<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Labour abandons monetary policy bipartisanship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 22:48:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: stuart munro</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633525</link>
		<dc:creator>stuart munro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 15:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633525</guid>
		<description>Well it&#039;s about time. A Labour party must represent the interests of the lower two thirds of society, and for the last 7 or so terms Labour has dropped that ball. This will be Goff&#039;s chance to prove he has some credibility to his constituency, and Labour&#039;s chance to prove there is something left besides the brand name.

But I&#039;m not holding my breath.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well it&#8217;s about time. A Labour party must represent the interests of the lower two thirds of society, and for the last 7 or so terms Labour has dropped that ball. This will be Goff&#8217;s chance to prove he has some credibility to his constituency, and Labour&#8217;s chance to prove there is something left besides the brand name.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m not holding my breath.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tknorriss</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633521</link>
		<dc:creator>tknorriss</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 13:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633521</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think there is a lot we can do about the weakness of the US dollar. So, the Reserve Bank can have little effect on the exchange rate due to forces much more powerful than anything the RB can do.

One solution is for the government to control its spending and run surpluses. The surpluses can then be reinvested back into the economy in the form of tax cuts when the economy needs stimulation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think there is a lot we can do about the weakness of the US dollar. So, the Reserve Bank can have little effect on the exchange rate due to forces much more powerful than anything the RB can do.</p>
<p>One solution is for the government to control its spending and run surpluses. The surpluses can then be reinvested back into the economy in the form of tax cuts when the economy needs stimulation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wreck1080</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633513</link>
		<dc:creator>wreck1080</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 11:22:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633513</guid>
		<description>Why doesn&#039;t Goff have a chat with Don Brash. 

Brash had some ideas for controlling consumption. One was to vary the gst rate.  

It&#039;s pretty tough though, the law of unintended consequences usually bites you in the bum.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesn&#8217;t Goff have a chat with Don Brash. </p>
<p>Brash had some ideas for controlling consumption. One was to vary the gst rate.  </p>
<p>It&#8217;s pretty tough though, the law of unintended consequences usually bites you in the bum.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: paradigm</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633465</link>
		<dc:creator>paradigm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633465</guid>
		<description>Phool Goff says:
&lt;blockquote&gt;&quot;Our Reserve Bank policy targets are not well designed to produce a stable and competitive exchange rate, nor to keep interest rates as low as possible,&quot;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
Of course they aren&#039;t. They are designed to keep inflation within the bracket set by the policy targets agreement. Diciplined fiscal policy, including both: 

A) limited government spending and 
B) taxes and other policies which encourage private earning/savings/industry while discouraging private borrowing for consumption 

are what will ensure low interest rates and a competitive exchange rate. Basically the opposite of everything labour did over the past 9 years.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phool Goff says:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our Reserve Bank policy targets are not well designed to produce a stable and competitive exchange rate, nor to keep interest rates as low as possible,&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Of course they aren&#8217;t. They are designed to keep inflation within the bracket set by the policy targets agreement. Diciplined fiscal policy, including both: </p>
<p>A) limited government spending and<br />
B) taxes and other policies which encourage private earning/savings/industry while discouraging private borrowing for consumption </p>
<p>are what will ensure low interest rates and a competitive exchange rate. Basically the opposite of everything labour did over the past 9 years.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Johnboy</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633450</link>
		<dc:creator>Johnboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:32:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633450</guid>
		<description>It really will be exciting when the arse falls out of the $kiwi and the treaty lawyers discover that we colonisers owe the mowree even more to compensate for our lack of foresight to protect treaty settlements against inflation. It will make the pathetic wafflings of Key and Smith re the ETS bribe look like petty cash stuff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It really will be exciting when the arse falls out of the $kiwi and the treaty lawyers discover that we colonisers owe the mowree even more to compensate for our lack of foresight to protect treaty settlements against inflation. It will make the pathetic wafflings of Key and Smith re the ETS bribe look like petty cash stuff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tvb</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633449</link>
		<dc:creator>tvb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633449</guid>
		<description>This does not matter much because the Labour Party does not matter much.  But under this policy of Labour&#039;s, interest rates will be higher because with high debts people will think a Labour Government will try and inflate its way out of debt.  The prospect of higher interest rates under Labour will probably give John Key another term in Government at least when things politically, perhaps in 5 years time get tight.  Thanks Phil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does not matter much because the Labour Party does not matter much.  But under this policy of Labour&#8217;s, interest rates will be higher because with high debts people will think a Labour Government will try and inflate its way out of debt.  The prospect of higher interest rates under Labour will probably give John Key another term in Government at least when things politically, perhaps in 5 years time get tight.  Thanks Phil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: getstaffed</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633445</link>
		<dc:creator>getstaffed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 07:17:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633445</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I still do not think the high dollar is due to the interest rate differential. We have not appreciated that much against other currencies. It is a case of a weak US dollar, and having higher inflation in NZ will not cause the US dollar to get stronger.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Hmm, partly agree. Some of the relative value in our currency is due to Obama minting 100&#039;s of billions of greenback dollars thereby causing it to devalue. Smart players in the US would have read the signals well in advance of Obama&#039;s election and moved assets offshore to places where there was less potential for their governments to run the cash print presses 24x7. Places like NZ I&#039;m guessing. 

