<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 22% gap</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 07:36:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: NX</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582867</link>
		<dc:creator>NX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 10:35:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582867</guid>
		<description>Side show bob wrote:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Leave your dick alone phil, your brain is screaming out for more blood. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Thank for that... really made me laugh!

As for the poll; Nationals continued high showing in the polls is sealing Helen legacy in my opinion.  It says that Helen + Michael were in power for almost 4 years too long.  

^ it&#039;s the only explanation really.  Because National is still being Labour-lite in many ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Side show bob wrote:</p>
<blockquote><p>Leave your dick alone phil, your brain is screaming out for more blood. </p></blockquote>
<p>Thank for that&#8230; really made me laugh!</p>
<p>As for the poll; Nationals continued high showing in the polls is sealing Helen legacy in my opinion.  It says that Helen + Michael were in power for almost 4 years too long.  </p>
<p>^ it&#8217;s the only explanation really.  Because National is still being Labour-lite in many ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clintheine</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582846</link>
		<dc:creator>clintheine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 09:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582846</guid>
		<description>So what you&#039;re saying then Ross is that it isn&#039;t important to have a philosophy anymore  or are you saying that &quot;middle New Zealand&quot; is so wishywashy that they just wanted a new face on the same policies??

I don&#039;t think it&#039;s surreal at all. National have copied or have kept Labours policies.  After 9 years of frothing at the mouth they have decided it wasn&#039;t as bad as they said it was. That Labour pretty much &quot;got it right&quot;.  Now THAT sounds surreal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So what you&#8217;re saying then Ross is that it isn&#8217;t important to have a philosophy anymore  or are you saying that &#8220;middle New Zealand&#8221; is so wishywashy that they just wanted a new face on the same policies??</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s surreal at all. National have copied or have kept Labours policies.  After 9 years of frothing at the mouth they have decided it wasn&#8217;t as bad as they said it was. That Labour pretty much &#8220;got it right&#8221;.  Now THAT sounds surreal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ross Miller</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582765</link>
		<dc:creator>Ross Miller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 00:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582765</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s all a little bit sureal when posters argue ......

that National on 54% (plus 2%) is clearly on the wrong track by not implementing ACTs 1% (minus - 1.5%) &#039;vision for the future&#039;.

that Winston First, static on 1%, is poised for a comeback.

that the Maori Party has only one safe seat Te Tai Tokerau)

and Labour on 31.5% (minus 1.5%) doesn&#039;t even rate a mention.

.... or could it just be that middle New Zealand has got it about right?

p.s.   For &#039;Our Phil&#039;  ... by my count and since the election this is the fifth time in 7 months you have said (in respect of National) &quot;this is as good as it gets&quot;.    Stuck record perhaps.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s all a little bit sureal when posters argue &#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>that National on 54% (plus 2%) is clearly on the wrong track by not implementing ACTs 1% (minus &#8211; 1.5%) &#8216;vision for the future&#8217;.</p>
<p>that Winston First, static on 1%, is poised for a comeback.</p>
<p>that the Maori Party has only one safe seat Te Tai Tokerau)</p>
<p>and Labour on 31.5% (minus 1.5%) doesn&#8217;t even rate a mention.</p>
<p>&#8230;. or could it just be that middle New Zealand has got it about right?</p>
<p>p.s.   For &#8216;Our Phil&#8217;  &#8230; by my count and since the election this is the fifth time in 7 months you have said (in respect of National) &#8220;this is as good as it gets&#8221;.    Stuck record perhaps.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toby1845</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582724</link>
		<dc:creator>toby1845</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 23:03:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582724</guid>
		<description>&quot;Whats up with the ACT vote? They have lost 150% of their vote since the last poll.&quot;

I think you will find that it is mathematically impossible to lose more than 100% of anything.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Whats up with the ACT vote? They have lost 150% of their vote since the last poll.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think you will find that it is mathematically impossible to lose more than 100% of anything.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toby1845</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582721</link>
		<dc:creator>toby1845</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582721</guid>
		<description>Further to my last, this time last year we were all saying: &quot;BBQ at Phil&#039;s place.  You bring the votes, he&#039;ll supply the sausages.&quot;

