Neelam Choudary
June 10th, 2009 at 8:56 pm by David FarrarBoth TV stations have revealed (as did Whale Oil earlier in the day) that Neelam Choudary is Complainant A. She stood for Labour’s nomination for Botany in the 2008 election – so this was someone who wanted to be an MP – not a shy retiring unworldy type.
I will blog more on this tomorrow. But it is a matter of public record that Neelam’s husband has was convicted in December 2008:
Kumar Akkineni Choudary and Lourdu Joseph William Reddy, who both moved to New Zealand from India in the 1990s, tricked more than 20 Indian and Chinese immigrants, either already in the country or overseas, into paying thousands of dollars. …
An Indian national now living in the Auckland suburb of Avondale told the Herald he met Choudary and his wife Neelam in 2002 after hearing about the scheme from a friend back in India who read an advertisement in a newspaper.
The highly qualified 32-year-old was asked to pay $3500 in return for a job offer.
“They said that if you paid a bit of extra money, they could get the case sped up. They said that they had some contacts with the immigration office people.”
About five days after their fist meeting, the Choudarys sent the man a job offer working on computers for a company called Xzact.
The Herald article does not state that Neelam was charged with anything, but the wording refers to the Choudarys plural as making the job offers.
Choudary was found guilty on six fraud charges.
I repeat my earlier call that all the texts – in both directions – should be made available. Public damaging allegations have been made that could force an MP out of Parliament, and I think we need to see what the replies were to understand why the alleged harrassment went on for so long.
June 10th, 2009 at 8:59 pm
Busted.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:01 pm
COME ON GUYON, INTERVIEW HIM AND SCREW HIM TO THE WALL!!!! (in a nice way I mean)
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:01 pm
GOFF that is.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:04 pm
Now thinking back that anonymous statement released earlier by Neelam… it was written like it was from a wholesome traditional mum of 2… Tui ad anyone?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
Yang (Bill) Liu’s citizenship was not only more expensive, but nobody even investigated it. Little wonder she wanted to become a Labour MP
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
Busted you say? Maybe. But why was a senior National MP and senior lawyer at that, allegedly offering a job to the wife of a convicted fraudster who was also a Labour Party candidate?
Was Worth out of his mind? Or was he simply ****struck?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:06 pm
But but .. the bounder asked if she’d like to go swimming! If she accepted then he might see her ankle, the cad.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:13 pm
Pity about Worth trying to swap sex for a job with the Korean. Kinda messes it all up. Still. We get rid of seatwarmer Worth and we get to enjoy a Labour own goal. Perrrrfec.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:13 pm
I don’t know about “strikingly beautiful”.
http://api.ning.com/files/Mnfamnk-m6y1pfYYT24vWSYCbilKc66dWKtoK5AuL0rY3osHRm8W8WwT27s9nv1NtYIHK0nhdEdf3n1BhBWMnIMkL6hSNer0/DSCF2974.jpg
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:14 pm
As I have said elsewhere – pity about the face.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:16 pm
Watch the Left. They’ll accuse us all of being misogynistic. Of course they’ll accuse us all of committing smears. Yet they were quite happy to smear Worth and Key every single day just like their leader Phil Goff. We’re meant to take the word of this person who is supposedly passive when if anything the evidence suggests she was active in the texts. They’re so transparent, the left. You gotta love them.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:17 pm
This episode is sounding more and more like a New Zealand version of “Carry on… up the Khyber”.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:17 pm
Busted you say? Maybe. But why was a senior National MP and senior lawyer at that, allegedly offering a job to the wife of a convicted fraudster who was also a Labour Party candidate?
Was Worth out of his mind? Or was he simply ****struck?
How do you know Worth offered her a job? All we have is Goff and Choudary’s word on that, they have yet to table any proof at all and right now I wouldn’t believe them if they said the sky was blue.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:17 pm
“NoCash
Now thinking back that anonymous statement released earlier by Neelam… it was written like it was from a wholesome traditional mum of 2… Tui ad anyone?”
