About
Contact
Advertise

Facebook
Twitter

June 20, 2011 12:17pm by David Farrar

Is marriage a historical relic?

That’s the question I pose over at Stuff.

Share this:

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
Reddit
WhatsApp
More

Pinterest
Print
Tumblr

Like this:

Like Loading...

Email
Facebook
Twitter
Comment34

New Zealand
NZ Politics
By the numbers
marriage
Stuff

Related Stories

Barbarism in NZ and Canada
Stopping forced marriages
Should the age of marriage be changed to 18?

Comments (34)

Login to comment or vote

adze

I think it may be becoming an anachronism, marriage has historically been a social/economic/political construct as much as anything. In recent years changes in relational property law has minimized most if not all legal distinctions.
I do think it is no longer reasonable that live-in partners be entitled to more than what they contributed during the relationship except where children are involved, but that’s another topic.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 12:31pm
Mark

It I’d becoming less of a social requirement but will always have it’s place I suspect.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 12:51pm
mavxp

It is a social institution, a formalised relationship status based on exclusivity, and identifies that any children that result from the union are the responsibility of both the mother (obvious) but also the biological father (less obvious in non exclusive/ casual unions). I think for this reason, marriage often benefits women as it is a huge risk to take on children without partner support (financial, as well as emotional). It also provides a man with an important purpose to his life – as a husband (supporter) and father for said family unit. This is the “ideal” scenario for family life.

However, if ones experiences (through parents, friends, relatives) is that marriage hasn’t worked out, then you may be more cautious about entering into a committed relationship with someone until comfortable that the benefits outweigh the potential costs, that the person you are teaming up with will go the distance when the rubber hits the road. Broken relationships hurt everyone involved, especially kids.

As the social stigma associated both with being unmarried and also being divorced dissipate (it’s so common now it’s basically a non issue), it becomes easier for people to call it quits rather than work at relationships through the tough times – when job losses, money troubles, family disagreements, health problems all make life difficult. Relationships at such times can be a rock to people or make things worse (particularly if one partner is being more selfish, or communication is poor). A piece of paper and some old photos on the mantlepiece may not change things in peoples mind.

I think given the ideal nature of marriage it remains a goal for a lot of people, however people are less willing to enter into marriage as before because of the difficulties associated with break-ups. Also “marriage” has become the ceremony/party rather than the legal contract, and is seen as a luxury – an expense that many New Zealanders probably feel they can forgo or put off until they are a bit better off, which may never come around.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 12:53pm
Arthur Dent

Good post mavxp.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 1:02pm
Pete George

As per Mark, it’s nowhere near as necessary as it used to be but it’s still a very nice commitment to make in a relationship.

I “lived together” before my first marriage when it wasn’t the done thing, but getting married seemed a natural progression. Same the second time round.

Christmas could be seen as a historical relic to many people, same for Easter, same for Anzac Day but we still celebrate all of them in a variety of ways. So I don’t see marriage fading into history, it will remain popular at a reduced level.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 1:04pm
MT_Tinman

Surely marriage is simply the formation of a union to assist the couple (or group) to get through life together.

Any long term coupling could (should?) be considered such meaning, of course, that marriage is alive and well even if the superstitious and legal contract side of things is less common.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 1:26pm
Lee01

As marriage has “declined” (deliberately degraded by social liberals) so has the size and power of the managerial state grown. The so-called decline has been a deliberate policy by those seeking to replace the family as the central pillar of society with the state. Social liberalism, including that advanced by David and the liberal right, always leads to more government power and control.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 1:44pm
RRM

I think one of the major turn-offs is that if you decide to get married, people will expect you to “do it properly” which means throwing a party for all your friends and relatives that will cost something in-between the price of a car and a deposit on a house. More & more people just can’t justify the expense of doing it…
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 1:57pm
Simon Lyall

The peak in divorces in 1982 is probably due to Family Proceedings Act 1980 coming into force in 1981 which allowed “no fault” divorces.

http://www.teara.govt.nz/en/divorce-and-separation/3
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 2:13pm
Courage Wolf

Marriages are just an excuse for young Christians in their 20s to disregard Jesus’ teachings on materialism and have lavish weddings to show that they’re just like the ‘world’ they so claim to be in but not a part of.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 2:44pm
barry

With the decrease in marriage, there has been the mirrored increase in social welfare costs.
Marriage encouraged a couples to raise their children in a balanced way. Irrespective of what anyone thinks of marriage, the fact is that as its recognition reduces, the costs of unbalanced family units raises and is put on all of us to pay for the problem.

Its now recognised that pre-school is one way to elliminate the problems of drop dead parents. So weve all got increased ‘freedoms’ in our relationships, but there is a cost to pay – not just in money but in degraded lives.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 3:33pm
Don the Kiwi

As marriage declines, so does the moral fibre of our society. Just check the co-reationship.

At the current rate of decline, if it is not arrested, our society will last about three more generations before being over-run by other cultures that value the family unit as a stabilising influence on society.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 3:39pm
mikenmild

Don
And is this a causal relationship?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 3:41pm
david

No excuses for lazy grammar David. Surely it is ” … an historical relic”.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 4:19pm
lastmanstanding

Sadly for one that has been very happily married for 37 years I have witnessed the reduction of marriages has co related to the increase in social dysfunction.