But, we kiwi&#039;s also have a lifestyle that outstrips our productivity. Don&#039;t have the charts, but recall seeing the non-public debt levels climbing pretty consistently (while public debt has fallen) and that money&#039;s gotta come from somewhere. Carry trade?  It&#039;s just a shame that this money has been used to inflate the housing bubble rather than improve our international competitiveness. Our children won&#039;t thank us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I still do not think the high dollar is due to the interest rate differential. We have not appreciated that much against other currencies. It is a case of a weak US dollar, and having higher inflation in NZ will not cause the US dollar to get stronger.</p></blockquote>
<p>Hmm, partly agree. Some of the relative value in our currency is due to Obama minting 100&#8242;s of billions of greenback dollars thereby causing it to devalue. Smart players in the US would have read the signals well in advance of Obama&#8217;s election and moved assets offshore to places where there was less potential for their governments to run the cash print presses 24&#215;7. Places like NZ I&#8217;m guessing. </p>
<p>But, we kiwi&#8217;s also have a lifestyle that outstrips our productivity. Don&#8217;t have the charts, but recall seeing the non-public debt levels climbing pretty consistently (while public debt has fallen) and that money&#8217;s gotta come from somewhere. Carry trade?  It&#8217;s just a shame that this money has been used to inflate the housing bubble rather than improve our international competitiveness. Our children won&#8217;t thank us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viking2</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633433</link>
		<dc:creator>Viking2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 06:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633433</guid>
		<description>As has been observed the Reserve Bank Act is fatally flawed in that it is designed to only use one tiny participant in a large system to control the system. Doomed to fail and it has never done what its adherents said it would.  At the time it was bought in the high inflation was already declining and continued to do so of its own accord. Like every attempt to interfere in a market place its doomed to failure. 
The reserve Bank Act should be required to consider NZer&#039;s and the creation of WEALTH for the NZ economy. It needs to be paired with things like Tax rates but while the Reserve Bank Governors bonus apparently totally depends on his efforts to &quot;control&quot; (or hide or defer inflation&quot;), then that&#039;s all we will get.

Didn&#039;t agree with Peters about much but listened to what he had to say about this and agree that changes need to be considered. After all I think I&#039;m correct in saying that any reviews have been run by self interested and not necessarily very intelligent politicians and the reserve bank staff.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As has been observed the Reserve Bank Act is fatally flawed in that it is designed to only use one tiny participant in a large system to control the system. Doomed to fail and it has never done what its adherents said it would.  At the time it was bought in the high inflation was already declining and continued to do so of its own accord. Like every attempt to interfere in a market place its doomed to failure.<br />
The reserve Bank Act should be required to consider NZer&#8217;s and the creation of WEALTH for the NZ economy. It needs to be paired with things like Tax rates but while the Reserve Bank Governors bonus apparently totally depends on his efforts to &#8220;control&#8221; (or hide or defer inflation&#8221;), then that&#8217;s all we will get.</p>
<p>Didn&#8217;t agree with Peters about much but listened to what he had to say about this and agree that changes need to be considered. After all I think I&#8217;m correct in saying that any reviews have been run by self interested and not necessarily very intelligent politicians and the reserve bank staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chthoniid</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633414</link>
		<dc:creator>Chthoniid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:54:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633414</guid>
		<description>In the past- especially 2003-2008- the high NZ interest rates were an important driver of exchange rate appreciation.  But that related to the spending path adopted by the Labour government.  NZ has been almost unique for a long period in not having any guarantee of bank deposits.

