Afghan Elections go to second round

October 21st, 2009 at 12:00 pm by David Farrar

Reuters reports:

President Hamid Karzai has agreed to face a second round of voting in Afghanistan’s disputed election after a UN-led fraud inquiry tossed out enough of his votes to trigger a run-off.

It was a corrupt election, but good to see the UN in this case stood up to the local Government, and as a result there will be a second round of voting. Karzai would have lacked legitimacy if he had refused a second round.

The challenge now is for him and/or his supporters not to create fake votes next time. If the second round is as corrupt as the first round, it will reduce the moral legitimacy of the Government, and make it harder for the NATO led effort to continue.

Tags: ,

5 Responses to “Afghan Elections go to second round”

  1. MikeNZ (3,234) Says:

    yeah
    not create fake votes, Want to take a bet on that?
    Some are putting all the eggs in the basket on this.

    http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/10/lose_afghanistan_lose_pakistan.html at October 20, 2009 – 06:46:03 PM EDT

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. Peter2715626 (23) Says:

    This is another proof that implementing the western concept of democracy in Afganistan is a waste of time.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. MikeNZ (3,234) Says:

    We put in place and have supported a govt which wrote a constitution that discriminates against non-Muslim Iraqis and will ultimately demonise them as non humans as Sharia law is fully implemented. Which will be the same in Afghanistan.

    The 3rd Bush doctrine stated – “The survival of liberty in our land increasingly depends on the success of liberty in other lands.
    The best hope for peace in our world is the expansion of freedom in all of the world.”

    He wasn’t all bad despite the MSM.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. sk1 (7) Says:

    So DPF, can you explain why the SAS are in Afghanstania? I sure as hell do not get it.

    Shouldn’t this have been a decision where some advice was taken, and some intelligence (both forms: intel and brainpower) deployed?

    http://www.independent.co.uk/opinion/commentators/johann-hari/johann-hari-the-three-fallacies-that-have-driven-the-war-in-afghanistan-1806191.html

    Your chutzpah in posting on the topic of Afghanistania given your links to the current government is extraordinary

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. NeilM (342) Says:

    “and some intelligence”

    apart from the shit crazy right and left most people consider Obama intelligent. So it’s not surprising our govt has opted for sanity and supported Obama.

    Labour have gone for the shit crazy so you can vote for them.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.