The days when Mum was at home and looked after the house and was there when the kids came home from school were also the days of fewer crimes fewer beaten and murdered kids and wives.

The liberals can bang on but those are the facts The traditional family unit was and still does contribute much more to society than any other form

And yes the STATE in the name of the Socialist Party set out to destroy the traditional family unit because it favoured other models and also sought control.

The traditional family unit could run itself with little or no Gumint interference. the new model requires huge interventions and huge costs WFF CYPS etc etc all seeking to take the place of Mum and Dad in the old structure.

And failing time and again.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 4:32pm
krazykiwi

Beware Courage Wolf, that hatred is eating you up inside.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 4:39pm
EverlastingFire

Being single with a kid and on the dpb is the way of the future for NZ…
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 4:43pm
mikenmild

Wow, lastmanstanding, how has ‘the Scoialist Party’ (never in power in NZ) set out to destroy the family unit? I was under the impression that the institution of marriage has changed during a period of great economic and social change. I wasn’t aware that any government had the power to destroy the traditional family unit, with the possible exception of the impact of government policy on the Maori traditinal family unit, the whanau, in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 4:48pm
lastmanstanding

For Socialist Party read Labour Party. How did they do it? By taking away the tax allowance for couples where dad worked and MUm stayed home and instituting policy settings that required wives to go out to work to balance the family budget.

How many working woman really want to work and would rather be home. How the hell do they manage to run a household and hold dwon a fulltime job. they are Superwoman and I take my hat off to them. But it should have to be like that. But it is becuase the Socialists and the Lesbians sought and got social change so wimmin had to go to work.

And thats why we have the bloody problems now but because many have their eyes and ears painted in they dont see or hear the cause of the problems. Morons all.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 4:59pm
Courage Wolf

krazykiwi (6,959) Says:
June 20th, 2011 at 4:39 pm

Beware Courage Wolf, that hatred is eating you up inside.

Beware krazykiwi – that belief in fairytales and myths is rotting your brain.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 5:01pm
krazykiwi

Interesting that today’s posts cover the apparent desirability of advocacy for kids (c.f. Ministry of Children) alongside a tacit suggestion that marriage is a historical relic. While some idiots will oppose marriage on the flawed logic that supporting it could be interpreted as support for traditional religious or political values, the evidence points to a strong, committed mother+father team as the best environment for raising kids. Given that marriage is supposed to be a commitment for life, perhaps the focus should be on restoring the institution for the benefit of our future citizens… rather than suggesting its become irrelevant on account of levels of commitment that an increasing number of people are unwilling to sign up to.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 5:02pm
mikenmild

Ok, so when did the Labour Party require wives to go out to work?

Did any of those wives actually want to go out to work?

Why should women who work be required to run the household? Can’t the men help them at all?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 5:04pm
Pauleastbay

Last man Standing says:

The traditional family unit could run itself with little or no Gumint interference. the new model requires huge interventions and huge costs WFF CYPS etc etc all seeking to take the place of Mum and Dad in the old structure.

I think that is just an outstanding comment,

And besides every chick in the world wants to be married, they don’t have to give up any sovereignty they just want to be asked , I know my wife is bloody lucky to have me……….
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 6:56pm
Shunda barunda

Marriages are just an excuse for young Christians in their 20s to disregard Jesus’ teachings on materialism and have lavish weddings to show that they’re just like the ‘world’ they so claim to be in but not a part of.

Makes one wonder why the Homo’s are so keen on the tradition then.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 7:20pm
Pauleastbay

Shunda

These ” Homo’s “of which you speak are they a governemnt department, citizens of new country or a relgion.? I was just wondering given the capitalization
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 7:25pm
Shunda barunda

Yes.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 7:30pm
Pauleastbay

Ah, citizens of the planet Hom
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 7:35pm
krazykiwi

@pauleastbay – my wife puts up with me despite my array of glaring faults. I’m bloody lucky to have her..!
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 7:37pm
Pauleastbay

KK, never admit fault never, you do it once and you open a whole can of worms…
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 7:50pm
Mick Mac

Great question DPF.
I think it would matter as in their heart of hearts people know that marriage is the best option for kids, they just lack the guts to take a stand.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2004878/Unmarried-parents-6-times-likely-split-time-child-5.html

It stands to reason that we all want the best for kids and the reality is, first prize is that kids need their dad and mum loving each other and them in a family together.
Anything else isn’t first prize and I’m sorry if that isn’t you or wasn’t yours but that doesn’t change what is first prize for kids.

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2011/jun/16/dad-mom-in-home-is-essential-americans-say/

Why does marriage matter? because marriage isn’t just a bit of paper, if it were, everyone would do it and last in it too.
Sorry if that comes across a bit judgmental I’m just trying to be brief and to the point.

