However the argument stands, or perhaps we should call NZ the Aotearoa Free Vegan Collective for the Advancement of Interfaith Woolen Underpants.

sheath might also tell us why incorporated societies are maintained separately from limited liability companies in the Companies Office register.

The point is that in “New Zealand Inc” fits nicely with organisations set up other than for “pecuniary gain” — profit.

New Zealand Inc is therefore an appropriate name for an NZ as mythologised by the Standard warthogs.

It is broadly reasonable to borrow the term “Inc” when newspapers report NZ’s state accounts roughly in the style they they would those of a business, such as when the Minister of Finance releases budget details annually.

In fact it would be more appropriate than the lefties at the Standard think. In America the term Inc. describes limited-liability businesses. In New Zealand, however, “Inc” refers to incorporated charitable and other non-profit societies. Limited in NZ applies to incorporated businesses.

Thus the lefties should welcome Inc. It fits their goal of a non-profit socialist country-like co-op, economically stagnant, saddled with rising debt, and slipping backwards while the rest of the Western world moves forward. All thanks to generations of lefty brainwashing.

New Zealand Inc should be the Standard’s logo.

I blame the pollsters myself – eh David.

Still the longer Labour let these cretins act as their attack blog the more Kiwi’s will turn from them.

Boo Hoo, and Did Dums!

NZ Inc is a derivative of UK Plc (as used by the British Banks to describe the economic condition of the UK economy) that has been used historically by the National Bank in its economic assessment of NZ for the year.

No big deal unless you are a card carrying commie happy at spending tax payers cash on little red books bearing the image of alfred e neuman or uncle hulun.