They should have stopped with the maple syrup

March 31st, 2011 at 3:00 pm by David Farrar

Edward Gay in the NZ Herald reports:

Two women who discovered they were sleeping with the same man poured maple syrup in his bed, cooked his shoes in a microwave and threatened to make public explicit photographs he had sent them.

I wonder how long you have to cook shoes for in a microwave until they are done, and what happens to the shoes?

They then blackmailed the man – whose name is suppressed – by threatening to send photographs of his genitals to his workplace, bank and a cafe where his daughter worked unless he paid them $4000 each.

This is where they went wrong. If they had just stuck to the maple syrup and the shoes, then no jury would convict them. But blackmail is not good.

They would have been better with the maple syrup to tie him to the bed first, and then pour the maple syrup over him and the bed. If in a really bad mood, you also then leave a dog or two in the room!

Crown prosecutor Fletcher Pilditch said the offending was premeditated and serious.

He said the pair should be jailed, and proposed a term of between 12 months and two and a half years in prison.

Justice Woodhouse said he gave the women credit for their early guilty pleas.

“I do not consider the harm to the complainant or to his family from this offending will be long term,” he said.

“Any long-term harm will occur from the complainant’s conduct, which was morally reprehensible.”

But despite this, the women’s conduct could not be condoned.

Sounds like the Judge is not too sympathethic to the complainant.

Stories of revenge upon cheating exes are welcome in the comments!

Tags:

29 Responses to “They should have stopped with the maple syrup”

  1. Brian Smaller (3,835) Says:

    They would have been better with the maple syrup to tie him to the bed first, and then pour the maple syrup over him and the bed. If in a really bad mood, you also then leave a dog or two in the room!

    While being tied to a bed by two women and covered in maple syrup could be strangely arousing in the right circumstances, if they had done that to the man and he objected it could have been a kidnapping charge they were facing, which is usually punished far worse than some blackmail over a dick shot.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  2. Viking2 (9,608) Says:

    Not a dog no no no! The Indians used Ants.

    Prick deserved it.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  3. Linda Reid (364) Says:

    It never ceases to amaze me how people over-react to the circumstances in their life. Don’t people have boundaries anymore?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  4. beautox (332) Says:

    I think judges should stick to the law and STFU when it comes to morals.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  5. annie (507) Says:

    The blackmail was a bridge too far.

    Otherwise, I’m with the judge.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  6. alex Masterley (1,164) Says:

    This rubbish was on the front page of the Herald.
    Surely there was something else that could have merited front page treatment such as Libyia, the Japanese Earthquake or even our very own Christchurch Earthquake.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  7. RightNow (5,455) Says:

    alex – would this have been better? http://whaleoil.gotcha.co.nz/?p=22080

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  8. smttc (428) Says:

    A leaf from the Swedish girls guide book to sex with Julian Assange?

    BTW Brian Smaller, i think the technical term for tying the guy up would be false imprisonment.

    [DPF: I was not suggesting the two women tie him up by force. I'm pretty sure they could get him to agree. And I'm not sure if it is a crime to not take action to free someone who has agreed to be tied up?]

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  9. Rex Widerstrom (4,971) Says:

    beautox says:

    I think judges should stick to the law and STFU when it comes to morals.

    Hear hear. Nasty whiff of vigilantism in this post DPF. Tying people to a bed against their will is also illegal, you know. And being a cad doesn’t mean it’s open season on your wallet or your maple syrup covered genitalia.

    Men – and, I might add, women – have been doing this since a cavewoman dragged a mammoth home and found her husband had clubbed another Neanderthal on the head in her absence.

    Perhaps if one took a more pessimistic view of one’s fellow humans, as I tend to, one wouldn’t be so surprised and hurt when they live down to your expectations :-/

    [DPF: I was not suggesting they tie him to his bed against his will. I was suggesting one of them gets him to consent to being tied up, and then once he is, the other appears, and see his face as he realises the game is up]

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  10. Murray (8,833) Says:

    WOW, sex in the Winderstrom household must be a thing to behold… or at least call noise control about.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  11. Thomas the Unbeliever (141) Says:

    Agree with LR @3:15 – no boundaries in evidence here. They were lucky that they struck a paternalistic judge who preferred to levy some moral judgment on the man involved.
    …. and if the blackmailing vigilantes had been men and the victim a woman?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  12. Rex Widerstrom (4,971) Says:

    DPF: I was not suggesting they tie him to his bed against his will. I was suggesting one of them gets him to consent to being tied up…

    Keeping someone tied up against their will, even if they consented to begin with, is also illegal. If I didn’t value my liberty so much I’d give the “DPF defence” a go and see if I could rope you in as an accessory for suggesting it isn’t ;-)

    @Murray:

    Generally, no one beholds me having sex, so clearly you’ve outed yourself as an exhibitionist. Can we shortly expect a leaked sex tape? :-D

    [DPF: But they are not keeping him tied up. The ropes are. I'm not sure you can get charged for not doing something. Having said that, not keen to be a test case!]

