<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: General Debate 11 November 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:35:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeNZ</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630742</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeNZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 19:22:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630742</guid>
		<description>He represents who his constituents are!
The King is the glory of the nation!
If he didn&#039;t they wouldn&#039;t vote for him.

So what does that say about us with Key and National?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>He represents who his constituents are!<br />
The King is the glory of the nation!<br />
If he didn&#8217;t they wouldn&#8217;t vote for him.</p>
<p>So what does that say about us with Key and National?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oseanain</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630711</link>
		<dc:creator>oseanain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 10:28:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630711</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tangata Whenua&quot; = &quot;that term we can use to make our opinion more important than anyone else&#039;s&quot;

I&#039;m sceptical that even Maori themselves understand the meaning of this term. &quot;People of the land&quot; or anything that refers to Maori as the first people of NZ is a common definition, though I fail to see how this makes them any different from anyone else. I must apologise here now actually - I&#039;m coming from a thread that was back in April about Harawira speaking at a policy lecture at UofA where he called one Steve Baron, a student, a racist due to the latter&#039;s including Maori as a minority group in NZ. Which of course they are. 

Basically my point is Harawira should be stood down as an MP of this country. He is not a good role model for his constituents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tangata Whenua&#8221; = &#8220;that term we can use to make our opinion more important than anyone else&#8217;s&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;m sceptical that even Maori themselves understand the meaning of this term. &#8220;People of the land&#8221; or anything that refers to Maori as the first people of NZ is a common definition, though I fail to see how this makes them any different from anyone else. I must apologise here now actually &#8211; I&#8217;m coming from a thread that was back in April about Harawira speaking at a policy lecture at UofA where he called one Steve Baron, a student, a racist due to the latter&#8217;s including Maori as a minority group in NZ. Which of course they are. </p>
<p>Basically my point is Harawira should be stood down as an MP of this country. He is not a good role model for his constituents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nickb</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630704</link>
		<dc:creator>nickb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 09:01:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630704</guid>
		<description>http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&amp;objectid=10608670
Oh well, the Maori Party is taking staunch action on Hone isn&#039;t it?

My bet is that he will be publicly thrashed with a wet lettuce leaf, while being privately told by the kaumatua to &quot;take the white man for all he&#039;s got-how was Paris?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&#038;objectid=10608670" rel="nofollow">http://www.nzherald.co.nz/nz/news/article.cfm?c_id=1&#038;objectid=10608670</a><br />
Oh well, the Maori Party is taking staunch action on Hone isn&#8217;t it?</p>
<p>My bet is that he will be publicly thrashed with a wet lettuce leaf, while being privately told by the kaumatua to &#8220;take the white man for all he&#8217;s got-how was Paris?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack5</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630700</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:44:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630700</guid>
		<description>As for Cadmus&#039;s report of the Soviet Asian troops wearing strips of cloth for socks.

Such bindings were, and may still be, standard winter practice for Russian troops, and followed centuries old Russian peasant practice. Worn inside tough boots, they were virtually water proof, and withstood the bitter winter conditions better than the Germans&#039;  socks and boots.

The Russians were also cruel to the Germans, but at least they do not boast about it, as Cadmus&#039;s odious German obviously  does (or did).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As for Cadmus&#8217;s report of the Soviet Asian troops wearing strips of cloth for socks.</p>
<p>Such bindings were, and may still be, standard winter practice for Russian troops, and followed centuries old Russian peasant practice. Worn inside tough boots, they were virtually water proof, and withstood the bitter winter conditions better than the Germans&#8217;  socks and boots.</p>
<p>The Russians were also cruel to the Germans, but at least they do not boast about it, as Cadmus&#8217;s odious German obviously  does (or did).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack5</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630695</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack5</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:29:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630695</guid>
		<description>I find Cadmus&#039;s reports of the  German&#039;s comments (4.04 and 5.19 posts) about Asian soldiers in the Red Army  repugnant.

The comments would have been about the Kalmyks, Khazahks, Buryats, and other Tatar minorities in Russia. They formed an important part of the Siberian divisions that were called westwards when the Germans threatened Moscow, and after a spy reported to Moscow that the Japanese were going to strike south towards Malaysia, IndoChina, and the SOuth Pacific rather than attack the Soviet Union in Siberia.