Now it&#039;s: &quot;Morning tea at David Cunliffe&#039;s: You bring the votes, he&#039;ll supply the &#039;T&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Further to my last, this time last year we were all saying: &#8220;BBQ at Phil&#8217;s place.  You bring the votes, he&#8217;ll supply the sausages.&#8221;</p>
<p>Now it&#8217;s: &#8220;Morning tea at David Cunliffe&#8217;s: You bring the votes, he&#8217;ll supply the &#8216;T&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toby1845</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582717</link>
		<dc:creator>toby1845</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:46:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582717</guid>
		<description>My wife has just captured Labour&#039;s dilemma in a single sentence: &quot;Who is that guy in charge of Labour, again?&quot;

* Chuckle *</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My wife has just captured Labour&#8217;s dilemma in a single sentence: &#8220;Who is that guy in charge of Labour, again?&#8221;</p>
<p>* Chuckle *</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clintheine</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582695</link>
		<dc:creator>clintheine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582695</guid>
		<description>Neil, damn straight buddy. I went to school in Motueka. The Greens have that area sown up for sure. No surprises, what a laid back place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil, damn straight buddy. I went to school in Motueka. The Greens have that area sown up for sure. No surprises, what a laid back place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clintheine</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582692</link>
		<dc:creator>clintheine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 22:10:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582692</guid>
		<description>The thing is, yes it is the Nats fault in many cases, BUT Labours scorched earth policy led to this gigantic meltdown. The lies over the ACC deficit would have been treated as a war crime in other countries and as for the nationalisation of the railways during election year while being behind in double digits in the polls.... that is pure planning to prevent National the tools to pull us out of the meltdown Labour passed on.

Labour had the knowhow to drag NZ to the left - National has a golden opportunity to pull it back, if only to the centre to start with. Start giving Sir Roger a bigger role in the push back. Any Government that has him sitting on his hands is a Government NOT committed to change for the better.  

How embarrassing would it be to say in three years that Labour used Sir Roger more effectively than National did?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is, yes it is the Nats fault in many cases, BUT Labours scorched earth policy led to this gigantic meltdown. The lies over the ACC deficit would have been treated as a war crime in other countries and as for the nationalisation of the railways during election year while being behind in double digits in the polls&#8230;. that is pure planning to prevent National the tools to pull us out of the meltdown Labour passed on.</p>
<p>Labour had the knowhow to drag NZ to the left &#8211; National has a golden opportunity to pull it back, if only to the centre to start with. Start giving Sir Roger a bigger role in the push back. Any Government that has him sitting on his hands is a Government NOT committed to change for the better.  </p>
<p>How embarrassing would it be to say in three years that Labour used Sir Roger more effectively than National did?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big bruv</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582675</link>
		<dc:creator>big bruv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:40:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582675</guid>
		<description>Clint is dead right, do not delude yourself into thinking that we had a change of power or control last November, Labour effectively neutered Neville Key with their &quot;slippery&quot; tag, if forced him into making promises to the middle or floating voter that he will never break, of course he is more than happy to break every promise he ever made to his core or tribal voters as he knows they will always vote blue irrespective of who is the leader.

The result of this is that we have a man and a government who are afraid of doing what is right, they are still being controlled by what Labour said pre election, they backed key into a corner and the bastard is afraid to come out swinging.

It pains me to say it but our nation is still in the grasp of Klark and Kullen, until Key rediscovers his testicles he will continue to be held back by the pre election labour party spin.

The Nat&#039;s and Key should realise that THIS is the term when they can change things, THIS is the term when they can go a long way toward weaning Kiwi&#039;s off the welfare state and teaching the lazy bastards that any improvement in living standards only comes about through your own hard work.

