Do I have to bold it for you?

Wouldnt be very bright accussing a fellow party member of impropriaty without evidence, Worth could have sued Key – he was willing to do as such if Goff made the allegation in public!

You really should read the full post, not just the first sentence….

Also my man point is still valid, if Key was told earlier that means he would have had a chance to do nothing about it a few weeks before he did nothing about it.

If Goff didnt have the permission of the Labour Party activist to go public, what makes you think John Key would have permission? Wouldnt be very bright accussing a fellow party member of impropriaty without evidence, Worth could have sued Key – he was willing to do as such if Goff made the allegation in public!

If these things were on a scale it would be impossible to register with all of Clarks misdeeds.

And still goff makes a hash of it. It was worth a chew for a bit of media attention, but that halfwit seems to think it is the silver bullet that will bring the Nats down and allow him and his clan of half bred hill williams to saunter back onto the treasury benches. Get real.

BBTB

Like others in Labour he simply has not gotten the message that we’re sick of their muck racking politics and inept manipulations.

And did he have the woman’s permission to tell anyone?

Also my man point is still valid, if Key was told earlier that means he would have had a chance to do nothing about it a few weeks before he did nothing about it.

To be fair, mickysavage got the point and ran away. The other troll probably needs somebody to explain to him what this is all about. He will turn the horse into mince meat before he notices it expired long ago.

He’s the PM of the country, not Magnum fucken PI.

Goff tells Key, Goff reads out text – does not show Key the text. No official complaint laid.
Worth asked for his side of the story, states that he would sign an affidavit regarding his side of the story and sue Phil Goff and the Labour Party if they make the accusation in Public.

And hey guess what, Goff and the complainant STILL have not made the allegations or tabled the evidence outside the protection of palliamentary privelledge.

I wish the left cared more about this sort of thing when Helen was in charge!

Just before your 75 days line gets set in stone David I’d just point out that “May” is rather important.

[DPF: Indeed. It turns out Goff knew back in Nov 2008]

Beat the dead horse hard chronic, that’ll turn things around.

Ummm yes – but Phil Goff had just said he didn’t have it
Why would you ask something you have just been told?

Of course not, he’d just been informed that one of his ministers had been trying to sell jobs for sex, who would want evidence of a little, inconsequencial matter like that?

Did you vote early and often emmess?

Can that be made any clearer to you socialist retards?

79% of the public can understand that
http://dynamic.nzherald.co.nz/poll/pub/polls/index.cfm?action=results&pollid=A7A6188A-010B-2D8C-C650988ED8407695

That git Phil Goff. If only he had told John key sooner he could have refused to do anything about it months ago, which would have been better because….

er

Winston Peters! Phillip Field!

I’ve seen you lot like headless chickens before but this thread takes the biscuit!

There is a lesson in this; when you defend something you know is wrong simply because it was your team doing it – don’t do it in writing.

Blogs have changed the landscape on hypocrisy – it use to simply be a matter of saying “I never said that” but now proving it is just a hypocrolink ( © burt ) away.