<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: General Debate 24 November 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 03:36:02 +1300</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Luc Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635599</link>
		<dc:creator>Luc Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 18:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635599</guid>
		<description>hurf 11.52pm

That&#039;s a good study of the arguments presented in favour of continuing the carnage in Afghanistan and Pakistan, with many valid points.

But I think any comparison with Hamas and Hezbollah is wrong, simply because in those cases both organisations sprung up to resist belligerent occupation by Israel.  But the US, I believe, never intended to occupy Afghanistan - remember the repeated babarianism of &quot;bombing the country back to the stone age?&quot; - but found itself trapped there.  One of the reasons it is still there is actually a good aspect of the US; an unwillingness to allow the internal civil war that would play out against the back drop of the damage to its international reputation.

But sometimes you have to bite the bullet, as the British and the Russians did before it in Afghanistan, the French did in Algeria and the US did in Vietnam.  And of course, these examples only strengthen the resolve of the resistance groups, and that is their true relevance to today&#039;s situation.

Briefly, the ability of the Pakistan army to deal with internal threats is grossly underestimated. The US allowed Pakistan to develop the cold war enemy mentality which actually gave rise to the Taleban (it started in Pakistan, sponsored by the ISI and the army), and more diplomatic effort to deal with Kashmir would see Pakistan&#039;s army redirected from conflict with India to concentrate on internal threats.

The article touches on the real problem for the US, the unwillingness of voters to countenance continued involvement with increasing costs in blood and treasure.  It&#039;s a problem of democracy.  This is the real battleground.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hurf 11.52pm</p>
<p>That&#8217;s a good study of the arguments presented in favour of continuing the carnage in Afghanistan and Pakistan, with many valid points.</p>
<p>But I think any comparison with Hamas and Hezbollah is wrong, simply because in those cases both organisations sprung up to resist belligerent occupation by Israel.  But the US, I believe, never intended to occupy Afghanistan &#8211; remember the repeated babarianism of &#8220;bombing the country back to the stone age?&#8221; &#8211; but found itself trapped there.  One of the reasons it is still there is actually a good aspect of the US; an unwillingness to allow the internal civil war that would play out against the back drop of the damage to its international reputation.</p>
<p>But sometimes you have to bite the bullet, as the British and the Russians did before it in Afghanistan, the French did in Algeria and the US did in Vietnam.  And of course, these examples only strengthen the resolve of the resistance groups, and that is their true relevance to today&#8217;s situation.</p>
<p>Briefly, the ability of the Pakistan army to deal with internal threats is grossly underestimated. The US allowed Pakistan to develop the cold war enemy mentality which actually gave rise to the Taleban (it started in Pakistan, sponsored by the ISI and the army), and more diplomatic effort to deal with Kashmir would see Pakistan&#8217;s army redirected from conflict with India to concentrate on internal threats.</p>
<p>The article touches on the real problem for the US, the unwillingness of voters to countenance continued involvement with increasing costs in blood and treasure.  It&#8217;s a problem of democracy.  This is the real battleground.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Smaller</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635596</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Smaller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 17:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635596</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Chthoniid (764) Vote:  1   0   Says: 

November 24th, 2009 at 9:42 pm 
@Brian Smaller

Now there is something I have never thought on before. Do vegan women swallow?

Would ingestion really be considered different to umm, delivery into other anatomical regions? Either way, it’s inside.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I don&#039;t know but would be willing to help any vegan woman if she wanted to explore this dilemma.

As an aside - Google &quot;Do vegan women swallow&quot; and be amused. Perhpas it wasn&#039;t a joke after all :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Chthoniid (764) Vote:  1   0   Says: </p>
<p>November 24th, 2009 at 9:42 pm<br />
@Brian Smaller</p>
<p>Now there is something I have never thought on before. Do vegan women swallow?</p>
<p>Would ingestion really be considered different to umm, delivery into other anatomical regions? Either way, it’s inside.
</p></blockquote>
<p>I don&#8217;t know but would be willing to help any vegan woman if she wanted to explore this dilemma.</p>
<p>As an aside &#8211; Google &#8220;Do vegan women swallow&#8221; and be amused. Perhpas it wasn&#8217;t a joke after all <img src='http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurf Durf</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635587</link>
		<dc:creator>Hurf Durf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 10:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635587</guid>
		<description>That shit Editing the Herald blawg makes me lol hard. The fact that it and most of its columnists already leans left doesn&#039;t matter to these clowns; they&#039;re butthurt that it isn&#039;t more like Alternet.