The rationale for the guarantee (late 2008) was a response to perceived risk driving currency flows.  As our Current Account had risen to record levels, we remained dependent on foreign sources for covering our imports.

The current interest rates in NZ are not high.  An OCR of 2.5% and a CPI inflation rate of 1.9% only gives a real return of 0.6%.  The willingness to hold NZ dollars at this point has more to do with the perceived risks of different currencies.  The USD and the UK pound have lost a lot of favour.  But this is not true of all our trading partner&#039;s currencies- the NZD has for instance, depreciated against the AUD since early 2008.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the past- especially 2003-2008- the high NZ interest rates were an important driver of exchange rate appreciation.  But that related to the spending path adopted by the Labour government.  NZ has been almost unique for a long period in not having any guarantee of bank deposits.</p>
<p>The rationale for the guarantee (late 2008) was a response to perceived risk driving currency flows.  As our Current Account had risen to record levels, we remained dependent on foreign sources for covering our imports.</p>
<p>The current interest rates in NZ are not high.  An OCR of 2.5% and a CPI inflation rate of 1.9% only gives a real return of 0.6%.  The willingness to hold NZ dollars at this point has more to do with the perceived risks of different currencies.  The USD and the UK pound have lost a lot of favour.  But this is not true of all our trading partner&#8217;s currencies- the NZD has for instance, depreciated against the AUD since early 2008.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paw Prick</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633406</link>
		<dc:creator>Paw Prick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 05:11:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633406</guid>
		<description>&quot;!

I still do not think the high dollar is due to the interest rate differential&#039;

Why else would anyone invest in the most indebted per population country in the world?? High returns and a government guarantee perhaps?
we are the size of a small Chinese town but we have the 11th most traded currency in the world.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;!</p>
<p>I still do not think the high dollar is due to the interest rate differential&#8217;</p>
<p>Why else would anyone invest in the most indebted per population country in the world?? High returns and a government guarantee perhaps?<br />
we are the size of a small Chinese town but we have the 11th most traded currency in the world.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chthoniid</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633386</link>
		<dc:creator>Chthoniid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 04:07:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633386</guid>
		<description>The problem with fixing or pegging exchange rates is that you need a ton of cash to hold enough forex to defend it.  That can expose you to very heavy losses, as the Bank of England discovered trying to defend it&#039;s peg against Soros.

Pegs sort of work if you have a lot of fiscal discipline as well- as Singapore has a times managed.  But then, there&#039;s not a lot of difference then to a float.