Say what you like about Labour but they were smart enough to know that the first term is the one to implement real change, they used their honeymoon period to push their own agenda, Key is missing his one chance to make a real difference

The reality is that Labour are still relevant, the bastards are almost as relevant as they were pre election, the more worrying and scary reality is that this will not change as long as Neville Key remains the leader, its time for a change and its time for Crusher Collins.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clint is dead right, do not delude yourself into thinking that we had a change of power or control last November, Labour effectively neutered Neville Key with their &#8220;slippery&#8221; tag, if forced him into making promises to the middle or floating voter that he will never break, of course he is more than happy to break every promise he ever made to his core or tribal voters as he knows they will always vote blue irrespective of who is the leader.</p>
<p>The result of this is that we have a man and a government who are afraid of doing what is right, they are still being controlled by what Labour said pre election, they backed key into a corner and the bastard is afraid to come out swinging.</p>
<p>It pains me to say it but our nation is still in the grasp of Klark and Kullen, until Key rediscovers his testicles he will continue to be held back by the pre election labour party spin.</p>
<p>The Nat&#8217;s and Key should realise that THIS is the term when they can change things, THIS is the term when they can go a long way toward weaning Kiwi&#8217;s off the welfare state and teaching the lazy bastards that any improvement in living standards only comes about through your own hard work.</p>
<p>Say what you like about Labour but they were smart enough to know that the first term is the one to implement real change, they used their honeymoon period to push their own agenda, Key is missing his one chance to make a real difference</p>
<p>The reality is that Labour are still relevant, the bastards are almost as relevant as they were pre election, the more worrying and scary reality is that this will not change as long as Neville Key remains the leader, its time for a change and its time for Crusher Collins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OECD rank 22 kiwi</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582674</link>
		<dc:creator>OECD rank 22 kiwi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582674</guid>
		<description>Clintheine, you should check out Colin Espiner&#039;s comment 24 on his blogpost:

&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/blogs/on-the-house/2582620/Cruise-control&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Cruise control&lt;/a&gt;

He&#039;s well and truely got National&#039;s number.

He states:

&lt;i&gt;&quot;The problem as I see it is this: National is hamstrung, essentially, because it can&#039;t do any of the things a National administration would normally do right about now because it signed up almost entirely to Labour&#039;s policy programme. 

It&#039;s true that National administrations are less reformist by nature than Labour ones, and I accept the point of the liberals above that less government can be better than interventionist government. 

HOWEVER, National would dearly love to get stuck in to Working for Families, and get people earning $100K-plus off welfare and all the lack of productivity that entails. But it can&#039;t, because it promised not to. 

It would LOVE to list some state assets on the stock exchange. It would be good for business, for the SOEs, for the stock exchange, and for investors. But it can&#039;t, because it promised not to. 

It would like to make substantial changes to the health and education systems. But it can&#039;t, because it was elected on a platform of no radical change. 

And it can&#039;t pour money into productive areas like tertiary education or other projects of its own making because its entire budget is tied up paying for Labour&#039;s policies. 

So it&#039;s trapped in no-man&#039;s land, with no real agenda and no mandate for the sorts of changes that many of the people who comment on this blog would dearly like, I suspect. 

