<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So what were they marching against?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html</link>
	<description>DPF&#039;s Kiwiblog - Fomenting Happy Mischief since 2003</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:55:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwi in america</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688875</link>
		<dc:creator>kiwi in america</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 04:22:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688875</guid>
		<description>Tell that to the Greek civil servants faced with 15% pay cuts because as NZ slides lower and lower in the OECD its tax revenues from ever less profitable businesses and the opportunity cost of entrepreneurial talent leaving NZ makes its provision of services ever more difficult. There are so many areas where already today the NZ Govt cannot match what is offered in Australia.

Your recipe sounds a lot like the rhetoric from Chavez, Castro and Kim Jong Ill. The end of the socialist road you espouse is poverty for all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tell that to the Greek civil servants faced with 15% pay cuts because as NZ slides lower and lower in the OECD its tax revenues from ever less profitable businesses and the opportunity cost of entrepreneurial talent leaving NZ makes its provision of services ever more difficult. There are so many areas where already today the NZ Govt cannot match what is offered in Australia.</p>
<p>Your recipe sounds a lot like the rhetoric from Chavez, Castro and Kim Jong Ill. The end of the socialist road you espouse is poverty for all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menace</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688739</link>
		<dc:creator>menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 01:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688739</guid>
		<description>Also,

I dont need a new 20 thousand dollar car ever 4 years.

I dont need a new lounge sweet every 4 years.

I dont need to change my whole kitchen just because my new kettle looks out of place.

I dont need to re carpet because i made a mistake a year ago when i put the wrong &quot;color&quot; in.

The gap between rich and poor continues to grow, and mining will not change this one little bit, life is well and truly at an acceptable level for my self and many others so long as there standards are not purely material based. Material based values will never be satisfied.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also,</p>
<p>I dont need a new 20 thousand dollar car ever 4 years.</p>
<p>I dont need a new lounge sweet every 4 years.</p>
<p>I dont need to change my whole kitchen just because my new kettle looks out of place.</p>
<p>I dont need to re carpet because i made a mistake a year ago when i put the wrong &#8220;color&#8221; in.</p>
<p>The gap between rich and poor continues to grow, and mining will not change this one little bit, life is well and truly at an acceptable level for my self and many others so long as there standards are not purely material based. Material based values will never be satisfied.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menace</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688735</link>
		<dc:creator>menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 01:14:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688735</guid>
		<description>kiwi in america

did you read my earlier post?

&lt;blockquote&gt;
Is mining the only thing that can help our economy out?

Every body keeps saying we have to mine to fix the economy.

Surely there is something else?

Or are we totally fucked with out mining?

I say if we can’t be a touch more creative than a single idea then we are fucked already.

The public doesnt want it so I say to the economists and back seat economists to start creating, utilise your time and come up with something else.
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Is there nothing else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kiwi in america</p>
<p>did you read my earlier post?</p>
<blockquote><p>
Is mining the only thing that can help our economy out?</p>
<p>Every body keeps saying we have to mine to fix the economy.</p>
<p>Surely there is something else?</p>
<p>Or are we totally fucked with out mining?</p>
<p>I say if we can’t be a touch more creative than a single idea then we are fucked already.</p>
<p>The public doesnt want it so I say to the economists and back seat economists to start creating, utilise your time and come up with something else.
</p></blockquote>
<p>Is there nothing else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwi in america</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688710</link>
		<dc:creator>kiwi in america</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688710</guid>
		<description>Menace
Be careful what you wish for. Did you not read my last post? Do you want the wage and standard of living gap with Australia to just keep getting wider? Do you want NZ to continue its slow slide DOWN the OECD because that is what is happening.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Menace<br />
Be careful what you wish for. Did you not read my last post? Do you want the wage and standard of living gap with Australia to just keep getting wider? Do you want NZ to continue its slow slide DOWN the OECD because that is what is happening.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menace</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688683</link>
		<dc:creator>menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 May 2010 00:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688683</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I have no doubt the Nats will cave and this proposal will be shelved&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Ans so it fucking should provided that is what the majority of kiwis want.

This in turn would be democracy, the government working according the what the majority of the nation wants.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I have no doubt the Nats will cave and this proposal will be shelved</p></blockquote>
<p>Ans so it fucking should provided that is what the majority of kiwis want.</p>
<p>This in turn would be democracy, the government working according the what the majority of the nation wants.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwi in america</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688569</link>
		<dc:creator>kiwi in america</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 20:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688569</guid>
		<description>If Phase 2 RMA reforms stop roaming unemployed environment activists from holding up wothwhile projects with vexatious appeals expoiting the RMA&#039;s protections then that will be a good thing.