The main (historical) factors driving the high NZD were the inconsistency in fiscal and monetary policy.  Getting better consistency and alignment in fiscal policy would probably be a nice, safe way of lowering the value of the NZD.  But it also means you wouldn&#039;t be able to indulge in the spending binges Labour was fond of.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The problem with fixing or pegging exchange rates is that you need a ton of cash to hold enough forex to defend it.  That can expose you to very heavy losses, as the Bank of England discovered trying to defend it&#8217;s peg against Soros.</p>
<p>Pegs sort of work if you have a lot of fiscal discipline as well- as Singapore has a times managed.  But then, there&#8217;s not a lot of difference then to a float.</p>
<p>The main (historical) factors driving the high NZD were the inconsistency in fiscal and monetary policy.  Getting better consistency and alignment in fiscal policy would probably be a nice, safe way of lowering the value of the NZD.  But it also means you wouldn&#8217;t be able to indulge in the spending binges Labour was fond of.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PaulL</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633378</link>
		<dc:creator>PaulL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633378</guid>
		<description>In other news, Phil Goff seeks out the NZ First vote base.  Presumably once he has succeeded in the transition to minority party espousing nationalist policies, it will leave room for National to move into the vacated space on the left.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In other news, Phil Goff seeks out the NZ First vote base.  Presumably once he has succeeded in the transition to minority party espousing nationalist policies, it will leave room for National to move into the vacated space on the left.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pita</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633377</link>
		<dc:creator>Pita</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633377</guid>
		<description>Ah!... the clarity of vision brought about after only a few short months in opposition...a real &quot;road to Damascus&quot; revelation...I wonder if it will include some quantative easing or a fixing of the exchange rate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah!&#8230; the clarity of vision brought about after only a few short months in opposition&#8230;a real &#8220;road to Damascus&#8221; revelation&#8230;I wonder if it will include some quantative easing or a fixing of the exchange rate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Farrar</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633376</link>
		<dc:creator>David Farrar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:30:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633376</guid>
		<description>I still do not think the high dollar is due to the interest rate differential. We have not appreciated that much against other currencies. It is ore a case of a weak US dollar, and having higher inflation in NZ will not cause the US dollar to get stronger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I still do not think the high dollar is due to the interest rate differential. We have not appreciated that much against other currencies. It is ore a case of a weak US dollar, and having higher inflation in NZ will not cause the US dollar to get stronger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chthoniid</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633373</link>
		<dc:creator>Chthoniid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 03:24:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633373</guid>
		<description>Not quite the whole story OldNews.

Inflation in the UK is 1.1 to 1.5%.  Latest CPI stats from the US are a 0.3% increase.  NZ&#039;s inflation rate is 1.9%.

In real interest rate terms the difference is smaller, not the 10 x you are describing.  Plus the extraordinarily &lt;i&gt;low&lt;/i&gt; Fed or Bank of England rates being charged at the moment are very abnormal.  Historically it&#039;s been largely in a 2-4% band.  In the UK there is a fairly clear attempt to transfer wealth from savers to debtors.  Under such circumstances, it is hardly surprising UK savers are looking elsewhere,</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not quite the whole story OldNews.</p>
<p>Inflation in the UK is 1.1 to 1.5%.  Latest CPI stats from the US are a 0.3% increase.  NZ&#8217;s inflation rate is 1.9%.</p>
<p>In real interest rate terms the difference is smaller, not the 10 x you are describing.  Plus the extraordinarily <i>low</i> Fed or Bank of England rates being charged at the moment are very abnormal.  Historically it&#8217;s been largely in a 2-4% band.  In the UK there is a fairly clear attempt to transfer wealth from savers to debtors.  Under such circumstances, it is hardly surprising UK savers are looking elsewhere,</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OldNews</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633369</link>
		<dc:creator>OldNews</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633369</guid>
		<description>While agree with your general point, and would go futher to say this is just desperation on Goff&#039;s part, one part of your post is quite odd.
&quot;But declaring monetary policy is no longer working is silly, because of course it is. You can’t blame the high NZ dollar on monetary policy considering we have the official cash rate at a very low 2.5%.&quot;