That&#039;s the reality of this situation. Attacking the media for pointing this out doesn&#039;t make it not so.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clintheine, you should check out Colin Espiner&#8217;s comment 24 on his blogpost:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/blogs/on-the-house/2582620/Cruise-control" rel="nofollow">Cruise control</a></p>
<p>He&#8217;s well and truely got National&#8217;s number.</p>
<p>He states:</p>
<p><i>&#8220;The problem as I see it is this: National is hamstrung, essentially, because it can&#8217;t do any of the things a National administration would normally do right about now because it signed up almost entirely to Labour&#8217;s policy programme. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s true that National administrations are less reformist by nature than Labour ones, and I accept the point of the liberals above that less government can be better than interventionist government. </p>
<p>HOWEVER, National would dearly love to get stuck in to Working for Families, and get people earning $100K-plus off welfare and all the lack of productivity that entails. But it can&#8217;t, because it promised not to. </p>
<p>It would LOVE to list some state assets on the stock exchange. It would be good for business, for the SOEs, for the stock exchange, and for investors. But it can&#8217;t, because it promised not to. </p>
<p>It would like to make substantial changes to the health and education systems. But it can&#8217;t, because it was elected on a platform of no radical change. </p>
<p>And it can&#8217;t pour money into productive areas like tertiary education or other projects of its own making because its entire budget is tied up paying for Labour&#8217;s policies. </p>
<p>So it&#8217;s trapped in no-man&#8217;s land, with no real agenda and no mandate for the sorts of changes that many of the people who comment on this blog would dearly like, I suspect. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s the reality of this situation. Attacking the media for pointing this out doesn&#8217;t make it not so.&#8221;</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582673</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:37:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582673</guid>
		<description>clintheine what I am talking about are our trendy greenie voters who inhabit that area-in the last election the Greens polled strongly in that area. Go over the hill from Motueka you enter the Golden Bay which is truly alternative living.
You just don&#039;t find cultural elites in cities, they exist as well in rural areas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>clintheine what I am talking about are our trendy greenie voters who inhabit that area-in the last election the Greens polled strongly in that area. Go over the hill from Motueka you enter the Golden Bay which is truly alternative living.<br />
You just don&#8217;t find cultural elites in cities, they exist as well in rural areas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: expat</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582669</link>
		<dc:creator>expat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:15:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582669</guid>
		<description>LABOUR ARE LESS RELEVANT THAN THE GREENS! HA AH AHA HA HA!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LABOUR ARE LESS RELEVANT THAN THE GREENS! HA AH AHA HA HA!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clintheine</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582668</link>
		<dc:creator>clintheine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:13:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582668</guid>
		<description>Neil - trendy and Motueka is an oxymoron :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Neil &#8211; trendy and Motueka is an oxymoron <img src='http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: clintheine</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582667</link>
		<dc:creator>clintheine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582667</guid>
		<description>22% ahead and yet no resolve to move things along from Labour Lite to 100% true blue National policy.  While I am happy Labour are not in charge, I am not celebrating that National is 22% ahead.  It only lends to the theory that the country was tired of Labour rather than wanting National in - which I was hoping wasn&#039;t the case.

National still supports a 38% top tax rate, Working for Families, compulsary student unionism.... Why don&#039;t they start believing in themselves and doing what Labour did by implementing some policy?  Labout achieved so much in their first few years, as much as it pissed us off - so why isn&#039;t National doing something to brand themselves?

If they don&#039;t get a majority ACT/Nat Govt after the next election - they would have blown their only opportunity to push through meaningful right wing policy. Who knows who will support them next time, and every thinking person knows that ACT will vote for anything that will give us less state and more freedom.  