And wha-da-ya-know, turns out to be a darkie mum of 2, or perhaps in your terms, a “wholemeal” mum of 2?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:18 pm
but the body’s good Petal
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:18 pm
Oh my God, her husband has been convicted of fraud! So that makes it OK for a predator like Worth to harass her??
‘Public damaging allegations have been made that could force an MP out of Parliament’ Utter bullshit, Key sacked him (correction would have sacked him, if he had not ‘resigned’) as a minister BEFORE any allegations were made public and he will only be ‘forced’ from parliament if that is what Key/National decide to do.
[DPF: No one but you is saying it is right to sexually harass her. The issue is her credibility - having your husband convicted of fraud, and you named in the case does not help credibility]
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:22 pm
Oh my God, her husband has been convicted of fraud! So that makes it OK for a predator like Worth to harass her??
Where is the proof she was harrassed? I wasnt aware any had been presented.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:22 pm
As the facts come out, it’s becoming clear that Phil Gaffe has made a momentous blunder in championing this woman.
John Key is proving to have been absolutely right to refuse to meet her until she first met his staff.
Forty or so years ago there was a famous libel case concerning a Labour Cabinet Minister. This stemmed from a story in the then powerful “Truth” weekly under the infamous heading: Phil will Fix it.
Mr Gaffe may be remembered for the motto Phil will flunk it.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:22 pm
So her husband, and a preferred candidate of the Labour Party were both allegedly involved in an Immigration Scam.
Although only he got convicted out of that couple.
This is becoming something of a norm in the Labour Party. Immigration = Money.
Simple Formula, and think that the Police should now be involved to recover ALL the mails, txts, and voice tabs from their strange
communications.
As for Honey Trap 2, there is a lot more information coming down the tubes on this viper.
Women under sexual duress, always have breakfast with the perp. Tui Moment!
Goff is looking more like a big girl’s blouse by the hour.
Maybe his candidate for Mt Albert will turn out to be Universal Soldier. Yeah Right!
Hopefully he won’t have been involved at all in the arms trade, or deniable operations with unregistered deniable operations.
Blood Diamonds anyone?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:22 pm
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10577700
LOL.
Oh go cry crocodile tears. Who day after day after day kept bringing this up. It was Phil Goff. Honestly, if Goff just shut the fuck up. She wouldn’t be getting stressed out. But no he kept digging and digging to score political points. She and him have no one to blame for this other than themselves.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:22 pm
YesWeDid (9:18pm): how do you know Worth “harassed” her? – it appears she has been more than complicit in this affair. You will be calling her the “victim” next!
Take your blinkers off.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:33 pm
gingercrush, it’s started alright: http://www.thestandard.org.nz/national-targeting-the-victim/
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:35 pm
‘it appears she has been more than complicit in this affair’ is that the Christine Rankin definition of ‘affair’ or the standard definition of ‘affair’?
As for evidence try http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&objectid=10577493
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:37 pm
Bevan, I used the word “allegedly”. I agree with you, but where there’s smoke there’s fire. I wouldn’t put it past Worth considering what’s happened.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 9:51 pm
[DPF: No one but you is saying it is right to sexually harass her. The issue is her credibility - having your husband convicted of fraud, and you named in the case does not help credibility]
Actually the issue is Worth’s credibility, that is why he is no longer a minister.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:01 pm
YWD, that is *an* issue, it is not the sole issue.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:07 pm
“….or the standard definition of ‘affair’?”
sorry – but the standard is seldom correct about anything
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:13 pm
“An Indian national now living in the Auckland suburb of Avondale told the Herald he met Choudary and his wife Neelam in 2002 after hearing about the scheme from a friend back in India who read an advertisement in a newspaper.
The highly qualified 32-year-old was asked to pay $3500 in return for a job offer”.