Also: &lt;a href=&quot;http://editingtheherald.blogspot.com/2009/11/repeal-section-51.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;evidence of left wing infiltration at the March for Democracy.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That shit Editing the Herald blawg makes me lol hard. The fact that it and most of its columnists already leans left doesn&#8217;t matter to these clowns; they&#8217;re butthurt that it isn&#8217;t more like Alternet.</p>
<p>Also: <a href="http://editingtheherald.blogspot.com/2009/11/repeal-section-51.html" rel="nofollow">evidence of left wing infiltration at the March for Democracy.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurf Durf</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635579</link>
		<dc:creator>Hurf Durf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635579</guid>
		<description>An FPI factsheet blows the myths purported by Puke &lt;a href=&quot;http://foreignpolicyi.org/node/13391&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;out of the water&lt;/a&gt;:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Charge: We can defeat our enemy in Afghanistan with a more limited counterterrorism strategy, using drones and increased intelligence gathering.

Response: “If the United States should adopt a small-footprint counterterrorism strategy, Afghanistan would descend again into civil war,” Frederick Kagan testified before the House Armed Services Committee. “The Taliban group headed by Mullah Omar and operating in southern Afghanistan (including especially Helmand, Kandahar, and Oruzgan Provinces) is well positioned to take control of that area upon the withdrawal of American and allied combat forces. The remaining Afghan security forces would be unable to resist a Taliban offensive. They would be defeated and would disintegrate. The fear of renewed Taliban assaults would mobilize the Tajiks, Uzbeks, and Hazaras in northern and central Afghanistan. The Taliban itself would certainly drive on Herat and Kabul, leading to war with northern militias. This conflict would collapse the Afghan state, mobilize the Afghan population, and cause many Afghans to flee into Pakistan and Iran. Within Pakistan, the U.S. reversion to a counterterrorism strategy (from the counterinsurgency strategy for which Obama reaffirmed his support as recently as August) would disrupt the delicate balance that has made possible recent Pakistani progress against internal foes and al Qaeda.” -- House Armed Services Committee

In Commentary, Max Boot notes, “it is hard to point to any place where pure [counterterrorism] has defeated a determined terrorist or guerrilla group. This is the strategy that Israel has used against Hamas and Hezbollah. The result is that Hamas controls Gaza, and Hezbollah controls southern Lebanon. It is the strategy that the U.S. has employed in Somalia since our forces pulled out in 1994. The result is that the country is utterly chaotic and lawless, and an Islamic fundamentalist group called the Shabab, which has close links to al-Qaeda, is gaining strength. Most pertinently, it is also the strategy the U.S. has used for years in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The result is that the Taliban control the tribal areas of Pakistan and are extending their influence across large swathes of Afghanistan.” -- Commentary &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An FPI factsheet blows the myths purported by Puke <a href="http://foreignpolicyi.org/node/13391" rel="nofollow">out of the water</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>Charge: We can defeat our enemy in Afghanistan with a more limited counterterrorism strategy, using drones and increased intelligence gathering.</p>
<p>Response: “If the United States should adopt a small-footprint counterterrorism strategy, Afghanistan would descend again into civil war,” Frederick Kagan testified before the House Armed Services Committee. “The Taliban group headed by Mullah Omar and operating in southern Afghanistan (including especially Helmand, Kandahar, and Oruzgan Provinces) is well positioned to take control of that area upon the withdrawal of American and allied combat forces. The remaining Afghan security forces would be unable to resist a Taliban offensive. They would be defeated and would disintegrate. The fear of renewed Taliban assaults would mobilize the Tajiks, Uzbeks, and Hazaras in northern and central Afghanistan. The Taliban itself would certainly drive on Herat and Kabul, leading to war with northern militias. This conflict would collapse the Afghan state, mobilize the Afghan population, and cause many Afghans to flee into Pakistan and Iran. Within Pakistan, the U.S. reversion to a counterterrorism strategy (from the counterinsurgency strategy for which Obama reaffirmed his support as recently as August) would disrupt the delicate balance that has made possible recent Pakistani progress against internal foes and al Qaeda.” &#8212; House Armed Services Committee</p>
<p>In Commentary, Max Boot notes, “it is hard to point to any place where pure [counterterrorism] has defeated a determined terrorist or guerrilla group. This is the strategy that Israel has used against Hamas and Hezbollah. The result is that Hamas controls Gaza, and Hezbollah controls southern Lebanon. It is the strategy that the U.S. has employed in Somalia since our forces pulled out in 1994. The result is that the country is utterly chaotic and lawless, and an Islamic fundamentalist group called the Shabab, which has close links to al-Qaeda, is gaining strength. Most pertinently, it is also the strategy the U.S. has used for years in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The result is that the Taliban control the tribal areas of Pakistan and are extending their influence across large swathes of Afghanistan.” &#8212; Commentary </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luc Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635578</link>
		<dc:creator>Luc Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:48:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635578</guid>
		<description>A Cohen line for poor Hurf @9.16pm...