The ECan Act addressed the logjam on effective water resource management in Canterbury after the years of dysfunction on the ECan board. Not really relevant to the mining issue.

Still waiting for your wisdom toad on the reasons for the 35% wage gap between Aus and NZ and your solutions to close it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Phase 2 RMA reforms stop roaming unemployed environment activists from holding up wothwhile projects with vexatious appeals expoiting the RMA&#8217;s protections then that will be a good thing.</p>
<p>The ECan Act addressed the logjam on effective water resource management in Canterbury after the years of dysfunction on the ECan board. Not really relevant to the mining issue.</p>
<p>Still waiting for your wisdom toad on the reasons for the 35% wage gap between Aus and NZ and your solutions to close it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: toad</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688565</link>
		<dc:creator>toad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 19:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688565</guid>
		<description>@kiwi in america 4:51 am 

&lt;blockquote&gt;For crying out loud any mining company would have to negotiate the strictures of the RMA BEFORE any mining could commence. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not if something similar to the ECan Act is put in place to facilitate mining.  That Act allows the Minister to suspend various parts of the RMA in Canterbury.  And don&#039;t forget, Brownlee still has Phase II of the RMA reforms in the pipeline.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@kiwi in america 4:51 am </p>
<blockquote><p>For crying out loud any mining company would have to negotiate the strictures of the RMA BEFORE any mining could commence. </p></blockquote>
<p>Not if something similar to the ECan Act is put in place to facilitate mining.  That Act allows the Minister to suspend various parts of the RMA in Canterbury.  And don&#8217;t forget, Brownlee still has Phase II of the RMA reforms in the pipeline.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kiwi in america</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688559</link>
		<dc:creator>kiwi in america</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 16:51:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688559</guid>
		<description>phil has successfully derailed discussions by rabbitting on about the royalty percentage the government makes. Its not the main event, its the multiplier effect of new private sector investment which can be as high as 3 times the amount invested. If a mining company (NZ or foreign owned) invests $100m in a mine then the total spend through the economy is $300 million. The spin offs are employment of locals (who all pay PAYE and spend on food petrol clothing in local shops and there&#039;s GST on all that), contractors buy equipment (more GST) and a raft of downstream companies hire staff and buy equipment and use materials (more PAYE and GST). 

I repeat what was said earlier - modern mining techniques are not the open cast high impact mining techniques of yesteryear. For crying out loud any mining company would have to negotiate the strictures of the RMA BEFORE any mining could commence. That will involve endless appeals by greenies and druggies who live in house buses on the dole who roam NZ trying to kill projects via Environment Court appeals. So any mining proposal that survives this hostile appeals environment is going to be pretty darn water tight and as green as possible.

NZers seem to want it all - an environmental regulatory regime that kills almost anything that Greenpeace doesn&#039;t like (which is pretty much any development since radical greens want us to ride bikes, use composting toilets and become vegans) and yet enjoy a 1st world standard of living where the government beneficently provides benefits to all who may need them. The ability to help the poor and disadvantaged come from taxes. Taxes are levied on ....businesses and on the wages of people employed by businesses. The wages of government workers dont count - because they are paid from the taxes on the productive sector. So the productive sector has to actually make a profit for the government to tax. If a regulatory regime becomes too hostile to profit then two things happen-profitable businesses become marginally profitable and the amount of tax they pay drops OR they move to a juristiction that is less hostile to profit - in the case of mining companies they move to Australia where they can operate in a predictable regulatory environment that ensures some reasonable profit and the NZ govt and economy get zip.

And so the Australians become the beneficiary of the multiplier effect I described. Mutiply that on a grand scale - ie billions and you get a small hint as to why Australia is more prosperous, why its govt can afford to tax its people less and still provide higher and more benefits and why its citizens wages and salaries (and thus standard of living) are higher than NZ.

