For a glimpse at the opinion of a left wing feminist check out this:
http://www.reclusiveleftist.com/2009/07/04/feminists-and-the-mystery-of-sarah-palin/

Totally debunks all of the lies you lot spout about her.

kiwi in america (740) Vote: 4 3 Says:

July 5th, 2009 at 7:55 am
If the left love her and see her as a dream candidate to run against Obama as you say Danyl why do they invest so much time and energy in taking her out?

Oh for god’s sake, if she was any sort of leader she’d be able to look after herself politically, only losers whine about how the press treated them. And quitters.

Abbiamo un nuovo partito in Stati Uniti d’America. Il nome sarà Il Partito Fascista. Sarò Leader.

Ciao, Sarah.

I hope she starts a new party and scares the shit out of those useless compromisers in the Republican Party- Noonan, Bennett, Parker, Frum, and McCain etc who have betrayed her.

I sincerely hope you are right Red. No, truly.

http://www.adn.com/palin/story/853746.html

http://wonkette.com/409643/so-why-did-this-crazy-palin-lady-quit-the-alaska-governor-job-she-just-started-two-years-ago#more-409643

What sort of people do you think Palin appeals to?
What proportion of the population?

I agree that Obama wasn’t backed by a great resume. But condemning him before he has done the job is unfair. It’s a huge task anyway, and he has to also try and overcome some major messes left by his predecessor and circumstances. He has made a mixed start but it is too soon to say how he will measure up overall.

All you jerks can do is post boring pre-conceived left wing opinion. Why? What’s the point? Only the left could be so dumb.

The narcissistic bubble that Palin inhabits — such that she would see July 4 as a natural day to make it all about her — is, like Mark Sanford’s crazy Argentinian adventures, or the self-indulgent tea parties — the effect of a political movement in such disarray that its proponents can only sustain themselves with illusion and diversion. Most of the Republican big-beasts — Huckabee, Rove — have washed their hands of her, though she may well prove useful as a sort of party cheerleader, which is what she seems to aspire to.

Just about her last publicity appearance was an interview in Runner’s World, which featured her in full jogging gear, and sheer pantyhose, looking like an extra in a Devo film clip, in which she challenged Obama to a running race. In like spirit her remnant supporters go into the standard deeply confused political er-tics of the right, one praising her “balls of steel”, another urging her to be “Big Daddy to Obama’s soft mama”(!?!).’

Guy Rundle slightly savvier!

Obama is a lawyer who was a “community organizer,” whatever the fuck that means. He was a civil rights attorney, and worked with such noble organizations as ACORN, preently under investigation in numerous states for vote fraud.

In his 12 years as a law school professor, Obama failed to publish a single damn item.

Politically, Obama spent eight years in the Illinois Senate and joined the U.S. Senate in 2005. Palin, on the other hand, served four years on the Wasilla, Alaska, City Council and six years as the mayor/manager. She became the first woman governor of Alaska in 2006. She was doing things while Obama was voting absent 90% of the time.

However, much of Obama’s time in the U.S. Senate has been spent running for president. His life as an Illinois senator was so busy that he was still able to teach law at the University of Chicago.

Meanwhile, Palin out in the real world, was making actual decisions and forming budgets.

Where Obama accomplished SFA as a legislator, Palin actually got things done as a mayor and governor. During her tenure as mayor, she reduced property tax levels.

Face it. Life as a legislator is simple. You have an aide tell you what a bill means and then you cast a vote. You have very little responsibility and the ability to get anything done is very limited.

Obama had not crafted a single government budget. He had not made a single executive decision. He has not implemented a single governmental policy. In fact, running his campaign is about the only management experience Obama has ever had, and in reality he had fuck all to do with that either, having handlers and a teleprompter do all the work and failing miserably when they weren’t around to save his useless arse.

As I have already said above, some of the greatest presidents had very little governmental experience while some of our worst presidents were career politicians. Senators, historically, have made poor presidents while governors generally do a much better job.

In the end, actual government experience is less desirable than strong character and strong beliefs in limited government. That certainly describes Palin more than it does Obama, and its why she’s in reality the better choice by a light year.

Perhaps you can list some of Palin’s other qualities or credentials? I know she’s had more executive experience than Obama had, that’s giving full weight to her burdensome responsibilities as Mayor, but what else precisely do you feel are her claims to office?

So can you, simply, list her claims to be VP aside from her executive experience as Mayor of Wasilla (which I acknowledged was, or at least could be claimed, more executive experience that Obama had)? Just bullet points will do.

Oh crap, Obama was elected by a combination of media bias and vote fraud (ACORN) and appealing to an illiterate and uneducated under class (a product of Democrat policies) with meaningless slogans like “Hope and Change”.

Oh right, thanks for pointing that out. I guess that’ll be what’s behind all those election petitions (and I suppose it’s better than legislatively disenfranchising black people).

BTW, you’re seriously uninformed and out of touch. You’ll learn that soon. There is a deep growing anger in the US at the way Democrats steal elections by (among other means), attacking Republican candidates through their Democrat media partners. You’ve shot your bolt over Palin, and you’ll be paying for it for a long time.

Thanks for the skinny. I visit here to review the insights of those who’re truly connected to the political zeitgeist. The contrast between your earlier bluff and bluster and now this, rather muted, denunciation is hilarious.