&quot;dance me through the panic till I&#039;m gathered safely in...&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Cohen line for poor Hurf @9.16pm&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;dance me through the panic till I&#8217;m gathered safely in&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: stephen</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635568</link>
		<dc:creator>stephen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 09:04:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635568</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I believe that there is a lot of long meaningful looks exchanged as well. &lt;/i&gt;

I believe the first movie could&#039;ve been ~30 minutes shorter with just half the number of meaningful looks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I believe that there is a lot of long meaningful looks exchanged as well. </i></p>
<p>I believe the first movie could&#8217;ve been ~30 minutes shorter with just half the number of meaningful looks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chthoniid</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635566</link>
		<dc:creator>Chthoniid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635566</guid>
		<description>@Brian Smaller
&lt;blockquote&gt;Now there is something I have never thought on before. Do vegan women swallow?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Would ingestion &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; be considered different to umm, delivery into other anatomical regions?  Either way, it&#039;s inside.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Brian Smaller</p>
<blockquote><p>Now there is something I have never thought on before. Do vegan women swallow?</p></blockquote>
<p>Would ingestion <i>really</i> be considered different to umm, delivery into other anatomical regions?  Either way, it&#8217;s inside.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurf Durf</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635564</link>
		<dc:creator>Hurf Durf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635564</guid>
		<description>I can see the distance wail of the &quot;moderate centre-left&quot; but for some reason I cannot hear it. I wonder why?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can see the distance wail of the &#8220;moderate centre-left&#8221; but for some reason I cannot hear it. I wonder why?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete George</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635563</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635563</guid>
		<description>Steve, you must be blind if you don&#039;t see it, there are a lot of Kiwibloggers who are getting fucking sick of people going on and on about Phil, encouraging the noise and substantially increasing the noise. If you like continual taunting and want to keep poking your stick try it on Phil&#039;s blog where you won&#039;t piss off so many.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Steve, you must be blind if you don&#8217;t see it, there are a lot of Kiwibloggers who are getting fucking sick of people going on and on about Phil, encouraging the noise and substantially increasing the noise. If you like continual taunting and want to keep poking your stick try it on Phil&#8217;s blog where you won&#8217;t piss off so many.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurf Durf</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635562</link>
		<dc:creator>Hurf Durf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:16:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635562</guid>
		<description>GLOBAL WARMING GLOBAL WARMING
CLIMATE CHANGE CLIMATE CHANGE
DO NOT QUESTION
DO NOT QUESTION
CLIMATE CHANGE
CLIMATE CHANGE
YOU GOT CAUGHT OUT? YOU GOT CAUGHT OUT?
SPIN IT HARD
SPIN IT HARD
MSM HAS GOT YOUR BACK 
GOT YOUR BACK
SPIN IT HARD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>GLOBAL WARMING GLOBAL WARMING<br />
CLIMATE CHANGE CLIMATE CHANGE<br />
DO NOT QUESTION<br />
DO NOT QUESTION<br />
CLIMATE CHANGE<br />
CLIMATE CHANGE<br />
YOU GOT CAUGHT OUT? YOU GOT CAUGHT OUT?<br />
SPIN IT HARD<br />
SPIN IT HARD<br />
MSM HAS GOT YOUR BACK<br />
GOT YOUR BACK<br />
SPIN IT HARD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635560</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635560</guid>
		<description>George, stick it where  the global warming sun don&#039;t shine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>George, stick it where  the global warming sun don&#8217;t shine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635559</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 08:10:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635559</guid>
		<description>Come on George Pete. This week is like the last supper for Phool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Come on George Pete. This week is like the last supper for Phool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whafe</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635554</link>
		<dc:creator>Whafe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635554</guid>
		<description>It seems this land of the long white cloud is becoming a racist shit hole, man alive I hate saying that, but so feel it today...

Then on top of that, this whole Global Warming BS..... Being a farmer and all, this BS on climate makes me sick.... Try growing thousands of acres of spuds &amp; onions, my ass its getting warmer, and on the years it is actually getting warmer it isnt human beings, it is the cyclic nature of this here planet!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems this land of the long white cloud is becoming a racist shit hole, man alive I hate saying that, but so feel it today&#8230;</p>
<p>Then on top of that, this whole Global Warming BS&#8230;.. Being a farmer and all, this BS on climate makes me sick&#8230;. Try growing thousands of acres of spuds &amp; onions, my ass its getting warmer, and on the years it is actually getting warmer it isnt human beings, it is the cyclic nature of this here planet!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hurf Durf</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635552</link>
		<dc:creator>Hurf Durf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635552</guid>
		<description>Hone Hairywire the racist won&#039;t be forced to stand down because he has massive support from his electorate. A racist electoral system backs a racist MP. Who would have thought?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hone Hairywire the racist won&#8217;t be forced to stand down because he has massive support from his electorate. A racist electoral system backs a racist MP. Who would have thought?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Luc Hansen</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635548</link>
		<dc:creator>Luc Hansen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:39:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635548</guid>
		<description>&lt;a&gt;36 arguments for the existence of God&lt;/a&gt;

Very comprehensive discussion and extensive exposition of the flaws in each of the 36 arguments.

