Editorials 15 April 2010

April 15th, 2010 at 11:09 am by David Farrar

The Herald enthuses over :

It has been a long and tortuous road but, finally, an acceptable plan for the use of Queens Wharf during next year’s has been arrived at. “Party central” will be in a temporary structure on the site of one of the wharf’s two cargo sheds. This has two compelling pluses: the sprucing up of Queens Wharf for the Cup festivities for as low a cost as possible, and the demolition of both the unsightly sheds, an essential precursor to the wharf later being developed to its full potential.

All that is required for the World Cup celebrations is a gathering point. Little needs to be done. A temporary structure housing television screens and places for eating, drinking and dancing will suffice. Solidly constructed, it will easily withstand the buffeting of a wet and windy spring. The swept-up development advocated until recently by the Government was always unnecessary, as well as becoming constrained by time. It could also have resulted in the wharf’s final development being compromised for the benefit of a one-off event.

I tend to agree. People just need shelter, screens, sausages and drink and it will work.

The Dom Post calls on to accept the ruling on apples:

Australia has led New Zealand apple growers a merry dance for 89 years. Now the jig is up.

A World Trade Organisation disputes panel has found that Australian fears that fireblight, a bacterial disease found in some New Zealand orchards, can be transferred from mature New Zealand apples to Australian fruit trees are groundless.

It is past time for the Australian Government to show some leadership on the issue. The ruling is an embarrassment to a government that trumpets the cause of in other arenas, Australian scientists who have lent legitimacy to an illegitimate argument and Aussie growers who appear to believe they cannot compete with their New Zealand counterparts.

Rather than prolong the process yet again, Australian officials and growers should sit down with their counterparts in New Zealand, agree a sensible regime, and develop a marketing strategy that will benefit growers on both sides of the Tasman.

Trans-Tasman believes that the Governments are working on an agreement which would be a good thing.

Tags: , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Editorials 15 April 2010”

  1. davidp (3,540 comments) says:

    >People just need shelter, screens, sausages and drink and it will work.

    I don’t get the whole Party Central thing. Bars and cafes all over Auckland (and the rest of the country) will be offering shelter, screens, sausages, and drink. Why would someone head to a giant tent on an old wharf for this?

    Like if this was Welly, then would you prefer to socialise in a bar in Courtenay Place, or would you want to do so in a temporary structure erected down near the container terminal?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. wreck1080 (3,730 comments) says:

    Party central is a crap phrase, the bureaucrat who coined this phrase needs to find a new job.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. dog_eat_dog (743 comments) says:

    I like the idea of snarlers and a tent, has a real club rugby feel to it.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. side show bob (3,660 comments) says:

    I agree with davidp but one will need a good pocket full of cash for the thieving bastards that run the bars in central dockland.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.