This is highly relevant as the Choudary’s seem well versed in the social and legal dynamics of offering jobs in return for favours or cash.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:14 pm
Looks like the Injun’s been exposed. Will we now find out who the white men are who have been speaking with forked tongue?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:17 pm
After all Phil Goff’s media pontificating over this strikingly beautiful bombay babe, he’s now coming across as very much a “Scumdog Silly-on-air!”
(hat, coat……)
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:20 pm
YesWeDid (9:35pm) – speaking of Christine Rankin, the rule-book was rewritten during the left’s recent muck raking attempts to have her kicked out of the Families Commission. Nothing was spared – her family, who’s-bonking-who, McAuley’s suicide etc were all fair game, and gleefully reported.
Now lefty double standards are exposed again here with Neelam Choudary – the public surely deserve to know her background! As expected, your enthusiasm for a similar panty-sniffing expose of Ms Choudary’s intimate details seems to have deserted you. Flip-flop ethics – typical lefty bullshit moralising.
By the way, where are the “sleazy” messages Ms Choudary and Phil Goofy claimed she received? Your link just refers to some limp (alleged) texts, replying to her texts to Worth – if that’s “sleaze” you need to get a life. Where is ANY evidence?? The phone call tapes, the emails…all promised, but nothing delivered.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:26 pm
SATIRE
The Indian businessman who put up $15,000 in prize money for the first person to identify the “strikingly attractive” Indian “Labour Party activist” at the centre of the “Dr Richie Worthy Honey Trap Scandal”, as worldwide media are now calling it, is refusing to pay out the prize money to the clear winner: Mr Sam Clater who runs the blogsite Whalesoil.com. (He posted the woman’s identity on his blog at 9.23 am today).
Dr Rajjie Chandra Wickramasingh, founder of See-thru Saree Enterprises Ltd, has conceded that Whalesoil CEO Clater was the first person to correctly identify the Indian “honey” as “unsuccessful Labour Party nominee Spicy Chowdairy of Botany Baywatch, Auckland”. However, Rajjie says that the prize money will not be paid out, until such time as the Hon. Phillipe Gaffe publicly confirms that the Indian “honey” Whalesoil has identified, is indeed the “strikingly attractive” Spicy “honey” he first accused Hon. Dr Richie Worthy of attempting to “sample”.
“Gaffe has provided the New Zealand public with all the clues as to her identity thus far,” says Rajje, “and it must be him, and him alone, who publicly OUTS her, because he alone has had three months of exclusive access to ‘the litany of lurid and salacious text messages’ – that flowed between the Indian “honey” he knows so well and the wannabe Worthy sampler.”
Gaffe, despite persistent and professional hounding by the media today, has resolutely refused to disclose the identity of the Indian “honey” whose name he is trying to keep secret for sensitive commercial reasons. “My lips are firmly sealed for hygienic reasons,” he told gossip columnist Melanie Mindless late this afternoon, in a heated exchange that was replayed on TV 3 News at 6 pm tonight.
Media Matters expert, Gyon Expelair, stated on TV One News at 6 pm that “the gaffe-prone Leader of the Labour Party will have to get real with the New Zealand public on this HTS” [honey trap scandal], and “put an end to the mounting speculation surrounding the mystery “Labour Party activist” whose identity he has been seeking to protect.” He predicted that if Gaffe fails to make a full and honest public disclosure before this weekend’s Mt Roskill By-election begins – his Labour Party will self-destruct. He also warned that blogsite Whalesoil.com might turn its attention to honey trap scandals involving Gaffe himself, in revenge for the delayed prize money payout, caused by Gaffe’s refusal to disclose the truth.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:34 pm
Yes we did – best you stop stealing our oxygen and wake up and smell the coffee!
Give me strength, I think we have found the first living brain donor…
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:35 pm
DPF
I thought you were going to respect the desire of privacy that the complainant requested.
This is a feeding frenzy.
All that Goff wished to highlight is the inadequacy of Key’s handling of Worth.