Where is Ian Wishart when you need him? :-) :-) :-)

Source: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.aldaily.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Arts and Letters Daily&lt;/a&gt; where you can also find articles like this: &lt;i&gt;Religion reduces corruption and acts to increase respect for law in ways that boost economic growth in societies where it is present&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;Religion is blamed when it promotes such evils as persecution or warfare, but gets less attention when it patches up the moral fabric of society.&lt;/i&gt;

Look down the LH column.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a>36 arguments for the existence of God</a></p>
<p>Very comprehensive discussion and extensive exposition of the flaws in each of the 36 arguments.</p>
<p>Where is Ian Wishart when you need him? <img src='http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  <img src='http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Source: <a href="http://www.aldaily.com/" rel="nofollow">Arts and Letters Daily</a> where you can also find articles like this: <i>Religion reduces corruption and acts to increase respect for law in ways that boost economic growth in societies where it is present</i> and <i>Religion is blamed when it promotes such evils as persecution or warfare, but gets less attention when it patches up the moral fabric of society.</i></p>
<p>Look down the LH column.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pete George</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635547</link>
		<dc:creator>Pete George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:28:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635547</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;#  Steve: You are a stupid prick. &lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>#  Steve: You are a stupid prick. </p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635546</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:26:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635546</guid>
		<description>Phool,
Once we laughed at your drug induced comments and stupidity.
Nobody cares about you now.
They did not care today, they did not care yesterday and they will not care tomorrow.
They did not care last week and they will not care next week.
They did not care last year, they do not care this year and they will not care next year.
You are a stupid prick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phool,<br />
Once we laughed at your drug induced comments and stupidity.<br />
Nobody cares about you now.<br />
They did not care today, they did not care yesterday and they will not care tomorrow.<br />
They did not care last week and they will not care next week.<br />
They did not care last year, they do not care this year and they will not care next year.<br />
You are a stupid prick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635545</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:25:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635545</guid>
		<description>I know we are avoiding Phool and blocking the comments via RIP, but ..
Phool, have you got your turkey for christmas and your ham.
Run out of money (for drugs) and go to the food bank? I mean use the system, us taxpayers will provide for you.

I did tell you that your time was coming. Kiwiblogers will use the RIP add on.
Your offspring must be disapointed, deciding to work or bludge as a student then learn to get his own blog.
Lots of comments on whore.co.nz, like 3 this week.
&#039;The boy&quot; may start to think on his own soon, but I doubt it, he is on the same drugs as you.

RIP Phool</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know we are avoiding Phool and blocking the comments via RIP, but ..<br />
Phool, have you got your turkey for christmas and your ham.<br />
Run out of money (for drugs) and go to the food bank? I mean use the system, us taxpayers will provide for you.</p>
<p>I did tell you that your time was coming. Kiwiblogers will use the RIP add on.<br />
Your offspring must be disapointed, deciding to work or bludge as a student then learn to get his own blog.<br />
Lots of comments on whore.co.nz, like 3 this week.<br />
&#8216;The boy&#8221; may start to think on his own soon, but I doubt it, he is on the same drugs as you.</p>
<p>RIP Phool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Smaller</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635543</link>
		<dc:creator>Brian Smaller</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:09:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635543</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Brian said: Now there is something I have never thought on before. Do vegan women swallow?

Just reminded me of a T-shirt I saw on a very attractive lass at a festival long ago. Across her perfect, ahem, chest, were the words: “I swallow”.

I never got to find out if she was telling the truth  
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

I was serious though about my question Luc.  Interesting moral dilemma for a  vegan.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Brian said: Now there is something I have never thought on before. Do vegan women swallow?</p>
<p>Just reminded me of a T-shirt I saw on a very attractive lass at a festival long ago. Across her perfect, ahem, chest, were the words: “I swallow”.</p>
<p>I never got to find out if she was telling the truth
</p></blockquote>
<p>I was serious though about my question Luc.  Interesting moral dilemma for a  vegan.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getstaffed</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/general_debate_24_november_2009.html#comment-635541</link>
		<dc:creator>getstaffed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 07:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38367#comment-635541</guid>
		<description>Chthoniid, just how many times have you watched it?!? ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chthoniid, just how many times have you watched it?!? <img src='http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