The Siberian divisions, tough and at home in the snow,  turned the tide for Russia, and thus for all of us. They gave the German Army the critical hiding of the war at the approaches to Moscow, even more important than Stalingrad. It was such a defeat that Nazi political &quot;cabinet minister&quot; Fritz Todt, the builder of Germany&#039;s superb autobahns, flew to Hitler and called on him to sue for peace with Stalin. Hitler rejected the idea, and Todt&#039;s plane blew up on a flight away from the meeting, brought down by a bomb believed to have been planted by the SS.

The Tatar troops were excellent soldiers, and when in tank units, they adapted their ancient cavalry tactics, such as the  fish-hook retreat. 

The German&#039;s  comments as reported by Cadmus, are the sort of odious racism you would expect from a fanatic Nazi. Fuck him. I&#039;m pleased our fathers and uncles (these days I guess, our grandfathers) fought such scum, and thankful they had the Red Army on their side, Tatars included.

By the way I hadn&#039;t heard of ex-Nazis volunteering to fight in Vietnam, though earlier plenty of ex-SS troops were in the French units in the French IndoChina war, as part of a clemency deal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find Cadmus&#8217;s reports of the  German&#8217;s comments (4.04 and 5.19 posts) about Asian soldiers in the Red Army  repugnant.</p>
<p>The comments would have been about the Kalmyks, Khazahks, Buryats, and other Tatar minorities in Russia. They formed an important part of the Siberian divisions that were called westwards when the Germans threatened Moscow, and after a spy reported to Moscow that the Japanese were going to strike south towards Malaysia, IndoChina, and the SOuth Pacific rather than attack the Soviet Union in Siberia.</p>
<p>The Siberian divisions, tough and at home in the snow,  turned the tide for Russia, and thus for all of us. They gave the German Army the critical hiding of the war at the approaches to Moscow, even more important than Stalingrad. It was such a defeat that Nazi political &#8220;cabinet minister&#8221; Fritz Todt, the builder of Germany&#8217;s superb autobahns, flew to Hitler and called on him to sue for peace with Stalin. Hitler rejected the idea, and Todt&#8217;s plane blew up on a flight away from the meeting, brought down by a bomb believed to have been planted by the SS.</p>
<p>The Tatar troops were excellent soldiers, and when in tank units, they adapted their ancient cavalry tactics, such as the  fish-hook retreat. </p>
<p>The German&#8217;s  comments as reported by Cadmus, are the sort of odious racism you would expect from a fanatic Nazi. Fuck him. I&#8217;m pleased our fathers and uncles (these days I guess, our grandfathers) fought such scum, and thankful they had the Red Army on their side, Tatars included.</p>
<p>By the way I hadn&#8217;t heard of ex-Nazis volunteering to fight in Vietnam, though earlier plenty of ex-SS troops were in the French units in the French IndoChina war, as part of a clemency deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty Rat</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630673</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirty Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630673</guid>
		<description>Big Bruv

How much tax do you pay ?

Are you self employed so people like me can get you off tax, or are you a weasly snively little employee, whos employer has to PAYE on your behalf ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Big Bruv</p>
<p>How much tax do you pay ?</p>
<p>Are you self employed so people like me can get you off tax, or are you a weasly snively little employee, whos employer has to PAYE on your behalf ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dirty Rat</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630668</link>
		<dc:creator>Dirty Rat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 07:16:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630668</guid>
		<description>Gordon Brown challenges mother to televised spelling bee
By Jeff Nicols  
The Prime Minister has challenged the grieving mother of a soldier killed in Afghanistan to a US-style televised spelling bee in response to criticism he received after spelling her name incorrectly in a letter of condolence.

In the offending letter Brown used a thick crayon, and referred to the mother of soldier Jamie Janes by the wrong name.

“I would never show disrespect to anyone by spelling something badly,” said Mrs. Janes (Is this right? -ed.)

The Prime Minister, well known for having a head for figures, is “a dark horse when it comes to spelling”, according to one spelling expert.

“It’s kind of ironic that he misspelt her rather simple name when he gets regular practise spelling long words like Incompetence, Recession and Financial-Armageddon.”

Calligraphy

Gordon Brown drew fire of his own this week, and not all of it friendly, when he was accused not just of bad spelling but poor penmanship.

The maligned PM has reportedly taken up calligraphy in an effort to improve his writing. He is thought to be working on Baroque Hand and Champignon Serif in an effort to wow the next tranche of bereaved next of kin.