Worth was sacked BEFORE Goff even went public.
Sorry but Worth using the offer of public positions for sex is the story. Venting at the victim in this is particularly poor.
You should be thankful that Goff did not drop this in public the day of the budget.
Any smug self satisfied right winger would have done so if Labour was still in power.
I look forward to reading the ranting and raving of various wingnuts complaining that I cannot possibly be right.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:37 pm
Dr Worth if you are kicked out of parliament, I sincerely hope you and Goff share the same taxi.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:39 pm
mickysavage, you are a dipstick, we don’t like you, so fuck off.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:43 pm
mickydipstick – you too are like YesWeDid, another living brain donor…..
“I look forward to reading the ranting and raving of various wingnuts complaining that I cannot possibly be right.”
Give me strength mickydipstick, not even worth wasting the energy to retort to your post…
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:44 pm
“All that Goff wished to highlight is the inadequacy of Key’s handling of Worth.”
Piss off Mick – Goff loved the attention he was getting with this and rode it to death. Suffer in yer jocks labour
Now it’s turned pear shaped he wants to “see the end of it” Shameless gutter politicking on Goffs part
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:47 pm
Have I just invented a new name for micky?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:49 pm
Yep Murray M, I here by introduce you all to mickydipstick, so far up Labour he is lacking oxygen…
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:52 pm
How about mickypullthrough?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:54 pm
I see a rather interesting plot line for a movie here. It would be a comedy of course
New Cabinet Minister has business interests in India. An Indian couple (with some experience in fraud) see an opportunity to put Cabinet Minister in a compromising position in order to gain future advantage. They set up a honey pot sting. Silly Cabinet Minister then says some stupid things in India and is forced to sell his business interests by PM. Couple are thwarted in their opportunistic attempt and decide (due to their involvement in politics) to leverage situation by bringing in Leader of Opposition who falls for this further set up by the couple due to his keenness to teach young upstart PM a lesson. PM sees other things that Cabinet Minister does and “sends Cabinet Minister to Coventry”. Leader of Opposition tries to make his story the lead in all this without knowing the real initial motivations of the Indian couple. The couple try to remain anonymous but are finally exposed.
Now this is all fiction of course and I cannot quite think what the rest of the story will be. But I sense further inspiration coming.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:55 pm
All that Goff wished to highlight is the inadequacy of Key’s handling of Worth.
Really? I thought he was trying to help the “victim”?
Sorry but Worth using the offer of public positions for sex is the story. Venting at the victim in this is particularly poor.
That is a defamatory statement unless you can provide proof. IP check aisle 5… May need to butt cover in case the wrong people read it…
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:55 pm
“…. and “put an end to the mounting speculation surrounding the…”
‘Mounting speculation’…??
Seems a rather appropiate choice of words.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:56 pm
Smug:
“contentedly confident of one’s ability, superiority, or correctness”
And you really don’t think you and your side are like that, mickey? Are you blind, or just dumb?
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 10:58 pm
it’s like been savaged by a toothless budgie. His only cheap trill!!
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 11:03 pm
sorry mickey
“All that Goff wished to highlight is the inadequacy of Key’s handling of Worth.”
“Worth was sacked BEFORE Goff even went public.”
so what was goff highlighting again ??
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 11:05 pm
DPF, isn’t this gutter political blogging? Vilifying someone because their husband (in this case) or wife or son or daughter or brother or sister has done something illegal?
I agree with you that all texts on both sides should be made available. But dragging someone’s family into it (presumably to damage their credibility) is a very bad look.
The bottom line is that Worth was somewhat more free than was appropriate in using his Cabinet position to encourage potential sexual partners to decide where his todger should or should not go.
It could be worse, as the facts may eventually reveal, but that alone is enough for him to be sacked.
Everything else is a smokescreen designed to confuse the issue. I think Goff seems to be blinded by that smokescreen as much as Key.
