http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/the_libertarian_debate.html

If so there doesn’t seem to be much point in covering the same ground again.”

]
True…..reality is still just that,man is still man and facts are still facts……;-)

Phool,
Once we laughed at your drug induced comments and stupidity.
Nobody cares about you now.
They did not care today, they did not care yesterday and they will not care tomorrow.
They did not care last week and they will not care next week.
They did not care last year, they do not care this year and they will not care next year.
You are a stupid prick.

Steve, you cared enough to post that. If you really don’t care, just ignore him. Don’t respond. Eventually he’ll get bored and fade away to a world filled with ellipses and one line blog entries.

precocious young child starts posting before calling it.

Castle-Hughes?

This blog is in very real danger of jumping the shark…..

Like America’s Top Model with their “OMG it’s a guy!” ploy. That has to be the most obvious “jumping of the shark” I’ve seen yet.

In terms of the poll, I voted for Tara as my favourite blogger, simply because she very effectively flushed out the worst of the ‘sewer’ quite effectively. That takes some skill.

I think you should wait until a precocious young child starts posting before calling it.

..anyone wanna sell him a bridge..?

..he loves to boast about how rich he is..

..(inherited..?..d’yareckon..?..)

phil(whoar.co.nz)

Get some idiot to make some comment that will anger most people and stand back and watch! With the odd stirring of the pot of course.

Then sell the advertising space…

Who was your favourite guest poster?

* Jadis (58%, 14 Votes)
* Peter Gibbons (21%, 5 Votes)
* Tara te Heke (21%, 5 Votes)
* The Bride (0%, 0 Votes)
Bad polling Cactus, guess you got up the nose of some.
I’m sure that can be fixed by the time I rise in the morning and by the time you go to bed tonight.

I have previously suggested that Cactus Kate had a hand in this. However, I doubt that neither DPF or National can afford her hourly rate.

The Tara posts are a surprise, and a disappointment. I visit this blog to read and engage in discussion with like-minded souls, and our opposites (and whatever sits in between – even you philu).

This is how KiwiBlog has done so well, and DPF has built a good reputation through it, and is frequently called upon by the MSM to comment on topical issues.

Just my opinion, but a set-up like this seems bizarre and an act of poor judgement. And I think it will harm the reputation DPF has built.

And I suspect, if anything, that the “Tara posts” are an experimental research tool for National as it looks to overhaul the social welfare system.

Possible and good correlation. the flair and style is definitely there

Let’s remember, there are those National members who pretended to be Maori beneficiaries in the past. (negative karma for that but sadly true)

But I hope not.

I want Tara to be real. An intelligent Maori woman who can define and comprehensively describe her real life frustrations. It doesn’t happen often from Maori’s and their sincere feedback need’s attention. although she sounds like she needs to get off her arse and jog it hard.

Plus, what a cop out from a usually classy and entertaining politically educated female such as Cactus.

This would be below her and unneeded considering her blogging talent.

But from the start I have quietly questioned where David found Tara.

anyone seen her in the blogosphere?

In order to win a sizeable chunk of the overall electorate, and not just rely on the DPB regulars what policies would you propose?

Bearing in mind the current Financial Storm that surrounds us?

So how about 10 policies for the DPB beneficiaries, and 10 to sway the rest of the electorate.

http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2007/03/the_libertarian_debate.html

If so there doesn’t seem to be much point in covering the same ground again.

I second that

But Rubies a strange one

What on earth does all that theology have to do with Tara.

The prohecies Ruby raises are still for the future. Especially to do with Israel.

There were some good points, such as Paul never mentioning Christs tomb. He definitely teaches the resurrection

And if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain and your faith is in vain.
(1 Corinthians 15:14)

Rubies reference that not all Jews have returned to Israel is probably correct but a mute point.

Israel became a state in one day according to the scriptures in 1948 and Jews have been returning ever since. Common knowledge.

And say unto them, Thus saith the Lord God; Behold, I will take the children of Israel from among the heathen, whither they be gone, and will gather them on every side, and bring them into their own land:
Ezekiel 37.21