Support

Labour supporters believe the recent events work in the government’s favour, pointing out that a one-eyed man who can’t spell has much in common with the people, or at the very least should secure the crucial pirate vote.

A Conservative spokesman this week said: “I’ve been in politics for 58 years, the writing is on the wall for Labour - though to be honest you can hardly read it.”



Read more: Gordon Brown challenges grieving mother to televised spelling bee &#124; newsarse.com http://newsarse.com/2009/11/10/gordon-brown-challenges-mother-to-televised-spelling-bee/#ixzz0WX6O6fMS</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gordon Brown challenges mother to televised spelling bee<br />
By Jeff Nicols<br />
The Prime Minister has challenged the grieving mother of a soldier killed in Afghanistan to a US-style televised spelling bee in response to criticism he received after spelling her name incorrectly in a letter of condolence.</p>
<p>In the offending letter Brown used a thick crayon, and referred to the mother of soldier Jamie Janes by the wrong name.</p>
<p>“I would never show disrespect to anyone by spelling something badly,” said Mrs. Janes (Is this right? -ed.)</p>
<p>The Prime Minister, well known for having a head for figures, is “a dark horse when it comes to spelling”, according to one spelling expert.</p>
<p>“It’s kind of ironic that he misspelt her rather simple name when he gets regular practise spelling long words like Incompetence, Recession and Financial-Armageddon.”</p>
<p>Calligraphy</p>
<p>Gordon Brown drew fire of his own this week, and not all of it friendly, when he was accused not just of bad spelling but poor penmanship.</p>
<p>The maligned PM has reportedly taken up calligraphy in an effort to improve his writing. He is thought to be working on Baroque Hand and Champignon Serif in an effort to wow the next tranche of bereaved next of kin.</p>
<p>Support</p>
<p>Labour supporters believe the recent events work in the government’s favour, pointing out that a one-eyed man who can’t spell has much in common with the people, or at the very least should secure the crucial pirate vote.</p>
<p>A Conservative spokesman this week said: “I’ve been in politics for 58 years, the writing is on the wall for Labour &#8211; though to be honest you can hardly read it.”</p>
<p>Read more: Gordon Brown challenges grieving mother to televised spelling bee | newsarse.com <a href="http://newsarse.com/2009/11/10/gordon-brown-challenges-mother-to-televised-spelling-bee/#ixzz0WX6O6fMS" rel="nofollow">http://newsarse.com/2009/11/10/gordon-brown-challenges-mother-to-televised-spelling-bee/#ixzz0WX6O6fMS</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadmus</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630622</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadmus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 04:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630622</guid>
		<description>Ryan Sproull....He told be the Soviet asian gooks in WW2 had strips of cloth for socks. The germans used a lot of horses in the war which had to be well cared for. They used product still in use (Horse Liniment) which was for sprains to the horses. Something 5 times as strong as standard liniment. The Germans used to rub it on the feet of the gooks when upside down on a rope to get information. He said the gooks would holla and scream. It burnt like hell on the soft part of the bare sole. If the Gook really held out they then would grab the bottle and pull the Gooks trousers down and then show the bottle. He told me then the information flowed freely!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ryan Sproull&#8230;.He told be the Soviet asian gooks in WW2 had strips of cloth for socks. The germans used a lot of horses in the war which had to be well cared for. They used product still in use (Horse Liniment) which was for sprains to the horses. Something 5 times as strong as standard liniment. The Germans used to rub it on the feet of the gooks when upside down on a rope to get information. He said the gooks would holla and scream. It burnt like hell on the soft part of the bare sole. If the Gook really held out they then would grab the bottle and pull the Gooks trousers down and then show the bottle. He told me then the information flowed freely!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurf Durf</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630600</link>
		<dc:creator>Hurf Durf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:44:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630600</guid>
		<description>Gwen Dyer, the man wrong on everything, sez the War of Terror has something to do with the Fort Hood shooting. Well, when you&#039;re an anti-Western Marxist, any excuse will do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gwen Dyer, the man wrong on everything, sez the War of Terror has something to do with the Fort Hood shooting. Well, when you&#8217;re an anti-Western Marxist, any excuse will do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Sproull</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630588</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Sproull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:22:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630588</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Talking of Nazi Germany I new a guy that was in the Hitler Youth as a kid. He volunteered for Nam and was excepted no problem. The same guy told me that things were great in Germany until 1942 . He said he would go back to those days again if he could, everyone was happy. I asked about the killing of those undisireables. He thought it was great idea, so did eveyone else. He told me that in the end everyone (Germans) were happy and Proud to be German for once instead of being the scum of Europe. As the undisirables vanished the whole of society felt safer, more money, new goods. He said people didn’t do anything not because of fear but because the govt was doing a great job most thought? He told me they never showed the good side of Germany in the 1930’s when the rest of the world was starving and unemployed and they where having a great time. I said what happened near the end of the war. He told me nothing! his sister was in the Girls Hitler Youth our mother burned the uniforms and headed West. The house was stuffed the old man was in a prison camp in France and we started a New life in the US in 1947. He said he joined up to fight in Nam because he hated gooks! He told me half the Russian Soviet army was full of them, he rembered seeing them captured on news reels in Germany, ugly horrible little people in uniforms far to big for them. He told me the germans used to hang the gooks upside down with a rope around the feet when they captured them ,the gooks didn’t like that.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The fellow sounds undesirable himself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Talking of Nazi Germany I new a guy that was in the Hitler Youth as a kid. He volunteered for Nam and was excepted no problem. The same guy told me that things were great in Germany until 1942 . He said he would go back to those days again if he could, everyone was happy. I asked about the killing of those undisireables. He thought it was great idea, so did eveyone else. He told me that in the end everyone (Germans) were happy and Proud to be German for once instead of being the scum of Europe. As the undisirables vanished the whole of society felt safer, more money, new goods. He said people didn’t do anything not because of fear but because the govt was doing a great job most thought? He told me they never showed the good side of Germany in the 1930’s when the rest of the world was starving and unemployed and they where having a great time. I said what happened near the end of the war. He told me nothing! his sister was in the Girls Hitler Youth our mother burned the uniforms and headed West. The house was stuffed the old man was in a prison camp in France and we started a New life in the US in 1947. He said he joined up to fight in Nam because he hated gooks! He told me half the Russian Soviet army was full of them, he rembered seeing them captured on news reels in Germany, ugly horrible little people in uniforms far to big for them. He told me the germans used to hang the gooks upside down with a rope around the feet when they captured them ,the gooks didn’t like that.</p></blockquote>
<p>The fellow sounds undesirable himself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cadmus</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630578</link>
		<dc:creator>Cadmus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:04:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630578</guid>
		<description>Brian Smaller said...If you’re looking for atheist regimes persecuting religious groups, why look further than China today? 