The best thing Key could do is put up all the evidence publicly as to why he sacked Worth, and story over. The way he’s playing it, it will drag on for weeks, to his detriment.
[DPF: I have not vilified her. But she has made very damaging allegations and failed to provide proof of them. Hence credibility becomes an issue. If it was a sibling or child then I would say not an issue, but when it is your spouse, when you are named in the story as being involved, and when it is very very recent then it is relevant to her credibility.
And if she is upset about being publicly named, she should blame Phil Goff and Brian Rudman]
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 11:06 pm
Have you seen the picture on Clint Heine’s blog. Indian, Korean, HC. Coincidence or is Helen a pimp? Come on Goff save your own arse and spill the beans.
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 11:16 pm
ROLF …. I’m larfin so much the tears are rolling down my legs.
Talk about bein shot down with a ball of your own shit!!!!
Go .. go .. Goff!
Up and atum Atom Ant!
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 11:22 pm
“The bottom line is that Worth was somewhat more free than was appropriate in using his Cabinet position to encourage potential sexual partners to decide where his todger should or should not go.”
Have you seen evidence of this Toad?
Or are you indulging in “gutter political blogging?”
Or smearing?
Gia forbid!
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 11:26 pm
http://www.grapheine.com/bombaytv/movie-uk-c34b2ab4ebcd217b568ca9dcfac9a07a.html
Meanwhile, in a suburban Auckland house!!
Vote:June 10th, 2009 at 11:32 pm
Goff should visit an optometrist quick smart, it will help him to see the people waiting to stab him in the back after this sad episode. No matter your view of politics surely this is the biggest non-issue ever.
Vote:Key or the Police should tell the silly cow to piss off and quit wasting everybody’s time.
June 10th, 2009 at 11:33 pm
Right of Way (11:26pm) – Excellent!!!
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 12:13 am
At the very least Worth has been proven to be easily led by his dick, not an admirable quality for a minister. Key, all be it inelegantly, has dealt with this. Now is he guilty of harassment? What this business in Welly all about?
I hope he didn’t charge a hooker to his parliamentary expense account in this Welly fiasco, shit if parliamentary services have approved it then National will be forced to validate it quickly as demonstrated by Labour. Can’t have pesky accounting issues buggering up the running of the country now can we.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 6:46 am
mickysavage said “I look forward to reading the ranting and raving of various wingnuts complaining that I cannot possibly be right.”
I don’t know that I’d describe myself as a wingnut micky (though others may beg to differ), but read my lips:
YOU CANNOT POSSIBLY BE RIGHT
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 6:49 am
toad said “DPF, isn’t this gutter political blogging? Vilifying someone because their husband (in this case) or wife or son or daughter or brother or sister has done something illegal?”
It would seem that one of the victims of Kumar Choudary’s fraud disagrees with you toad
http://keepingstock.blogspot.com/2009/06/they-played-with-my-life.html
Hint: who do you think he means by “they”?
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 6:53 am
Strikingly beautiful? More like a camel with minor cosmetic surgery…….
Goff needs new glasses.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 7:09 am
After seeing her photo (the one that looked like a model-pose) I find it somewhat unbelievable that she didn’t know what xxx meant at the end of a text. I think her crediility has been busted completely. Fuck, even Sonic signs off like that on occasion in here – does that mean he is sexually harrassing people? So, those who say that she was sexually harrassed – can you show me some proof please.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 7:16 am
And guys – I think she is pretty good looking. She would be a 10 in any Labour caucus and probably rate a 7-8 anywhere else. You guys are too harsh. Fact is given the opportunity almost all of you who have rubbished her would jump at a chance to explore anglo-indian relations.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 7:19 am
Not me Brian – I can’t handle garlic and spices
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 7:33 am
So you don’t like Italian, French, Greek, Latin American or ME women either then? I obviously have a more sophisticated palette than you I2:)
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 7:53 am
Two points:
* After reading the front page of the Herald this morning, I would suggest Mrs Choudry should know a fake job offer when she sees one.
