Comments on: The Human Rights Review Tribunal

By: KiwiGreg

KiwiGreg — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 13:43:41 +0000

It’s clearly a clever ploy – Neeson was an incompetent MP so the best place to put him is an irrelevant organisation.

Is there anyone except serial whingers who would miss this waste of tax dollars?

By: kiwirights

kiwirights — Sun, 20 Dec 2009 03:01:26 +0000

This isn’t the first lot of politically motivated appointments, what are you talking about David? What about Christine Rankin to the Families Commission? But appointing a homophobe like Brian Neeson is a pretty strange appointment regardless of politics.

By: black paul

black paul — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 17:26:31 +0000

Time and taxpayer money for Helen Clark? Say what?

By: 3-coil

3-coil — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:48:05 +0000

NRT bleats about partisan political appointments – suck it up you hypocrite! Why were you not bleating about some of Helyn’s shockers during the last decade…because you supported her partisan appointments. Loser.

By: OECD rank 22 kiwi

OECD rank 22 kiwi — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:44:55 +0000

Generally parties don’t have a lot of time for people who quite and break their written word not to stand against the official candidate.

Well John Key has a lot of time and taxpayer money for Helen Clark and Michael Cullen so why not Brian Neeson. At least Brian Neeson was in the right party. It appears John Key is not.

By: tvb

tvb — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 06:10:21 +0000

Brian Neeson got a job because John Key felt he owed him something as John took him out of politics when he successfully challenged Neeson.

By: backster

backster — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 03:39:15 +0000

I can only assert what Redbaiter has stated when you have such Commissioners as DeBres and Noonan and consider some of their recent statements it seems obvious that some balance is needed until they can be disposed of. Better still though would be to dispense with the Commissions altogether.

By: Redbaiter

Redbaiter — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:32:31 +0000

Who cares what that repulsive little coward thinks? Even if the charges he levels at the new appointments were credible, they would only add some sorely needed balance.

Political background?? You’re kidding right?? The Race Relations Commissioner is a long time Communist, and almost all of the rest of the Human Rights Commissioners are Progressives following and enforcing the politically correct doctrines of the left.

If National had any gonads, or any understanding of what an exceptionally poisonous organisation this outfit really is, they would be shutting it down not adding to the farce.

If shut down, the HRC would not be missed for one nanosecond by the hard working NZers paying for it with money they would rather spend on their families.

By: scrubone

scrubone — Sat, 19 Dec 2009 01:25:55 +0000

I love the part where he repeats another left-winger’s hateful interpretation of something that guy allegedly read in the newspaper.