NZ will get what it wants - I have no doubt the Nats will cave and this proposal will be shelved. This will be another economic windfall to the wider economy (not the narrow royalty the govt might make from mine profits) that will never accrue to NZ. The consequences will be more subtle and less dramatic - like the frog in the cold water that is slowly cooked with the steadily rising temperature that never gets too hot to shock the frog into jumping out. The gap between Aus and NZ slowly widens, NZ drops another notch down in the OECD in 2011, then one more in 2012. If the wishes of the environmental left are adhered to than NZ continues its slow slide into economic 2nd world status. 

The reality is you can have your cake and eat it too - it requires the people to look at the issue pragmatically and accept a very small and easily remediated footprint on a tiny portion of land. Other 1st world countries make these compromises - the French survive with all their nuclear power stations despite the dire warnings of Greenpeace. NZ can make this proposal work but I fear the entire left leaning commentariat so command the attention of the silent middle class that rational discussion on this subject has become nigh impossible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>phil has successfully derailed discussions by rabbitting on about the royalty percentage the government makes. Its not the main event, its the multiplier effect of new private sector investment which can be as high as 3 times the amount invested. If a mining company (NZ or foreign owned) invests $100m in a mine then the total spend through the economy is $300 million. The spin offs are employment of locals (who all pay PAYE and spend on food petrol clothing in local shops and there&#8217;s GST on all that), contractors buy equipment (more GST) and a raft of downstream companies hire staff and buy equipment and use materials (more PAYE and GST). </p>
<p>I repeat what was said earlier &#8211; modern mining techniques are not the open cast high impact mining techniques of yesteryear. For crying out loud any mining company would have to negotiate the strictures of the RMA BEFORE any mining could commence. That will involve endless appeals by greenies and druggies who live in house buses on the dole who roam NZ trying to kill projects via Environment Court appeals. So any mining proposal that survives this hostile appeals environment is going to be pretty darn water tight and as green as possible.</p>
<p>NZers seem to want it all &#8211; an environmental regulatory regime that kills almost anything that Greenpeace doesn&#8217;t like (which is pretty much any development since radical greens want us to ride bikes, use composting toilets and become vegans) and yet enjoy a 1st world standard of living where the government beneficently provides benefits to all who may need them. The ability to help the poor and disadvantaged come from taxes. Taxes are levied on &#8230;.businesses and on the wages of people employed by businesses. The wages of government workers dont count &#8211; because they are paid from the taxes on the productive sector. So the productive sector has to actually make a profit for the government to tax. If a regulatory regime becomes too hostile to profit then two things happen-profitable businesses become marginally profitable and the amount of tax they pay drops OR they move to a juristiction that is less hostile to profit &#8211; in the case of mining companies they move to Australia where they can operate in a predictable regulatory environment that ensures some reasonable profit and the NZ govt and economy get zip.</p>
<p>And so the Australians become the beneficiary of the multiplier effect I described. Mutiply that on a grand scale &#8211; ie billions and you get a small hint as to why Australia is more prosperous, why its govt can afford to tax its people less and still provide higher and more benefits and why its citizens wages and salaries (and thus standard of living) are higher than NZ.</p>
<p>NZ will get what it wants &#8211; I have no doubt the Nats will cave and this proposal will be shelved. This will be another economic windfall to the wider economy (not the narrow royalty the govt might make from mine profits) that will never accrue to NZ. The consequences will be more subtle and less dramatic &#8211; like the frog in the cold water that is slowly cooked with the steadily rising temperature that never gets too hot to shock the frog into jumping out. The gap between Aus and NZ slowly widens, NZ drops another notch down in the OECD in 2011, then one more in 2012. If the wishes of the environmental left are adhered to than NZ continues its slow slide into economic 2nd world status. </p>
<p>The reality is you can have your cake and eat it too &#8211; it requires the people to look at the issue pragmatically and accept a very small and easily remediated footprint on a tiny portion of land. Other 1st world countries make these compromises &#8211; the French survive with all their nuclear power stations despite the dire warnings of Greenpeace. NZ can make this proposal work but I fear the entire left leaning commentariat so command the attention of the silent middle class that rational discussion on this subject has become nigh impossible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: menace</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688557</link>
		<dc:creator>menace</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:55:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688557</guid>
		<description>And I&#039;ve just had another brain storm.

If 1 or 2 percent is all we get...... How much percent of total value does the mining company get in profit?

NZ has pristine beauty that is irreplaceable. Australia has thousands and thousands of kilometres of land that when mined is unnoticed.

What is the most logical way to make money out of mining?

NZ government forms a mining company gets permits and mines in Australia.