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  13. adze (1,463) Says:

    “I’m not sure if it is a crime to not take action to free someone who has agreed to be tied up?”

    No means no David. ;)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  14. IHStewart (388) Says:

    Hell being tied up by two women and having maple syrup poured on me sounds like a lot of fun. I wonder what occupation I should take up next ?

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zJd21zPeLxY&feature=related

    I loved the MP application form.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  15. pq (728) Says:

    for less middle aged nonsense and up to date info on sexual mores,
    go here

    http://roissy.wordpress.com/the-sixteen-commandments-of-poon/

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  16. Lee C (4,499) Says:

    Yes it’s sooo de riguer isn’t it that a woman can engage in ‘emppowering’ acts of criminality and we are invited to flock to their side and affirm their nasty vindictive streaks with ‘You go sista!’ hi-five?

    Imagine if it had been two guys being cuckolded by one woman, I dare say there are those who would have applauded the woman’s ‘fiesty’ act of lself-affirmation and suggested that the guys were a pair of dicks for getting so hoodwinked…

    My point being that thisissue is rife with the kinds of double-standards that have so infested our judgement that now we have the pulpit of te elaw pronouncing its sympathy for people who commit vindictive acts of criminal damage – as long as they are ‘women’, but would throw the book at and censure a man for similar cowardly acts.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  17. Lee C (4,499) Says:

    apologies for the typos but the phone went. One of my several mistresses begging me to come back . . .

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  18. Viking2 (9,608) Says:

    Now if they had tied him too the bed and then covered him with syrup, chocolate and cream then called the girls surfing team in to slowly lick it all off +-/! he would never double up again.
    Just imagine a room full of birds in bikini’s licking the dick (head) I mean!

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  19. flipper (1,736) Says:

    Seem to recall that a women once used super glue in the middle of the night……
    Hands and geniitals had be separated by a surgeon

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  20. Steve (3,691) Says:

    Do you pay more for maple syrup?
    Dime would know. Just the normal charge like honey, marmite, vegemite (ozzies) golden syrup ..
    Cockeys Joy, what is that?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  21. burt (5,962) Says:

    I saw a stand up comedian do a great skit on divorce getting nasty, one line that has stuck in my mind is something like; Don’t go crazy and cut up her clothes – study her wardrobe, replace as much of it as you can with the same garments 1 size smaller.

    [DPF: Now that is evil]

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  22. Rich Prick (1,112) Says:

    Shhhhh, don’t go giving Darren ideas.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  23. Engineer (5) Says:

    I take it from the lack of stories in the comments that Kiwiblog commenters don’t get much

    Mine is the woman in Nelson who found the Mini belonging to the other femme who stole her man – she got her friend (bloke who drives a concrete truck) to back the said truck up to it, chute down, windscreen blown in by said chute, concrete starts pouring at speed.

    It blew all the tyres and poured out the windscreen.

    A Mini will hold about 2.6 cubic metres of concrete

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  24. Lee C (4,499) Says:

    “I take it from the lack of stories in the comments that Kiwiblog commenters don’t get much.”

    I think you petty much nailed the demographic there, Engineer.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  25. Mr Nobody NZ (384) Says:

    Apart from the moral judgements from the judge which others have already on enraged on the also appears from the reports lack of any reparations. I would imagine these woman have cause at least $1000 worth of damage to personal items that this victim is out of pocket for.

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  26. Yvette (2,428) Says:

    Has no one noticed recently how much maple syrup costs?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  27. K.Reed (18) Says:

    “Two women who discovered they were sleeping with the same man poured maple syrup in his bed…”

    Was it a big bed or were they that drunk? How could you miss an extra person?

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  28. sassycassy (30) Says:

    They say “Hell hath no fury such as a woman scorned” but, some of the most vengeful people I’ve seen in unrequited or wronged love situations have been men and some hang on to their resentment for years .

    Agree though, the mischief making could be dismissed and difficult to prove or pin with charges (vandalism? harrassment? trespass? I assume they had keys to his residence) but blackmail is unlawful and a step too far

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote
  29. adze (1,463) Says:

    “I take it from the lack of stories in the comments that Kiwiblog commenters don’t get much”

    The other way of reading it is that right-wing folks cheat less and are less vindictive :)

    Vote: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0 You need to be logged in to vote

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.