I know Pansey Wong was born in Shanghi???? Wong and her husband have had several trips to China. Who know&#039;s the Wong&#039;s could have a hidden agenda??? Remember the Rosenberg&#039;s.

Talking of Nazi Germany I new a guy that was in the Hitler Youth as a kid. He volunteered for Nam and was excepted no problem. The same guy told me that things were great in Germany until 1942 . He said he would go back to those days again if he could, everyone was happy. I asked about the killing of those undisireables. He thought it was great idea, so did eveyone else. He told me that in the end everyone (Germans) were happy and Proud to be German for once instead of being the scum of Europe. As the undisirables vanished the whole of society felt safer, more money, new goods. He said people didn&#039;t do anything not because of fear but because the govt was doing a great job most thought? He told me they never showed the good side of Germany in the 1930&#039;s when the rest of the world was starving and unemployed and they where having a great time. I said what happened near the end of the war. He told me nothing! his sister was in the Girls Hitler Youth our mother burned the uniforms and headed West. The house was stuffed the old man was in a prison camp in France and we started a New life in the US in 1947. He said he joined up to fight in Nam  because he hated gooks! He told me half the Russian Soviet army was full of them, he rembered seeing them captured on news reels in Germany, ugly horrible little people in uniforms far to big for them. He told me the germans used to hang the gooks upside down with a rope around the feet when they captured them ,the gooks didn&#039;t like that.