Our OCR is one of the highest in the developed world.  Look at US, Japan, Britain, Euro Zone, all well under 1%.  US under 0.25%.  Whether our rate is low by historical standards is entirely irrelevant. It&#039;s whether it low compared to the prevailing rates in countries who have savers who might be look for somewhere else to invest.  If you&#039;re Japanese or Belgian or American or Canadian why save in your own currency, when you can save it ours with our extraordinarily high interest rates - over 10 times higher than rates in US or Canada.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While agree with your general point, and would go futher to say this is just desperation on Goff&#8217;s part, one part of your post is quite odd.<br />
&#8220;But declaring monetary policy is no longer working is silly, because of course it is. You can’t blame the high NZ dollar on monetary policy considering we have the official cash rate at a very low 2.5%.&#8221;</p>
<p>Our OCR is one of the highest in the developed world.  Look at US, Japan, Britain, Euro Zone, all well under 1%.  US under 0.25%.  Whether our rate is low by historical standards is entirely irrelevant. It&#8217;s whether it low compared to the prevailing rates in countries who have savers who might be look for somewhere else to invest.  If you&#8217;re Japanese or Belgian or American or Canadian why save in your own currency, when you can save it ours with our extraordinarily high interest rates &#8211; over 10 times higher than rates in US or Canada.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: labrator</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633364</link>
		<dc:creator>labrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:22:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633364</guid>
		<description>Well I&#039;m disappointed that this hasn&#039;t been embraced some what more here. The Reserve Bank Act has been criticised since it&#039;s inception and it&#039;s about time something changed. With the swings in our currency being so wild and unpredictable it&#039;s becoming a harder and harder place to do business in NZ. It&#039;s all fine waxing lyrical about entrepreneurs and growth but if you can&#039;t do an accurate cash projection out more than 2 years without thinking about hedging then it&#039;s time to worry about what base currency you&#039;re working in and considering whether NZ is the best country to do business. 

We&#039;re a very small country, significantly smaller than large numbers of cities in other countries. It seems a little odd that we allow ourselves to have a floating currency that offers no protection to business owners in NZ whilst allowing currency traders to decide the value of our exports.

In terms of what can be done I&#039;d be most interested in a currency fixed against a basket of our major trading partners adjusted regularly inline with our export ratio to each country rather than &quot;one rate to rule them all&quot;. Also, I don&#039;t see why Goff has to have an answer, he&#039;s not an economist and wasn&#039;t elected to be. He&#039;s raising the point that a lot of businesses discuss and bringing in to the open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I&#8217;m disappointed that this hasn&#8217;t been embraced some what more here. The Reserve Bank Act has been criticised since it&#8217;s inception and it&#8217;s about time something changed. With the swings in our currency being so wild and unpredictable it&#8217;s becoming a harder and harder place to do business in NZ. It&#8217;s all fine waxing lyrical about entrepreneurs and growth but if you can&#8217;t do an accurate cash projection out more than 2 years without thinking about hedging then it&#8217;s time to worry about what base currency you&#8217;re working in and considering whether NZ is the best country to do business. </p>
<p>We&#8217;re a very small country, significantly smaller than large numbers of cities in other countries. It seems a little odd that we allow ourselves to have a floating currency that offers no protection to business owners in NZ whilst allowing currency traders to decide the value of our exports.</p>
<p>In terms of what can be done I&#8217;d be most interested in a currency fixed against a basket of our major trading partners adjusted regularly inline with our export ratio to each country rather than &#8220;one rate to rule them all&#8221;. Also, I don&#8217;t see why Goff has to have an answer, he&#8217;s not an economist and wasn&#8217;t elected to be. He&#8217;s raising the point that a lot of businesses discuss and bringing in to the open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: brucehoult</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633359</link>
		<dc:creator>brucehoult</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:19:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633359</guid>
		<description>What high exchange rate?

Yes, the NZ$ is reasonably high against the US$ and the pound at the moment, but compared to the Aussie dollar, the Japanese Yen or the Euro we are either about normal or even a tad on the low side.

I&#039;d say the current situation is much more about the US economy than about ours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What high exchange rate?</p>
<p>Yes, the NZ$ is reasonably high against the US$ and the pound at the moment, but compared to the Aussie dollar, the Japanese Yen or the Euro we are either about normal or even a tad on the low side.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say the current situation is much more about the US economy than about ours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Inventory2</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633358</link>
		<dc:creator>Inventory2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 02:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633358</guid>
		<description>Good point wreck - opposing the government is easy; suggesting credible alternatives - less so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point wreck &#8211; opposing the government is easy; suggesting credible alternatives &#8211; less so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wreck1080</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2009/11/labour_abandons_monetary_policy_bipartisanship.html#comment-633337</link>
		<dc:creator>wreck1080</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 01:34:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=38430#comment-633337</guid>
		<description>Oi Goff, whats your alternative then? 

Helen got your tongue? No doubt.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oi Goff, whats your alternative then? </p>
<p>Helen got your tongue? No doubt.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