NZ keeps our beautiful treasures and makes even more money.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And I&#8217;ve just had another brain storm.</p>
<p>If 1 or 2 percent is all we get&#8230;&#8230; How much percent of total value does the mining company get in profit?</p>
<p>NZ has pristine beauty that is irreplaceable. Australia has thousands and thousands of kilometres of land that when mined is unnoticed.</p>
<p>What is the most logical way to make money out of mining?</p>
<p>NZ government forms a mining company gets permits and mines in Australia.</p>
<p>NZ keeps our beautiful treasures and makes even more money.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reid</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688555</link>
		<dc:creator>reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688555</guid>
		<description>&quot;whether there is a difference in perception or reality is not the point.&quot;

uh, it&#039;s actually precisely the point, bc. See, I&#039;d put my environmentally friendly tree-hugging plant love-making credentials up against yours any day of the week. I think I commune with nature more often and far more vigorously that you will ever do in your wildest dreams. Wink.

And yet, even given that I&#039;m a tree-loving, plant-hugging environmental lover par excellence, people still don&#039;t seem to understand why I&#039;m so very much in favour of large machinery elegantly extracting large mineral wealth from mother earth.

It&#039;s called jobs. At the end of the day if they find mineral wealth under valuable land that has more than 8 zeroes after it, why not get it?

Lastly, what would either of you, phil or bc, say if the govt said:

&quot;If we can&#039;t mine, you can&#039;t have your benefit. It&#039;s one or the t&#039;other. Which do you choose?&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;whether there is a difference in perception or reality is not the point.&#8221;</p>
<p>uh, it&#8217;s actually precisely the point, bc. See, I&#8217;d put my environmentally friendly tree-hugging plant love-making credentials up against yours any day of the week. I think I commune with nature more often and far more vigorously that you will ever do in your wildest dreams. Wink.</p>
<p>And yet, even given that I&#8217;m a tree-loving, plant-hugging environmental lover par excellence, people still don&#8217;t seem to understand why I&#8217;m so very much in favour of large machinery elegantly extracting large mineral wealth from mother earth.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s called jobs. At the end of the day if they find mineral wealth under valuable land that has more than 8 zeroes after it, why not get it?</p>
<p>Lastly, what would either of you, phil or bc, say if the govt said:</p>
<p>&#8220;If we can&#8217;t mine, you can&#8217;t have your benefit. It&#8217;s one or the t&#8217;other. Which do you choose?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bc</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688554</link>
		<dc:creator>bc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:28:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688554</guid>
		<description>RKBee: &quot;Somewhere between Reid and Philu is the reallity&quot;

This must be me then!
ok, now it really is goodnight...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RKBee: &#8220;Somewhere between Reid and Philu is the reallity&#8221;</p>
<p>This must be me then!<br />
ok, now it really is goodnight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philu</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688553</link>
		<dc:creator>philu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:20:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688553</guid>
		<description>cd u turn out the light..?..ta..!

phil(whoar.co.nz)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>cd u turn out the light..?..ta..!</p>
<p>phil(whoar.co.nz)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bc</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688552</link>
		<dc:creator>bc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:18:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688552</guid>
		<description>Anyway, time for sleep. But at 240 commnets and still going strong, it indicates that this is a passionate issue for people. Time for the National to put it to bed, which incidently is where I&#039;m going now!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyway, time for sleep. But at 240 commnets and still going strong, it indicates that this is a passionate issue for people. Time for the National to put it to bed, which incidently is where I&#8217;m going now!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RKBee</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688551</link>
		<dc:creator>RKBee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:17:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688551</guid>
		<description>Somewhere between Reid and Phil...u  is the reallity..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somewhere between Reid and Phil&#8230;u  is the reallity..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philu</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688550</link>
		<dc:creator>philu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688550</guid>
		<description>why do key/brownlee not deny that wd b the rate..?..

and just swerve/avoid the question..?