My own parents divorced when I was 12 and my own marriage has been 26yrs, it has had it’s ups and downs, but at the end of the day, til death us do part is what we said and we have worked on our relatuionship and our love has grown and changed into something fuller and different than when we started. That means I’ve had to examine myself and sos the wife and we have had to work at being a marriage. sadly that’s not the way it is now. everythings me me me.
Society has suffered and now we seem to be breeding feral kids from feral kids as each generation goes further down the tubes.

Don’t believe me, look at the top of the tree, Politicians (remember they are representative of us) and they are wallys almost to a man, lack honour and guts to, do the right thing, stand for truth. NAh! they are representative of us, as they are so are we.
We tut tut and tsk tsk but we vote for them instead of saying onyabike you’re not good enough and when we get a principled one they get slagged off.
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 20, 2011 9:09pm
DRBASS

Interestingly marriage is still far more successful than defacto relationships. According to the NZIER report on the cost of marriage breakdown a couple of years ago, marriage was still six times more likely to succeed than de facto relationships… maybe it’s not just a piece of paper?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 21, 2011 1:15am
Clint Heine

Courage Wolf… now now, I am not at all religious, nor is my wife. We both think god is a myth and a joke. But we still got married because we are quite fond of each other 🙂
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 21, 2011 7:52am
Angus

You’re not married are you Clint?

FWIW, I always assumed that you were a homosexual (just like your parents did too)
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 21, 2011 8:11am
Clint Heine

Oh Angus. Wherever you get your drugs from make sure you share them with us all.

How is your relationship with Handgelina Jolie going? Or was it Palmela Handerson?
0 0
Log in to Reply
Report
June 21, 2011 8:35am

Add a Comment Cancel reply

Login to comment or vote

« Federated Farmers

Labour’s priorities »

Donations

You can now donate to Kiwiblog

Exclusive content from DPF on Patreon

Become a Patron!

Highlights

The Kiwis are fleeing
Inflation by term
Houston we have a problem
Our immunisation disaster

Top Stories

General Debate 17 April 2024
General Debate 18 April 2024
Fire and Emergency costs blowout
Ministry of Education Cuts in Perspective.
This could explain the brickbat
UK Labour Deputy Leader in trouble
Graham Adams on MACA and the Court of Appeal
We still have an inflation problem
The Cass Report
No excuse for fleeing

Recent Posts

No excuse for fleeing 18 April 2024
This could explain the brickbat 18 April 2024
General Debate 18 April 2024 18 April 2024
We still have an inflation problem 18 April 2024
UK Labour Deputy Leader in trouble 17 April 2024
Ministry of Education Cuts in Perspective. 17 April 2024
Graham Adams on MACA and the Court of Appeal 17 April 2024
General Debate 17 April 2024 17 April 2024
Fire and Emergency costs blowout 17 April 2024
The Cass Report 16 April 2024
Another badly designed cycleway 16 April 2024
General Debate 16 April 2024 16 April 2024

Never miss a post

Email Address

Recent Comments

General Debate 18 April 2024
imalwaysright
General Debate 18 April 2024
Ghost
General Debate 18 April 2024
CJames
General Debate 18 April 2024
fightingtemeraire
This could explain the brickbat
jkt
General Debate 18 April 2024
Ghost
General Debate 18 April 2024
Steve Otto(North Shore)
No excuse for fleeing
thirteenstars
General Debate 18 April 2024
Steve Otto(North Shore)
General Debate 18 April 2024
Keith White
No excuse for fleeing
Benedict Yu
General Debate 18 April 2024
Keith White
General Debate 18 April 2024
Keith White
No excuse for fleeing
Keith White
General Debate 18 April 2024
Maggie Pie

Links

Point of Order: Buzz from the Beehive - 18/4/24
Breaking Views
A question for you all on those sackings
Not PC
Despair - construction consenting edition
Offsetting Behaviour
Jones finds $410,000 to help the government muscle in on a spat project
Point of Order
Word of the day
Hompaddock
Again, hate crimes are not necessarily terrorism.
Kiwipolitico
Ordinary Everyday Beauty
No Minister
What Time Is The Protest March To The Iranian Embassy?
Utopia
The 4% inflation rate vs thousands of jobs cut highlights a need to redesign the Reserve Bank inflation targets
The Daily Blog
Open mike 18/04/2024
The Standard
Ministers are not above the law
No Right Turn
RACIST ADVERTISING
No Punches Pulled (Bob Jones)
Is the state coming for churches?
Bob McCoskrie's McBlog
Super Rugby Predictions for Week 9
Stats Chat
Coalition Promises
NZCPR
Tougher than that
Croaking Cassandra
ABs stripped of 2011 title after try disallowed
Imperator Fish
Legal Beagle: Election '23: The Special Votes
Public Address
Making this movie might have been a mistake
Liam Hehir
Why I am retiring from political blogging
Kiwi FireWalker
Angie Warren-Clark: Meet the Newbies
Dan Moskovitz

editor@kiwiblog.co.nz

PO Box 12270, Thorndon, Wellington 6144

Facebook
Twitter
FourSquare
Instagram
LinkedIn
Google+

© 2003-2024 David Farrar

Archives
Disclosure Statement
Editorial Policy
Privacy Policy
Complaints Policy
Comments Policy

Design by cre8d

%d