I found it quit interesting, but somethings he told me are best left off this board!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brian Smaller said&#8230;If you’re looking for atheist regimes persecuting religious groups, why look further than China today? </p>
<p>I know Pansey Wong was born in Shanghi???? Wong and her husband have had several trips to China. Who know&#8217;s the Wong&#8217;s could have a hidden agenda??? Remember the Rosenberg&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Talking of Nazi Germany I new a guy that was in the Hitler Youth as a kid. He volunteered for Nam and was excepted no problem. The same guy told me that things were great in Germany until 1942 . He said he would go back to those days again if he could, everyone was happy. I asked about the killing of those undisireables. He thought it was great idea, so did eveyone else. He told me that in the end everyone (Germans) were happy and Proud to be German for once instead of being the scum of Europe. As the undisirables vanished the whole of society felt safer, more money, new goods. He said people didn&#8217;t do anything not because of fear but because the govt was doing a great job most thought? He told me they never showed the good side of Germany in the 1930&#8242;s when the rest of the world was starving and unemployed and they where having a great time. I said what happened near the end of the war. He told me nothing! his sister was in the Girls Hitler Youth our mother burned the uniforms and headed West. The house was stuffed the old man was in a prison camp in France and we started a New life in the US in 1947. He said he joined up to fight in Nam  because he hated gooks! He told me half the Russian Soviet army was full of them, he rembered seeing them captured on news reels in Germany, ugly horrible little people in uniforms far to big for them. He told me the germans used to hang the gooks upside down with a rope around the feet when they captured them ,the gooks didn&#8217;t like that.</p>
<p>I found it quit interesting, but somethings he told me are best left off this board!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Sproull</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630577</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Sproull</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 03:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630577</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Ryan Sproull at 10.10 asked for references for Hitler’s atheism, and later suggested Hitler promoted something called positive Christianity.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I didn&#039;t suggest, I cited historical fact.


&lt;blockquote&gt;Here’s a good solid reference Ryan. Michael Burleigh, one of the top historical authorities on Hitler, in his 2000 book: The Third Reich, a New History. See the last chapter in Part Nine, “Men of God”.

Hitler’s views in his own words:

Christianity is nothing but ” wholehearted Bolshevism under a tinsel of methaphysics”.

And Christianity is “an invention of sick brains” and Hitler asked: “Who is this God who takes pleasure only in seeing men grovel before him”.

And, pertinent to the Pacific: “.. a Negro with his taboos is crushingly superior to the human being who seriously believes in Transubstantiation…”

And “.. I dream of a state of affairs in which every man would know that he lives and dies for the preservation of the species…”

Burleigh says elsewhere in the book that for the Nazis, Christ was an inconvenience, except when crucified by the Jews.

Burleigh also writes Nazis despised Christianity (page 255 of the Pan edition of the book).&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The question wasn&#039;t whether or not Hitler was a Christian, but whether or not he was an atheist.

But that research does seem to suggest that if he was a theist, he wasn&#039;t a Christian theist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Ryan Sproull at 10.10 asked for references for Hitler’s atheism, and later suggested Hitler promoted something called positive Christianity.</p></blockquote>
<p>I didn&#8217;t suggest, I cited historical fact.</p>
<blockquote><p>Here’s a good solid reference Ryan. Michael Burleigh, one of the top historical authorities on Hitler, in his 2000 book: The Third Reich, a New History. See the last chapter in Part Nine, “Men of God”.</p>
<p>Hitler’s views in his own words:</p>
<p>Christianity is nothing but ” wholehearted Bolshevism under a tinsel of methaphysics”.</p>
<p>And Christianity is “an invention of sick brains” and Hitler asked: “Who is this God who takes pleasure only in seeing men grovel before him”.</p>
<p>And, pertinent to the Pacific: “.. a Negro with his taboos is crushingly superior to the human being who seriously believes in Transubstantiation…”</p>
<p>And “.. I dream of a state of affairs in which every man would know that he lives and dies for the preservation of the species…”</p>
<p>Burleigh says elsewhere in the book that for the Nazis, Christ was an inconvenience, except when crucified by the Jews.</p>
<p>Burleigh also writes Nazis despised Christianity (page 255 of the Pan edition of the book).</p></blockquote>
<p>The question wasn&#8217;t whether or not Hitler was a Christian, but whether or not he was an atheist.</p>
<p>But that research does seem to suggest that if he was a theist, he wasn&#8217;t a Christian theist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MikeNZ</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630571</link>
		<dc:creator>MikeNZ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630571</guid>
		<description>Ohh Boy Murray
I wish those in parliament could get their heads round that too!

