911 amusement
Over at uncensored they pose 156 questions on 9/11. If you can’t answer them all, then Bush did it.
They also have many interesting questions on other issues ranging from Henry Kissinger to The Sun-Sentinel. I’m not sure what they all mean, but it is disturbing the authorities have been unable to answer them all.
No TweetBacks yet. (Be the first to Tweet this post)
Tags: 9/11
July 29th, 2010 at 10:58 am
Here is the link: http://uncensored.co.nz/2010/07/26/911-the-basic-questions-all-in-one-chunk/
July 29th, 2010 at 11:18 am
I’ve argued with truthers before. They are absolutely retarded. Many of the “questions” in the link are so stupid that a 10 year old would laugh at them.
July 29th, 2010 at 11:18 am
What a load of utter shite. Let me add a few more. I could say that “each of these questions is a thesis itself.” but the truth is I pulled them out of my, er, hat, just as the original conspiracy nutters did.
Why were the links to this site suppressed by the government until now?
Why has the company which made the boxcutters not been questioned by investigators?
Why does the FBI and CIA refuse to investigate links between Bin Laden construction and the WTC site developer?
Why will the US government not name the substance used to fuel the airliners on that day?
Why does the USAF refuse to release details of UFO sightings on July 2001?
Why did “uncensored” stop looking for fairies at the bottom of the garden on 9/11?
Have you stopped beating your wife?
July 29th, 2010 at 11:43 am
Someone made a comment on my blog once that there was video showing windows blowing out below the collapsing towers.
Well, of course there was – with entire floors collapsing in split seconds, the air pressure has to go somewhere. The retarded thing is, when you’ve got a massive building coming down, with all that momentum, why on earth would you need to keep setting off explosives?
The one building that really sets them off though is WTC7 – because there’s a video showing the undamaged side when it collapsed as a whole. Never mind that the other side was severely damaged, never mind that it was build with a subway tunnel running underneath and thus braced more strongly, no, it was a controlled demolition.
Trouble is with these people is that if you refute them they then just claim you to be part of the conspiracy. (Such as Popular Mechanics) They’ve even claimed that a highway accident a few years later was part of it, as it also lead to the “impossible” feat of fire from burning fuel melting steel.
July 29th, 2010 at 12:05 pm
1. Why didn’t jets intercept the airliners since they had numerous warnings of terrorist attacks?
And do what? Shoot them down? Good luck finding a pilot willing to do that.
4. Why didn’t the Secret Service hustle Dubya out of the classroom?
Because they’re not retards. The school was secure, outside may have been compromised as part of the attacks.
6. Why did passengers or crewmembers on three of the flights all use the term boxcutters?
Because that’s what everyone calls them over there. People under stress aren’t going to invent new names for common objects.
7. Where are the flight recorders?
Flight recorders are quite often destroyed in crashes, even when the crash is accidental.
10 Why was security meeting scheduled for 9/11 cancelled by WTC management on 9/10?
A routine meeting canceled. What a scoop!
11. How did they come up with the “culprits” so quickly?
12. How did they find the terrorist’s cars at the airports so quickly?
Last I checked, airlines take names of people on board. Checking those names against known terrorist lists wouldn’t have taken long. I doubt there was a lack of manpower for the case that day.
Finding the cars would also be pretty simple. Just check tapes for cars that parked at around the right time, and see if they’re still there. What, that would take 100 people? Gee, funny story.
18. Why did the FBI in 1996 close the files to investigate Osama bin Laden’s relatives in Washington?
Probably because they discovered the shocking fact that (in order to protect their business interests – i.e. money) they’d cut him out of the family.
23. What about media reports that hijackers bought tickets for flights scheduled after Sept. 11?
Sounds like a “plan B” in case things went wrong.
25. Why would devout Muslims frequent bars, drink alcoholic beverages and leave their bibles?
Because they were about to wipe the slate clean. Monks in the middle ages used to do much the same for similar reasons. It’s human nature.
26. Why would the hijackers use credit cards and allow drivers licenses with photos to be zeroxed?
Because they didn’t care – after all, they’d be dead with all those virgins right?
27. Why did the hijackers force passengers to call relatives?
What terrorist wouldn’t force a man to call his mother-in-law?
28. How did the hijackers change the flight plan without law enforcement or the military try to stop them?
With a pen?
30. How could the FBI distinguish between “regular” Muslims and hijacker Muslims on those flights?
31. Why was there not one “innocent” Muslim on board any of these flights?
The flights were nearly empty anyway. Statistically, not much chance of other Muslims on board but since you asked, “regular” Muslims wouldn’t have been on terror lists.
July 29th, 2010 at 12:05 pm
We should pass this on to the producers of Kathryn Ryan’s Nine to Noon show.
That way they can pre-screen nutters before they get interviewed.
To late for the interview of Van Jones of course.
July 29th, 2010 at 12:30 pm
Semi-literate: “Can he explain why there was no guard at the gold reservoir under the WTC?”
Less than semi-literate: “Did Roche ever try to shutdown the plane in Pennsylvania?”
Proving that it isn’t just a typo: “Why did President Bush say only one week later that he tried to shutdown that plane?”
What?: “Did the CIA helped him provoke a tumult?”
Clearly evidence of a conspiracy: “Why was President Bush scheduled to visit a school in Florida?” and “Who scheduled the time of the visit?”
If Richard Reid’s shoes are bigger than size 10 then it absolutely can’t be a conspiracy, but questions remain if they are smaller than that: “What size are his shoes?”
Basic lack of general knowledge that would shame a 10 year old: “When was the last time George H.W. Bush traveled to South Arabia on behalf of the Carlyle Group?”
Retards!
July 29th, 2010 at 12:32 pm
Mental masturbation by fuckwits with an audience
Move on – nothing to see here
July 29th, 2010 at 12:34 pm
The theory of a “controlled demolition” of the WTC Towers is the one that seems most ridiculous to me.
No tall buildings of that size have ever been demolished anywhere. Pretty hard to predict how they would fall. But the risk of them swaying sideways and falling a la a tree being cut down, crushing a large number of other buildings below, would be huge. If it was a conspiracy of that kind, then the conspirators where plotting to destroy the whole area, not just the twin towers IMHO.
Apart from that, I love:
Giuliani should have just stored it all in his garage. There’s no money in scrap steel. Yeah.
Wikipedia is your friend. Were recovered, but only partially readable. (Surprise! They had a whirlwind tour of the WTC towers, through one wall and then the other… )
They don’t know the basics about instrument data recorders vs cockpit voice recorders, yet are ready to start expounding elaborate conspiracy theories.
August 2nd, 2010 at 7:08 pm
The real ‘conspiracy’ is that they don’t actually have 156 questions… Just one example of a repeat !!
and further down…
Btw, can anyone parse the following question ?
August 2nd, 2010 at 7:17 pm
oh and BTW, have a look at this BBC link – http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/theeditors/2008/10/caught_up_in_a_conspiracy_theo.html
In other words, don’t argue with them, don’t talk to them, just ignore them…. you will only be encouraging them !!