 22 kiwi</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567232</link>
		<dc:creator>OECD rank 22 kiwi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567232</guid>
		<description>dime says at 9:06 pm 
&lt;blockquote&gt;so they should have broken the other promise?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Damn straight!!  Reducing spending is always preferable.  Why not just push the factory default reset button back to 1999 before Labour started fucking up the economy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dime says at 9:06 pm </p>
<blockquote><p>so they should have broken the other promise?</p></blockquote>
<p>Damn straight!!  Reducing spending is always preferable.  Why not just push the factory default reset button back to 1999 before Labour started fucking up the economy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OECD rank 22 kiwi</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567227</link>
		<dc:creator>OECD rank 22 kiwi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:26:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567227</guid>
		<description>This isn&#039;t a budget a Don Brash lead Government would have made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isn&#8217;t a budget a Don Brash lead Government would have made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paradigm</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567208</link>
		<dc:creator>paradigm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 10:02:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567208</guid>
		<description>National&#039;s options:

1) Cut spending. Labour shouts Key is Roger Douglas Mk II. Electorate (who are addicted to welfare) panics, kick out National. We get another 9 years of labour. Many of the changes National tried to make are reversed. Govt gets bigger.

2) Cut tax cuts. Upset people who have no choice but to vote right wing anyway. Welfare addicted centre vote retained. Key gets wins multiple elections and slowly weans electorate off welfare. We get 9+ years of National. Over that time Govt is put on a diet. 

Which to choose....?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>National&#8217;s options:</p>
<p>1) Cut spending. Labour shouts Key is Roger Douglas Mk II. Electorate (who are addicted to welfare) panics, kick out National. We get another 9 years of labour. Many of the changes National tried to make are reversed. Govt gets bigger.</p>
<p>2) Cut tax cuts. Upset people who have no choice but to vote right wing anyway. Welfare addicted centre vote retained. Key gets wins multiple elections and slowly weans electorate off welfare. We get 9+ years of National. Over that time Govt is put on a diet. </p>
<p>Which to choose&#8230;.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big bruv</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567177</link>
		<dc:creator>big bruv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:10:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567177</guid>
		<description>The public sector, social welfare, no more money into health (they receive enough as it is, fire a few thousand bureaucrats and they could fund all the operations they need on the existing budget) cut the 43 million bribe to the apartheid party, cut the home insulation packace.....the list goes on and on Dime.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The public sector, social welfare, no more money into health (they receive enough as it is, fire a few thousand bureaucrats and they could fund all the operations they need on the existing budget) cut the 43 million bribe to the apartheid party, cut the home insulation packace&#8230;..the list goes on and on Dime.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dime</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567173</link>
		<dc:creator>dime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:06:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567173</guid>
		<description>OECD - so they should have broken the other promise? and cut the public sector? or would you prefer to have our national debt blow out?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OECD &#8211; so they should have broken the other promise? and cut the public sector? or would you prefer to have our national debt blow out?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OECD rank 22 kiwi</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567169</link>
		<dc:creator>OECD rank 22 kiwi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 09:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567169</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Labour’s entire 2008 election campaign was based on how you can’t trust John Key&lt;/blockquote&gt;

On the election promise of tax cuts Labour has been proved right.

Today marks the first broken election promise from Labour-Lite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Labour’s entire 2008 election campaign was based on how you can’t trust John Key</p></blockquote>
<p>On the election promise of tax cuts Labour has been proved right.</p>
<p>Today marks the first broken election promise from Labour-Lite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dime</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567168</link>
		<dc:creator>dime</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567168</guid>
		<description>no bruv - the economic outlook is fucked. 

my point was, we arent in the same situation that we were in 25 years ago. sure, some things are similar... but the world wasnt FUCKED 25 years ago like it is now.


as for social issues - i dont know if you honestly believe what you say. but id rather have some shit bags take advantage of our welfare system, than live in a country that lets people live in absolute poverty.

if i ever change.. put a fucking bullet in me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>no bruv &#8211; the economic outlook is fucked. </p>
<p>my point was, we arent in the same situation that we were in 25 years ago. sure, some things are similar&#8230; but the world wasnt FUCKED 25 years ago like it is now.</p>
<p>as for social issues &#8211; i dont know if you honestly believe what you say. but id rather have some shit bags take advantage of our welfare system, than live in a country that lets people live in absolute poverty.</p>
<p>if i ever change.. put a fucking bullet in me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big bruv</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/05/the_2009_budget.html#comment-567167</link>
		<dc:creator>big bruv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 08:56:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=33645#comment-567167</guid>
		<description>Oh really dime, so the economic outlook is all rosy is it?

The solutions that worked so well back then will work just as well today.

Oh, one more thing, do you REALLY want to get into a shit fight with me about social issues Dime?....really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh really dime, so the economic outlook is all rosy is it?</p>
<p>The solutions that worked so well back then will work just as well today.</p>
<p>Oh, one more thing, do you REALLY want to get into a shit fight with me about social issues Dime?&#8230;.really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