..mmm..???

phil(whoar.co.nz)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do key/brownlee not deny that wd b the rate..?..</p>
<p>and just swerve/avoid the question..?</p>
<p>..mmm..???</p>
<p>phil(whoar.co.nz)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bc</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688549</link>
		<dc:creator>bc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:10:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688549</guid>
		<description>Reid - whether there is a difference in perception or reality is not the point. What is the point is that this has got the potential to be a powder-keg issue. Elections are lost on less. 
Is there not more important things the government could be doing? I really believe Labour could use this as an elec tion issue as there is a clear point of difference. And for every one person marching, there are 10 others that agree with them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reid &#8211; whether there is a difference in perception or reality is not the point. What is the point is that this has got the potential to be a powder-keg issue. Elections are lost on less.<br />
Is there not more important things the government could be doing? I really believe Labour could use this as an elec tion issue as there is a clear point of difference. And for every one person marching, there are 10 others that agree with them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reid</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688548</link>
		<dc:creator>reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:07:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688548</guid>
		<description>&quot;..so..we can assume the/any royalties wd b the standard..eh..?&quot;

Really?

I doubt an idiot politician such as George Hawkins would take this amount of heat for a measly 1-2% phil, let alone astute politicians such as we have in the top jobs.

Perhaps you&#039;re wrong.

Is that a possibility?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;..so..we can assume the/any royalties wd b the standard..eh..?&#8221;</p>
<p>Really?</p>
<p>I doubt an idiot politician such as George Hawkins would take this amount of heat for a measly 1-2% phil, let alone astute politicians such as we have in the top jobs.</p>
<p>Perhaps you&#8217;re wrong.</p>
<p>Is that a possibility?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: philu</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688547</link>
		<dc:creator>philu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688547</guid>
		<description>that is the standard commission..

and when asked about that..key/brownlee don&#039;t deny/address it..

..they just bang on about jobs-created/tax-paid..

..so..we can assume the/any royalties wd b the standard..eh..?

..that&#039;s 1-2%..

..eh..?

almost laughable really..eh..?

phil(whoar.co.nz)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>that is the standard commission..</p>
<p>and when asked about that..key/brownlee don&#8217;t deny/address it..</p>
<p>..they just bang on about jobs-created/tax-paid..</p>
<p>..so..we can assume the/any royalties wd b the standard..eh..?</p>
<p>..that&#8217;s 1-2%..</p>
<p>..eh..?</p>
<p>almost laughable really..eh..?</p>
<p>phil(whoar.co.nz)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: krazykiwi</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688545</link>
		<dc:creator>krazykiwi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:01:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688545</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;We don’t really want to lose voters do we?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

bc - that statement describes why NZ is sliding inexorably towards becoming a sleepy Polynesian economy. To retain power under MMP, our leaders continuously defer to factions left, right and centre thereby ensuring overall, and over time, that most of NZers are economical disenfranchised. 

Notable exceptions to this slow train wreck are, you guessed it, the gold-plated civil-service pension holders who have their hands on the levers of power today, and on our diminished wealth tomorrow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>We don’t really want to lose voters do we?</p></blockquote>
<p>bc &#8211; that statement describes why NZ is sliding inexorably towards becoming a sleepy Polynesian economy. To retain power under MMP, our leaders continuously defer to factions left, right and centre thereby ensuring overall, and over time, that most of NZers are economical disenfranchised. </p>
<p>Notable exceptions to this slow train wreck are, you guessed it, the gold-plated civil-service pension holders who have their hands on the levers of power today, and on our diminished wealth tomorrow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reid</title>
		<link>http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/2010/05/so_what_were_they_marching_against.html#comment-688544</link>
		<dc:creator>reid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 11:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.kiwiblog.co.nz/?p=42600#comment-688544</guid>
		<description>&quot;what matters is that a significant amount of people got off their backsides and took a valuable part of their weekend leisure time (you can’t tell me they were all unemployed deadbeats) to protest about an issue they cared about.&quot;

What actually happened is that a whole lot of people got all emotional about stuff they knew nothing about because they had no facts and reacted emotionally to a perception that a lot of 1920&#039;s style steam-shovels would go in and start strip-mining Kiwi nesting grounds.

Which isn&#039;t what will happen and wasn&#039;t what was ever intended in the first place.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;what matters is that a significant amount of people got off their backsides and took a valuable part of their weekend leisure time (you can’t tell me they were all unemployed deadbeats) to protest about an issue they cared about.&#8221;</p>
<p>What actually happened is that a whole lot of people got all emotional about stuff they knew nothing about because they had no facts and reacted emotionally to a perception that a lot of 1920&#8242;s style steam-shovels would go in and start strip-mining Kiwi nesting grounds.</p>
<p>Which isn&#8217;t what will happen and wasn&#8217;t what was ever intended in the first place.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