National, step up!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>22% ahead and yet no resolve to move things along from Labour Lite to 100% true blue National policy.  While I am happy Labour are not in charge, I am not celebrating that National is 22% ahead.  It only lends to the theory that the country was tired of Labour rather than wanting National in &#8211; which I was hoping wasn&#8217;t the case.</p>
<p>National still supports a 38% top tax rate, Working for Families, compulsary student unionism&#8230;. Why don&#8217;t they start believing in themselves and doing what Labour did by implementing some policy?  Labout achieved so much in their first few years, as much as it pissed us off &#8211; so why isn&#8217;t National doing something to brand themselves?</p>
<p>If they don&#8217;t get a majority ACT/Nat Govt after the next election &#8211; they would have blown their only opportunity to push through meaningful right wing policy. Who knows who will support them next time, and every thinking person knows that ACT will vote for anything that will give us less state and more freedom.  </p>
<p>National, step up!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582666</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 21:09:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582666</guid>
		<description>Result very much as expected as Goff just doesn&#039;t get traction.I applaud people like English who works away quietly to keep things on the straight and narrow. Key gives the excitement, as well as taxpayers money to others.People underestimate English&#039;s wise head, a dose of realistic southern conservatism in the political approach. Keep up the good work Bill !!
Still there are concerning signs for the Nats with a feeling among the party faithful, workers,membership collectors,policy meeters etc that National seems more enamoured of the flashy elite and trendy residents of Parnell,Motueka and the Coromandel. Ignore your bed rock supporters at your peril- they write the cheques, do the hard work and are there on the rainy day.The elites and trendy are fair weathyer friends - happy to live off you in the good times but quick to savage when the going gets tough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Result very much as expected as Goff just doesn&#8217;t get traction.I applaud people like English who works away quietly to keep things on the straight and narrow. Key gives the excitement, as well as taxpayers money to others.People underestimate English&#8217;s wise head, a dose of realistic southern conservatism in the political approach. Keep up the good work Bill !!<br />
Still there are concerning signs for the Nats with a feeling among the party faithful, workers,membership collectors,policy meeters etc that National seems more enamoured of the flashy elite and trendy residents of Parnell,Motueka and the Coromandel. Ignore your bed rock supporters at your peril- they write the cheques, do the hard work and are there on the rainy day.The elites and trendy are fair weathyer friends &#8211; happy to live off you in the good times but quick to savage when the going gets tough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joeAverage</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582665</link>
		<dc:creator>joeAverage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582665</guid>
		<description>Had the foreshore and seabed raised its ugly head yet, the worth issure was a crap issure to excite posters on kiwiblog, wait till the nats want to give NZ (f&amp;S) to the maori  THEY WILL BE FUCKED and heading down the gurgler as i said the nats colours are a dirty purple now</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Had the foreshore and seabed raised its ugly head yet, the worth issure was a crap issure to excite posters on kiwiblog, wait till the nats want to give NZ (f&amp;S) to the maori  THEY WILL BE FUCKED and heading down the gurgler as i said the nats colours are a dirty purple now</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cerium</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582664</link>
		<dc:creator>Cerium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 19:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582664</guid>
		<description>Nah, preaching with the converted isn&#039;t much fun. I like to challenge and be challenged, to explore different views. I just find that too much negative on the same catchphrases gets a bit tedious. So I suppose I shouldn&#039;t whinge about the whinging.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, preaching with the converted isn&#8217;t much fun. I like to challenge and be challenged, to explore different views. I just find that too much negative on the same catchphrases gets a bit tedious. So I suppose I shouldn&#8217;t whinge about the whinging.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chicken Little</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582663</link>
		<dc:creator>Chicken Little</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:59:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582663</guid>
		<description>4chan is the place for you Cerium.

Nice and calm, no abuse, gentle, no whinging, lovely young people disscusing politics and the importance of being earnest.

Google it and good luck.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>4chan is the place for you Cerium.</p>
<p>Nice and calm, no abuse, gentle, no whinging, lovely young people disscusing politics and the importance of being earnest.</p>
<p>Google it and good luck.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cerium</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582659</link>
		<dc:creator>Cerium</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 18:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582659</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s possible for some to be pragmatic and leave the griping behind. The continual whinge doesn&#039;t achieve much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s possible for some to be pragmatic and leave the griping behind. The continual whinge doesn&#8217;t achieve much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Glutaemus Maximus</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582658</link>
		<dc:creator>Glutaemus Maximus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2009 16:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/07/22_gap.html#comment-582658</guid>
		<description>Hi Expat, of course it is the wild North where the weather has been uncharacteristically dry. Not got any London trips planned this visit.

Bristol, Hull, and Newcastle. Dusseldorf, Barcelona (again), and Scotland for a weekend break.

I have also gotten a little tired of the shrill noises from the shape shifters, but I still fail to understand why they persist with their

false recollections, and tiresome ideology. All of which is based on a false premise.

They really fail to comprehend how folk resent being ordered around.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Expat, of course it is the wild North where the weather has been uncharacteristically dry. Not got any London trips planned this visit.</p>
<p>Bristol, Hull, and Newcastle. Dusseldorf, Barcelona (again), and Scotland for a weekend break.</p>
<p>I have also gotten a little tired of the shrill noises from the shape shifters, but I still fail to understand why they persist with their</p>
<p>false recollections, and tiresome ideology. All of which is based on a false premise.</p>
<p>They really fail to comprehend how folk resent being ordered around.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