I thought we were the crown, the collective?
If not off with her head!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ohh Boy Murray<br />
I wish those in parliament could get their heads round that too!</p>
<p>I thought we were the crown, the collective?<br />
If not off with her head!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Busker</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630559</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Busker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 02:02:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630559</guid>
		<description>The political scrutiny recently isn&#039;t simply because corruption appeared before the country - like it did not exist or was not seen previously. Nor was it specifically to do with the recession as if that in itself was an independent cause: it was because some folk decided to ask the right questions and make the proper demands. After a while of badgering and standing one&#039;s ground some folk who have power eventually have to concede. What I am asking you to consider is that the regimes established in NZ government linking into the courts and over a considerable period have calcified corrupted practices. They can do it because they own and distribute the money you earn. Until they are drawn to a monitored regulation of effect then there will be no proper free system and fear will be maintained and abused as the market of that freedom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The political scrutiny recently isn&#8217;t simply because corruption appeared before the country &#8211; like it did not exist or was not seen previously. Nor was it specifically to do with the recession as if that in itself was an independent cause: it was because some folk decided to ask the right questions and make the proper demands. After a while of badgering and standing one&#8217;s ground some folk who have power eventually have to concede. What I am asking you to consider is that the regimes established in NZ government linking into the courts and over a considerable period have calcified corrupted practices. They can do it because they own and distribute the money you earn. Until they are drawn to a monitored regulation of effect then there will be no proper free system and fear will be maintained and abused as the market of that freedom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630557</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:46:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630557</guid>
		<description>And yet its still giving other peoples money away.

Get your head around the idea that the people ARE the government. Those elected to operate it are our servants. Not the other way round.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And yet its still giving other peoples money away.</p>
<p>Get your head around the idea that the people ARE the government. Those elected to operate it are our servants. Not the other way round.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Busker</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630536</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Busker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630536</guid>
		<description>You don&#039;t own the money when you give it to the Crown. They own it. To think otherwise is to drift along in a mind set of self importance and the very reason I complain (and prove) about complacency: Please, think about it, it is avery important junction in democracy, its purpose, and the how and why of how it is abused. The WCC and Infratil, the BNZ, the HRC and all of these activities letting you think you are something more important to them than a cash cow exposes the facts that slip by when you think you have any real control about what it is they feed you. .The Maori system is different from this. In that system the human is the principal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You don&#8217;t own the money when you give it to the Crown. They own it. To think otherwise is to drift along in a mind set of self importance and the very reason I complain (and prove) about complacency: Please, think about it, it is avery important junction in democracy, its purpose, and the how and why of how it is abused. The WCC and Infratil, the BNZ, the HRC and all of these activities letting you think you are something more important to them than a cash cow exposes the facts that slip by when you think you have any real control about what it is they feed you. .The Maori system is different from this. In that system the human is the principal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630528</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:09:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630528</guid>
		<description>The money that &quot;other people&quot; are giving away is in fact ours PB.

Lingual gymnastics wont change that simple fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The money that &#8220;other people&#8221; are giving away is in fact ours PB.</p>
<p>Lingual gymnastics wont change that simple fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Busker</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630525</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Busker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 01:02:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630525</guid>
		<description>I didn&#039;t say that you had to - I suggest we run a system embodied under two functional principles in existence. You pay for a system anyway. It isn&#039;t you who gives Maori money, just like it isn&#039;t you who pays for the unemployed - it is the politicians. You agree to let them make decisions and they get back to you consulting with what they do. Optimally they do this with care and consideration - very unlike the WCC allowing Infratil to take a city and eventually a nation.  

Your impression that your money is used for anything specific other than for the benefit of an operating system is wrong. You pay tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I didn&#8217;t say that you had to &#8211; I suggest we run a system embodied under two functional principles in existence. You pay for a system anyway. It isn&#8217;t you who gives Maori money, just like it isn&#8217;t you who pays for the unemployed &#8211; it is the politicians. You agree to let them make decisions and they get back to you consulting with what they do. Optimally they do this with care and consideration &#8211; very unlike the WCC allowing Infratil to take a city and eventually a nation.  </p>
<p>Your impression that your money is used for anything specific other than for the benefit of an operating system is wrong. You pay tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Murray</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630522</link>
		<dc:creator>Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:59:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630522</guid>
		<description>They&#039;re not &quot;side by side&quot;, one is a parasite of the other.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They&#8217;re not &#8220;side by side&#8221;, one is a parasite of the other.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: big bruv</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_11_november_2009.html#comment-630520</link>
		<dc:creator>big bruv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 00:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38133#comment-630520</guid>
		<description>PB

Given that you are suggesting two separate nations existing along side each other I fail to see why I should have to pay one cent to Maori.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>PB</p>
<p>Given that you are suggesting two separate nations existing along side each other I fail to see why I should have to pay one cent to Maori.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

