Do as I say, not as I did

December 24th, 2009 at 4:40 pm by David Farrar

Trevor Mallard blogged:

Back in 2000 I was acting Minister of Communication while Paul Swain was sick. I made it very clear at the time that the Crown did not accept that the radio spectrum was an asset that attracted rights for Maori from the 1840 Treaty of Waitangi. Frankly I thought, and still think, that that concept is nonsense.

Yet back in 2000 Hansard records:

The Government has decided that preferential bidding access to one of the four 15 megahertz blocks of third generation spectrum will be given only to those parties able to demonstrate some commitment to involve Maori in the development of this spectrum. This is likely to be telecommunications working in partnership with Maori. The third generation spectrum will provide significant opportunities for new investment and technological advancement in New Zealand’s telecommunications sector. The Government considers that it is very important to ensure that Maori can take part in this process.

Now to be clear, Trevor did not say that the telecommunications spectrum was a “right” under the Treaty of Waitangi. But he did advocate policy of preferential access for Maori to it, regardless of treaty claims. That is something he somehow forgot to mention.

Tags: ,

13 Responses to “Do as I say, not as I did”

  1. Jack5 (3,019) Says:

    So bro-partheid preceded the Key coalition.

    The allocation of radio frequencies on a race basis is illogical, unfair, and obviously racist.

    Vote: Thumb up 16 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. Simon Arnold (84) Says:

    I must say that I’ve always felt that if the electromagnetic spectrum is to be carved up we should consider who gets which bits of the rainbow.

    Vote: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 4 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. Steve (3,644) Says:

    Black and White are not colours so I go for Blue

    Vote: Thumb up 8 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. felldownagain (5) Says:

    Pardon me if my memory is fallible but I seem to remember Prime Minister Clark stating that taxpayer funding of the embryonic Maori TV channel was required under our Treaty obligations.

    Vote: Thumb up 15 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. burt (5,928) Says:

    felldownagain

    If it would help Helen win an election then she would say it, sign it or deny it.

    Vote: Thumb up 21 Thumb down 2 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. Manolo (9,870) Says:

    “If it would help Helen win an election then she would say it, sign it or deny it.”

    The same can be said of our current Prime Minister or any other spineless politician. They are chameleons ready to change colour depending on the background.

    Remind me again of the difference between Clark and Key?

    Vote: Thumb up 17 Thumb down 7 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. billyborker (1,102) Says:

    Manolo – One has a dick, the other is a dick. Your choice.

    Vote: Thumb up 11 Thumb down 3 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. Ross Miller (1,539) Says:

    Manolo … difference is Key won the election and Clark lost and now Key has over 50% support so perhaps the ‘great unwashed’ see it somewhat differently from you.

    Remind me just how much ACT is rating. Remind me too who said when fingered over his use of politician perks “Its my entitlement”.

    If your mob don’t like the way the Key Government is taking New Zealand then you should at least have the couerage of your convictions and pack your tent a go and cohabit in a telephone booth somewhere in the dark recesses of Bowen House.

    May the spirit of Christmas decend upon you from a great height.

    Vote: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 11 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. centreforward (32) Says:

    There is an old saying that a house divided against itself cannot stand. Just last week Hone Harawira talked about building the “Maori nation”. Last month he lambasted the country’s white citizens with expletive-laden language.
    Now we have government proposals for race-based allocation of valuable radiospectrum. Enough of this nonsense. Prattlings like Harawira’s serve only to perpetuate the blame game instead of placing responsibility where it properly belongs – with individuals themselves. Here is John Key’s first big test – real leadership of NZ – or Chamberlain-type appeasement of the separatist Maori Party?

    Vote: Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  10. Manolo (9,870) Says:

    “Remind me just how much ACT is rating.”

    Ross, let me remind you I’m not an ACT supporter; it is not “my mob” as you called it.
    I’m a libertarian and the first one to criticise Hide for his lack of principles in relation to his blatant abuse of ministerial perks.

    Thank you for your Christmas wishes. Same to you and your family.

    Vote: Thumb up 9 Thumb down 1 You need to be logged in to vote
  11. Banana Llama (1,105) Says:

    Ross is clearly drinking the cool aid, god it makes me nerd rage to see such stupidity.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  12. Ross Miller (1,539) Says:

    Manolo .. clearly I got it wrong for which I apologise. I accept Liberarians are a different animal from the more rabid Actoids who inhabit this site and to whom John Key and the National Party are the devil incarnate while their mob is as pure as the driven snow.

    But to be fair this was a blog about Trevor Mallard and you managed to turn it into an attack against John Key.

    I don’t turn the other cheek.

    And no, I wasn’t referring to Rodders but rather Sir Woger.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  13. boredboy (237) Says:

    U-turns are a part of politics. That’s fine but it is stupid to do what Mallard did and deny he ever advocated preferential bidding by organisations with Maori involvement. In this day and age, you will get caught out.

    Vote: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.