The Brash e-mails file

May 8th, 2009 at 2:00 pm by David Farrar

The Dom Post reports:

Police national headquarters confirmed this week that the file’s release was imminent, after fighting its disclosure for more than a year.

A Brash ally, government relations consultant Matthew Hooton, has been battling police for more than a year over their refusal to release the file. He took the case to the ombudsman.

Mr Hooton was yesterday cautious about the police about-turn. “We may be pleasantly surprised, but our understanding is that the file will be so heavily censored as to be meaningless and we expect the matter will return to the ombudsman or even end up in the courts.”

Dr Brash said police had told him they were about to release the file and had sent him a “heavily censored” version.

This is ridicolous. Why won’t they release the full version, rather than one with 90% redacted?

Hooton in NBR states:

The file will be so heavily censored it will largely be blank and will contain no new information.  This pseudo-release follows an Official Information Act (OIA) request my government relations firm lodged on May 27, 2007.  Under the law, PNHQ had 20 days to respond.  In fact, getting to this point, two years later, has required enormous effort by my staff and pro bono assistance from Kensington Swan.

Lest anyone think police files can’t be released, the “paintergate” press conference, at which PNHQ announced Ms Clark would not face forgery charges, suggests otherwise.  Then, PNHQ staff told journalists that if they scribbled down an OIA request, the file would be released, uncensored, the same day.

I think Mr Hooton and Kensington Swan need to press on – even if it means court action. Hell I can think of a lot of people who might donate to help cover the costs.

Let the truth come out.

Tags: , , ,

21 Responses to “The Brash e-mails file”

  1. Murray (8,832) Says:

    Someone fax the PNHQ a copy of the lection results please, they seem to have missed it.

    And timing it wont save the ploice administration from hositle attention either.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. gd (2,286) Says:

    So who are the Police really protecting Whose names dont they want the citizens to see. Why are they doing this

    Where is the governance principles of disclosure and transpernacey

    Answers please on a postcard Howard

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. big bruv (11,207) Says:

    It would not surprise me to see Key try and keep this information suppressed even if it does implicate Klark.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. Jack5 (3,029) Says:

    The police are playing a political game here. Appalling.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. mudrunner (66) Says:

    The Police are suspected of playing a political game. Let them show us they were not. Re-establish and demonstrate political independence, please.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. big bruv (11,207) Says:

    I do have one question DPF, is there anybody inside the National party who would be shitting bricks about the release of this file?

    [DPF: Nope]

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. 3-coil (1,146) Says:

    Mudrunner (2:12pm)….don’t hold your breath.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. MyNameIsJack (2,415) Says:

    Can Hooton and farrar say “beat up”?

    The file is yet to be seen, buit already they know what is and isn’t in it.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. Razork (374) Says:

    Best delay the release as long as possible; it’s important that the offenders have settled into their roles at the UN and Kiwipost first!

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  10. Jack5 (3,029) Says:

    The post by Former Plod at 2.45 in today’s General Debate string throws light on political direction of our police.
    Brilliant, first-hand report.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  11. PaulL (5,197) Says:

    MyNameIsJack: well, I thought the commentary said that Don Brash had received an advance copy. And that copy was heavily censored. Are you suggesting tat the police gave him an advance copy that was different than the one they planned to release? That is quite a serious allegation to make about our police force, I hope you have some evidence with which to support that.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  12. NX (595) Says:

    Hell I can think of a lot of people who might donate to help cover the costs

    Me for one. A token 10 bucks to reserve the right for private correspondence, particularly for parliamentarians regardless of political persuasion.

    A Brash ally, government relations consultant Matthew Hooton

    A Brash ally? A ‘brash’ ally is about right – the guy laid the daggers into Don Brash on ‘nine to noon’ while he was still leader. Hooton is pursuing this case for his own reasons.

    Message to John Key – you have in the past claimed Dr Brash is your personal friend. Please get to the bottom of this. This is New Zealand’s equivalent of Watergate. Hager is a spineless twat who’s a danger to democracy.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  13. side show bob (3,660) Says:

    Perhaps a brown envelope full of loot might do the job.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  14. reid (13,570) Says:

    Combine this indefensible and apparently inexplicable behaviour with the information from Former Plod on the General Debate thread and you get some clues as to what’s been going wrong all these years.

    Liarbore were always a bad govt. Pictures now emerging are indicating they were also corrupt at the deepest possible level. I know this is not surprising to some and not to me either, it’s just sad to see.

    And it’s beginning to anger me that lefties are so blinded by ideology they can’t bring themselves to admit the obvious.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  15. getstaffed (9,188) Says:

    I think Helen gave Howard her still warm shredder as a farewell gift. The second half of its duty-cycle is about to commence.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  16. Glutaemus Maximus (2,207) Says:

    Broad has got a lot of stuff to bring out into the daylight.

    Do I think that Police HQ is/was corrupt?

    Do bears shit in the woods?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  17. clintheine (1,534) Says:

    Remember, Helen has these massive briefcases full to the brim which are collecting dust at the national archives until she dies… I suggest breaking in (or finding a freedom friendly accomplice) and bringing them to light ASAP. This will be pure gold and will ruin Clark and Labour for a generation…

    Which was exactly the reason why she has them sealed until the new generation.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  18. reid (13,570) Says:

    Say again, clint? Haven’t heard about those.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  19. OECD rank 22 kiwi (2,678) Says:

    Time to crack some skulls.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  20. clintheine (1,534) Says:

    Reid – http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/news/politics/2308432/Exiting-Clark-buries-secrets

    I bet it’s pure gold.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  21. reid (13,570) Says:

    Thanks Clint.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.