An interesting read. Great example of religious freedom.

You have fascist wishes Redshitter. You wouldn’t care about destroying a country to achieve your own extreme goals.

But I could be wrong. You may be just a fake, an entertainment for Kiwiblog. For those that like sad shitty entertainment.

” Should those who wish to destroy freedom be permitted to use freedom to achieve that objective??

Answer that question and you’re dealing with the real issue. <<

Do any of you know what a minaret is ? It is to provide a vantage point for a call to prayer which is played on an amplified sound system 5 times during the day very loudly.
If you have never heard it , i can say it is damned annoying & from the moment it starts you would welcome it to stop.
The Swiss have done the right thing with regard to banning them! I doubt anyone here would want to hear it in their own backyard, 5 times daily!!!!!!!!!!!!

You seem to have a lot of trouble understanding my points Petey. What I am trying to tell you is that there are going to be a number of massive social changes occurring over the next decade or so, not for the better unfortunately. These negative changes are all down to the Progressives Petey. (that’s you)

People who are already immensely pissed off at what you and your ilk have done are going to get a lot more pissed off. What’s more the number of pissed off people is growing exponentially. The next decade is not going to be quite as comfy for the Progressives as the last few decades Petey.

People will be looking for someone to blame for the outcomes that are on their way Pete. You think a bit of perceived abuse is something to whine about today mate, you ain’t seen nothing yet.

You are the one with the pointless rants, and then offer nothing constructive to address your concerns. I offer constructive, ethical suggestions and you abuse me. At least Herman has the balls to say what he thinks – slaughter 1.4 billion people.

“Should” does not mean Islam will be wiped out or even can be wiped out, as you well know Lucy.

The style of your avoidance of answering questions and points raised, and your ripostes with off-beam, irrelevant questions raises suspicion that the Lucy-posters syndicate is actually a group of stand-ins for DPF working to keep the postings count high. It’s rather like play with one of those “psychologist interviewer” programs that were in vogue on the early internet. Vague questions just to keep the flow going.

Now, Lucy should go to bed. How this should be accomplished is up to the Lucy syndicate.

how you think Islam should be wiped out?

Guns are fine. Bombs are not visceral enough really, although I think chemical weapons could be quite entertaining.

The fact remains that Islam treats women abominably and should be wiped out for this reason alone.

It offends me too, Jack, how Islam treats women, so what I am asking you is just how you think Islam should be wiped out?

Feel free to reply without ad homs, but, hey, water off a ducks back, Jack.

… Muslims are still there and still the fastest growing religion, if only through a prolific birth rate..

Please read the link in my post immediately before yours.

I’ll repeat it for you below. Get your facts right.

And let’s similarly question the statistics on Islam’s spread. Someone head counting the black Africans being forcibly converted to Island before being enslaved, raped, murdered, or all three? Who is counting in Afghanistan, in Pakistan, and Indonesia? Who is verifying the figures.

The fact remains that Islam treats women abominably and should be wiped out for this reason alone. I’m surprised leftist fuckers who recently championed feminism, so quickly jump on the tolerance-for-Islam bandwagon.

Lucy, one of the contributors under the Lucy pseudonym may be a Waikato farmer, but the varying tone suggests others aren’t. Or perhaps Lucy is a victim of the multiple-personality syndrome. That would explain much about the Lucy posts.

The link repeated for Lucy contributor No. X:

http://tkcollier.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/muslim-birthrates-falling-worldwide/

Jack5 (1247) Vote: Add rating 4 Subtract rating 2
December 1st, 2009 at 5:09 pm

Jack5, sorry mate, fourth generation Kiwi, born in the King Country, raised in the Waikato. There you go.

My suggestion to you is to repeat what I said above, and you kindly quoted.

Rant and rave all you like, but Muslims are still there and still the fastest growing religion, if only through a prolific birth rate. So instead of personal abuse, why don’t you tell us how you would address what is perceived at the “Islam problem”.

The floor is yours.

So what does Europe do about it’s falling birth rates, aging population, and a need for cheap labour?

Pete is way off the mark if the linked article below is any guide. The fertility rate has collapsed in Iran, it argues. Palestine and Yemen are the only Muslim states still with high birth rates. Muslims, like Europe and Russia, are suffering the same collapse in birthrates.

As for labour requirements, that’s old hat. Robotics, computerisation, and new production methods have only begun to slash numbers in manufacturing, and service industries will develop higher productivity, too. Rising labour costs will drive innovation’s pace and cause a surge in productivity.

Don’t write off Europe and Russia, especially the latter. Russia has been through appalling population decreases during attacks by the Mongols and by the Nazis (20 million dead), and bounced back. It will bounce back from its present poverty-caused devastation.

The link:

http://tkcollier.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/muslim-birthrates-falling-worldwide/

I would hope we follow suit and outlaw the Briscoes woman

I’m more critical of more Muslim values but I simply don’t see what is wrong with a building part of a certain shape, that’s the least of my worries about Islam.