I’m very very happy with today’s announcement from Steven Joyce:
Key highlights of the proposal include:
- An open, transparent partner selection process, which will be initiated in the next month.
- Government investment directed to an open access, wholesale-only, passive fibre network infrastructure.
- A new Crown-owned investment company (“Crown Fibre Holdings”), which will be operational by October, to carry out the government’s partner selection process and manage the government’s investment in fibre networks.
- Crown Fibre Holdings and each partner establishing a commercial vehicle, a “Local Fibre Company” (LFC), to deploy fibre network infrastructure and provide access to dark fibre products and, optionally, certain active wholesale Layer 2 services.
- Provision for national and regionally-focused proposals, as well as consortium and proposals aggregating any combination of LFC regions.
- Independence, equivalence and transparency requirements for LFCs.
- Expansion to 33 candidate coverage areas based on the largest urban areas (by population in 2021).
What is really good is the commitment to open access to dark fibre, and the regional approach to the issue. The Government has held firm to most of their draft proposal, with the main change being an increase in the number of coverage areas to 33.
Computerworld reports on positive reaction:
“The paper builds very constructively on the work done previously,” Newman says. “It takes into account most of the key issues raised in submissions, and sets a timetable with milestones. It is an excellent blueprint on which to build.” …
InternetNZ also welcomed the plan, saying it is “delighted” with today’s announcement of a regionally-based approach to investment.
“This is a world-leading programme that can be expected to deliver the infrastructure New Zealand needs,” spokesperson Jordan Carter says.
“Steven Joyce and the Government have put in place a framework that over time can deliver a widespread fibre rollout across urban New Zealand.”
Those unsure about the benefits of ultra-fast broadband, might want to read the guest post from Rod Drury earlier this week.
In the proposal document released today, the minister also flags that “The capacity and reliability of New Zealand’s international data connectivity will become increasingly important as LFCs’ [local fibre companies’] networks are deployed over the course of the UFB Initiative.”
The Commerce Commission recently identified slow international data as a roadblock to better domestic broadband performance, with testings showing that overseas pages take twice as long to load as those hosted locally – even with our current copper-dominated networks.
International bandwidth and data costs are often cited as a big issue also.
In a fit of good timing, Juha Saarinen has an article in Computeworld on dark fibre, and how you basically can not get it from Telecom or TelstraClear. Have a look at this price comparison and weep:
James Watts, who runs Palmerston North-based ISP Inspire Net, says the reason dark fibre is attractive to his customers is because they can “do whatever the hell they want with it.” Inspire currently charges $595 and $995 for intra-town dark fibre pair leases, depending on contract terms, and double that for inter-town unlit circuits.
To light the circuits, Watts says his company sells Gigabit Ethernet transceivers for $140 each.
A similar 1Gbit/s circuit from Telecom apparently costs $7000 a month, plus installation charges.It’s $69k a year according to Telecom’s pricing book.
Finally a focus on the issue of fibre providers being discouraged from also operating retail telecommunication services, both here and in Australia. Steven Joyce said in a Q&A:
Will Telecom have to structurally separate its network business to participate?
Any such decisions are up to Telecom. The Government has made it clear that it will only invest money into fibre companies that are not controlled by shareholders who also operate retail telecommunication businesses. The Government is also clear that potential partners who already own fibre assets can table options that involve those fibre assets being vended into any new fibre companies.
Preventing vertically integrated monopolies is crucial. This basically means Telecom can not be a majority shareholder in any regional fibre company unless they structurally separate (ie sell off Chorus). They can have a minority stake however.
In Australia, the Government has done similiar:
The government could also deny Telstra access to new spectrum for advanced wireless broadband unless the telco sells off its cable network and 50 per cent stake in Foxtel (25 per cent owned by News Corporation, owner of The Australian)
If you want to be part of the future, you need to be separated.
For those who think separation is not a big issue, think what it would be like if Air New Zealand owned the airports and could set access terms for other airlines. Or if Ford owned the roads and set the rules for what other cars could drive on them, and for how much.
So as I said, very pleased with the announcements today, and now working my way through the details.Tags: broadband, Chris Keall, Ernie Newman, fibre, Inspire Net, InternetNZ, James Watts, Jordan Carter, Juha Saarinen, Operational Separation, Steven Joyce, structural separation, Telecom, Telstra, Telstra-Clear, TUANZ