Vote:* If anything John Key has fired Richard Worth for being the biggest fucking imbecile in Parliament for getting caught trying to screw the ENEMY. What a moron? If he wanted to be a sleazy bastard, be like the rest of them and pay for it on Vivian St.
June 11th, 2009 at 8:06 am
Brian – sometimes the brain, the eyes and the stomach are all in synch, but sometimes the stomach rebels
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 8:14 am
I2 – happens.
I think siobhan is dead right – Worth was guilty of bad judgement – there must be plenty of Indian women he can screw who are right of centre. Maybe he thought that turning her away from the Dark Side of the Force would make the conquest all that much better.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 8:24 am
“Maybe he thought that turning her away from the Dark Side of the Force would make the conquest all that much better.”
If that is the case, then one has no hope of describing how big of a Muppet Richard Worth really is.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 8:28 am
Check out Neelam Choudary’s page on grassroots.labour.org.nz and on Facebook.
Vote:Friends listed are Pete Hodgson, David Cunliffe, Chris Carter, Lynne Pillay and lots of photos of Goff and Clark.
Quite the shrinking violet.
This was a set up from the first time Worth approached her and she immediately spoke to Goff for instructions.
June 11th, 2009 at 8:48 am
Hump – I don’t do Facebook. But could you tell me if Mrs Choudary looks like she reveres these prestigous people. As this is Goffs excuse for her failure to tell Worth to bugger off.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 8:48 am
This all just getting to be more bloody offensive to our collective inteligences by the minute.
Goff and a labour party hack (a tainted one at that) sets up a leacherous idiot.
They got him, he was fired. Very clever well done.
But now Goff wants to make a meal of it and keep yapping like one of those annoying little dogs squealing conspiracy. Meanwhile they simply refuse to actually pony up the information. This is pure grubby political bullshit from Goff and if he didn;t get the memo we just fired Saint Helen for that sort of shit.
I for one am done with this pathetic little tabloid grandstanding attempt from Goff.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 8:54 am
Fuck, even Sonic signs off like that on occasion in here – does that mean he is sexually harrassing people?
OMG! I’ve been sexually harassed by sonic!!!
I feel so used and dirty…
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 9:04 am
Wait till he invites you to share a hotel room.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 9:04 am
Does anyone else think it is a little patronising and even racist of Goff to imply that this poor shy retiring Indian woman with no knowledge of the seedier side of life (apart from fraud that is) couldn’t tell Worth to fuck off because he was an important white man? Typical lefty – manufacturing a victim.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 9:08 am
And you still wont respect him in the morning.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 9:10 am
Murray said “Wait till he invites you to share a hotel room.”
But Murray – would sonic stay for breakfast? And more to the point, given his alleged Scottish ancestry (which I share), would he pay
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 9:10 am
Goff, the Garbler.
This will explode in his girly face.
So delighted that the useless trouser snake Worth has been canned.
Going to be very interesting to get any mails, and txt between the two accusers and Goof.
This has all the hallmarks of a classic sting. And of course we can trust our impartial HQ Police.
Remember the Broad Squad, that could never bring a charge against a Labour Party member.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 9:13 am
Theres nothing alledged about Franks ancestory. Hes a skirt wearing haggis chaser. EOS
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 9:20 am
Frank? Shouldn’t sonic be Jimmy, like every Scotsman worth his salt?
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 9:21 am
> And if she is upset about being publicly named, she should blame Phil Goff and Brian Rudman.
Well, she could even look at herself. Did she really think she could make serious allegations about a Minister and remain anonymous? Given that she is a political activist, she surely cannot be that naive. I would’ve thought that if she had any concerns about sexual harassment or just harassment in general, she might have gone to the police instead of the leader of the Labour Party, but maybe I’m just old-fashioned.
Vote:June 11th, 2009 at 9:30 am
Worth should be kicked out of the National Party for bad taste if nothing else.
Vote: